Hans 36 CDR

AERO 402 BizX A - The Strutting Aggies

Ahad Ali, John Broucek, Cassie Chan, Harry Ma, Brendan McGee, Paul
Poungsangchaun, Natalie Roehrs, Marissa Strandmo, Junlong Zheng
Team Members

Ahad Ali John Broucek Cassie Chan Harry Ma Brendan McGee Paul Poungsangchaun
NBT NBT/DBF DBF DBF NBT NBT

The work performed this semester and the

results presented herein are ours and ours
alone.

Natalie Roehrs Marissa Strandmo Junlong Zheng

DBF DBF DBF

Cassie Chan 2
Program Management (5-C)
Ahad Ali Paul Poungsangchaun
● CFD and WT Lead ● WT Design & Assembly
John Broucek Lead, FEDC POC
● Sizing, Build, Avionics, Natalie Roehrs
Assembly Lead & GH1 ● Wing & Strut Product Owner,
Cassie Chan Nose Cone Designer & TSO
● Detail Organizer & GH2 Marissa Strandmo
Harry Ma ● BOM and Checklist Product
● Empennage Product Owner Owner & CLO
Brendan McGee Junlong Zheng
● CFD and WT Lead ● Fuselage, Engine Mount, &
Nose Cone Product Owner
Cassie Chan 3
Timesheet Summary
Name Sub-team Total Hours
Ahad Ali NBT 116

Brendan McGee NBT 100

Cassie Chan DBF 123

Harry Ma DBF 170

John Broucek NBT/DBF 200

Paul Poungsangchaun NBT 130

Marissa Strandmo DBF 221

Natalie Roehrs DBF 197

Junlong Zheng DBF 150

Team Total 1407

Cassie Chan 4
Schedule Summary (5-C)
Deliverables Deadlines
Initial Design Review 01/31/22
Phase 1
Design Freeze 02/07/22
3D Model 02/25/22
Build Jigs 03/09/22
Avionics (Iron Bird) 02/18/22
Build/Skin Empennage 03/29/22
Phase 2
Build/Skin Wing 03/30/22
Build/Skin Fuselage 04/01/22
Build/Skin Control Surfaces 04/05/22
Final Integration 04/11/22
Monokote 04/19/22
Ground Testing 04/20/22
Phase 3 Detailing 04/29/22
Fly 04/30/22

Cassie Chan 5
GANTT Chart (5-C)

Cassie Chan 6
Design Process (2-E)

Cassie Chan 6
Preliminary Design
Project Targets (2-D)

Brendan McGee 9
Stakeholders (2-A)
Stakeholder Nature of Stakeholder Interest

VIPs and the wealthy Customer

Brendan McGee 10
Stakeholders (2-A)
Stakeholder Nature of Stakeholder Interest

VIPs and the wealthy Customer

Charter/Leasing Companies Customer

Brendan McGee 11
Stakeholders (2-A)
Stakeholder Nature of Stakeholder Interest

VIPs and the wealthy Customer

Charter/Leasing Companies Customer

Corporations Customer

Brendan McGee 12
Stakeholders (2-A)
Stakeholder Nature of Stakeholder Interest

VIPs and the wealthy Customer

Charter/Leasing Companies Customer

Corporations Customer

Pilots End User

FAA Other Interested Party

Maintenance Crew Other Interested Party

Airport Personnel Other Interested Party

Brendan McGee 13
Concept of Operations (CONOPS)

● Medium range private jet

○ Continental flights
○ Able to cross swiss alps or rocky mountains
● Low cost of maintenance
○ Co-rotating engines
● Luxurious amenities
● Multiple customer bases

Ahad Ali 14
System Requirements (2-B)
The system shall observe FAR 23 Level 3.
● Sets limit at 9 passengers while enforcing other regulations
The system shall observe FAR 23.2540.
● Enforces known icing condition certification for flight
The system shall have continental flight capability in line with competing aircraft.
● Creates requirements for range of 1,500 nm, cruising speed 325 kts, service ceiling
31,000 ft per stakeholder requirement
The system shall have IFR and RVSM compliant avionics and equipment.
● Ensures operation of aircraft electronics in off-nominal operations
The system shall take off and land in distances of 3,500 ft and 3,000 ft respectively.
● Enables operation of the aircraft from most airports in the continental United States
The system shall observe FAR 91.167
● Establishes 100 nm range to fly to alternate airport
Ahad Ali 15
Derived Requirements (2-B)
The system shall have a pressurized cabin.
● Ensures the safety of the passengers and crew as pressurization
is necessary above 10,000 ft
The system shall have multiple redundancies for the fly-by-wire flight
control system (FCS).
● Prevents disruptions of operations despite any failure
The system shall display real-time flight data
● Allows critical flight information to be displayed to aid in operations
The system shall use a turbojet engine
● Ensures that the system requirements of 1500 nm range and
cruising speed of 325 kts are met

Ahad Ali 16
Standards & Regulations (2-C)
Followed:
● FAR 23 Level 3
● FAR 23.2120, 23.2540, 91.167
● FAR 25 for takeoff/landing
● NASA Systems Engineering NASA NPR 7213.5
● Category 5 of Roskam (Business Jets)
Effect on Design Process:
● Initial aircraft sizing
● Iterative design process

Paul Poungsangchaun 17
Trade Study (2-D)

Phenom 100EV Cirrus Vision Jet

Honda Hondajet Citation M2 Hawker 200

Paul Poungsangchaun 18
Trade Study (2-D)

Range: 1178- 1550 nm

Cruising speed: 294 - 465 kts
Phenom 100EV Cirrus Vision Jet

Seating capacity: 5 - 7 seats

Honda Hondajet Citation M2 Hawker 200

Paul Poungsangchaun 19
Trade Study Evaluation (2-D)
Decision Criteria Hawker 200 Phenom 100EV HONDA HondaJet

Requirements Weight Info Score Info Score Info Score

Max Cabin Capacity 0.10 6 8 7 10 5 6

Top speed (kts) 0.10 473 10 406 10 421 10

Cruising speed (kts) 0.10 449 10 400 10 338 10

Range (nm) 0.10 1370 7 1,178 5 1437 8

Service Ceiling (ft) 0.10 45000 10 41000 10 43000 10

Max takeoff weight (lbs) 0.10 13800 4 10852 10 10701 10

Average Cost New ($) 0.20 $7.6 million 5 $4.5 million 8 $5.28 million 7

Cost of Operation ($) 0.20 $3,684.88 per 3 $2,400 per 5 $1,806.75 per 7
hour hour hour

Overall Score (%) 1 65 81 82

Paul Poungsangchaun 19
Trade Study Evaluation (2-D)
Decision Criteria Cirrus Vision Jet Cessna M2 Gen2

Requirements Weight Info Score Info Score

Max Cabin Capacity 0.10 7 10 7 10

Top speed (kts) 0.10 311 6 404 10

Cruising speed (kts) 0.10 305 5 400 10

Range (nm) 0.10 1,275 6 1,550 10

Service Ceiling (ft) 0.10 31000 10 41000 10

Max takeoff weight (lbs) 0.10 6000 10 10700 10

Average Cost New ($) 0.20 $2.1 million 10 $3.3 million 9

Cost of Operation ($) 0.20 $782 per 10 $1,427.75 9

hour per hour

Overall Score (%) 1 87 96

Paul Poungsangchaun 20
Trade Study Evaluation (2-D)
Decision Criteria Cirrus Vision Jet Cessna M2 Gen2

Requirements Weight Info Score Info Score

Max Cabin Capacity 0.10 7 10 7 10

Top speed (kts) 0.10 311 6 404 10

Cruising speed (kts) 0.10 305 5 400 10 Budget Competitor

Range (nm) 0.10 1,275 6 1,550 10 Cessna M2 Gen2
Service Ceiling (ft) 0.10 31000 10 41000 10 $3.3 Million
Max takeoff weight (lbs) 0.10 6000 10 10700 10

Average Cost New ($) 0.20 $2.1 million 10 $3.3 million 9

Cost of Operation ($) 0.20 $782 per 10 $1,427.75 9

hour per hour

Overall Score (%) 1 87 96

Paul Poungsangchaun 21
402 Accomplishments
Design Summary

John Broucek 23
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 24
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 25
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 26
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 27
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 28
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 29
Strut Orientations

[1-5]
John Broucek 30
Design Summary

Airbus A320 M2 Gen 2 [6,7] Boeing 777ER [5]

Vertical Tail Nose, Fuselage, Wing, Strut
Empennage, Horizontal
Stabilizer, Rudder
John Broucek 31
Design Summary
RC Requirements
● 25 flight lifecycles
● Structural components made only of
hardwood
● Removable and replaceable wing
● Center of Gravity
○ measured at the root rib of the
wing
● Sizing and Flight
○ < 6 ft in width and length
○ < 25 lbs in weight
○ < 0.04 lbs/in2 wing loading
● Control
○ separate channel per control
surface
● Avionics
○ 2S LiPo battery
○ removable and replaceable
○ < 14 channel receiver
○ ESC airflow required
○ servo with 90° pushrods
● Propulsion
○ removable and replaceable
○ < 90mm fan per EDF
○ arming plug per motor
○ 6S or 8S LiPo battery
● Ground angle of attack cannot be
negative
Marissa Strandmo 32
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary

Budget Cost* $1690.16

Percent of Budget 85%

Waste Cost $82.84

*Without ESCs, EDFs, BEC, batteries, avionic battery, receiver, transmitter,

transmitter battery, arming plugs, servo wires, on-off switch, and landing gear.
These were reused from past semesters.

Marissa Strandmo 33
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Breakdown by Category

Aircraft Use Expected Cost ($) Actual Cost ($)

Electronics 1157.81 33.98
Avionics 1240.15 334.94
Airframe 122 90.04
Wood 734.93 898.29
Miscellaneous 59.14 266.83
Waste 0 82.84

Marissa Strandmo 33
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Analysis of Effectiveness
● Strengths
○ Wood estimation
○ Limited error
○ Within budget
○ Waste < 5% of budget
● Weaknesses
○ Spar material miscommunication
○ Switching out fasteners
○ Poor estimation of miscellaneous supplies
■ (ex. CA glue, epoxy)

Marissa Strandmo 34
Verification & Validation
Overview
● Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Summary
● Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Results
● Wind Tunnel Summary
● Wind Tunnel Results
● Build Construction
● Wiring Diagram
● Weight and Performance
● Stakeholder Interaction
● Requirement Validation
● Flight Test Results

Ahad Ali 35
CFD Summary

Ahad Ali 36
CFD Results

Ahad Ali 37
Wind Tunnel Summary

Paul Poungsangchaun 38
Wind Tunnel Summary

Paul Poungsangchaun 39
Wind Tunnel Summary

Paul Poungsangchaun 40
Wind Tunnel Summary

Paul Poungsangchaun 41
Wind Tunnel Results

Ahad Ali 42
Wind Tunnel Results

Ahad Ali 43
Fuselage

Junlong Zheng 44
Fuselage

Junlong Zheng 45
Wing

Natalie Roehrs 46
Wing

Natalie Roehrs 47
Horizontal Stabilizer

Harry Ma 48
Vertical and Horizontal Stabilizers

Harry Ma 49
Plane Mid-Build

John Broucek 50
Initial Strut Build

John Broucek 51
Strut Build

John Broucek 52
Final Strut Build

John Broucek 53
Hatches

John Broucek 54
Final Product

John Broucek 55
Wiring Diagram

John Broucek 56
Weight and Performance
Weight 23.6 lbs

Center of Gravity Location (Aft of wing LE) 5 in

Take-off Speed at 𝛼 =4° 39.676 mph

Take-off Distance 134.771 ft

Wing Airfoil (t/c=0.3) RAE2822

Root Chord 12 in

Tip Chord ~3 in

Wing Area 588.842 in2

Wing Loading 0.040079 lbs/in²

[8,9]
John Broucek 57
Stakeholder Interaction (2-A/2-F)
Stakeholder needs were addressed throughout the process
at events where the stakeholder was present and provided
feedback.
● Briefing:
○ Initial Design Review 1 & 2
○ Design Freeze
○ Design Update
● System Level Tests:
○ Engine Test
○ Ironbird
○ Ground Testing
○ Flight Test

Natalie Roehrs 58
Requirement Verification (2-F)
Requirement Method to Verify Result
Wing Loading < 0.04 lbs/in2 Computation Not Met, 0.040079 lbs/in²

Weight Limitation Scale weight of aircraft Met, weight less than 25 lbs

Center of Gravity Two-point bending Not Met, flight CG fell outside

acceptable margin but provided
favorable flight characteristics

Sizing Measurement of aircraft dimensions Met, span and length dimensions

Removable Wing Assembly capable during pre-flight Met, wing was fully removable

25 flight lifecycle Successful flights Not Met, failure during second flight

Natalie Roehrs 59
RC Build, Fly Summary
Flight Test Result: Successful
○ Pre-Flight Issues
■ Left elevator hinges failed load test
■ Failed range check
○ Attempt #1
■ Became uncontrollable on runway
■ Taxied back
○ Attempt #2
■ Take-off attempt with uncontrollable counter-clockwise roll
■ Damaged landing gear, nose landing gear, and nose cone
○ Attempt #3
■ Shifted CG forward, trimmed out ailerons, reinstalled nose gear,
adjusted AoA, replaced main gear wheels
■ Successful flight
■ Mechanical error resulting in loss of vehicle

Marissa Strandmo 60
Technical Summary &
Conclusions
Technical Summary
Build
● Insecurity of jigs
● Non-linearity of spar/longeron holes & c-channels
● Incoherence of empennage and fuselage (designed in two parts)
● Wing sweep complicating wing box construction
● Mounting main landing gear
● Strut integration (geometry, weight, FEDC lead time)
● Building up & mounting control surfaces
● Full view of and access to wingbox area
● Filling gap for oversized wingbox area
● Wiring connectivity (wires removed when wingbox removed)
● Hatches for battery & receiver placement
● Monokote

Natalie Roehrs 62
Conclusions
Lessons Learned
● Team management
● Program management
● Application of theoretical topics
● Designing & building complex structures
○ Iterative design process
● System integration
● Asking questions

Harry Ma 65
References
References
[1] Bhatia, M., Kapania, R., van Hoek, M., & Haftka, R. (2009). Structural Design of a Truss Braced Wing: Potential and
Challenges. 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.
doi:10.2514/6.2009-2147
[2] Gur, O., Bhatia, M., Mason, W. H., Schetz, J. A., Kapania, R. K., & Nam, T. (2011). Development of a framework for truss-braced
wing conceptual MDO. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44(2), 277–298. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0612-9
[3] Gur, O., Schetz, J. A., & Mason, W. H. (2011). Aerodynamic Considerations in the Design of Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft. Journal
of Aircraft, 48(3), 919–939. doi:10.2514/1.c031171
[4] Ivaldi, D., Secco, N. R., Chen, S., Hwang, J. T., & Martins, J. (2015). Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Truss-Braced-Wing
Aircraft. 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. doi:10.2514/6.2015-3436
[5] Seber, G., Ran, H., Nam, T., Schetz, J., & Mavris, D. (2011). Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Truss Braced Wing
Aircraft with Upgraded Aerodynamic Analyses. 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. doi:10.2514/6.2011-3179
[6] Cessna sizing parameters- Textron Aviation Inc.. (2021). Citation M2 Gen2. Citation M2 GEN2. Retrieved May 1, 2022, from
https://cessna.txtav.com/citation/m2?trk=NavCitation
[7] Cessna sizing parameters= Textron Aviation Inc.. (2022). Citation M2 Gen 2. Citation M2 GEN2. Retrieved May 1, 2022, from
https://cessna.txtav.com/en/citation/m2-gen2#_model-specs
[8] Jaberi, S. A., Checo, S., Krawchyk, L., Lin, M., McElroy, C., Shaffer, J., & Zang, R. (n.d.). Analysis of the RAE 2822 airfoil using
computational fluid dynamics. Retrieved May 1, 2022, from
http://www.saeedaljaberi.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/5/5/37557833/aersp_312_project.pdf
[9] Fairman, J. (1996, August). Lift formula. NASA. Retrieved May 1, 2022, from
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/WindTunnel/Activities/lift_formula.html

67
Questions? 68
Appendix
Flight Results

70
GANTT Chart - Phase 1

71
GANTT Chart - Phase 2

72
GANTT Chart - Phase 3

73
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Waste

Budget Cost 1690.369

Waste Cost 82.84
Total Cost 3767.919

74
 Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Electronics
Shipping
Aircraft Use Component Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost Total Cost
Electronics
Talon 120HV ESC 120AMP, 12S Max Heavy Duty
ESC (Electronic Speed Controllers) BEC 2 259.95 9.85 529.75
BEC (Battery Eliminator Circuit) CC BEC 10A PEAK 25V MAX INPUT SBEC 1 23.95 10.03 33.98
EDF Ducted Fan JP Hobby 90mm + 8-10s Motor
EDF (Electric Ducted Fan) - 90mm 1250Kv (CCW) 2 290.55 Free 581.1
Castle Creations 5.5mm High Current Bullet
EDF Bullet Connectors Connector Set 1 10.99 1.99 12.98

* Items not included in the budget are color coded in yellow.

75
 Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Avionics
Shipping
Aircraft Use Component Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost Total Cost
Avionics
Gens Ace 4s LiPo Battery Pack 50C w/Deans Connector
Battery (14.8V/5000mAh) 4 92.99 - 371.96
Pulse 1350mAh 15C 7.4V 2S Receiver LiPo Battery -
Receiver Battery EC3 Connector 1 12.59 5.3 17.89
Receiver Futaba R3000SB 1 69.99 Free 69.99
Transmitter Futaba 10J 10-Channel Transmitter 1 360 Free 360
Transmitter Battery 1800 mAh NiMh Transmitter Battery (5-Cell) 1 49.99 - 49.99
Low Profile Servo DS115CLHV 5 59.99 Free with Bulk 299.95
High Torque Servo DS130DLHV 1 34.99 Free with Bulk 34.99
Arming Plug System, Anderson Power Pole (Maxx) 12
Arming Plug (1x per each motor) Gauge 2 4.95 - 9.9
Servo Wire 22AWG PVC Servo Wire 5m (Red/Black/Yellow) 1, ~16 ft 3.5 - 3.5
On-Off Switch Xpert Electronic Switch - 7.4V Input Voltage 1 19.99 1.99 21.98
* Items not included in the budget are color coded in yellow.
76
 Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Airframe
Shipping
Aircraft Use Component Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost Total Cost

Airframe
Strut-Raw Material (Modify in
EDC) Aluminum Alloy 3000 Series Strip (1/8" T x 24"W x 36"L) 1 76.05 - 76.05
Main Landing Gear Alloy Landing Gear With 90mm Wheels 1 16.96 - 16.96
Nose Landing Gear Steerable Nose Gear 6 5/8" 1 7.65 - 7.65

Landing Gear Wheels 3 2.45 - 7.35

Landing Gear Extender Vertical to Horizontal Axel Converter 1 13.99 - 13.99

All Wood 898.29

* Items not included in the budget are color coded in yellow.

77
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Wood
Cost Per
Total Material Type Thickness Length Width Unit Cost
18 Balsa Sheet 0.03125 4 36 3.83 68.94
8 Balsa Sheet 0.0625 4 24 3.67 29.36
7 Balsa Sheet 0.0625 4 48 8.83 61.81
10 Balsa Sheet 0.125 3 36 3.42 34.2
9 Basswood Stick 0.125 0.5 36 1.18 10.62
18 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.125 36 0.83 14.94
16 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.25 48 1.55 24.8
1 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.5 36 2.12 2.12
3 Basswood Sheet 0.125 3 24 2.41 7.23
2 Basswood Sheet 0.25 3 24 3.13 6.26
19.25 Lite Ply Sheet 0.25 12 48 19.84 381.92
16 Lite Ply Sheet 0.125 12 48 13.84 221.44
10 Sand Ply Sheet 0.125 12 12 3.465 34.65

Total Cost 898.29

78
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Fuselage
Fuselage Material Quantity Thickness (") Width (") Length (")
Bulkheads Lite Ply 20 0.25 7 7
Longerons Basswood 8 0.25 0.25 39
Wing Box Mating Surfaces Basswood 2 0.25 0.5 12
Engine Mount Plate Basswood 2 0.25 5 3
Engine Mount Support Spars Basswood 2 0.25 0.5 2.25
Inner Fus Shelf Lite Ply 1 0.25 2.95 16

Quantity Material Type t l w Cost

8 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.25 48 1.55
1 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.5 36 2.12
1 Basswood Sheet 0.25 3 24 3.13
4 Lite Ply Sheet 0.25 12 48 19.84
9 Lite Ply Sheet 0.125 12 48 13.84
1 Lite Ply Sheet 0.125 6 24 5.25

79
 Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Empennage
Thickness
Empennage Material Quantity (") Width (") Length (") Quantity Material Type t l w Cost

Bulkhead 1 Lite Ply 1 0.25 7 12 0.12 0.12

2 Balsa Stick 5 5 36 0.87
Bulkhead 2 Lite Ply 1 0.125 6 12
Shee
Bulkhead 3 Lite Ply 1 0.125 5.5 12
1 Lite Ply t 0.25 12 48 19.84
Bulkhead 4 Lite Ply 1 0.125 4.5 12
Shee 0.12
Bulkhead 5 Lite Ply 1 0.125 3.5 12 2 Lite Ply t 5 12 48 13.84
Bulkhead 6 Lite Ply 1 0.125 2.75 12 Basswo
Bulkhead 7 Lite Ply 1 0.125 2 12 2 od Stick 0.25 0.25 48 1.55
Top Plank Lite Ply 1 0.25 16.6 2
Mid Plank Lite Ply 1 0.125 16.5 2
Top Longeron Basswood 2 0.25 19.3 0.25
Mid Longeron Balsa 2 0.125 19.4 0.125
Bottom Longeron Basswood 2 0.25 19.6 0.25

80
 Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Vertical Stabilizer
Quantit
Quantity Material Type t l w Cost
Vertical Stabilizer Material y Thickness (") Width (") Length (")
Rib 1 Lite Ply 1 0.125 20.5 7 1 Lite Ply Sheet 0.25 12 48 19.84

Rib 2 Lite Ply 1 0.125 18.1 7 2 Lite Ply Sheet 0.125 12 48 13.84
Rib 3 Lite Ply 1 0.125 15 7 Basswoo
Rib 4 Lite Ply 1 0.25 12.2 7 1 d Stick 0.25 0.25 48 1.55
Rib 5 Lite Ply 1 0.125 8.5 7 Basswoo
Front Spar Basswood 2 0.25 13 0.3 1 d Sheet 0.25 3 24 3.13

Back Spar Basswood 2 0.25 17 0.25 Basswoo

1 d Sheet 0.125 3 24 2.41
Front Webbing Basswood 1 0.125 13 0.8
Back Webbing Basswood 1 0.125 12 0.8
Extra Vertical Support 1 Basswood 1 0.25 6.5 0.25
Rudder Servo Mount Lite Ply 1 0.125 2 1
Rudder Mount Basswood 1 0.125 6.2 0.8

81
Design Summary
BOM Summary - Horizontal Stabilizer (1/2)
Horizontal Stabilizer Material Quantity Thickness (") Width (") Length (")
HStab Box - Front/Back Lite Ply 2 0.25 3 1.75
HStab Box - Sides Lite Ply 2 0.25 10 1.75
HStab Box - Bottom/Top Lite Ply 2 0.25 3 10
Rib 1 Lite Ply 2 0.125 10 6
Rib 2 Lite Ply 2 0.125 8.75 6
Rib 3 Lite Ply 2 0.125 7.75 6
Rib 4 Lite Ply 2 0.125 7 6
Rib 5 Lite Ply 2 0.125 16 6
Rib 6 Lite Ply 2 0.125 5 6
Front Spars Basswood 4 0.125 17 0.25
Back Spars Basswood 4 0.125 0.25
Front Webbing Basswood 2 0.125 15.2 1.5
Back Webbing Basswood 2 0.125 14.5 0.8
Elevator Webbing Basswood 2 0.125 0.5 5.7
Elevator Servo Mount Lite Ply 2 0.125 3 1
82
Design Summary
BOM Summary - Horizontal Stabilizer (2/2)

Quantity Material Type t l w Cost

1 Lite Ply Sheet 0.25 12 48 19.84
1 Lite Ply Sheet 0.125 12 48 13.84
4 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.125 36 0.83
1 Basswood Stick 0.125 0.5 36 1.18
2 Basswood Sheet 0.125 3 24 2.41

83
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Wings (1/2)
Wings Material Quantity Thickness (") Width (") Length (")
Rib 1 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4.5 12
Rib 2 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4.25 10.5
Rib 3 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4.25 9.5
Rib 4 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4 8.5
Rib 5 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4 7.5
Rib 6 Lite Ply 2 0.25 4.5 7
Rib 7 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4 5.3
Rib 8 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4 5
Rib 9 Lite Ply 2 0.125 4 4
Spars Basswood 8 0.125 35 0.25 0.5
Webbing Balsa 36 0.125 4 1.5
Wing Box - Front Lite Ply 2 0.25 4 3.5
Wing Box - Sides Lite Ply 1 0.25 3.5 13
Wing Box - Bottom Lite Ply 1 0.25 3 12
Wing Box - Lid Lite Ply 2 0.25 4 13
Wingbox - Ribs Lite Ply 2 0.25 3 12
Rudder Servo Mount Lite Ply 1 0.125 2 1
Aileron Webbing Balsa 4 0.125 1.5 12
84
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Wings (2/2)

Quantity Material Type t l w Cost

11 Balsa Sheet 0.125 3 36 3.42
8 Basswood Stick 0.25 0.125 36 0.83
3 Lite Ply Sheet 0.25 12 48 19.84
3 Lite Ply Sheet 0.125 12 48 13.84

85
 Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Miscellaneous (1/2)
Shipping
Aircraft Use Component Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost Total Cost
Misc
Monokote Red Neucover Iron-on Model Airplane Covering 2 15 3.99 33.99
Secondary Monokote Silver Neucover Iron-on Model Airplane Covering 1 15 3.99 18.99
Stick Hinges Pivot Round Hinges 1 2.78 - 2.78
Bolts 1/4"-20 bolt 1 12.42 - 12.42
Washers 1/4"-20 bolt 1 11.88 - 11.88
Tee Nut 1/4"-20 bolt 1 9.6 - 9.6
Hex Nut 1/4"-20 bolt 1 11 - 11
Medium CA Glue 7 4.99 Local 34.93
Low CA Glue 7 4.99 Local 34.93
Glue Epoxy 1 9.99 5.99 9.99
3/4 in. x 30 ft. Commercial Carded Electrical Tape,
Electrical Tape Black 1 1.34 Local 1.34

* Items not included in the budget are color coded in yellow.

86
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Miscellaneous (2/2)
Shipping
Aircraft Use Component Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost Total Cost
Misc
Medical Tape - 2 1.24 Local 2.48
Push Rods 4-40 Fully Threaded 1 2.09 - 2.09
Jigsaw Bit - 1 5.99 Local 5.99
Dremel Bit - 1 19.97 Local 19.97
Velcro - 2 3.47 Local 6.94
Wood Filler - 2 4.59 Local 9.18
Control Horns - 2 1.65 - 3.3
Clevises - 2 12.75 - 25.5
Safety Wire - 0.1 8.49 Local 0.849
Laminate - 1 6.47 Local 6.47
Sand Paper - 1 2.21 Local 2.21

* Items not included in the budget are color coded in yellow.

87
Design Summary
Bill of Materials (BOM) Summary - Waste
Shipping
Aircraft Use Component Description Quantity Unit Cost Cost Total Cost

Waste
Nose Cone & Wing Box
Fasteners Hex Screw 2 8.83 - 17.66
Nose Cone & Wing Box
Fasteners Wing Nut 1 13.69 - 13.69
Nose Cone & Wing Box
Fasteners Tee Nuts 1 15.6 - 15.6
Engine Mount Fasteners Screws 8 1.96 - 15.68
Engine Mount Fasteners Nuts 2 2.78 - 5.56
Hstab Wing Box Fasteners Screws 2 1.43 - 2.86
Hstab Wing Box Fasteners Nuts 4 0.14 - 0.56
Hstab Wing Box Fasteners Washer 1 1.28 - 1.28

* Items not included in the budget are color coded in yellow.

88