Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philosophy
for
Isolation of Process Systems
Onshore
Document Number
TO-HQ-02-034-00
Issue Issue or Revision Description Origin Date Chkd Date Appd Date Auth Date
Rev By By By By
OMV Exploration & Production GmbH
Revision History
Revision Description of revision
A1 For Comment/Approval
A2 Client Comments Incorporated/ Issued for Approval
00 Final Issue
CONTENTS
3.0 ABBREVIATIONS...........................................................................................................6
4.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................7
1.0 PREFACE
This Philosophy defines the OMV Exploration & Production GmbH corporate
policy on the design of the Isolation of Process Systems for onshore
hydrocarbon production and processing facilities. The document specifies
basic requirements and criteria, defines the appropriate codes and
standards, and assists in the standardisation of facilities’ design across all
onshore operations.
The design process needs to consider project specific factors such as the
location, production composition, production rates and pressures, the
process selected and the size of the plant. This philosophy aims to address
a wide range of the above variables, however it is recognised that not all
circumstances can be covered. In situations where project specific
considerations may justify deviation from this philosophy, a document
supporting the request for deviation shall be submitted to OMV E&P for
approval.
2.0 DEFINITIONS
3.0 ABBREVIATIONS
4.0 INTRODUCTION
5.2 References
TO-HQ-02-001 Develop Process Engineering Guidelines and
Design Philosophies Overview
TO-HQ-02-063 Philosophy for Maintenance Onshore
7.1 General
OMV classifies Mechanical Isolations into the following three basic standards:
ISOLATION STANDARD 1 Physical Disconnection (Figure 1)
ISOLATION STANDARD 2 Double Block and Bleed (Figure 2)
ISOLATION STANDARD 3 Single Valve Isolation (Figure 3)
Notes:
1 These are the minimum recommended standards.
2 If the minimum recommended standard cannot be achieved, an isolation
Risk Assessment must be carried out. Under these conditions, all jobs
extending past a 12-hour duration must be treated as Standard 1 (i.e.
Positive) Isolation.
3 The above table indicates the valving required to implement Positive
Isolation.
4 Pipe work of ¾” n.b. and smaller shall be treated as for pressures less
than 10 barg.
5 The selection criteria should not disregard the need for sound technical
judgement by competent personnel.
Figure 1 - Isolation Standard 1
LC LC
Live Isolated
Bleed
RS
SP
LC LC
Live Isolated
Bleed
Notes
LC LC
Live Isolated
Bleed
Live Isolated
LC
Notes Bleed
LC
Live Isolated
Bleed
Notes
9.1 General
Isolation Standards can only be implemented securely by using the correct
equipment and following the correct procedures.
Correctly rated items of equipment such as valves, gaskets, blind flanges,
Spades and pressure gauges are selected by referring to P&IDs, engineering
specifications, joint tables and system inventory details.
All valves used in Isolation Schemes must have suitable immobilising or
locking devices fitted to provide Mechanical Isolation point security.
Isolation Labels must be attached to each isolation point and be cross-
referenced to a Mechanical Isolation Certificate.
The Isolation Scheme should be demonstrated to the Performing Authority and
form part of the pre-job toolbox talk to all permit users.
9.2 Isolation Block Valve Selection
Manually operated ball, plug and gate valves are the preferred valves for use
in isolations. Control valves or butterfly valves may not provide an effective
Isolation and should only be used following an Isolation Risk Assessment.
Actuated shutdown (fail closed) valves are suitable for inclusion in an Isolation
Scheme only where the instrument air supply is isolated and disconnected.
Electrically or hydraulically operated valves must have the power supply
positively isolated and any hand-jack must be manually locked. If the valve
cannot be physically immobilised, it should not be used for isolation purposes.
Single valves of a type, which provide a double seal in a single body, with a
cavity, Bleed Valve between the seals, are acceptable as a Double Block and
Philosophy for Isolation of Process Systems Document Number Rev Page
Onshore TQ-HQ-02-034 00 16 of 27
OMV Exploration & Production GmbH
Bleed. Examples of such valves are suitably specified double wedge gate,
parallel expanding gate, and double-seating ball valves where the seats are
energised by a means of a spring. (Note that double-seating ball valves where
the seats are energised by pressure are not acceptable).
9.3 Other Isolation Devices
In Pressure Systems that have liquid inventories only, use an open Bleed
Valve to monitor for any visual leakage in the section of piping between the
closed Block Valves to test Block Valve integrity. Valves operating as shut-
off valves should not allow any visual seepage of liquids across their seats
over a suitable monitoring period (typically 30 minutes).
Where liquid inventories have the potential to release hydrocarbons, the Bleed
Valve shall only be cracked open to check for visual seepage under direct
operator control. The operator shall be in attendance and shall monitor the
operations during the monitoring period.
In Pressure Systems containing gas, use a pressure gauge fitted to the Bleed
Valve to monitor pressure build-up or fall-off to show Block Valve integrity.
The Block Valves should not allow gas to leak at a rate where a pressure
build-up can develop in the downstream piping. (Note: Hydrates can cause
blockages in valves and pipe work under certain conditions of temperature and
pressure. This could provide misleading information during testing).
If any pressure build-up is observed using pressure gauges with ranges as
specified in Table 2 below, the valve does not have sufficient integrity to meet
the requirements of the Isolation standard.
An integrity test over 30 minutes should be carried out. Any increase on the
pressure gauge range indicates an unacceptable integrity test.
Each valve should be proved to the highest pressure that can be expected
within the system for the duration of the work activity.
Pipe Nominal
Bore Distance between Block Flanges / m
(ALL UNITS IN Barg)
Inch mm 1.5 to 9 to 12
0 to 1.5 3 to 5 5 to 7 7 to 9 >18
3 12 to18
1 25 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 1.6
2 50 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 2.5 1.6
Note : All pressure gauges used for integrity testing must be:-
a) fitted with an over-range protection device
b) calibrated to prove their accuracy
c) removed and replaced prior to re-instatement of the system
Valve 1 Valve 2
Live LC LC
Isolated
RS
Valve 1 Valve 2 SP
Live LC LC
Isolated
Notes
Isolated
Valve 1 Valve 2
LC LC Valve
Valve 4A
Notes 3A
Valve 3B Valve 4B
1 Close valve 2. Vent/ drain the inventory to atmospheric
pressure through Bleed Valves 4A and 4B.
2 In Pressure Systems with liquid inventories only, open valves
4A and 4B and monitor for any visual leakage.
3 In Pressure Systems containing gas, attach a pressure gauge,
with a range as indicated in Table 2, to bleed point 4 and
monitor pressure build-up. Final confirmation of zero pressure
should be by checking through Valve 4B.
4 No rise in pressure means valve 2 is providing an effective
single valve Isolation. Continuously monitor the isolations for
pressure build-up. Vent / drain any minor increases in pressure
to a suitable and safe area.
5 Close valve 1. Vent/ drain the inventory to atmospheric
pressure between valves 1 and 2 through Bleed Valves 3A/3 B
6 Attach a pressure gauge, with a range as indicated in Table 2,
to bleed point 3 and monitor pressure build-up. If there is no
rise in pressure, valve 1 is providing an effective single valve
Isolation, and the Double Block and Bleed has been proven.
Confirm zero pressure through Bleed Valve 3B.
7 While the equipment downstream of valve 2 is being worked
on, the gauge at point 3 provides information on valve 1
isolation and should be monitored on a regular frequency.
Should the gauge pressure increase, the integrity of the DB&B
no longer exists. Inform the AA and MIA immediately.
8 The isolation Block Valves must be securely immobilised prior
to work commencing on the isolated Pressure System and the
Bleed Valve(s) must be operated as described in Section 9.5.
Double Block and Bleed – Scheme 2 Single Valve Body
with Double Seals
Seat 1 Seat 2 & Cavity Bleed
Valve 1
Notes Valve
LC Valve
3A
2A
1 Ensure VALVE 1 is closed and secured. Vent / drain the
Valve 2B
inventory in the downstream side to atValve
mosphe3B
ric pressure
through Bleed Valves 3A and 3B.
2 Check the integrity of Seat 2 through Valves 2A and 2B by
pressurising the double seated valve annulus to live upstream
pressure using an appropriate medium e.g. water, nitrogen.
3 In Pressure Systems with liquid inventories only, monitor the
pressure at point 2 for any decrease in pressure in addition to
monitoring for any visual leakage through Valves 3A and 3B.
4 In Pressure Systems containing gas, attach a pressure gauge,
with a range as indicated in Table 2, to bleed point 3 and
monitor pressure build-up.
5 No decrease in pressure at point 2, and no increase in pressure
at point 3 means that Seat 2 is providing an effective seal. Final
confirmation of zero pressure should be by checking at Valve
3B.
6 De-pressurise VALVE 1 annulus through Bleed Valves 2A
and2B.
7 Attach a pressure gauge with a range as indicated Table 2 to
bleed point 2 and monitor pressure build-up. If there is no
increase in pressure, Seat 1 is providing an effective seal and
the Double Block and Bleed isolation has been proven.
8 While the equipment downstream of the double seated valve is
being worked on, the pressure gauge at point 2 provides
information on Seat 1 isolation and should be monitored on a
regular frequency. If the gauge pressure increases, the integrity
of the Double Block and Bleed isolation no longer exists. Inform
the AA and MIA immediately.
9 The double seated valve must be securely immobilised prior to
work commencing on the isolated Pressure System.
LC
Notes
The team must agree that the proposed alternative Isolation Scheme, with
its associated control measures, presents a low risk. The Site Manager
must review and approve all Isolation Risk Assessments.
If problems arise while the Isolation Scheme is being implemented, then
work must cease and the work site made safe and secure. The Mechanical
Isolating Authority must inform the Area Authority and Issuing Authority
immediately. Where necessary, a further Isolation Risk Assessment must
be carried out.
Where a number of activities are being carried out within an Isolation
Scheme, the Isolation Risk Assessment may apply to these other activities
providing they have been addressed as part of the risk assessment.
Where problems are repeatedly experienced in meeting the minimum
Isolation Standard for specific plant, the data gathered may highlight the
necessity for an engineering change.
The Issuing Authority should file the completed Isolation Risk Assessment in
the Isolation Library.
Where an Isolation Risk Assessment has been carried out, a copy must be
attached to the Mechanical Isolation Certificate as part of the Work Permit
application.