TECUMSEH PRODUCTS INDIA PVT. LTD.
IBW-EHS-STD-01
Criteria for Hazard Identification & Risk Analysis
Risk
Scale
Ranking
The consequences of hazard may
have risk to the entire factory or
5 Intolerable
even outside the factory.
The consequences of hazard may
pose a risk to more than one
4 department or in the most part of Substantial
factory area
Consequences of hazard may pose
3 Moderate
a risk to entire department or area
The consequences of hazard may
2 be on one station or in some area in Tolerable
a deptt
The consequences is limited to
1 Trivial
maximum one station / machine
Incase the product of S+S+P+D is more than 12 i.e.60% or above of the maximum rating Hazard & associated risk is treated as significant
Incase the hazard / risk is covered under the legal requirements irrespective of S+S+P+D rating it will be treated as significant
Prepared By: Safety Officer
Doc No.
Page No. Page 1 of 1
Issue No. 1
Revision No. 1/C
Date 04.12.2017
Severity Probability Duration
Work should not be started or continued until the risk has Repetitive instances. Once in a
been reduced or eliminated. month or more. Permanent
It is not possible to reduce the risk even with unlimited Previous history shows very Not recoverable
resources, work has to remain prohibited. high likelihood of occurrence
Work should not be started until the risk has been Frequent instances. Previous
reduced or eliminated. data shows happening of
Considering the resources may have to be allocated to impact between once in month Impact is More than one month
reduce the risk. Where the risk involves the work in to one quarter.
progress urgent actions should be taken.
Efforts should be made to reduce the risk, but the cost of
prevention should be carefully measured and limited.
Risk reduction measures should be implemented within a
Infrequent event. The
defined time period.
possibility of occurrence is Impact is more than 1 week butless
Where the moderate risk is associated with extremely
between quarterly to half then a Month
harmful consequences further assessment may be
yearly.
necessary to establish more precisely the likelihood of
harm as a basis for determining the need for improved
control measures
No additional controls are required. Consideration may The possibility of occurrence is
be given to a more cost effective solution or unlikely. The event between
Impact period is about ond day to one
improvement that imposes no additional cost burden. has not happened for more
week
Monitoring is required to ensure that controls are than two years.
maintained. Happened once in three years.
The possibility of occurrence is
No action is required and no documentary records need
rare. The events has not taken Less than one day
to be kept.
place for more than 3 years.
Approved By: Management Representative Issued By: Safety Officer