You are on page 1of 71

KNOWLEDGE OF PEOPLE ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LIQUID

WASTE DISPOSAL IN THE RURAL COMMUNITIES OF FUNTUA

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA KATSINA STATE

BY

HABIBA MAGAJI
19/HPKK/040

A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, COLLEGE OF HEALTH

TECHNOLOGY, KANKIA IRO, SCHOOL OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY

KANKIA KATSINA STATE

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DIPLOMA IN

HEALTH EDUCATION AND PROMOTION BY WEST AFRICA

HEALTH EXAMINATION BOARD (WAHEB)

DECEMBER, 2020
DECLARATION

I declared that this project has been written as my personal effort and the

research work has not been submitted anywhere, all information, literature

sources are acknowledged by references.

____________________ _______ ____________________


Habiba Magaji Date
(19/HPKK/040)

ii
CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that this project titled “The Knowledge of People on the

Importance of Liquid Waste Disposal in the Rural Communities of Funtua

Local Government Area Katsina State” meets the regulations for the ward of

Diploma in Health Education and Promotion approved for contribution to

the knowledge and humanity.

_____________________________________
Mal. Nura Surajo Sign & Date
Project Supervisor

_____________________________________
Mal. Sanusi Umar Radda Sign & Date
Head of Department (HOD)

_____________________________________
External Supervisor Sign & Date

iii
DEDICATION

The project work is dedicated to my lovely parents Daddy MAGAJI BALA

CHIROMA, MUMMY NASARA MAGAJI and My sweet brothers Staffie

Haruna M. CHIROMA, YUSHA’U MAGAJI and all my family and friends.

iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I thank Almighty God who created me and give me the opportunity to

undertake this research work, May his name alone be lifted and be glorify

Amen.

My deep gratitude goes to my dear lovely parents Daddy Magaji Bala


Chiroma and Mummy Hadiza Magaji for their unending support advices and
prayers given to me during the course of my studies, may the Almighty God
reward them both abundantly Amen.
My sincere appreciation goes to my project supervisor Malam Nura Surajo

for spending his time going through the manuscript of this research work for

necessary corrections and contribution toward the success of completing my

project work, all thanks Sir, I will also love to extend my gratitude to

technical staff of Health Education and Promotion, notable among them are

Malam Abdulhadi Lawal, Malam Usman Usman Tsauri and Malam

Shamsuddeen Sale for their charismatic ability in teaching and concern to

students problem at all the time may God reward them of their genuine work

Amen.

Special thanks to my brothers who are always there for me and my friends. I

really appreciate their effort and encouragement throughout the period of my

studies may the Good Lord Almighty bless and reward them abundantly

Amen.

v
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page i

Declaration ii

Approval Page iii

Dedication iv

Acknowledgement v

Table of Contents vii

Abstract ix

CHAPTER ONE

1.1 General Introduction 1

1.2 Historical Background of the Study Area 3

1.3 Objectives of the Study 6

1.4 Scope and Limitation of the Study 6

1.5 Statement of the Problems 7

1.6 Significance of the Study 8

1.7 Research Questions 8

1.8 Research Hypothesis 9

1.9 Operational Definition of Terms 10

vi
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Literature Review 11

CHAPTER THREE

3.1 Research Design 20

3.2 Population of the Study 20

3.3 Sample and Sampling Techniques 20

3.4 Instrument for Data Collection 21

3.5 Validity and Reliability of the Instrument 21

3.6 Administration of the Instrument 21

3.7 Techniques for Data Analysis 22

CHAPTER FOUR

4.1 Data Analysis and Result Discussion 23

4.1 Test of Hypothesis 37

CHAPTER FIVE

5.2 Summary and Conclusion 45

5.1 Recommendations 46

5.2 References 49

5.3 Appendix 50

5.4 Questionnaire 60

vii
ABSTRACT

This piece of project research is based on the knowledge of people on the

importance of proper liquid waste disposal. It has written to find out the

knowledge of the community members about the importance of liquid waste

disposal, with the objectives of promoting the peoples knowledge toward

liquid waste disposal. All the views in this document represent those on thus

the responsibilities for the accuracy of information (data) quoted is that of

author alone not for the institution.

viii
CHAPTER ONE

1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Environment in the modern complex community projects itself on to more

and more factors in an increasing variety of threat to health and life. Water,

air, land, shelter and food represent what is regarded as in-animate

environment but, other people, individually, in the family, in groups and in

masses represent an important and formable aspect of the environment in

which one opponent from pearliest time. Man has been striving to control the

environment, but man himself makes the environment a greatest to his own

health and life. Hence, he has compounded the problem of environmental

control through proper disposal of all his waste, especially liquid waste.

Knowledge of people on the importance of proper liquid waste disposal has

had much impact on a time than any sanitation activities. Historically, liquid

waste disposal is a problem demanding greater and greater investment in

disposal it’s a price that must be aid for progress. The primary purpose of

people knowledge towards the importance of liquid waste disposal is to

prevent the spread of diseases among human beings, proper liquid disposal is

imperishable in any community particularly one with a high population

concentration like Funtua Local Government is to protest water suppliers,

protect food, people also believed that soil pollution, protect, livestock and
1
renders water for human and industrial usage.

People appreciate the fact that the unsanitary condition of their environment is

due to poor liquid waste disposal, this importance of environment hygiene,

the progress of sanitation, through the world has long been appreciate as

milestone of announcement public health services. Where sewage is found in

and around non-functional latrine, where water supply is not readily available

for sanitation activities and human environment will found polluted, food

especially those that are ate raw, various disease associated with water

morbidity and mortality cases.

No matter the effort of government in the control of disease associated with

liquid waste, the channels of controlling those diseases solely defend on the

important of people knowledge towards liquid waste disposal, therefore, the

effort of SEPA and other non-governmental organization should mainly be

directed in educating people on the importance of liquid waste disposal,

provision of efficient drainage system in their premises instead of controlling

mosquitos, because prevention is better and cheaper than cure.

2
1.2 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY AREA

Funtua Local Government is one of the Premier Local Governments in

Nigeria created after the local government reform in 1976. It is the

headquarters of the Katsina South Senatorial District which comprises eleven

(11) Local Governments namely: Bakori, Danja, Kafur, Musawa, Sabuwa,

Kankara, Malumfashi, Matazu, and Funtua.

The local government has district head known as Sarkin Maska Katsina

district head of Funtua Local Government Area under the leadership of Alhaji

Sambo Idris who is the head of all traditional title holders.

Funtua Local Government Area has a conducive weather condition as it

respectively on the latitude and longitude 1132N and 719E respectively. The

city has an average temperature of 32 o and humidity of 44%. It has an area of

448Km2 and a population of (225,571 at the 2006 census) and 570,110

according to 2016 estimate.

Agriculture

Funtua Local Government is blessed with a fertile soil and it has annual

average of rainfall of about 49.5mm, they produces both cash crops and crops

in large quantities, also the area produces sugarcane and engaged in livestock

productions in the local government of KTARDA in assisting farmers with

3
modern farming techniques, also the people engaged in farming on producing

enough tomatoes, onions, pepper in large quantity.

Social Development

Being a city area, Funtua Local Government Area enjoyed an excellent

transportation system with recent construction of Katsina road and it has an

electricity supply under the construction of (KEDCO) and recently a pipe

borehole of water supply was commission in the town.

Education

In education sector, some number of public schools was provided primary and

nursery schools and annually enrolment of 14,300 pupils, post-secondary

school, government girls secondary school in Funtua town. In the area they

comprised some pre-tertiary or remedial schools such as (SBRS) along

Dandume road Jabiri Funtua. The area boosts the status of education.

Health Care Delivery

The attainment of health in the society is the most important steps toward the

achievement, in view of this, the local government has set up several health

institutions, there is one primary health care centre (PHC) along First Bank,

40 health clinics around the geographical boundary of the area, family support

4
clinic and general hospital. The area its best in sponsoring professional into

high institution of learning centre.

Commerce and Industry

There are small scale industries within the area of study like, filling station,

bakery, poultry and block industries which include brickworks industry but is

not working presently and Jargaba Industry which produces product in large

amount, the products are as follows, rice, fertilizer, oil/palm etc. all these are

done in order to boost the economic status of the area of study and provided a

great opportunity to youth in order to hold their international value. Also the

area recently constructed market and shops inside, in order to improve the

financial productivity of the area.

Tourism Potentials

Funtua Local Government is blessed with tourism potentials, for example

Funtua market hills and recreational center, Mai-Ruwa Dam will keep

individual busy for a whole day. There are various hotels and motels in the

area of provide an accommodation for stranger not to be stranded.

5
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

1. To find out the various health problems associated with poor disposal of

liquid waste.

2. To find out the effect of people knowledge on the importance of liquid

waste disposal.

3. To find out ways that peoples’ knowledge towards the importance of

liquid waste disposal that could be improved.

4. To find out the rules of government and NGOs toward improving people

knowledge on the importance of proper liquid waste disposal.

5. To health educate the general public on the importance of proper liquid

waste disposal to human and environmental health.

1.4 SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

This project research is focused on the knowledge of people on the

importance of proper liquid waste disposal. Its importance, its effect and

possible ways of improving people knowledge towards proper method of

liquid waste disposal. In the first place, research is supposed to cover a large

area beyond Funtua Local Government, but due to financial constrains which

affects transportation from one place to another to acquire all the necessary

data for successful implementation of the project, the research has to be

limited Funtua Local Government, which serves as the study.


6
Secondly, is the unavailability of time, which make impossible for the

researcher to expand this study beyond Funtua Local Government. However,,

despite the above stated problems and others, the research was successfully

derived in this process concerning the topic of discussion was clearly put into

writing and coming up with this project.

1.5 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

In order to improve the level of peoples’ knowledge on the importance of

proper liquid waste disposal, the following problems need to be talked:

One major problem is ignorance of people on the importance of liquid waste

disposal within the area of study people are motivated to understand the

importance of liquid waste disposal, because most of the health problems

associated with liquid waste disposal are due to lack of awareness on the

importance of liquid waste disposal.

Another problem worth noticing is lack of provision of liquid waste collection

and disposal facilities due to the laxity of government in providing those

facilities within the area of study, this contribute greatly towards insect and

vermin’s infestation within the area of study. Likewise, in the case of

professional health personnel, they neglect their duties in the public on the

importance of liquid waste disposal within the area of study.

7
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The most important issue in designing any project is to serve as an identifier

of a particular problem therefore this project after successfully compiled it

would help government, NGOs and public at large interesting in the

importance of peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste disposal.

1.7 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1. Do you believe that poor liquid waste disposal has any significant

impact to health?

2. Do you believe peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste disposal can

promote environmental sanitation?

3. Can the incidence of insects borne diseases attributed to poor waste

disposal?

4. Does ignorance of people toward the importance of liquid waste

disposal contribute to faeco-oral transmitted diseases?

5. Do you believe that poor health education by health personnel in

educating the public can contribute to poor liquid waste management?

6. Can inadequate liquid waste disposal facilities promote poor

environmental sanitation within the area of study?

8
1.8 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS

1. Proper liquid waste disposal has more significant impact than any

public utility in human population.

2. Peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste disposal can promote proper

environmental sanitation.

3. The incidence of inset borne diseases is due to poor liquid waste

disposal.

4. Ignorance of people towards the importance of liquid waste disposal

contributes to faeco-oral transmitted diseases.

5. Poor health education by health personnel in educating people on the

importance of liquid waste disposal can contribute to poor liquid waste

management.

6. Lack of liquid waste disposal facilities can also promote poor

environmental sanitation within the area of study.

9
1.9 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS

 Environment: Man’s total surrounding e.g. air, rock etc.

 House: Physical structure that human being used a shelter.

 Hygiene: Act of keeping good health and preventing the spread of

diseases.

 Pollution: Make something dirty, destroy purity or sanity.

 Sewage: Water carrying waste or used in any community.

 Sanitation: Arrangement to protect public health e.g. efficient waste

disposal.

 Vermin: Small animals that do damage or harm, or insect that lived on the

body of dirty animals or people.

 Vector: Agent of transmitting diseases e.g. insect or rodents.

 Diseases: Simply means defaulting from health.

 Parasite: An organism that lived on one to survive.

10
CHAPTER TWO

2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW

This chapter is mainly concern with the wiring and saying of some specific

textbooks, authors, experts extracted in line of the topic under discussion.

Therefore, they are aware of the factors necessary to maintain health, this

means undertaking hygiene as application to liquid waste disposal, it will

enable them to prevent themselves against diseases associated with it, because

such knowledge will be an important aspect to maintain health both in human

and their environment and to help people must have a wider education than a

mere knowledge on the health.

2.2 According to Timo, M.B and Sebina DB (1978:14) they emphasized that

in the past some of the most dramatic improvement in health have brought

about through environmental sanitation including proper liquid waste

disposal, which is classic example in the control of London in the first half of

the 19th century. Dr. John Snow observed that the people affected all had

drunk water from Broad Street Pump, without any understanding of the living

between water diseases. He proceeded to remove the handle from the pump

thereby preventing the spread of disease in the later part some of the major

11
concerns which people have regarding their health waste disposal. Therefore,

from the above statement it present as a clear evidence that people start to

acknowledge the importance of liquid waste disposal, it’s no wonder that

services of liquid waste disposal, range from home to community in which

people are found there in, it is important to mentioned that people of Funtua

Local Government appreciate the importance of liquid waste disposal in their

premises by providing it with efficient drainage and latrine system.

2.3 Krelse, W. et-al (1984:40) he pointed out that “most people nowadays

need not to be told that human faeces are health risk, if not disposed safely,

because germs in faeces can be passed to water, when such water is drunk,

swallowed spreading diseases and resultant is death and eruption of epidemic

diseases. Most of European Communities appreciate the facts that proper

liquid waste disposal including excreta disposal is the most essential way of

promoting their health, must acknowledged the importance of liquid waste

disposal. In other words, people learned that proper liquid waste disposal

involved cleanliness in all part of liquid waste disposal facilities, because of a

poor liquid waste disposal in a community is a source of danger, because it

may attract insect which may carry diseases and infect man with it therefore,

proper disposal of liquid waste not only involved keeping our environment

clean alone, but what matter is the fact that people must be involved.

12
Provision of drainage system in a community is another major area where

people appreciate the importance of liquid waste disposal. Jordan, C.S. et-al

(1980:17) they pointed that “water stand on the surface of the soil, the

problem is poor drainage. Poor drainage is a threat to both urban and rural

development. In rural area poor surface drainage can reduce the agricultural

potential on the area, where as the urban area poor surface drainage can make

a place unsuitable. Poor drainage can lead to flood hazard, which can destroy

lives and properties. That is why people appreciate to consider techniques for

the disposal of liquid waste”. From this statement, it’s clear evidence that

many people in Funtua Local Government area appreciate fact that good

health of individual, families and community in general requires a healthy

environment build on solid foundation for the proper liquid waste disposal.

People believed that the provision of liquid waste disposal facilities in a

community required community understanding and belief toward the

importance of these facilities which the invasion of early of grate important

toward the knowledge of people of Funtua Local Government on the

importance of liquid waste disposal. People believed that indiscriminate

disposal of liquid waste disposal. Malaria, cholera, diarrhea etc. are all disease

associate with poor liquid waste disposal.

Macnold, J.C (1980:174) shed more light that “recently, people appreciate

13
that system for disposing of liquid waste and the main aims are always to

prevent possible contamination of water suppliers and food, and it provide a

convenient and in offensive environment, without insect that contribute to all

health problems”.

From the above statement, this is clear evidence that people appreciate

importance of liquid waste disposal could affect their water, source of food

meant for human consumption, which at the end diseases like cholera,

dysentery could affect them. In other words, people of Funtua Local

Government are acquired accept and practiced, that liquid waste disposal

must be handled and disposed properly, this is due to the fact that

indiscriminate disposal of liquid waste is of great risk and it increases the

chance of diseases associated with liquid waste to invade them.

Funtua Local Government teeming populations appreciated the fact and other

liquid waste collection facilities can be a means of propagating epidemic

diseases to become natural and inevitable.

2.4 Samuel, P.S. et-al (1978:189) “urine more easy disposed than faeces,

urinals nowadays are built in houses and drained into drainage soak away pits.

People acknowledge that urine and faeces should not be carelessly disposed

because in case disease germs infection may be spread, from 1977 during

cholera outbreak, many people in this country appreciate the importance of


14
proper sanitation especially with regard to liquid waste disposal.

This indicate the fact that from the period of epidemic in this country, many

people including those living within Funtua Local , practiced the importance

of proper liquid waste disposal, because people believe that diseases

associated with improper liquid waste including excreta disposal is a potential

danger to their health because it may provide a breeding ground of many

insects which are capable of transmitting diseases. From the earliest times,

man has been striving to control the environment a greater threat to his own

health and life. Man has realized that the problem of environmental health

depend solely on his hand. Greater congregation of people especially in

Funtua Local Government makes due to mobility of modern life and job

opportunity makes the control of liquid waste disposal impossible.

Catherine, M. et-al (1980:30) “the disappearance of enteric fever, cholera, and

diarrhea are the major killer diseases of the early 19 th century of many

developed communities was brought about by improved liquid waste disposal

many people in these communities appreciate the importance of liquid waste

disposal, in the same vein, many people in developed community expect

considerable more form their environment in the way of comfort, pollution

free safe community water supply. While in developing communities, most of

their health problems are in one way or the other related to ignorance about

15
the importance of liquid waste disposal. Therefore, the need of people in the

area of study to understand the importance of proper liquid waste disposal

cannot be over emphasized, because most of the diseases are due to the fact

that poverty and ignorance of people about the importance of proper liquid

waste disposal. Public health officials should find a means of educating

people about the major cause of specific diseases. This will greatly contribute

towards the importance of liquid waste disposal. It is obvious that improper

liquid waste disposal may not only cause local offence and nuisance, but may

result in contamination of water supplies and consequently spread of diseases.

It is often common to find a sewage been discharged indiscriminately in

human environment, this can lead to wide spread of diseases.

2.5 Jellifee, D.B (1980:157) stated that “diseases associated with poor liquid

waste disposal can result due to poor knowledge of people about the

importance of liquid waste disposal. These are important because they can

affect a large number of people at once.

Excreta, urine from a single person may carry infection via water supply to

cause a widespread epidemic of serious intestinal disease, infection present in

liquid waste e.g. poliomyelitis, typhoid fever and sector malaria. This state

present a challenge to the teeming population of Funtua Local Government

Area to understand that improper sewage disposal may cause a widespread

16
epidemic to become inevitable to them, while government and public health

officials paid from taxes should seriously engaged themselves in educating

people about the importance of liquid waste disposal. Not just to eradicate a

disease millions of Naira is spent in controlling of poliomyelitis, but still we

are being challenge with that diseases, I think it’s against the rule of medicine

to treat a disaster and at the same time to send the same person back into the

environment that caused the disease, this is what we have been doing for a

long period of time, but still we are in square one. Poor knowledge of people

towards the importance of liquid waste disposal affects many factors, but its

effect on domestics purpose is is the most important. This holds priority over

all consideration.

2.6 Maixi C.P et-al (1987:209) shed more light that “generally poor waste

disposal is a threat to human health, in a situation where people don’t

appreciate the proper method of liquid waste disposal environmental pollution

is obvious; water may not be safe, which in turn economy would be affected

significantly”.

Therefore, health promotion is not dysgenic clear up disease and people can

take care of themselves, at the termination of world war. It is in every 10

people living in Greece has disease associated with improper liquid waste

disposal but with improvement of people awareness on the importance of

17
sanitation especially liquid waste disposal many diseases are now a history,

during the period agricultural production increase with about 33% as against

15% social approval is obvious.

This statement challenge the people of Funtua Local Government to have

personal responsibility in knowing the importance of liquid waste disposal,

because Funtua has a high population concentration so it is through a

community effort or approach that proper knowledge of people could

improve, this will mean they have to make all the necessary investment for

the protection of their health and that of environment.

2.7 Holder, L. et-al (1970:136) stated that promotion of health has a beneficial

impact on the economy of a community, which in turn will affect the

community cultural and social advancement. Between 1953 – 1970 most of

the common diseases associated with United States of America, an intensive

program was instituted to educate people about the importance of sanitation

must especially liquid waste with treatment of existing cases a miracle was

achieved, not only in term of human health but including that of

environmental health people are fully acquitted with that knowledge that will

pass from generation to generation.

As society becomes increasing complex, the need of people of Funtua Local

Government to understand the responsibility for a healthful environment and


18
motivate assume responsibility for the quality of the environment.

It is a daily scheme that due to poor knowledge of people on the importance

of proper liquid waste disposal many people are falling a victim of various

disease, they are there within Funtua Local Government, that due to their

ignorance many diseases invade them, most especially children. The answer

is in health education and the Local Government should ensure that the

message about hygiene and sanitation are discriminative to people, because

liquid waste possess a health risk to others.

2.8 According to W.H.O. new letter (1994:3) stated that Africa is currently
received less sanitation investment than any other region. It is estimated that
between the years 1980 – 1990 only 10 percent of the global sanitation were
in the African countries.

From the above statement, it is clear evidence that, this is a gigantic task to
the local government of Funtua, because we live in a world that has made
dramatic advances in services and technologies, yet it is a matter of daily
shame that the people still lack a safe environment, if health is human right,
then easy access to sanitation is automatically a paramount human right. The
need to mobilize the resources called for those concerned in providing
sanitation and education is of great importance.

Conclusively, it is important to educate people about the importance of liquid

waste disposal that provide them with a hospital bed, which after all they fell

sick will make them sick, therefore government should provide an avenue of

19
educating these people about the importance of proper liquid waste disposal

and to ensure health care as so conceived.

CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

This research project was carried out in order to find out the importance of

peoples’ knowledge on the importance of proper liquid waste disposal within

Funtua Local Government, so as to emphasized the importance of liquid

waste disposal to human health as well as to find out the effects of people

knowledge towards liquid waste disposal to human health as to find out the

possible control and preventing measures within the area of study for the

purpose of promoting and preventing human health.

3.2 POPULATION AND UNIVERSE OF THE STUDY

The target population of the area of study is about 280,760 living in Funtua

Local Government, so as to assess the level of their knowledge on the

importance of liquid waste disposal, and to ensure that they participate

actively towards promoting liquid waste disposal.

3.3 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES

20
Ten communities were selected to be the sample size of this research work

among the communities living in Funtua, Gamji, Maska, Dan-duste, Sabon

Gari, Nasarawa, Makera, Unguwar Musa, Unguwar Ibrahim and Mairuwa

respectively. The sampling method used was simple random sampling

method, so as to compile the work successfully.

3.4 INSTRUMENT FOR DATA COLLECTION

The instrument used in obtaining the relevant data on this project was

questionnaire in which questions related to the topic of the project were

asked, so that the respondents can choose from the alternative answers of their

choice by ticking the appropriate answer of their choice. Likewise, various

textbooks, journals were also used, as to emphasize the project work.

3.5 VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT

For the instrument to be valid and reliable, a questionnaire was designed and

prepared was thoroughly read and screen by project supervisor who

authorized the distribution of the questionnaires were distributed as pre-

sampling method, so as to see how the message is going to responds to 100

questionnaires were distributed to the respondents and all the 100

questionnaires were returned to me successfully.

3.6 ADMINISTRATION OF THE INSTRUMENT

21
The manner through which the instrument was administered to the

appropriate people is through direct hand to hand message, so as to ensure

that the message was not disrupted as a result all the 100 questionnaires

administered were returned to me in order.

3.7 TECHNIQUES FOR DATA ANALYSIS

The technique applied in analyzing the data was statistical analysis, so as to

prove hypotheses or basic assumption.

2
X =¿

KLMN
The formula was derived from 2 x 2 contingency table which is shown below:

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male A B K

Female C D L

Total M N M

22
CHAPTER FOUR

4.1 DATA ANALYSIS, FINDING AND RESULT DISCUSSION

Below is the result of data collected from the questionnaire; 100


questionnaires were printed and distributed and all the 100 questionnaires
were filled correctly and returned to me in order.

TABLE 1:
Sex No of Respondents Percentage

Male 36 36%

Female 64 64%

Total 100 100%

The above table discus the sex distribution of the respondents, 36 respondents

that represent 36% of the total respondents are male, while 64 respondents

that represent 64% of the total respondents are female, this shows that most of

the respondents are females.

TABLE 2:

Age No of Respondents Percentage


18-22 years 62 62%

23
23-27 years 28 28%
28-32 years 8 8%
33 and above 2 2%
Total 100 100%

The above table discus the age distribution of the respondents, those at the

age between 18-22 years are 62 respondents and they represent 62% of the

total respondents, while those at the age of 23-27 years of age are 28

respondents and they represent 28% of the total respondents, and those at the

age 28-32 years of age are 8 respondents, while those at the age of 33 and

above have the total of 2 respondents and they represent 2% of the

respondents.

TABLE 3:

Marital Status No of Respondents Percentage


Single 74 74%
Married 26 26%
Total 100 100%

The above table discus the marital status of the respondents, 74 respondents

that represent 74% of the total respondents are single, while 26 respondents

that represent 26% of the total respondents are married, this shows that most

of the respondents are females.

TABLE 4:
24
Occupation No of Respondents Percentage
Farmers 48 48%
Business 52 52%
Total 100 100%

The above table discus the occupation of the respondents, 48 respondents that

represent 48% of the total respondents are farmers, while 52 respondents that

represent 52% of the total respondents are business people, this shows that

most of the respondents are business people.

TABLE 5:

Educational Background No of Respondents Percentage

Formal 87 87%

Informal 13 13%

Total 100 100%

From the above table, it discussed the educational background of the

respondents, 87 respondents that represent 87% of the total respondents have

formal education, while 13 respondents that represent 13% of the total

respondents have informal education, and this shows that most of the

respondents have formal education.

TABLE 6:

25
Religion No of Respondents Percentage

Muslims 50 50%

Christians 50 50%

Total 100 100%

The above table discus the religion of the respondents, 50 respondents that

represent 50% of the total respondents are Muslims, while 50 respondents that

represent 50% of the total respondents are Christians, this shows that the

respondents are equal.

TABLE 7: Do you know anything about liquid waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Yes 94 94%
No 6 6%
Total 100 100%

The above table discus the view of the respondents if they know anything

about liquid waste disposal, 94 respondents that represent 94% of the total

respondents indicated that, they know something about liquid waste disposal,

while 6 respondents that represent 6% of the total respondents indicate that

they don’t know anything about liquid waste disposal, this shows that most of

the respondents know something about liquid waste disposal.

TABLE 8: If yes, through which of the following ways?


26
Answer No of Respondents Percentage
Through personal research 36 36%
Through personal experience 40 40%
Through media 24 24%
TOTAL 100 100%

From the above table, the respondents are asked to specify the way they know

something about public liquid waste disposal, 36 people representing 36% of

the total respondents have the idea through personal research, while 40

respondents know something on the question asked through personal

experience and they are also representing 40% of the total respondents and 24

respondents that are representing 24% of the total respondents know

something about liquid waste disposal through media.

TABLE 9: To your own understanding which of the following ways

contribute to poor liquid waste disposal in your community?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Poor knowledge 41 41%
Ignorance 244 24%
Poverty 6 6%
Lack of sanitary facilities 14 14%
Negligence of health personnel 15 15%
Others specify - -
TOTAL 100 100%

27
The table above discussed the views of the respondents on the factors

responsible for poor liquid waste disposal in their communities where 41

respondents that represent 41% of the total respondents stated that poor

knowledge of people towards liquid waste disposal, while 24 respondents

representing 24% of the total respondents indicated that it’s due to ignorance

of people about the importance of liquid waste disposal, while 6 people that

represents 6% of the total respondents believes that the main factor

responsible for poor liquid waste disposal in their communities is poverty of

people, also 14 people who are representing 14% of the total respondents are

on the view that lack of sanitary facilities within the communities is the major

factor responsible for poor liquid waste disposal, and 15 people who are

representing 15% of the total respondents are on the view that negligence of

duty by health personnel in performing their duties effectively is factor

responsible for poor liquid waste disposal. This indicate the fact that most of

the respondents believed that lack of sanitary facilities is the main responsible

factor for poor liquid waste disposal.

TABLE 10: Do you believe liquid waste disposal has any significant

impact to health?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Yes 96 96%
No 4 4%
28
Total 100 100%

From the above table, it discus the views of the respondents on whether they

believe proper liquid waste disposal has any significant impact to human

health, 96 respondents that represent 96% of the total respondents believed

that proper liquid waste disposal has significant impact on human health,

while 4 respondents that represent 4% of the total respondents are against the

statement. This shows that most of the respondents believed that proper liquid

waste disposal has significant impact on human health.

TABLE 11: Do you know anything about liquid waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Yes 41 41%
No 59 59%
Total 100 100%

The above table discus the view of the respondents if they know anything

about liquid waste disposal, 41 respondents that represent 41% of the total

respondents indicated that, they know something about liquid waste disposal,

while 59 respondents that represent 59% of the total respondents indicate that

they don’t know anything about liquid waste disposal, this shows that most of

the respondents know something about liquid waste disposal.

29
TABLE 12: Does your community know anything about liquid waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Yes 70 70%

No 30 30%

Total 100 100%

The above table discus the view of the respondents if their community know

anything about liquid waste disposal, 70 respondents that represent 70% of

the total respondents indicated that, their community know something about

liquid waste disposal, while 30 respondents that represent 30% of the total

respondents indicated that their community don’t know anything about liquid

waste disposal, this shows that most of the community members know

something about liquid waste disposal.

TABLE 13: Does government assist your community towards the

provision of liquid waste facilities?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

Yes 32 32%

No 68 68%

Total 100 100%

The above table discus the view of the respondents on the effort of

30
government toward assisting the community in the provision of liquid waste

disposal facilities, 32 respondents representing 32% of the total respondents

indicated that the government is assisting their communities, while 68

respondents that represent 68% of the total respondents emphasized that there

is no such provision.

TABLE 14: Who are mostly affected with the problem of improper liquid

waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Children 50 50%
Adults 10 10%
Old age 40 40%
TOTAL 100 100%

The table discuss the views of the respondents on those category of people

who are mostly affected with the problem of improper liquid waste disposal,

50 respondents representing 50% of the total respondents emphasized that

children are mostly affected while 10 respondents that represent 10% of the

total respondents emphasized that adult are mostly affected with the problem

of improper liquid waste disposal and 40 representing 40% of the total

respondents emphasized that old age people are mostly affected with those

problems of improper liquid waste disposal.

TABLE 15: Do you normally patronize medical services in case you and
31
your family are affected with those problems?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage


Yes 54 54%
No 46 56%
Total 100 100%

From the above table, it discuss the views of the respondents on whether they

patronize medical services in case they are affected with those problems of

improper liquid waste disposal, 54 respondents representing 54% of the total

respondents stated that they patronize medical services in case they are

affected with those problems, while 46 respondents representing 46% of the

total respondents indicated that, they don’t patronize medicals services.

TABLE 16: Beside the effort of government, is there any assistance from non-

governmental organizations (NGOs) toward improving liquid waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

Yes 20 20%

No 80 80%

Total 100 100%

The above table discussed the view of the respondents on the effort of non-

government organization toward improving liquid waste disposal, 20

respondents representing 20% of the total respondents indicated that non-

32
government is assisting their communities towards improving liquid waste

disposal while 80 respondents that represent 80% of the total respondents

emphasized that there is no such assistance from non-governmental

organizations.

TABLE 17: Can incidence of insect borne diseases attributed to poor

liquid waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

Yes 60 60%

No 40 40%

Total 100 100%

From the above table, it discus the views of the respondents on whether the

incidence of insects borne diseases be attributed to poor liquid waste disposal,

60 respondents representing 60% of the total respondents indicated that the

incident of borne disease can be attributed to poor waste disposal, while 40

respondents that represent 40% of the total respondents emphasized that the

incidence of insect borne diseases cannot be attributed to poor waste disposal.

TABLE 18: Can inadequate liquid waste disposal facilities promote poor

environmental sanitation within the area of study?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

33
Yes 88 88%

No 12 12%

Total 100 100%

The above table discussed the views of the respondents on whether

inadequate disposal facilities promote environmental sanitation within the

area of study, 88 respondents representing 88% of the total respondents stated

that inadequate liquid waste disposal facilities can promote poor

environmental sanitation within the area of study, while 12 respondents that

represent 12% of the total respondents stated that inadequate waste disposal

facilities cannot promote poor environmental sanitation, therefore, this shows

that inadequate liquid waste disposal facilities cannot promote environmental

sanitation within the area of study..

TABLE 19: Do you believe poor health education by health personnel in

educating the public can contribute to poor liquid waste disposal?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

Yes 62 62%

No 38 38%

Total 100 100%

34
From table above it discusses the views of the respondents that, poor health

education by health personnel in education public can contribute to poor

liquid waste disposal, 62 respondents representing 62% of the total

respondents emphasized that poor health education among the public can

contribute to poor waste disposal, while 38 respondents that represent 38% of

the total respondents emphasized are against this statement. This shows that

poor health education by health personnel in educating the public contribute

to poor liquid waste disposal.

TABLE 20: Do you believe peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste

disposal can promote environmental sanitation?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

Yes 70 70%

No 30 30%

Total 100 100%

From the above table it discuss the views of the respondents on whether they

believe peoples knowledge towards liquid waste disposal can promote proper

environmental sanitations, 70 respondents representing 70% of the total

respondents stated that they believe peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste

disposal can promote proper environmental sanitation, while 30 respondents

that represent 30% of the total respondents are against this statement, this
35
shows that peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste disposal promote proper

environmental sanitation.

TABLE 21: What is your suggestion to government, non-governmental

organizations and public at large in controlling the situation, finally?

Answer No of Respondents Percentage

Public health education 5 5%

Proper sanitation of facilities 10 10%

Involved NGOs 80 80%

Strong legislation 5 5%

Others specify - -

TOTAL 100 100%

The table above discussed the views of the respondents on the respondents

suggestion to government, non-governmental organizations and public in

controlling the situation where 5 respondents that represent 5% of the total

respondents stated that the only way out of this problem is through public

health education, while 10 respondents representing 10% of the total

respondents indicated that only through the proper provision of sanitation

facilities that the problem could be solved, while 80 people that represents

80% of the total respondents emphasized that the problem could be solved

36
when non-governmental organizations were fully involved in the disposal of

proper liquid waste disposal, and 5 people who are representing 5% of the

total respondents emphasized that the only way out to this problem of liquid

waste disposal could be solved once and for all.

4.2 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF RESULT

Nwanna (1990) defined analysis of data as those techniques whereby a

researcher extract information that was not apparently there before and which

will enable a summary description of the subject under discussion.

In the following analysis the test statistic used is chi-square method (x 2)

dichotomous in nature of inferential statistic, we reject null hypothesis (Ho)

and assumed the null hypothesis (Ho) is not reliable with regard to this

research caution need to be taken when drawing conclusion on the test of

hypothesis because the pairs of value are greater or less.

4.2.1 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

Ho: Proper liquid waste disposal has more significant impact than any public

utility in human population.

Ha: The above statement is not true

37
i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

Table 4.2.1

Do you believe that proper liquid waste disposal has any significant

impact to human health?

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male 33 17 50

Female 35 15 50

Total 68 32 100

(P<0.05)
From appendix BI, since x2 calculated 0.49 < x2 tab 0.05 at Idf = 3.841, we
therefore concluded and accepted null hypothesis (Ho) the result (P < 0.05) it
clearly shows that out of one hundred (100) respondents representing both
sexes, 68 respondents representing both sexes agreed with the hypothesis
(Ho) as such they are majority, and 32 respondents representing both sexes
also disagreed with the hypothesis (Ho) as such they are minority, we
therefore, concluded and accept null hypothesis (Ho) that proper liquid waste
disposal has more significant impact than any public utility in human
population.

4.2.2 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

Ho: Incidence of insect borne diseases is due to poor liquid waste disposal.

38
i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 1

Table 4.2.2:

Can incidence of insect borne diseases attributed to poor liquid waste

disposal?

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male 35 15 50

Female 45 5 50

Total 80 20 100

(P<0.05)

From appendix BII, since x2 calculated 6.25 < x2 tab 0.05 at Idf = 3.841, we

therefore concluded and accepted null hypothesis (Ho) the result (P < 0.05) it

clearly shows that out of one hundred (100) respondents representing both

sexes, 80 respondents representing both sexes agreed with the hypothesis

(Ho) as such they are majority, and 20 respondents representing both sexes

also disagreed with the hypothesis (Ho) as such they are minority, we

therefore, concluded and accept null hypothesis (Ho) that incidence of insect

borne diseases can attributed to poor liquid waste disposal.

4.2.3 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

39
Ho: Ignorance towards the importance of liquid waste disposal contributes to

faeco-oral transmitted diseases.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

Table 4.2.3:

Do you believe that ignorance towards the importance of liquid waste

disposal can contributes to faeco-oral transmitted diseases?

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male 50 15 65

Female 5 30 35

Total 55 45 100

(P<0.05)

From appendix BIII, since x2 calculated 32.818 < x2 tab 0.05 at Idf = 3.841,

we therefore concluded and accepted null hypothesis (Ho) the result (P <

0.05) it clearly shows that out of one hundred (100) respondents representing

both sexes, 55 respondents representing both sexes agreed with the hypothesis

(Ho) as such they are majority, and 45 respondents representing both sexes

40
also disagreed with the hypothesis (Ho) as such they are minority, we

therefore, concluded and accept null hypothesis (Ho) that ignorance towards

the importance of liquid waste disposal can contributes to faeco-oral

transmitted diseases.

4.2.4 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

Ho: Poor health education by health personnel in educating public contribute

to poor liquid waste disposal.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

Table 4.2.4

Can poor health education by health personnel in educating public

contribute to poor liquid waste disposal?

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male 25 20 45

Female 30 25 55

Total 55 45 100
41
(P<0.05)

From appendix BIV, since x2 calculated 0.010 < x2 tab 0.05 at Idf = 3.841, we

therefore concluded and accepted null hypothesis (Ho) the result (P < 0.05) it

clearly shows that out of one hundred (100) respondents representing both

sexes, 55 respondents representing both sexes agreed with the hypothesis

(Ho) as such they are majority, and 45 respondents representing both sexes

also disagreed with the hypothesis (Ho) as such they are minority, we

therefore, concluded and accept null hypothesis (Ho) that poor health

education by health personnel in educating public can contribute to poor

liquid waste disposal.

4.2.5 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

Ho: Peoples’ knowledge toward liquid waste disposal can promote proper

environmental sanitation.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

Table 4.2.5:

42
Do you believe that peoples’ knowledge toward liquid waste disposal can

promote proper environment sanitation?

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male 50 40 90

Female 8 2 10

Total 58 42 100

(P<0.05)

From appendix BV, since x2 calculated 8.604 < x2 tab 0.05 at Idf = 3.841, we

therefore concluded and accepted null hypothesis (Ho) the result (P < 0.05) it

clearly shows that out of one hundred (100) respondents representing both

sexes, 58 respondents representing both sexes agreed with the hypothesis

(Ho) as such they are majority, and 42 respondents representing both sexes

also disagreed with the hypothesis (Ho) as such they are minority, we

therefore, concluded and accept null hypothesis (Ho) that peoples’ knowledge

towards liquid waste disposal can promote environmental sanitation.

4.2.6 TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

Ho: Lack of liquid waste disposal facilities promotes poor environmental

sanitation within the area of study.

43
Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

Table 4.2.6:

Can inadequate liquid waste disposal promote poor environment

sanitation within area of study?

Gender Responses Total

Yes No

Male 60 5 65

Female 30 5 35

Total 90 10 100

(P<0.05)

From appendix BVI, since x2 calculated 200 < x2 tab 0.05 at Idf = 3.841, we

therefore concluded and accepted null hypothesis (Ho) the result (P < 0.05) it

clearly shows that out of one hundred (100) respondents representing both

sexes, 90 respondents representing both sexes agreed with the hypothesis

(Ho) as such they are majority, and 10 respondents representing both sexes

44
also disagreed with the hypothesis (Ho) as such they are minority, we

therefore, concluded and accept null hypothesis (Ho) that inadequate liquid

waste disposal facilities promote poor environmental sanitation within the

area of study.

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The entire project research was aimed at in depth analysis of the knowledge

of the people on the importance of proper liquid waste disposal, a case study

of Funtua Local Government Area. The purpose of the study is to find out

various health problems associated with poor disposal of liquid waste and the

ways liquid waste disposal could be improved.

As we know Funtua Local Government Area is highly laid in Sub-Saharan

region, and dry season, with inadequate liquid waste disposal facilities within

the area of study, these can lead to the hundred environments where even
45
water source can be polluted and result to various diseases associated with

liquid waste to invade people.

People appreciate the fact that unsanitary condition of their environment due

to poor liquid waste disposal. This is mainly due to the ignorance of people

towards the importance of environmental hygiene; the progress of sanitation

throughout the world has long been appreciated as milestone of public health

services.

Based on hypotheses formulated, proper liquid waste disposal has more

significant impact than any public utility in human population that ignorance

of people towards the importance of liquid waste disposal contribute to faeco-

oral transmitted diseases from information collected and analyzed, using

various methods some recommendations were made to the government and

public at large within the area of study, that government should provide

sufficient and efficient liquid waste disposal facilities, and that the people

should participate actively towards promoting liquid waste disposal.

The reader will easily appreciate the fact that, the promotion of both human

and environmental health has a beneficial impact on the economy of an area.

Which in turn will affect the spread of many diseases associated with poor

liquid waste disposal was given and government and non-governmental

should give this problem attention it deserved by educating the people within
46
the area of study, if not the problem of poor liquid waste disposal will

continue to exist and spread even beyond.

5.2 RECOMMENDATION

In order to effectively improve the knowledge of people on the importance of

proper liquid waste disposal the following recommendation were made to the

government and public at large in the area of study.

Government

1. Provision of liquid waste collection and disposal facilities should be

provided within the area of study.

2. Adequate provision and construction of efficient drainage system should

be made to all street of the community.

3. Proper town planning should be enforced and agency that is responsible

should observe it.

4. Provision of adequate water supply should be made available to the people

within the area of study.

5. Mass health education should be done most often so as to educate people

about the importance of proper liquid waste disposal.

6. Non-government organizations should be involved in improving liquid

waste disposal.

47
7. Provision of monitoring liquid waste disposal should be provided within

the area of study.

8. Environmental health personnel like EHO/EHT and EHA should

developed ways of inspecting premises with regards to their liquid waste

disposal and defaulters should be punished.

9. Government should make fund available for NGOs in order to boast liquid

waste disposal.

10.Environmental sanitation activities especially with regards to their liquid

waste disposal should be accorded serious attention.

Public

1. The public should participate actively in promoting liquid waste disposal.

2. Each household should have its own personal liquid waste disposal

facilities.

3. Each household should have its own efficient drainage system up to public

sewers.

4. Environmental and personal hygiene should be practiced regularly in order

to improve liquid waste disposal.

5. Every house under construction must be provided with sufficient liquid

waste disposal facilities.

6. People should participate actively in all health related matter meant for

48
their own benefit.

REFERENCES

1. CATHERINE, M.B. et-al (1980) Municipal and Rural Sanitation MC,

Cyraw Hill Book Company Page 330.

2. HOLDER L. et-al (1999) Man and His Environment Williams and

Willkims Company Pg. 136.

3. JELLIFFEE, D.B. (1980) Waste Water Management Control National

Academy Books New York Pg. 157.

4. JORDAN, C.S. et-al (1989) Waste Management Tukks Books Washington

DC Pg. 17.

5. KREISEL, et-al (1984) Sewage Treatment in Hot Climate John Wiley and

Sons Pg. 40.

6. MARKS, C.P et-al (1987) Disposal of Sewage and Other Water Borne

Wastes, Annabor Books Canada Pg. 209.

49
7. MACNOLD, J.C (1980) Applied Simple Sanitation for Developing

Communities. CES Books Pg. 174.

8. SAMUEL, P.S. et-al (1979) A New Tropical Health Sciences Macmillan

Publishers Pg. 189.

9. TIMO M.B. and Sebina D.B (1994) Politics of Pollution, Pagasus

Publishers Page 14.

10.WHO News Letter, (1994) Sanitation in Africa Vol.11 No. 3:744:14 Pg. 3.

APPENDIX BI

1st Step = Formulate hypothesis

Ho: Proper liquid waste disposal has more significant impact than public

utility in human population.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

2nd Step = Select the Level of Significance

i.e. alpha (ϖ) and degree of freedom (df)


ϖ = 0.05/3.841
df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
= (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
=1ϖ1
3rd Step = State Test Statistic
50
Let the test statistic be

( ad−bc ) 2m
X2 =
Klmn

4th Step = State Decision Rule

i. Reject null hypothesis (Ho) if X2 calculated > X2 tab which is equal


to 0.05 at degree of freedom (df) = 3.841
ii. Accept null hypothesis (Ha) if X2 calculated < X2 tab 0.05 at degree
of freedom (df) 1 = 3.841.

5th Step = Compute test statistic in table 4:2:1

[ ( ad−bc ) ] 2 m
X2 =
Klmn

[ ( 33 X 15 )−(17 X 35) ] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 68 X 32

[ ( 495 )−(595)] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 68 X 32

[ ( 140 ) ] 2−X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 68 X 32

544000000
X2 = 5440000

X2 = 100

6th Step = Apply Decision Rule

51
Since X2 calculated 100 < X2 tab 0.05 at df = 3.841, we therefore concluded

and accepted that null hypothesis (Ho) that proper liquid waste disposal has

more significant impact than public utility in human population.

APPENDIX BII

1st Step = Formulate hypothesis

Ho: Incidence of insect borne diseases is due to poor liquid waste disposal.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

2nd Step = Select the Level of Significance

i.e. alpha (ϖ) and degree of freedom (df)


ϖ = 0.05/3.841
df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
= (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
=1ϖ1
3rd Step = State Test Statistic

Let the test statistic be

( ad−bc ) 2m
X2 = Klmn

4th Step = State Decision Rule

52
i. Reject null hypothesis (Ho) if X2 calculated > X2 tab which is equal
to 0.05 at degree of freedom (df) = 3.841
ii. Accept null hypothesis (Ha) if X2 calculated < X2 tab 0.05 at degree
of freedom (df) 1 = 3.841.

5th Step = Compute test statistic in table 4:2:1

[ ( ad−bc ) ] 2 m
X2 =
Klmn

[ ( 35 X 5 )−(45 X 15) ] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 68 X 32

[ ( 175 )−(675) ] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 80 X 20

[ ( 140 ) ] 2−X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 80 X 20

25000000
X2 = 4000000

X2 = 6.25

6th Step = Apply Decision Rule

Since X2 calculated 6.25 < X2 tab 0.05 at df = 3.841, we therefore concluded

and accepted that null hypothesis (Ho) that incidence of insect borne diseases

is due to poor liquid waste disposal.

APPENDIX BIII

1st Step = Formulate hypothesis

53
Ho: Ignorance of people toward the importance of liquid waste disposal

contributes to faeco-oral transmitted diseases.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

2nd Step = Select the Level of Significance

i.e. alpha (ϖ) and degree of freedom (df)


ϖ = 0.05/3.841
df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
= (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
=1ϖ1
3rd Step = State Test Statistic

Let the test statistic be

( ad−bc ) 2m
X2 = Klmn

4th Step = State Decision Rule

i. Reject null hypothesis (Ho) if X2 calculated > X2 tab which is equal


to 0.05 at degree of freedom (df) = 3.841
ii. Accept null hypothesis (Ha) if X2 calculated < X2 tab 0.05 at degree
of freedom (df) 1 = 3.841.

5th Step = Compute test statistic in table 4:2:1

54
[ ( ad−bc ) ] 2 m
X2 =
Klmn

[ ( 50 X 2 ) −(40 X 8)] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 58 X 52

[ (−220 ) ] 2 X 100
X2 =
50 X 50 X 58 X 52

4840000
X2 = 50 X 50 X 48 X 52

4840000
X2 = 562500

X2 = 8.604

6th Step = Apply Decision Rule

Since X2 calculated 8.604 < X2 tab 0.05 at df = 3.841, we therefore concluded

and accepted that null hypothesis (Ho) that proper liquid waste disposal has

more significant impact than public utility in human population.

APPENDIX BIV

1st Step = Formulate hypothesis

Ho: Poor health education by health personnel in educating people on the

importance of liquid waste disposal can contribute to poor liquid waste

management.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0


55
2nd Step = Select the Level of Significance

i.e. alpha (ϖ) and degree of freedom (df)


ϖ = 0.05/3.841
df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
= (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
=1ϖ1
3rd Step = State Test Statistic

Let the test statistic be

( ad−bc ) 2m
X2 = Klmn

4th Step = State Decision Rule

i. Reject null hypothesis (Ho) if X2 calculated > X2 tab which is equal


to 0.05 ate degree of freedom (df) = 3.841
ii. Accept null hypothesis (Ha) if X2 calculated < X2 tab 0.05 at degree
of freedom (df) 1 = 3.841.

5th Step = Compute test statistic in table 4:2:1

[ ( ad−bc ) ] 2 m
X2 =
Klmn

[ ( 25 X 23 )−(20 X 30)] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 55 X 45

[ ( 633 )−(600) ] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 55 X 45

625 X 100
X2 = 50 X 50 X 55 X 452

56
625000
X2 = 61807500

X2 = 0.010

6th Step = Apply Decision Rule

Since X2 calculated 0.010 < X2 tab 0.05 at df = 3.841, we therefore concluded

and accepted that null hypothesis (Ho) that poor health education by health

personnel in educating people on the importance of liquid waste disposal can

contribute to poor liquid waste management.

APPENDIX BV

1st Step = Formulate hypothesis

Ho: Knowledge of people toward liquid waste disposal can promote proper

environmental sanitation.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

2nd Step = Select the Level of Significance

i.e. alpha (ϖ) and degree of freedom (df)


ϖ = 0.05/3.841
df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
= (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
=1ϖ1
57
3rd Step = State Test Statistic

Let the test statistic be

( ad−bc ) 2m
X2 =
Klmn

4th Step = State Decision Rule

i. Reject null hypothesis (Ho) if X2 calculated > X2 tab which is equal


to 0.05 ate degree of freedom (df) = 3.841
ii. Accept null hypothesis (Ha) if X2 calculated < X2 tab 0.05 at degree
of freedom (df) 1 = 3.841.

5th Step = Compute test statistic in table 4:2:1

[ ( ad−bc ) ] 2 m
X2 =
Klmn

[ ( 50 X 2 ) −(40 X 8)] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 58 X 52

[ (−220 ) ] 2 X 100
X2 =
50 X 50 X 58 X 52

4840000
X2 = 50 X 50 X 48 X 52

4840000
X2 = 562500

X2 = 8.604

6th Step = Apply Decision Rule

58
Since X2 calculated 8.604 < X2 tab 0.05 at df = 3.841, we therefore concluded

and accepted that null hypothesis (Ho) that knowledge of people toward

liquid waste disposal can promote proper environmental sanitation.

APPENDIX VI

1st Step = Formulate hypothesis

Ho: Lack of liquid waste disposal facilities promotes poor environmental

sanitation within the area of study.

Ha: The above statement is not true

i.e. Ho: P # 0 Vs Ha: P – 0

2nd Step = Select the Level of Significance

i.e. alpha (ϖ) and degree of freedom (df)


ϖ = 0.05/3.841
df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
= (2 – 1) (2 – 1)
=1ϖ1
3rd Step = State Test Statistic

Let the test statistic be

( ad−bc ) 2m
X2 = Klmn

59
4th Step = State Decision Rule

i. Reject null hypothesis (Ho) if X2 calculated > X2 tab which is equal


to 0.05 ate degree of freedom (df) = 3.841
ii. Accept null hypothesis (Ha) if X2 calculated < X2 tab 0.05 at degree
of freedom (df) 1 = 3.841.

5th Step = Compute test statistic in table 4:2:1

[ ( ad−bc ) ] 2 m
X2 =
Klmn

[ ( 60 X 5 )−(5 X 30) ] 2 X 100


X2 =
50 X 50 X 95 X 5

[ ( 150 ) ] 2 X 100
X2 =
50 X 50 X 68 X 32

225000 X 100
X2 = 11245000

225000000
X2 = 11245000

X2 = 2.00

6th Step = Apply Decision Rule

Since X2 calculated 2.00 < X2 tab 0.05 at df = 3.841, we therefore concluded

and accepted that null hypothesis (Ho) that lack of liquid waste disposal

facilities can promotes poor environmental sanitation within the area of study.

SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE

Katsina State College of Health


60
Sciences, Kankiya Iro School of
Health Technology, Kankia
Department of Environmental
Health, Health Education and
Promotion Unit
Dear respondent;

I am a final year student of the above named institution pursuing a National


Diploma in Health Education and Promotion and also undertaking a research
project titled “Knowledge of people on the Importance of Liquid Waste
Disposal” a case study of Funtua Local Government.

SECTION ‘A’

BIO-DATA OF THE RESPONDENT

1. Sex: Male ( ) Female ( )


2. Age: 18-22years ( ) 23-27years ( ) 33years and above ( )
3. Marital Status: Single ( ) Married ( )
4. Occupation: Farmer ( ) Business ( )
5. Educational Background: Formal ( ) Informal( )
6. Religion: Muslim ( ) Christian ( )

SECTION ‘B’

7. Do you know anything about liquid waste disposal? Yes ( ) No ( )

8. If yes, through which of the following ways?

a. Through personal research ( )

b. Through personal experience ( )

c. Through the media ( )

61
9. Do you believe that proper liquid waste disposal has any significant

impact to health? Yes ( ) No ( )

10.To your own understanding which among the following ways contribute to

poor liquid waste disposal in your community?

a. Poor knowledge ( )

b. Ignorance ( )

c. Lack of sanitary facilities in the community ( )

d. Negligence of health personnel ( )

e. Poverty ( )

11.Do you know anything about liquid waste disposal? Yes ( ) No ( )

12.Does ignorance of people towards importance of liquid waste disposal

contribute to faeco-oral transmitted diseases? Yes ( ) No ( )

13.Does government assist your community towards the provision of liquid

waste disposal facilities? Yes ( ) No ( )

14.Who are mostly affected with the problem of improper liquid waste

disposal?

a. Children ( ) b. Adult ( ) d. Old Age ( )

15.Do you patronize medical services in case you and your family are

affected with those diseases? Yes ( ) No ( )

16.Beside the effort of government, is there any assistance from NGOs

towards improving liquid waste disposal? Yes ( ) No ( )


62
17.Can incidence of insect borne diseases attributed to liquid waste disposal?

Yes ( ) No ( )

18.Can inadequate liquid waste disposal facilities promote poor

environmental sanitation within the area of study? Yes ( ) No ( )

19.Do you believe that poor health education by health personnel in educating

the general public can contribute to poor liquid waste disposal?

Yes ( ) No ( )

20.Do you believe peoples’ knowledge towards liquid waste disposal can

promote environmental sanitation? Yes ( ) No ( )

21.What is your suggestion to government, non-governmental organizations

and public at large in controlling the situation, finally?

a. Public health education ( )

b. Proper sanitation of facilities ( )

c. Involved NGOs ( )

d. Strong legislation ( )

e. Other specify ( )

63

You might also like