MARKING RUBRIC

CODE : MTES3043
COURSE NAME : FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS

Task 3: Report 1: Amortization of loan (20%)

Grade Score Evaluation Criteria

High Distinction 18.0 – 20.0  Contents and Coverage

(90 – 100%) - Very good ability in applying mathematics concepts
A+ to solve financial problems. (C3)
- Very good analysis of repayment methods to make
decisions. (C5)
 Quality of Discussions
- Very good ability to find ideas and alternative
solutions to justify decision making. (CTPS3)

Distinction 15.0 – 17.9  Contents and Coverage

(75 – 89%) - Good ability in applying mathematics concepts to
A dan A- solve financial problems. (C3)
- Good analysis of repayment methods to make
decisions. (C5)
 Quality of Discussions
- Good ability to find ideas and alternative solutions to
justify decision making. (CTPS3)

Credit 12.0 – 14.9  Contents and Coverage

(60 – 74%) - Average ability in applying mathematics concepts to
B+, B dan B- solve financial problems. (C3)
- Some what good analysis of repayment methods to
make decisions. (C5)
 Quality of Discussions
- Average ability to find ideas and alternative
solutions to justify decision making. (CTPS3)

Pass 10.0 – 11.9  Contents and Coverage

(50 – 59%) - Poor ability in applying mathematical concepts to
C+ dan C solve financial problems. (C3)
- Poor analysis of repayment methods to make
decisions. (C5)
 Quality of Discussions
- Poor ability to find ideas and alternative solutions to
justify decision making. (CTPS3)

Weak < 10.0  Contents and Coverage

(< 50%) - Very poor ability in applying mathematical concepts
C-, D+, D, E and to solve financial problems. (C3)
F - Very poor analysis of repayment methods to make
decisions. (C5)
 Quality of Discussions
- Very poor ability to find ideas and alternative
solutions to justify decision making. (CTPS3)
 MARKING RUBRIC

CODE : MTES3043
COURSE NAME : FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS

Task 4: Report 2: Investment Project (20%)

Grade Scale Evaluation Criteria

High Distinction 18.0 – 20.0  Coverage and Contents

(90 – 100%) - Very good ability to evaluate projects using NPV
A+ and IRR. (C5)
 Organisation of Report
- Very good organization of report. Very clear and
coherent. Ideas very well related. (A4)
 Quality of Discussion
- Very good critical thinking, problem solving skills
and decisions making based on reliable evidence in
presenting arguments based on data.(CTPS5)
- Very good ability to accept new ideas and very good
self-autonomy learning. (LL2)

Distinction 15.0 – 17.9  Coverage and Contents

(75 – 89%) - Good ability to evaluate projects using NPV and
A dan A- IRR. (C5)
 Organisation of Report
- Good organization of report. Clear and coherent.
Ideas well related. (A4)
 Quality of Discussion
- Good critical thinking and problem solving skills and
decisions making based on reliable evidence in
presenting arguments based on data. (CTPS5)
- Good ability to accept new ideas and good self-
autonomy learning. (LL2)

Credit 12.0 – 14.9  Coverage and Contents

(60 – 74%) - Average ability to evaluate projects using NPV and
B+, B dan B- IRR. (C5)
 Organisation of Report
- Organization of report is somewhat clear, coherent
and related. (A4)
 Quality of Discussion
- Average critical thinking, problem solving skills and
decisions making based on reliable evidence in
presenting arguments based on data. (CTPS5)
- Somewhat good abilities to accept new ideas and
self-autonomy learning. (LL2)

Pass 10.0 – 11.9  Coverage and Contents

(50 – 59%) - Poor ability to evalute projects using NPV and IRR.
C+ dan C (C5)
 Organization of Report
- Poor organization of report. Unclear and
incoherent. Ideas are unrelated. (A4)
 Quality of Discussion
- Poor critical thinking, problem solving skills and
decisions making based on reliable evidence in
presenting arguments based on data. (CTPS5)
- Poor ability to accept new ideas and self-autonomy
learning. (LL2)
 Weak < 10.0  Coverage and Contents
(< 50%) - Very poor ability to evaluate projects using NPV and
C-, D+, D, E and IRR. (C5)
F  Organisation of Report
- Very poor organization of report. Very unclear and
incoherent. Ideas are not related at all. (A4)
 Quality of Discussion
- Very poor critical thinking, problem solving skills and
decisions making based on reliable evidence
- Unable to present good arguments based on data.
(CTPS5)
- Very poor ability to accept new ideas and no self-
autonomy learning. (LL2)