Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cognitive Psychological Communication Relationships Self-Help Heuristic
Cognitive Psychological Communication Relationships Self-Help Heuristic
A Johari window is a cognitive psychological tool created by Joseph Luft and Harry
Ingham in 1955 in the United States, used to help people better understand their
interpersonal communication and relationships. It is used primarily in self-help groups
and corporate settings as a heuristic exercise.
When performing the exercise, the subject is given a list of 55 adjectives and picks
five or six that they feel describe their own personality. Peers of the subject are then
given the same list, and each pick five or six adjectives that describe the subject.
These adjectives are then mapped onto a grid.
Contents
[hide]
1 Quadrants
2 Nohari variant
3 Motivational equivalent
4 Appropriation of name
5 External links
6 References
[edit] Quadrants
Adjectives are selected by both the participant and his or her peers and are placed into
the Arena quadrant. This quadrant represents traits of the participant of which both
they and their peers are aware.
Adjectives selected only by the participant, but not by any of their peers, are placed
into the Façade quadrant, representing information about the participant of which
their peers are unaware. It is then up to the participant whether or not to disclose this
information.
Adjectives that are not selected by the participant but only by their peers are placed
into the Blind Spot quadrant. These represent information of which the participant is
not aware, but others are, and they can decide whether and how to inform the
individual about these "blind spots".
Adjectives which were not selected by either the participant or their peers remain in
the Unknown quadrant, representing the participant's behaviors or motives which
were not recognized by anyone participating. This may be because they do not apply,
or because there is collective ignorance of the existence of said trait.
pati
ent
po
abl wer
depe
e ful
ndab
acc pro
le
ept ud sensi
digni
ing intellig qui ble
fied
ada ent et senti
ener
pta introve refl ment
getic
ble rted ecti al
extro
bol kind ve shy
verte
d knowl rela silly
d
bra edgeab xed spont
frien
ve le reli aneo
dly
cal logical gio us
givin
m loving us symp
g
car mature resp athet
happ
ing modes onsi ic
y
che t ve tense
helpf
erf nervou sear trust
ul
ul s chi wort
ideal
cle observ ng hy
istic
ver ant self war
inde
co - m
pend
mp organi asse wise
ent
lex zed rtiv
e witty
inge
con
niou
fid self
s
ent -
con
scio
us
infl
intoler
exi cow
ant timi
ble ardl
viole aloof d
glu y
nt irresp
m sim
insec onsibl unh
vul ple
ure e elpf
gar with
hostil selfish ul
un dra
e unima bras
hap wn
needy ginati h
py cyni
ignor ve chil
ina cal
ant irratio dish
ne boa
blasé nal imp
dist stful
emba imper atie
ant wea
rrasse ceptiv nt
cha k
d e pani
oti unet
insen loud cky
c hica
sitive self- smu
vac l
dispa satisfi g
uo rash
ssion ed pred
us call
ate over icta
pas ous
drama ble
siv
inatte tic
e hum
ntive fool
orle
unreli ish
dul ss
able
l
[edit] References
The original written publication appears to be: Luft, J. and Ingham, H. (1955)
"The Johari window, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness",
Proceedings of the western training laboratory in group development. Los
Angeles: UCLA
Einfuhrung in die Gruppendynamik, Joseph Luft, Klett 1972
The Johari Window and the Dark Side of Organisations, Steward Hase, Alan
Davies, Bob Dick, Southern Cross University 1999[[pt:Janela de Joha