You are on page 1of 80

4/13/2010

CE 103 Structural Analysis


y

Prep Course for PE (Civil Engineering Exam)
Prep Course for PE (Civil Engineering Exam

Assoc Professor Ang Kok Keng


Assoc Professor Ang
Department of Civil Engineering
National University of Singapore

Topics
• Classical Methods
• Analysis of Statically Determinate Structures
• Internal Forces in Structural Members
• Deflections
• Influence Lines
• Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures
• Force Methods
• Displacement Methods
• Matrix
Matrix--Stiffness Method

CE 103 Structural Analysis 2

1
4/13/2010

ANALYSIS  OF  STATICALLY 
DETERMINATE  STRUCTURES
CE 103 Structural Analysis 3

Free--Body Diagram
Free
First step of structural analysis is usually to draw a 
free‐‐body diagram
free
Simplified sketch of structure, isolated from its 
supports, showing all forces acting on it

Idealized model Free body diagram


CE 103 Structural Analysis 4

2
4/13/2010

Equations of Equilibrium

F  0 ; F  0 ; F  0
x y z
3-D
M  0 ; M  0 ; M  0
x y z

F x 0 ; F y 0 ; M O 0 2-D

Alternatively,

 Fx  0 ;  MO  0 ;  MO '  0
or  MO  0 ;  MO '  0 ;  MO"  0
in which points O, O’ and O’’ are not in a straight line.
CE 103 Structural Analysis 5

Stability And Determinacy

B C B C B C

A A A

Determinate  Indeterminate  Unstable 


Structure Structure Structure

CE 103 Structural Analysis 6

3
4/13/2010

General Stability And Determinacy of Beams

If r  c  3 , beam is statically unstable

If r  c  3 , beam is statically determinate*

If r  c  3 , beam is statically indeterminate

* provided there is no geometric instability (internal and external)

where r  number of reaction elements


c  number of equations of condition
 1 for hinge, 2 for roller, 0 no internal connection

CE 103 Structural Analysis 7

Example
<
r c r = c3
>
5 2 5  5 Stable & determinate

6 2 6  5 Stable & indeterminate

5 2 5  5 Unstable
Unstable**

5 3 5  6 Unstable

6 3 6  6 Stable & determinate
St bl & d t i t

7 2 7  5 Unstable
Unstable**

* Internal geometric instability 
* Internal geometric instability 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 8

4
4/13/2010

General Stability And Determinacy of Trusses

If m  r  2 j , truss is statically unstable

If m  r  2 j , truss is statically determinate*

If m  r  2 j , truss is statically indeterminate

* provided there is no external/internal geometric instability

where m  number of truss members


r  number of reaction components
j  number of joints

CE 103 Structural Analysis 9

Example
<
m r j mr = 2j
>

7 3 5 10  10 7 3 5 10  10 7 3 5 10  10
Stable & determinate Unstable*
Unstable* Unstable**
Unstable**

6 3 5 9  10 8 4 5 12  10 6 4 5 10  10
Unstable Stable & indeterminate Stable & determinate

* Internal geometric instability 
* Internal geometric instability  ** External geometric instability 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 10

5
4/13/2010

General Stability And Determinacy of Frames

If 3m  r  3 j  c, frame is statically unstable
If 3m  r  3 j  c, frame is statically stable*

If 3m  r  3 j  c, frame is statically indeterminate

* provided there is no geometric instability

where m  number of members


r  number of reaction elements
j  number of joints
c  number of equations of condition
 1 for hinge, 2 for roller, 0 no internal connection
CE 103 Structural Analysis 11

Example
<
m r j 3m  r = 3jc
>

10 9 9 0 39  27 10 9 9 4 39  31
Stable & indeterminate  Stable & indeterminate 
to 12th degree to 8th degree

10 9 9 1 39  28 10 9 9 3 * 39  30
Stable & indeterminate  Stable & indeterminate 
to 11th degree to 9th degree
CE 103 Structural Analysis 12

6
4/13/2010

INTERNAL FORCES IN 
STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
CE 103 Structural Analysis 13

Plane Trusses
A truss is a framework which is usually built-up from members
forming triangles. Trusses are common in roof construction,
transmission towers,
towers crane booms and bridges
bridges.

For analytical purposes, we assume that


 The joints are pinned or hinged, which implies that the
member forces are axial because there can be no moment
about the hinge
 Loads act only at joints

A truss is represented by a line drawing with the lines along


the centrelines of the members.

CE 103 Structural Analysis 14

7
4/13/2010

Sign Convention

Tension (+ve)

Compression (-ve)
( ve)

Pin is subjected to a
concurrent force system

Consider the above free-body diagram of a separate joint of


a plane
l ttruss (i
(i.e. a 2
2-D
D ttruss b
built
ilt tto resist
i t fforces in
i itits own
plane). The joint is in equilibrium when the forces acting on it
satisfy

 Fx  0 and  Fy  0
CE 103 Structural Analysis 15

Method of Joints

At each joint,  Fx  0,  Fy  0

Example – Determine the member forces in the plane


truss carrying the loads as shown in the figure.

15 kN 5 kN
4 First consider the
C E
3 free body diagram
1m of the entire truss
9 A and determine the
B D F
external reactions
1m 1m 1m by the equations of
20 31 equilibrium.
3 3
CE 103 Structural Analysis 16

8
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
F1

Assume tensile
At joint A forces initially
45
A
9 F2
20
3
20 F1
 Fy  0:   0  F1  9.43 kN
3 2
F
 Fx  0:  9  1  F2  0  F2  15.66 kN
2
Proceed to next joint (any joint) which has no more than 2
unknowns, e.g. joint B but not joint C. Why?
CE 103 Structural Analysis 17

Joints Under Special Loading Conditions


FAE
E FAB
B

A A
D
C
FAD
FAC

FAE  FAC and FAB  FAD

CE 103 Structural Analysis 18

9
4/13/2010

Joints Under Special Loading Conditions


FAE
EP P FAB
B

A A
D
C
FAD
FAC

FAC  P and FAB  FAD


then FAC  P  0
CE 103 Structural Analysis 19

Joints Under Special Loading Conditions


FAE
E FAB
B

A A

D
C
FAD
FAC

FAB  FAD
CE 103 Structural Analysis 20

10
4/13/2010

Joints Under Special Loading Conditions


FAE
E FAB
B

A A

D
C
FAD
FAC

FAE  FAC and FAB  FAD

FAD  FAE  0
CE 103 Structural Analysis 21

Method of Sections

In this method, the equilibrium of parts of the truss is


considered..
considered

The procedure involves cutting some carefully selected


members of truss in order to isolate a free body
comprising a section or portion of the truss onto which
cut member forces are applied
pp as external forces
forces..

Forces are calculated by applying equilibrium to the


selected section.
section.

CE 103 Structural Analysis 22

11
4/13/2010

Example

15 kN
4 5 kN
C E
3

1m
9 A B D F

1m 1m 1m
20 31
3 3

CE 103 Structural Analysis 23

Assume tensile
Example (Cont’d) 12 kN forces in cut
members
15 kN 5 kN C
9 kN F6
F5
1m
9 1m 1m
B F4 D A
20
3
Left hand portion of the truss is selected as a free body for the
purpose of determining three unknown forces F4, F5 and F6.
20 F
 Fy  0 :  12  5  0  F5   7.54 kN
3 2
20
 MD  0 : (2)  12(1)  9(1)  F6 (1)  0  F6   10.33 kN
3
20
 MC  0 : 9 (1)  (1)  F4 (1)  0  F4  15.66 kN
3
CE 103 Structural Analysis 24

12
4/13/2010

Method of Joint or Section?


In some types of determinate trusses, a difficulty arises with the
method of joints
joints..
For example, ?
I ?? ?
?
?
? ? ? ?
? ? ?
J
Fink Truss

At joints I and J, there are three unknown forces to be found.


found. We cannot
proceed with the method of joints without some modifications
modifications.. We may
overcome the difficulty by taking a section through three members and
determining the three corresponding member forces by the method of
sections.. Then, it is possible to continue with the method of joints.
sections joints.
CE 103 Structural Analysis 25

Example
Determine the force in member IK of the truss shown below.
2.7 m 2.4 m
A B 100
100 kN C

D E F
2.7 m 100  2.7  3
100 kN cot  
100 2.4
I 2.7 m
100 kN G H FGH FIH
a a 2.7 m FGJ FIK
J K
Take the section above a-a as a free body
7.5 m
 M G  0
 2  2.7  2.4 
100 ( 2.7  5.4)  FIK cos   7.5  0
 8 .1 
 810
FIK   143 .2 kN
8 .1
( 7 .5  1 .6 )
8.448
 143.2 kN (compression )
CE 103 Structural Analysis 26

13
4/13/2010

Example

Determine the forces in members AB and CD of


the plane
lane truss
tr ss loaded at joint B as shown
sho n below.
belo

A B P

a
C
a
D
a a a Roller
Support

CE 103 Structural Analysis 27

Example (Cont’d)
A B P
K By considering a free body diagram
of the entire truss, we can
H a determine the support reactions.
F G I C
By considering the free body
J
a diagram of EBC and noting that
P since at each of joints G, H, I, J, the
E
D intersecting members lie in two
a a a straight lines, we have
2P/3 2P/3 F1 = F2 and F3 = F4
FAB B P
K These forces cancel each other in
F4
tthe
e following
o o g equations:
equat o s
F1 H ΣMk = 0: - P (2a) – FCD (3a) = 0
I C
FEF J FCD = - 2P/3 (compression)
G FCD
P E F2 F3
ΣFx = 0: P - P - FAB = 0
a a a FAB = 0
CE 103 Structural Analysis 28
2P/3

14
4/13/2010

Beams and Frames


By
Bx
B
By Internal
Internal forces developed in 
forces developed in
q
Bx multiforce beam/frame members to 
B maintain equilibrium under applied 
C
q V loads include:
M
P  an axial force, F
C F
 a shear force, V
Ax F
A  a bending moment, M
M
Ay P
VC
A
Ax
Ay

CE 103 Structural Analysis 29

Sign Convention
 A cut through a beam reveals equal and opposite shear
forces and bending moments on opposing faces
P P
m m M M Vm
B A B

x n x n V n

 Upward force positive? Anticlockwise moment positive?


 Need a consistent sign convention to indicate sense of
internal beam resultants

CE 103 Structural Analysis 30

15
4/13/2010

Sign Convention (Cont’d)


 Sign conventions for stress resultants
called deformation sign conventions
 because based upon how material is deformed
 deformation sign convention also used for axial
members
 Elongation (tension) in a bar is +ve

 Shortening (compression) is –ve

 Static sign convention used when writing


equations of equilibrium
 forces are +ve or –ve according to their directions
along
l coordinate
d axes
P is given a positive sign in equation of
equilibrium because it acts upward; P y
M
V (positive shear force) is given a A m
negative sign because it acts downward x
n
V
CE 103 Structural Analysis 31

Method of Section
m q0
q

A B
x
L
n

q0 x 2 q0
2L q
m M
A
n
x V
L

CE 103 Structural Analysis 32

16
4/13/2010

Method of Section (Cont’d)


q0 x 2 q0
2L q
m M q0 x
q
A L
n
x V
L
Total downward load on free body is
1  q0 x  q0 x 2
   x  
2 L  2L
From an equation of equilibrium in the vertical direction we find
+   Fy  0 : q0 x 2 q x2
V   0 V   0
2L 2 L # (Ans)
CE 103 Structural Analysis 33

Method of Section (Cont’d)


q0 x 2 q0 x
q
2L L
m M
A
x
3
n
x V

Write an equation of moment equilibrium about cut section

1q x  x
 M mn  0: M   0   x    0
2 L   3
3
qx
 M  0
6 L # (Ans)
CE 103 Structural Analysis 34

17
4/13/2010

Relationships Between Load, Shear, BM


P

M V M  M1

q
y dx V  V1
P
M0
A B C
x
dx dx dx
RA
M0
q RB
M V M  M1
M V M  dM

dx V  dV dx V  V1

CE 103 Structural Analysis 35

Relationships Between Distributed Load, …

dV
 q
dx
q B B
M V M  dM  A
dV  VB  VA    qdx
A

dM
V
dx V  dV dx
B B
 A
dM  M B  M A   Vdx
A

CE 103 Structural Analysis 36

18
4/13/2010

Relationships Between Concentrated Loads, …


P

M V M  M1
V1   P

dx V  V1 M1  0

M0
M V M  M1 V1  0

M1  M 0
dx V  V1

CE 103 Structural Analysis 37

Shear and Moment Diagrams

1. Sketch the free


free--body (load) diagram
showingg loads, support
pp reactions and
dimensions for easy reference
2. Based on free-
free-body diagram,
determine support reactions using
equations of equilibrium
3. Construct vertical lines down from load
diagram through all points of conc.
loads/couples, supports and start and
end points of distributed loads

CE 103 Structural Analysis 38

19
4/13/2010

Shear and Moment Diagrams (Cont’d)


4. Start sketching shear diagram over
each segment (between vertical
construction lines) from left to right
 Determine shear at left end of segment
 For 1st segment, shear at left end = left beam vertical
support reaction
 Determine shear at right end of segment using
B
VB  VA    q  dx
A

 Follow direction of loading: VB > VA if distributed


loading is acting upward

CE 103 Structural Analysis 39

Shear and Moment Diagrams (Cont’d)


4. Start sketching shear diagram …..
 Sketch shape of shear diagram within segment using
dV
 q
dx
 Abrupt change in shear force occurs at point of
concentrated load not concentrated moment
 Follow direction of loading: shear immediately to the
right of conc
conc. load increases if load is acting up
5. Start sketching moment diagram over
each segment (between vertical
construction lines) from left to right
CE 103 Structural Analysis 40

20
4/13/2010

Shear and Moment Diagrams (Cont’d)


5. Start sketching moment diagram over
each segment (between vertical
construction lines) from left to right
 Determine BM at left end of segment
 For 1st segment, BM at left end = left beam moment
support reaction
 Determine BM at right end of segment using
B
M B  M A   Vdx
A

 MB > MA if area under shear diagram is positive

CE 103 Structural Analysis 41

Shear and Moment Diagrams (Cont’d)

5. Start sketching moment diagram ….


 Sketch shape of moment diagram within segment
using
dM
V
dx

 Abrupt change in bending moment occurs at point of


concentrated moment not concentrated load
 If conc. moment is
i positive
i i ((anticlockwise),
i l k i ) then
h BM
immediately to right of conc. moment will decrease
and vice-
vice-versa

CE 103 Structural Analysis 42

21
4/13/2010

Example: Beam
q = 1.0 kN/m
M0 = 12.0 kN.m
B
A
C
4m 8m 8m

q = 1.0 kN/m
M0 = 12.0 kN.m
B C
A
4m 8m 8m
RB RC

M B  0 : RC 16  M 0  q  4  2  0
 RC  1.25 kN
F y  0: RB  RC  q  4  0
 RB  5.25 kN
CE 103 Structural Analysis 43

Example (Cont’d)
q = 1.0 kN/m
M0 = 12.0 kN.m
B
A C
4m 8m 8m
5.25 kN 1.25 kN

+1.25
V (kN) 0
# (Ans)
-4.0
+2.0
2.0

M (kN.m) 0 0

-8.0
# (Ans)
-10.0

CE 103 Structural Analysis 44

22
4/13/2010

Example: Rigid Frame


BM and shear diagrams easiest drawn by breaking frame 
down into individual members and each analyzed by itself
20 kN/m

40 kN 40 kN
B C
2m
3m
60 kN
D
2m
A

14 m

B C

D
A 140 kN

108.6 kN 171.4 kN
CE 103 Structural Analysis 45

Example (Cont’d)
20 kN/m
108.6 440 440 171.4
40 40
40
40 40 B C 40
80 108.6 171.4
440 108.6
108.6 171.4
B C
5.34 m
108.6 171.4
440 171.4
80
80 B C C
B

60
D D
A 140 A
140
171.4
108.6

CE 103 Structural Analysis 46

23
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
20 kN/m
108.6 440 171.4
40 40
40
40 40 B 735 C 40
80 108.6 171.4
440 440
108.6 171.4
B C
5.34 m
108.6 171.4
440
440
80 B C C
B

60 280
D D
A 140 A
171.4
108.6

CE 103 Structural Analysis 47

DEFLECTIONS

CE 103 Structural Analysis 48

24
4/13/2010

Elastic Curve

B C
A D

(a)
y

P
v C M0
A x
D
x B
Elastic Curve
(b)

CE 103 Structural Analysis 49

Elastic--Beam Theory
Elastic

O’
d
d m2   d
y y + dy ds
y  m2 m1  y+ dy
m1 ds
A y
x x
B
x dx x dx

1 d
curvature  
 ds

dy dy
Slope of deflection curve  tan     tan 1
dx dx

CE 103 Structural Analysis 50

25
4/13/2010

Elastic--Beam Theory (Cont’d)


Elastic
Under service conditions, most beams undergo very small
deflections and angles of rotation  elastic curves have
extremely small curvatures:
dy
ds  dx and  tan   
dx
1 d  d d  dy  d 2 y
      
 ds dx dx  dx  dx 2

If material of beam is linearly


y elastic and follows Hooke’s
law, the curvature is M

EI
d2y M
Differential equation: 
dx 2 EI
CE 103 Structural Analysis 51

Singularity Functions
 x  a n when x  a Note: < > are called
 x  a n  
 0 when x  a Macaulay’s brackets
 x  a 0  x  a 1  x  a 2

x x x
a a a
(a ) n  0 (b ) n  1 (c ) n  2

1
  x  a  dx  n  1  x  a 
n 1
n
for n  0

d
 x  a  n  n  x  a  n1 for n  1
dx

CE 103 Structural Analysis 52

26
4/13/2010

Direct Integration Method


P  1.2 kN

q o  1 .5 k N /m M o  1.44 kN  m
C D
A E
0.6m 1.2m 0.8m 1.0m

Draw free-body diagram and compute support reactions:

P  1.2 kN

q o  1 .5 k N /m
M o  1.44
1 44 kN  m
C D
A
E
0.6m 1.2m 0.8m 1.0m

A y  2 .6 k N B

CE 103 Structural Analysis 53

Example (Cont’d)
y
P  1.2 kN M o  1.44 kN  m
0.6 m
q o  1 .5
5 k N /m
C X
A x
D E B
1.8 m
2.6 m
B
A y  2 .6 k N  q o   1 .5 k N /m

Rewrite distributed loading using singularity function:

q  x   qo  x  0.6 0  qo  x  1.8  0

CE 103 Structural Analysis 54

27
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
P  1.2 kN M o  1.44 kN  m
0.6 m
q o  1 .5 k N /m
M
C X
A E
x
D
1.8 m
V
2.6 m
A y  2 .6 k N
x
 q o   1 .5 k N /m
   Fy  0 :
Ay  P  x  0.6 0  qo  x  0.6 1  qo  x 1.8 1  V  0
V  2.6 1.2  x  0.6 0 1.5  x  0.6 1  1.5  x 1.8 1
 M X  0:
qo q
 Ay x  P  x  0.6 1   x  0.6 2  o  x 1.8 2  Mo  x  2.6 0  M  0
2 2
 M  2.6 x 1.2  x  0.6 1 0.75  x  0.6 2 0.75  x 1.8 2 1.44  x  2.6 0
CE 103 Structural Analysis 55

Example (Cont’d)
Differential equation:

EIy"  M  2.6 x  1.2  x  0.6 1 0.75  x  0.6  2


 0.75  x  1.8  2 1.44  x  2.6  0
Slope:

EIy '  1.3 x 2  0.6  x  0.6  2 0.25  x  0.6  3


 0.25  x  1.8  3 1.44  x  2.6 1  C1

Deflection:

EIy  0.4333 x 3  0.2  x  0.6  3 0.0625  x  0.6  4


 0.0625  x  1.8  4 0.72  x  2.6  2  C1 x  C 2

CE 103 Structural Analysis 56

28
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
Apply boundary conditions:
y 0   0  C 2  0
y  x  3 .6   0 
0.4333  3.6   0.2  3.0 3 0.0625  3.0  4
3

 0.0625  1.8  4 0.72  1.0  2 C1  3.6   C2  0


 C1  2.692#

Slope: EIy '  1.3 x 2  0.6  x  0.6  2 0.25  x  0.6  3


 0.25  x  1.8  3 1.44  x  2.6 1 2.692 #(ANS)
Deflection:
EIy  0.4333 x 3  0.2  x  0.6  3 0.0625  x  0.6  4
 0.0625  x  1.8  4 0.72  x  2.6  2 2.692 x #(ANS)
CE 103 Structural Analysis 57

Moment--Area Method
Moment

 Alternative method for finding deflections and


angles
g of rotation of beams
 Method is based upon 2 theorems related to area
of bending-moment diagram, hence its name
 Same assumptions apply, that is
 linearly elasticity
 small slopes
 Method is suited, from practical standpoint, to
finding deflections and rotations at specific points
on beam

CE 103 Structural Analysis 58

29
4/13/2010

Moment--Area Theorem 1
Moment
Mdx
d 
EI
B B Mdx
Md
 A
d  
A EI
Mdx
B
 B / A   B   A  
EI
A

 B/ A  Area of M / EI diagram between A & B

The change in slope B/A between 2


points on deflection curve = area of
M/EI diagram between these points

CE 103 Structural Analysis 59

Sign Convention

 Angles A and B are +ve counterclockwise


 Angle B/A is +ve when B is algebraically
larger than A
 Point B must be to the right of point A
 Bending moment M is +ve according to
usual sign
g convention
 Area of M/EI diagram sign is according to
the sign of BM

CE 103 Structural Analysis 60

30
4/13/2010

Moment--Area Theorem 2
Moment

Mdx
dt  x1d  x1
EI
B B B Mdx
 A
dt   x1d   x1
A A EI
Mdx
B
 t B / A   x1
EI
A

 First moment of area of M / EI diagram


between A & B, evaluated w.r.t. B

The tangential deviation tB/A of point B


from tangent at A = moment of area of
M/EI diagram between A & B about B

CE 103 Structural Analysis 61

Construction of Moment Diagrams by Parts


b
q
a P

L
RL RR
RL L

-P (L - a)

-½ q (L - b)2

CE 103 Structural Analysis 62

31
4/13/2010

Properties of Typical Shapes


x rectangle
y A  bh
h
x y  kx n x
b
b 2
h x
bh
b triangle A
2
h
b
b x
bh 3
A
n 1 x
parabolic bh
x
b A
n2 h 3
b
b x
4
CE 103 Structural Analysis 63

Example

1.5PL
1  PL  L PL2
A1      2P
2  EI  2 4 EI 2P
P
1  PL  L PL2
A2      
2  3EI  2 12 EI
0.5PL
1.5PL
1  PL  L PL2
A3      A2
2  2 EI  2 8 EI A3
A1
PL

PL PL 
EI  2 EI
3EI
CE 103 Structural Analysis 64

32
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)

A
A  0 tC / A
C
C
(a) Slope at C: 1.5PL
Apply 1st moment‐area theorem:
2P
11PL2 A2
 C   C / A  A1  A2  A3   A3
24 EI
#Ans A1
PL

PL PL 
(b) Deflection at C: EI  2 EI
3EI
Apply 2nd moment‐area theorem:

5  2  1  11PL3
vC  tC / A  A1  L   A2  L   A3  L   
6  3  3  36 EI
#Ans
CE 103 Structural Analysis 65

Example
P

A EI EI B 2EI C

1  22PL
PL  PL2
A1      2P
2P tB / A P tC / A
L
2  3EI  3EI 3 3
L L L
1  2 PL  PL2
A2     L   2P
2  3EI  3EI 3

1  PL  PL2
A3     L 
P
2 PL 
2  3EI  6 EI 3
PL 3
3
1  PL  PL2
A4     L  
2  6 EI  12 EI 2 PL PL
3EI 3EI PL
A2 6 EI
A1 A3
A4
CE 103 Structural Analysis 66

33
4/13/2010

P
Example (Cont’d)
A EI EI B 2EI C

2P tB / A P tC / A
3 3
L L L
2 PL PL
3EI 3EI PL
A2 6 EI
A1 A3
A4

Apply 2nd moment‐area theorem:
 L  2L   L  2L 
tC / A  A1  2 L    A2  L    A3  L    A4  
 3  3   3  3 
29 PL3
 tC / A 
18 EI
CE 103 Structural Analysis 67

P
Example (Cont’d)
A EI EI B 2 EI C

2P tB / A P tC / A
3 3
L L L
2 PL PL
3EI 3EI PL
A2 6 EI
A1 A3
A4
Apply 2nd moment‐area theorem:
Apply 2 moment area theorem:
 L  2L  L
t B / A  A1  L    A2    A3  
 3  3  3
3
13PL
 tB / A 
18EI
CE 103 Structural Analysis 68

34
4/13/2010

P
Example (Cont’d)
A EI EI B 2 EI C

2P tB / A P tC / A
3 3
L L L
2 PL PL
3EI 3EI PL
A2 6 EI
A1 A3
A4

By Similar Triangles:
2
vB  t B / A  tC / A
3
13PL 2 29 PL3
3
19 PL3
 vB    #(ANS)
18 EI 3 18 EI 54 EI
CE 103 Structural Analysis 69

Energy Methods
• Earlier methods for calculating deflections
were based on differential equation of member
• Suitable for finding displacements
displacements, slopes in beams
subjected to rather simple loads

• For more complicated loadings or for trusses


and frames, preferable to use energy methods
• All energy methods are based on principle of
conservation of energy
Ue  Ui
work done by all external forces acting on a structure,
Ue, is transformed into internal work or strain energy, Ui
CE 103 Structural Analysis 70

35
4/13/2010

External Work

Work is defined as product of force and displacement, in the


direction of force, through which the force acts
x
U e   P dx
0

Work of a moment is defined by the product of the magnitude


of the moment and the angle through which it rotates

U e   M d
0

CE 103 Structural Analysis 71

Strain Energy – Axial Force


When an axial force is applied gradually to a bar, it will strain
the material such that external work done will be converted
into strain energy which is stored in the bar

Fdx Pdx
d  
x
F EA EA
L
1 1  Pdx 
F d  P 
dx
dx
dU i  
 d 2 2  EA 
P
1  Pdx  P 2 L
L
 Ui   P  
P

0
2  EA  2 EA

CE 103 Structural Analysis 72

36
4/13/2010

Strain Energy – Bending


When a member is subjected to lateral loading, the member
experiences internal moment and rotation resulting in strain
energy stored in the member

P d M Mdx
   d 
dx EI EI
x dx
1 1  Mdx 
dU i  M d  M 
L

2 2  EI 
M dx M L
M2
d
 Ui   dx
0
2 EI

CE 103 Structural Analysis 73

Principle of Work and Energy


P P
M V


L x
x
1
U e   P dx  P
0
2

Ui  
M
L
dx  
2
 Px 
L
dx 
P 2 L3
2

0
2 EI 0
2 EI 6 EI
1 P 2 L3
U e  U i  P 
2 6 EI
3
PL
 
3 EI
CE 103 Structural Analysis 74

37
4/13/2010

Principle of Virtual Work


• Method of work & energy limited in application
• Since it is applicable only to computing deflection at a point
of concentrated force
• If more than one force is applied simultaneously, then more
than one unknown deformation will appear in one energy
equation – solution becomes impossible
• One way to circumvent above limitations is to
use method of virtual work, also called unit-
unit-
load
l d method
th d
• Method is also based on conservation of energy, Ue = Ui
• Provides a general method of obtaining displacement, slope
at any point on a structure, be it a beam, truss or frame

CE 103 Structural Analysis 75

Method of Virtual Work


P1
2 P2
1

C C
L dL D L dL1 D
S S  u u 
A A
B B
1
Case (a) Case (b)

External work done by applied loads must equal internal strain


energy of all elements in the structure:

1 1 1
P11  P2  2   S  dL
2 2 2
1
1   1  u  dL1
2 2
CE 103 Structural Analysis 76

38
4/13/2010

Method of Virtual Work (Cont’d)


P1
2 P2
1

C C
L dL D L dL1 D
S S  u u 
A A
B B
1
Case (a) Case (b)

Now imagine case (b) exists first and then actual loads P1 and P2
are applied gradually
gradually. Equating total work done to total strain
energy, we have

1
1   1 P11  1 P2  2  1    1  u  dL1  1  S  dL   u  dL
2 2 2 2 2

CE 103 Structural Analysis 77

Method of Virtual Work (Cont’d)


1 1 1
P11  P2  2   S  dL (1a)
1
1   1  u  dL1 (1b)
2 2 2 2 2
1
1   1 P11  1 P2  2  1    1  u  dL1  1  S  dL   u  dL (2)
2 2 2 2 2

Subtracting (1a) and (1b) from (2), we get the basic equation of the
unit-load method:
real displacements

1     u  dL
virtual loadings
virtual loadings

In a similar manner, we can obtain the equation to obtain slope:


real displacements
External virtual unit
couple applied in 1     u  dL
direction of 
virtual loadings
CE 103 Structural Analysis 78

39
4/13/2010

Method of Virtual Work: Trusses


External Loads
uFL
1   
EA
u  internal virtual member force caused by external virtual unit load
F  internal member force caused by real loads

Temperature
1     u  T L
u  internal virtual member force caused by external virtual unit load
  coefficien t of thermal expansion of member
T  change in tempera ture of member

CE 103 Structural Analysis 79

Example
C E  200 GPa
4 kN
A  400 mm 2
3m
A B Find vertical
displacement at C
4m 4m

Virtual Forces u: Real Forces F:

1 kN

C C
4 kN
 0.833 kN  0.833 kN
 2.5 kN  2.5 kN
A B A B
4 kN
 0.667 kN  2 kN

0.5 kN 0.5 kN 1.5 kN 1.5 kN

CE 103 Structural Analysis 80

40
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
Virtual-Work Equation:

Member u (kN) F (kN) L (m) uFL (kN2m)


AB 0.667 2.0 8 10.67
AC -0.833 2.5 5 -10.41
BC -0.833 -2.5 5 -10.41
 10.67

uFL
1   
EA
1 10 .67
 C 
EA
 uFL 
EA
 0.133 mm # (ANS)

CE 103 Structural Analysis 81

Method of Virtual Work: Beams/Frames


External Loads
L
mM
1    dx
0
EI
m  internal virtual moment in beam/frame caused by
external virtual unit load
M  internal moment in beam/frame caused by real loads
L
m M
1   dx
0
EI
m  internal virtual moment in beam/frame caused by
external virtual unit couple
M  internal moment in beam/frame caused by real loads
CE 103 Structural Analysis 82

41
4/13/2010

Example
E  200 GPa
12 kN/m
I  500  10 6 mm 4

A B
Find vertical
10 m displacement at B

Virtual Moment m: Real Moment M:


1 kN
12 kN/m

x x
1 kN
12 kN/m
m  1x M  6x 2

v V
CE 103 Structural Analysis 83

Example (Cont’d)
Virtual Moment m: Real Moment M:
1 kN
12 kN/m

x x
1 kN
12 kN/m
m  1x M  6x 2

v V

Virtual-Work Equation:

1   
L
mM
10
 1x  6 x 2  dx
0
EI
dx  
0
EI
   150 mm #(ANS)
CE 103 Structural Analysis 84

42
4/13/2010

Example
C
3m
E  200 GPa

60 o 5 kN I  15  10 6 mm 4
B

2m x2 Find slope at C
A

Real Moment M:
Virtual Moment m: 5 kN
1 kN  m 5 kN

1 kN  m
1 kN  m 7.5 kN  m
m1
M1 M 1  2.5 x1
m1  1 x1
x1
5 kN 5 kN
1 kN  m 1 kN  m 7.5 kN  m
7.5 kN  m
m2   1 M 2  7 .5
x2 m2 x2 M2
CE 103 Structural Analysis 85

Example (Cont’d)

Virtual Moment m: Real Moment M:

m1  1 m2   1 M 1  2.5 x1 M 2   7.5

Virtual-Work Equation:

L 3 2
m M mM mM
1   C    dx   1 1 dx1   2 2 dx 2
0
EI 0
EI 0
EI


3
 1 2.5 x1  dx 2
 1 7.5 dx
1  2
0
EI 0
EI
 C  0.00875 rad #(ANS)

CE 103 Structural Analysis 86

43
4/13/2010

INFLUENCE LINES

CE 103 Structural Analysis 87

Concept of Influence Line


• In many structures a number of different live
loading conditions are possible

• Important to determine that load position or


combination which will be critical

• An influence function denotes the effect at one


specific point as a function of the position of the
cause of unit value

• An influence line denotes the plot of the


influence function
CE 103 Structural Analysis 88

44
4/13/2010

Influence Lines for Beams


1

A C B
6m
10 m
1 .0 0 .4
IL for RA RA  1 
x
L
0 .6 1 .0
x
IL for RB RB 
L
1
M C VC
M C  4 RB 
 0 x6
VC   RB 

RA RB
MC 1
M C  6 RA 
 6  x  10
VC  R A 
VC
RA RB
CE 103 Structural Analysis 89

Influence Lines for Beams (Cont’d)

1 .0 0 .4
IL for RA x
RA  1 
L

1 .0
0 .6
IL for RB RB 
x
L

2. 4
4 R , 0  x  6
IL for MC MC   B
6 R A , 6  x  10

0 .4
IL for VC  R , 0  x  6
VC   B
 R A , 6  x  10
0 .6

CE 103 Structural Analysis 90

45
4/13/2010

Influence Lines for Trusses

B 1 C D E F

3m

A H J K L M G

6 @ 4 m  24 m

CE 103 Structural Analysis 91

Influence Lines for Trusses (Cont’d)


B C D E F
1
3m
A G
H J K L M

6 @ 4 m  24 m

B C D E F
1
A G
H J K L M
RA RG

1 .0 0.833 0.667
IL for RA RA  1 
x
L
1 .0

0.167 0.333 x
IL for RG RG 
L
CE 103 Structural Analysis 92

46
4/13/2010

Influence Lines for Trusses (Cont’d)


B FBC C D E F
1 FBC
FBJ
A FBJ G
H J K L M
RA RG
MJ  0: FBC 3  RG 16   0  FBC  5.33 RG
RHS

F
3
y  0: FBJ  RG  0  FBJ  1.67 RG
RHS 5

B FBC C D E F
FBC 1
FBJ
A FBJ G
H J K L M
RA RG
MJ  0:  FBC 3  R A 8   0  FBC  2.67 R A
LHS

F
3
y  0:  FBJ  R A  0  FBJ  1.67 R A
LHS 5

CE 103 Structural Analysis 93

Influence Lines for Trusses (Cont’d)


B FBC C D E F
FBC 1
FBJ
A FBJ G
H J K L M
x
RA x RG
4

M J  0: FBC 3  RG 16   0  FBC  5.33 RG


RHS

F
3 x
y  0: FBJ  RG   0  FBJ  1.67 RG  0.42 x
RHS 5 4

  5.33 RG , 0  x  8
FBC  
 2.67 R A , 8  x  24
 1.78 IL for FBC
1.11
  1.67 RG , 0 x4

FBJ   1.67 RG  0.42 x, 4  x  8
 0.278 IL for FBJ  8  x  24
 1.67 R A ,
CE 103 Structural Analysis 94

47
4/13/2010

Uses of Influence Lines: Concentrated Loads


1

A C B
6m
10 m

2 .4
1 .6 1 .2
4 R , 0  x  6
IL for MC MC   B
6 R A , 6  x  10

10 kN 6 kN 8 kN

A B
C
4m 2m 2m 2m

M C  10 1.6   62.4   81.2   40 kN #

CE 103 Structural Analysis 95

Uses of Influence Lines: UDL


a
x dx
b
q kN/m
A B

4m 12 m 4m

1.33
1 .0 y
 0.33
IL for RA
b b
R A   qy dx  q  y dx
a a

Value of RA due to a UDL = intensity of load, q, multiplied by the


area of the influence line corresponding to length of beam over
which load is acting

CE 103 Structural Analysis 96

48
4/13/2010

Example
A D B C

8m 4m 6m

Find the maximum value of MD due to a UDL of intensity 5 kN


kN/m,
/m,
which can act over any part of the beam, and two concentrated
loads of 10 kN each, with a fixed distance of 4 m between them.

1 .0 0.33
IL for RA
 0 .5
1 .0 1 .5
0.67
IL for RB

2.67
1.33
IL for MD

 1.33
CE 103 Structural Analysis  4 .0 97

Example (Cont’d)
2.67
1.33

IL for MD
 1.33
 4 .0
Since loads acting in a region where influence line is + +ve
ve have an effect that is
opposite from that produced by loads acting where the influence line is –ve ve,,
we must place all loads either to left or to right of B:

10 kN 10 kN
4m 4m
5 kN/m
A B C
D

8m 4m 6m 10 kN 10 kN
4m
5 kN/m
A B
C
D

8m 4m 6m
CE 103 Structural Analysis 98

49
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
2.67
1.33

IL for MD
 1.33
 4 .0
10 kN 10 kN
4m 4m
5 kN/m M D max  101.33  102.67  
A B C
1 
D 5  12  2.67   120 kNm
8m 4m 6m
2 

10 kN 10 kN
4m
5 kN/m M D max  104   101.33 
A B
C 1 
D 5  4  6   113 .3 kNm
2 
8m 4m 6m

CE 103 Structural Analysis 99

Muller--Breslau’s Principle
Muller

To obtain an IL for reaction of any statically determinate beam,


remove the support and make a unit displacement of its point
of application – deflected beam is the IL for reaction

A C B
a b
L

B'
s B  1
A B

IL for RB

CE 103 Structural Analysis 100

50
4/13/2010

Muller--Breslau’s Principle (Cont’d)


Muller
To obtain an IL for the shear at a section of any statically
determinate beam, cut the section and induce a unit relative
transverse sliding displacement between the portion to left
and right of the section keeping all other constraints intact –
deflected beam is the IL for the shear

A C B
a b
L

sC  1 b
C'
L
A B
C a
L
C"

IL for VC
CE 103 Structural Analysis 101

Muller--Breslau’s Principle (Cont’d)


Muller
To obtain an IL for the moment at a section of any statically
determinate beam, cut the section and induce a unit rotation
between the portion to left and right of the section keeping all
other constraints intact – deflected beam is the IL for the
moment
1

A C B
a b
L

a C  a  C  1 C'
b C  b
A B
C

IL for MC

CE 103 Structural Analysis 102

51
4/13/2010

Example
1
D C E
A B

a a a a

A'
s A  1 C
A B IL for RA

D'
s D  1 1
2 C
A
D 1
B IL for VD
2
D"

D'
 D  1
a
2 C
A B IL for MD
D

CE 103 Structural Analysis 103

Example (Cont’d)
1
D C E
A B

a a a a

C E
A B IL for VE
s E  1
C' E'

 E  1
C E
A B IL for ME
a

C'

CE 103 Structural Analysis 104

52
4/13/2010

ANALYSIS  OF  STATICALLY 
INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
CE 103 Structural Analysis 105

Statically Indeterminate Structures

 Statically determinate – all the unknown reactions


at the supports can be obtained by considering
equilibrium
 Statically indeterminate – the number of
equilibrium equations are insufficient to evaluate
the unknown reactions
 Degree of indeterminacy/redundancy – the
difference between the number of unknown
reactions and number of equilibrium equations

CE 103 Structural Analysis 106

53
4/13/2010

FORCE METHODS
FORCE METHODS

CE 103 Structural Analysis 107

Method of Consistent Deformation


P P

A A
L L
B
= L L
B
 BP
MA
2 2 2 2

RA RB
Determinate structure
Actual structure
subject to actual loads

+
 B   BP   BR  0
A  BR
3 3 B
5 PL R L
  B 0 L L
RB
48 EI 3 EI 2 2

5
 RB  P Determinate structure
16
subject to redundant
CE 103 Structural Analysis 108

54
4/13/2010

Method of Least Work


Castigliano’s second theorem, sometimes called method
of least work, is a useful alternative force method, where
forces called redundants are treated as unknowns

Main difference between methods of least work and


consistent deformation is that the former requires strain
energy of system to be determined to formulate
equations instead of deflections in the latter

Method of least work is preferable when it is easier to set


up expressions for strain energy than to calculate
displacements

CE 103 Structural Analysis 109

Castigliano’s Theorems
F1 F2

A 1 2 B
1 2

1   11 F1   12 F2  2   21 F1   22 F2

where  ij  deflection at i due to a unit load at j

W 
1
F11  F2  2 
2
U  W 
1
2

 11 F12   12 F1 F2   21 F1 F2   22 F22 
Maxwell’s reciprocal theorem:  12   21

U 
1
2

 11 F12  2 12 F1 F2   22 F22 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 110

55
4/13/2010

Castigliano’s Theorems (Cont’d)


F1 F2

A 1 2 B
1 2

1   11 F1   12 F2  2   21 F1   22 F2

U 
1
2

 11 F12  2 12 F1 F2   22 F22 
U 1 

F1 2 F1
11 F12  212 F1 F2   22 F22   11 F1  12 F2
U
  1
F1
Castigliano’s first theorem: The partial derivative of strain energy
with respect to one of the external forces acting on the structure is
equal to the displacement at that force in the direction of the force

CE 103 Structural Analysis 111

Castigliano’s Theorems (Cont’d)


F1 F2

RA RB RC

U
 A  0
R A

Castigliano’s second theorem: Upon applying castigliano’s first


theorem to find deflection at support A, which is zero, we conclude
that redundants must assume values that will make the strain
energy in the structure a minimum

Redundants in indeterminate structures can be determined by


applying Castigliano’s second theorem – also called method of
least work

CE 103 Structural Analysis 112

56
4/13/2010

Example
P

A
B
C
L L
MA
2 2

RA RB

U
L
M2
0 U  dx
R B 0
2 EI

U  L M2  L M M RB 
   dx  dx  0
R B R B  2 EI 
0  0 EI

Element x0 M M R B
BC B RB x x
CA B RB x  P  x  L 2  x

CE 103 Structural Analysis 113

Example (Cont’d)
P

A
B
C
MA L L
2 2

RA RB

Element x0 M M R B
BC B RB x x
CA B RB x  P  x  L 2  x

U M M RB 
L

RB 0
 dx  0
EI

M M RB  1  PLx 


L L 2 L
 dx   RB x 2 dx   RB x 2  Px 2  dx  0
0
EI EI  0 L 2
2 

5
 RB  P # (ANS)
16
CE 103 Structural Analysis 114

57
4/13/2010

Example
40 kN

HD
B C D
MD
5m 5m 5m
VD
A
R2

R1

U M M Ri 
 dx  0 i  1,2
Ri EI

Element x0 M M R1  M  R2


AB A  R2 x 0 x
BC B R1 x  5 R2 x 5
CD B R1 x  5 R2  40 x  200 x 5

CE 103 Structural Analysis 115

Example (Cont’d)
Element x0 M M R1  M R 2
AB A  R2 x 0 x
BC B R1 x  5R2 x 5
CD B R1 x  5 R2  40 x  200 x 5

U M M Ri 
 dx  0 i  1,2
Ri EI

 R x   
5 10

1
2
 5 R2 x dx   R1 x 2  5 R2 x  40 x 2  200 x dx  0 (1)
0 5
5 5 10

 R2 x dx    5 R1 x  25 R2 dx    5 R1 x  25 R2  200 x  1000 dx  0 (2)


2

0 0 5

333 R1  250 R2  4167  0 


  R1  17 kN, R2  6 kN
 250 R1  292 R2  2500  0 
# (ANS)

CE 103 Structural Analysis 116

58
4/13/2010

DISPLACEMENT METHODS
DISPLACEMENT METHODS

CE 103 Structural Analysis 117

Slope--Deflection Method
Slope
Method uses displacements as unknowns and is referred to as
a displacement method

When a rigid frame or continuous beam is loaded, moments are


developed at the ends of individual members

The relationship that exists between these moments and


deformations at the ends of the members is the basis of the
slope--deflection method
slope

In methods of consistent deformation and least work,


compatibility equations are written in terms of unknown
redundants;; in slope-
redundants slope-deflection method, equilibrium equations
are written in terms of unknown joint displacements

CE 103 Structural Analysis 118

59
4/13/2010

Slope--Deflection Equation
Slope
M AB

A  P

A 

B
B M BA
L

2 EI  3 
M AB   2 A   B    M AB
F

L  L 
2 EI  3 
  2 B   A    M BA
F
M BA
L  L 
1. Moments acting on the ends of members are positive when clockwise
2. Rotations of the ends of members are also positive when clockwise
3. Relative displacement of the ends of a member  is positive when the
axis rotation  is clockwise
CE 103 Structural Analysis 119

Fixed--End Moments
Fixed

P qL2 qL2
PL PL F
M AB  q
F
M BA 
F
M AB  F
M BA  12 12
8 8
A B A B
L L
2 2 L

qL2 qL2
F

Pab 2 P Pba 2 F
 q
F
M BA 
M AB F
M BA  M AB 20
L2 L2 30

A B A B
a b
L L

CE 103 Structural Analysis 120

60
4/13/2010

Example
40 kN
B
B
A EI C
EI
8m 8m 8m

Determine the reactions and draw the moment diagram

Joint rotations and translations are the unknowns. There are no


joint translations here. Only joint B can rotate. So, there is only one
unknown here.

Fixed--End Moments:
Fixed
PL 40 PL
F
M AB   80 F
M BA   80 F
M BC 0 F
M CB 0
8 8

A B B C
8m 8m 8m

CE 103 Structural Analysis 121

Example (Cont’d)
16 m 8m
M AB M BC
B
A EI B B EI C
M BA M CB

Slope--Deflection Equations:
Slope

M AB 
2 EI
 B   80  0.125 EI B  80
16
M BA 
2 EI
2 B   80  0.25 EI B  80
16
M BC 
2 EI
2 B   0.5 EI B
8
M CB 
2 EI
 B   0.25 EI B
8
Equations of Equilibrium:

M B  0: M BA  M BC  0  0.25 EI B  80   0.5 EI B   0


 EI B  106 .7
CE 103 Structural Analysis 122

61
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
Member End Moments:
EI  B  106 .7
M AB  0.125 EI  B  80  93 .3 kN - m
M BA  0.25 EI  B  80  53 .3 kN - m
M BC  0.5 EI  B  53 .3 kN - m
M CB  0.25 EI B  26 .7 kN - m

Calculate Shear Forces and Reactions:


40
22 .5 17 .5 17 .5 10 10 10
A B B
B C
8m 26 .7
93 .3 53 .3 53 .3
8m 8m

RB  27.5

CE 103 Structural Analysis 123

Example (Cont’d)
40
22 .5 17 .5 17 .5 10 10 10
A B B
B C
8m 26 .7
93 .3 53 .3 53 .3
8m 8m

RB  27.5

Reactions and Moment Diagrams:


40
26 .7
Support Reactions
93 .3

22 .5 10
27 .5
86 .7
26 .7

Moment Diagram
 53 .3
 93 .3
CE 103 Structural Analysis 124

62
4/13/2010

Example
50 kN
6m 4m
B C
2 EI

EI EI 8m

A D

Determine displacements and member end moments

Unknowns:  B , C , 

 
B
B C C

A D

CE 103 Structural Analysis 125

Example (Cont’d)
50 kN
Fixed--End Moments:
Fixed 6m 4m

 
B C
50 6  4 2 2 EI
F
M BC   48
10 2 EI EI 8m

M F

 
50 6 2 4 
 72 A D
CB
10 2

Slope--Deflection Equations:
Slope
2 EI  3 
M AB   B    0.25 EI  B  0.0938 EI 
8  8 
2 EI  3 
M BA   2 B    0.5 EI  B  0.0938 EI 
8  8 
M BC  0.8 EI  B  0.4 EI  C  48
M CB  0.4 EI B  0.8 EI  C  72
M CD  0.5 EI  C  0.0938 EI
M DC  0.25 EI  C  0.0938 EI 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 126

63
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
M AB  0.25 EI B  0.0938 EI 
M BA  0.5 EI  B  0.0938 EI 
M BC  0.8 EI  B  0.4 EI  C  48 M BA M CD

M CB  0.4 EI B  0.8 EI  C  72 B C

M CD  0.5 EI  C  0.0938 EI


M DC  0.25 EI  C  0.0938 EI  A HA D HD
M AB M DC
VA VD
Equations of Equilibrium:

M B  0: M BA  M BC  0  1.3 EI  B  0.4 EI C  0.0938 EI   48  0 (1)

M C  0: M CB  M CD  0  0.4 EI B  1.3 EI C  0.0938 EI   72  0 (2)


 M  M BA   M DC  M CD 
F x  0: H A  H D  0   AB  0
 8   8 
 0.75 EI  B  0.75 EI  C  0.375 EI   0 (3)

CE 103 Structural Analysis 127

Example (Cont’d)
Solve for Unknown Displacements:
1.3 EI  B  0.4 EI  C  0.0938 EI   48  0 (1)
0.4 EI  B  1.3 EI  C  0.0938 EI  72  0 (2)
( )
0.75 EI  B  0.75 EI  C  0.375 EI   0 (3)

 EI  B  57 .7, EI C  75 .8, EI   36 .2

Member End Moments:


M AB  0.25 EI B  0.0938 EI  17 .8 kN - m
M BA  0.5 EI  B  0.0938 EI   32 .2 kN - m
M BC  0.8 EI  B  0.4 EI  C  48  32 .2 kN - m
M CB  0.4 EI  B  0.8 EI  C  72  34 .5 kN - m
M CD  0.5 EI  C  0.0938 EI   34 .5 kN - m
M DC  0.25 EI C  0.0938 EI  15 .6 kN - m

CE 103 Structural Analysis 128

64
4/13/2010

Moment--Distribution Method
Moment
Just like slope-
slope-deflection method, moment
moment--distribution method is also
a displacement method

Unlike slope
slope--deflection method, does not need to solve simultaneous
equations

Instead, answers are obtained by a procedure of successive


approximations, an iterative technique

Moment-distribution method is based on the knowledge that member


Moment-
end--moments consist of several distinct parts:
end
1. Fixed‐
Fixed‐end moments –
end moments – moments caused by applied loads with member ends 
assumed to be fixed
2. Moments due to rotations that actually take place at ends of member
3. Moments caused by translation of one end of member relative to the other

CE 103 Structural Analysis 129

Distribution Factor
Sign Convention
Follows same sign convention as those adopted in slope-
slope-deflection
method, viz., clockwise end-
end-moments are positive

Distribution Factor
Distribution factor for any one member is a measure of the proportion
of the total resistance to rotation supplied by that member
M DA  M 
A M
A A M AB D B
D M AD
M AD
M AC

From slope-
slope-deflection equation,
2 EI  3  4 EI AD C
M AD   2 A   D    M AD 
F

L  L  L AD
4 EI AC 4 EI AB
M AC  M AB 
L AC L AB
CE 103 Structural Analysis 130

65
4/13/2010

Distribution Factor (Cont’d)


M AB  4 Ek AB M AC  4 Ek AC M AD  4 Ek AD
I I I
k AB  AB k AC  AC k AD  AD
L AB L AC L AD
where the quantity I / L of a member is called the stiffness factor, k M
A M AB
M A  0: M  M AB  M AC  M AD  4 E  k A M AD
M AC
where  k A denotes the sum of the stiffnesses of members framing into joint A
k AB
M AB  4 Ek AB  M
 kA
k
M AC  4 Ek AC  AC M
 kA
k
M AD  4 Ek AD  AD M
 kA
k
where is referred to as the distributi on factor
k
CE 103 Structural Analysis 131

Carry--Over Factor/Moment
Carry
M DA 
A
D
M AD

From slope-
slope-deflection equation,

2 EI  3  2 EI AD 1
M DA   2 D   A    M DA   M AD
F

L  L  L AD 2

The moment induced at the far (fixed) end of a prismatic member


equals one-
one-half the distributed moment at the near end

The carry-
carry-over factor, defined as the ratio of induced moment at
far end (fixed) to the moment applied at the near end, which is
prevented from translation but allowed to rotate, is thus equal to ½

The induced moment is called carry-


carry-over moment

CE 103 Structural Analysis 132

66
4/13/2010

Example
30 kN
4 kN/m
B C
A D
EI 2 EI EI
8m 4m 8m 10 m

I 2I I
k k k
8 12 10
Distribution Factors
3 4 5 3
7 7 8 8
Fixed-End Moments 0 0  53.3  26 .7  33 .3  33.3
Balancing of Joint B  22 .9  30 .4
Carry-Over Moments  11 .4  15 .2
Balancing of Joint C  5 .4  3 . 2
Carry-Over Moments  2 .7  1 .6
Balancing of Joint B  1 .2  1 .5
Carry-Over Moments  0 .6  0 .8
Balancing of Joint C  0 .5  0 . 3
Carry-Over Moments  0.2  0 .1
Balancing of Joint B  0 .1  0 .1
Final End Moments  12 .0  24 .2  24 .2  36.8  36 .8  31.6
CE 103 Structural Analysis 133

Example (Cont’d)
30 kN
4 kN/m
B C
A D
EI 2 EI EI
8m 4m 8m 10 m

30 kN
4 .5 19 11 20.5 4 kN/m 19.5
12
A B B C C D
4 .5 24 .2 24 .2 36 .8 36 .8 31 .6

51 .6

12 15 .8

 24 .2  31 .6
 36 .8
Moment Diagram
CE 103 Structural Analysis 134

67
4/13/2010

Simply Supported Ends

Effective Stiffness
 I
 if member
b isi fixed
fi d at its f endd
i far
 L
k' 
 I
0.75 L if member is hinged at its far end

Carry--Over Factor (COF)


Carry
0.5 if member is fixed at its far end

COF  
0 . 0
 if member is hinged at its far end

CE 103 Structural Analysis 135

Structures With Joint Translations


P2

B
C
P1
=
A D

P2

Q
B C B
Q
C
P1
+
A D A D

CE 103 Structural Analysis 136

68
4/13/2010

MATRIX‐‐STIFFNESS METHOD
MATRIX

CE 103 Structural Analysis 137

Element--Stiffness Matrix
Element
Axially Loaded Element

q1 ,  1 1 EA 2 q2 ,  2
L

q  k  
where
 q1   1 
q        
q2   2 

 1
k   EA 
1
L  1 1 

CE 103 Structural Analysis 138

69
4/13/2010

Element--Stiffness Matrix
Element
Flexural Element
q1
q2
q3
2
q4
1 4
1 EI 2 3
L

q  k  
 12 6 12 6
 L3   
 q1  L2 L3 L2   1 
 6 4 6 2 
q   2   
where q   2  k   EI  12
L L L2 L      2 
  3 
6 12 6 
 q3 
q4   L3 L2 L3 L2   4 
 6 2 6 4 
 
 L2 L L2 L 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 139

Direct--Stiffness Method
Direct
In the direct-
direct-stiffness method, the transformation from element to
structure coordinates is carried out using deformation compatibility
relations between element and structure deformations

 e  T e e
where T e is the deformation-
deformation-transformation matrix that relates the
element deformations of element e,  e to the structure deformations
at the extremities of that element, e

The element and structure end forces are also related in the same
manner
qe  T e Qe
where qe contains the element forces for element e and Qe contains
the structure forces at the extremities of that element

CE 103 Structural Analysis 140

70
4/13/2010

Direct--Stiffness Method (Cont’d)


Direct
 e  T e e qe  T e Qe

qe   k e  e  T e Qe   k e T e e


 Qe  T e  k e T e e
1

Since T e represents an orthogonal transform ation, T e  T e


1 T

 Qe  T e  k e T e e   K e e


T

K e  T Te k e T e
where K e represents the element stiffness matrix in global coordinates

CE 103 Structural Analysis 141

Analysis of Trusses
l
2
k
y j

Member
M b
x   direction
i

1

1. Member is assigned a direction, and r and s, the member


deformations at tail and front end of member are assumed to be
in this direction
2. The x and y structure deformations, at the tail and front end of
member,, are g given the designations
g i, j, k, l, respectively
p y
3. The angles between the vectors representing the member
deformations and those representing the x and y structure
deformations are designated as  and 
  cos  ,   cos 
where  and  are called the direction cosines of the member
CE 103 Structural Analysis 142

71
4/13/2010

Analysis of Trusses (Cont’d)


l j
2
k 1 i
y j 
 l
Member
EA  1  1 
x   direction
k e 
Member
L   1 1  direction k
i

1
2
 e  T e e
 i 
    
 1  0 0   j    0 0 
        T e   
 2   0 0      k  0 0   
  l 
i j k l
 2   2    i
 
EA   2    2
K e  T Te k e T e
j

L   2    2
  k
 
    2   2  l
CE 103 Structural Analysis 143

Example
4

3
53.10

1.6 m EA 1 2

1
6
0.9 m EA 2
2 kN 36.90
5
1.22 m

Member L     i j k l
1 2.0 m -53.1o -143.1o 0.6 -0.8 3 4 1 2
2 1.5 m -143.1o 126.9o -0.8 -0.6 1 2 5 6

CE 103 Structural Analysis 144

72
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)4
Member L     i j k l
1 2.0 m -53.1o -143.1o 0.6 -0.8 3 4 1 2
2 1.5 m -143.1o 126.9o -0.8 -0.6 1 2 5 6

Element 1 Stiffness Matrix in Global Coordinates

 2   2   
 
EA   2    2
K e 
L   2   2  
 
    2   2 
3 4 1 2
 0.09  0.12  0.09 0.12  3
  0.12 0.16 0.12  0.16 
K 1  EA 
4

0.5   0.09 0.12 0.09  0.12  1


 
 0.12  0.16  0.12 0.16  2
CE 103 Structural Analysis 145

Example (Cont’d)4
Member L     i j k l
1 2.0 m -53.1o -143.1o 0.6 -0.8 3 4 1 2
2 1.5 m -143.1o 126.9o -0.8 -0.6 1 2 5 6

Element 2 Stiffness Matrix in Global Coordinates

 2   2   
 
EA   2    2
K e 
L   2   2  
 
    2   2 
1 2 5 6
 0.21 0.16  0.21  0.16  1
 0.16 0.12  0.16  0.12 
K 2 EA  2

0.5   0.21  0.16 0.21 0.16  5
 
  0.16  0.12 0.16 0.12  6

CE 103 Structural Analysis 146

73
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)4
Element Stiffness Matrices in Global Coordinates

3 4 1 2 1 2 5 6
 0.09  0.12  0.09 0.12 3  0.21 0.16  0.21  0.16 1
 0.12 0.16 0.12  0.16 4  0.16 0.12  0.16  0.12 2
K 1  EA   K 2  EA  
0.5  0.09 0.12 0.09  0.12 1 0.5   0.21  0.16 0.21 0.16 5
   
 0.12  0.16  0.12 0.16 2  0.16  0.12 0.16 0.12 6

Assembling Structure-
Structure-Stiffness Matrix
3 4 1 2 5 6
 0.09  0.12  0.09 0.12  3
 0.12 0.16 0.12  0.16  4
 
 0.09 0.12 0.09  0.21  0.12  0.16  0.21  0.16
K   K 1  K 2  EA 
1

0.5  0.12  0.16  0.12  0.16 0.16  0.12  0.16  0.12 2
  0.21  0.16 0.21 0.16 5
 
  0.16  0.12 0.16 0.12 6

CE 103 Structural Analysis 147

Example (Cont’d)4
Reordering Structure-
Structure-Stiffness Matrix & Applying Boundary Conditions

1 2 3 4 5 6

Q1   0.30 04 00.09


0 30 00.04 12 00.21
09 00.12 21 00.16
16  1 
Q   0.04 0.28 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.12  
  2   2
Q3  EA 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.12 0 0  0 
    
Q4  0.5  0.12 0.16 0.12 0.16 0 0  0 
Q5   0.21 0.16 0 0 0.21 0.16  0 
    
 6 
Q  0.16 0.12 0 0 0.16 0.12  0 

Solve for Primary


y Unknown Structure Deformations

Q1  EA 0.30 0.04  1 


    
Q2  0.5 0.04 0.28 2 
1
 1  0.5 0.30 0.04 Q1  0.5 1  0.28 0.04  0 1  0.485
  0.04 0.28 Q   EA  0.0824 0.04 0.30  2  EA 3.641

 2 EA    2     
CE 103 Structural Analysis 148

74
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)4
1 2 3 4 5 6

Q1   0.30 0.04 0.09 0.12 0.21 0.16  1 


Q   0.04 0.28 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.12  
 2   2
Q3  EA 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.12 0 0  0  1  1  0.485
        
Q4  0.5  0.12 0.16 0.12 0.16 0 0  0  2  EA  3.641
Q5   0.21 0.16 0 0 0.21 0.16  0 
    
 6 
Q  0.16 0.12 0 0 0.16 0.12  0 

Solve for Support Reactions

Q3  0.09 0.12 0.96


Q   0.12 0.16   
 4  EA 
    1    1.28
Q5  0.5  0.21 0.16 2   0.96
 
Q6  0.16 0.12  0.72

CE 103 Structural Analysis 149

Example (Cont’d)4
Solve for Member Forces
 1  
T e  
0 0
k e  EA 
1
L  1 1  0 0   
 i 
 q1  EA           j 
 qe   k e  e   k e T e e       
 q2  L           k 
  l 
Since q1 is always numerically equal to q2 , it is only necessary
to solve for one of these forces. Since q2 was assumed to be a
force, a  ve answer means that the bar is in tension
tension force
 i 
 
EA  
q2       j 
L  k 
  l 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 150

75
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)4
Member L     i j k l
1 2.0 m -53.1o -143.1o 0.6 -0.8 3 4 1 2
2 1.5 m -143.1o 126.9o -0.8 -0.6 1 2 5 6

 i 
 
EA   1  1  0.485
q2        j     
L  k  2  EA  3.641
  l 
0
0
 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8     1.60
EA
q12  .60 kN
N
2  1
  2 
 1 
 
0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6   02   1.20 kN
EA
q22 
1.5  
 0 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 151

Analysis of Flexural Structures


Structures With Joints That Can Rotate But Not Translate
1 , q1  2 , q2
i
EI
j
L

Element Stiffness Matrix in Local Coordinates

 q1  2 EI  2 1   1 
   
 q2  L  1 2   2 

1  1 0    i  1 0 
 
      T e   0 1 
 2  0 1  j  
Element Stiffness Matrix in Global Coordinates
i j
2 1 
K e  T Te k e T e 2 EI i
 1 2 
L   j
CE 103 Structural Analysis 152

76
4/13/2010

Example
20 kN - m 3 2
A B C
EI EI
4
EI 5m

D 1

5m 10 m
Global Coordinates

1 1

1 2 2 2
Member L i j 2

1 5m 3 2
3
2 10 m 2 4
1
3 5m 1 2
Local Coordinates

CE 103 Structural Analysis 153

Example (Cont’d)
Element Stiffness Matrix in Global Coordinates Member L i j

j
1 5m 3 2
i
EI  2 1 2 10 m 2 4
K e  22EI
i
 L 1 2  j 3 5m 1 2

3 2 2 4 1 2

K 1  EI 
0 .8 0 .4   0 .4 0 . 2  2  0 .8 0 .4 
K 2 K 3
3 1
  EI    EI  
 0 . 4 0 .8  2  0 .2 0 . 4  4  0 . 4 0 .8  2

Assembling Structure-
Structure-Stiffness Matrix

 Q1   0.8 0.4 0   1 
0
Q   0.4 2.0 0.4 0.2    2 
 2
   EI   
 Q3   0 0.4 0.8 0    3 
Q4   
 0 0.2 0 0.4    4 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 154

77
4/13/2010

Example (Cont’d)
Solve for Primary Unknown Structure Deformations
1
1  1 0.8 0.4  0  1  5.56
       
2  EI 0.4 2.0 20 EI  11.11

Solve for Member Forces

T e  
1 0
k e  2 EI 
2 1
L 1 2  
0 1 

 q  2 EI 2 1   i 
 qe   k e  e   k e T e e   1   1 2   
 q2  L   j

q   4.44 4.44 2.22 0 6.67


T T
1
1 q12 q12 q22 q13 q23 8.89

CE 103 Structural Analysis 155

Equivalent Joint Loads


20 kN 20 kN

A B
C
EI EI
5m 5m 2.5 m 2.5 m

1 , Q1  2 , Q2
Global Coordinates  3 , Q3

 ,q
1
2 2
1 12 , q12
Local Coordinates
1  21 , q12 2  22 , q22

20 kN 20 kN

q11F  25 q12F  25 q12 F  12.5


1 2 q22 F  12.5

Fixed--End Member Forces


Fixed

CE 103 Structural Analysis 156

78
4/13/2010

Equivalent Joint Loads (Cont’d)


20 kN 20 kN

A B
C
EI EI
5m 5m 2.5 m 2.5 m

=
20 kN 20 kN
q12F  25

q11F  25 q12 F  12.5 q22 F  12.5

+
QE 1  25 QE 2  12.5

CE 103 Structural Analysis 157

Analysis of Flexural Structures


Structures With Joints That Can Translate
 3 , q3  6 , q6
 1 , q1  4 , q4
EI
 2 , q2 L  5 , q5

Element Stiffness Matrix in Local Coordinates


 EA EA 
 0 0  0 0
L L
 6 EI 
 2   1 
 q1   12 EI 6 EI 12 EI
0  0 
q   L3 L2 L3 L   
 2  6 EI 4 EI 6 EI 2 EI   2 
 2
 q3   L   3 
0 0
L L L2
   
0   4 
EA EA
q 4    0 0 0
 q5   L L   
   12 EI 6 EI 12 EI 6 EI   5 
 q6   0  3 0  
L L2 L3 L2   6 
 6 EI 2 EI 6 EI 4 EI 
 0  2 0 
 L L L2 L 
CE 103 Structural Analysis 158

79
4/13/2010

Analysis of Flexural Structures (Cont’d)


m
Transformation Matrix
4 n
l
j 6
k 
3 Member 5
y   direction
i
1
x 2

 1     0 0 0 0  i 
      0 0 0 0    j 
 2 
 3   0 0 1 0 0 0    k 
      cos  ,   cos 
 4   0 0 0   0  l 
 5   0 0 0   0  m 
    
 6   0 0 0 0 0 1   n 

where  and  are called the direction cosines of the member


CE 103 Structural Analysis 159

Analysis of Flexural Structures (Cont’d)


Element Stiffness Matrix in Global Coordinates
i j k l m n
 C1  i
 C C3 symmetric  j
 2 
 C  C5 C6  k
K e  T Te k e T e  4 
  C1  C2  C4 C1  l
 C2  C3 C5 C 2 C3  m
 
 C 4  C5 C7  C 4 C 5 C 6  n
where
EA 2 12 EI 2  EA 12 EI  EA 2 12 EI 2
C1    3  , C2    3  , C 3    3 
L L  L L  L L
6 EI 6 EI 4 EI 2 EI
C4   , C5  2  , C 6  , C7 
L2 L L L
CE 103 Structural Analysis 160

80

You might also like