Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GROUP 1A - QH2021D2 - TOPIC 1 - Discourse, Vocabulary & Background Knowledge
GROUP 1A - QH2021D2 - TOPIC 1 - Discourse, Vocabulary & Background Knowledge
Vocabulary &
Background Knowledge
Lecturer: Dr. Huynh Anh Tuan
Group 1A - QH2021D2
21045217 Thành Hữu Hà Anh
5 Schema 6 Script
5 Schema 6 Script
By Trịnh Thị Chinh By Vũ Thị Kim Cúc
Endophoric Exophoric
Anaphoric Cataphoric
p. 108
4. Conjunction - Elaboration
(a) Apposition: an element is re-presented or restated by exposition
or by example
Example: They need to stop smoking. I mean, if they don’t, they’re
going to ruin their health.
(a) Clarification: an element is reinstated, summarized, made more
precise or in some other way clarified for purposes of the discourse.
Seven subtypes: corrective, distractive, dismissive, particularizing,
resumptive, summative, verifactive.
Example: A: What about skateboarding? That sounds fun.
– B: It’s not my thing. Anyway, um – I was thinking… [dismissive]
● “Lexical cohesion happens when two words in a text are semantically related in
some way; in other words, they are related in terms of their meaning”
Nunan (1993: 28).
● “The role played by the selection of vocabulary in organizing relation within a text.”
Baker (2018).
● “Related vocabulary items occur across clause and sentence boundaries in written
texts and across act, move and turn boundaries in speech and are a major
characteristic of coherent discourse.”
Halliday and Hasan (1976)
b. Classification of lexical cohesion
Original classification
Lexical
cohesion
General
Repetition Synonymy Superordinate Collocation
word
b. Classification of lexical cohesion
New classification
Lexical
cohesion
Reiteration Collocation
By Bachman (1990)
c. Communicative Competence
Four components of communicative competence:
➔ Grammatical competence
➔ Sociolinguistic competence
➔ Discourse competence
➔ Strategic competence
3.1 3.2
Definition The importance of
coherence
3.3 3.4
How to create ⇒ How to apply coherence
coherence in teaching writing
3.1 Definition of coherence
“Coherence refers to how clear and logical ideas are organized. A central idea
underlying in a paragraph helps the reader understands each sentence easier.”
Carrigan (2019). Cohesion & Coherence
“He perceives the coherence of a discourse as “the relationship between the
illocutionary acts which propositions, not always overtly linked, are being used to
perform.”
Widdowson (1978, p.29)
Coherence refers to the type of semantic or rhetorical relationships that
underline texts.
Prior knowledge
Make predictions
o Relevant features of context
o What is likely to happen
o Topics likely to be raised
o Attitudes likely to be expressed
4.2. The process of using background knowledge
5. Application
5.1 Definition
A schema is...
+ A cluster/a group of related pieces of information, knowledge or
memory that are stored in the mind.
+ Cognitive frameworks as they are a system for categorizing and
organizing information and memory.
*The plural of schema is ‘’schemata’’ or ‘’schemas’’.
The price of oil goes up and down
5.2 Schema theory
Schema theory is trying to explain how our minds organize information,
knowledge and memories.
5.2 Schema theory
‘’Schema theory is the theory that in comprehending language, people activate
relevant schemata allowing them to process and interpret new experiences
quickly and effectively.
Schemata serve as a reference store from which a person can retrieve relevant
existing knowledge and into which new information is assimilated.’’
Eg: Earthquake
- A person’s knowledge of the
structure of a particular genre, such
as news reports or journal articles.
-The rhetorical structure of
language
5.2 Schema theory
‘’I’m in my bathroom.’’ ‘’I’m in love.’’
5.3 Characteristics and Functions
● Characteristics
- Long - lasting
- Difficult to change (not impossible)
● Functions
- Comprehend new information - improve information processing and
comprehension.
- Help us make sense of the complex world of information
- Generalize about situations, people and places - help us save our cognitive
energy.
5.4 Influence on our thinking
● Tannen (1979: 138) uses the
description 'structures of
expectation' (adopted from Ross,
1975) to characterise the influence
of schemata on our thinking.
● Schemata/ schemas can be seen as
the organised background
knowledge which leads us to expect
or predict aspects in our
interpretation of discourse.
Ex: What do you expect when coming
to a restaurant?
5.4 Influence on our thinking
● Different cultural backgrounds can result in different schema for the description of
witnessed events.
● Confirmation bias: We tend to focus on, remember and believe the information that
is consistent with existing beliefs.
For example: thinking of racial prejudice, as the manifestation of some fixed way of thinking
about newly encountered individuals:
Context: You are listening to reports from the Sea Games 2022
Yonhap said the Games remained quite balanced with the two teams playing
out a 0-0 draw in the first half. Nham Manh Dung headed the ball into
Thailand’s net in the 83rd minute to open the score. The goal into the far left
corner sent the home crowd wild and Vietnam held on to its narrow lead until
the end of the match.
6.4 Notes
● The script may vary from one place to the other.
● Assumptions of shared knowledge can lead to
misunderstanding.
● Clarification is needed if one violates the normal script.
6.5 Script in teaching
● Scripted teaching or scripted instruction refers to commercial
reading programs that have highly structured lessons, often with
specific time allotments for teaching specific skills, and often
word-for-word scripts of what the teacher is to say.
b. Lexical cohesion
e. Modality
a. Using discourse analysis in vocabulary teaching
1994).
a. Using discourse analysis in vocabulary teaching
● predict how a text will develop and understand the context more
- Related vocabulary items across a text, with influence on the meaning of the text
comprehension.
c. Vocabulary for larger textual patterns of discourse
- Certain lexical items are frequently used in specific patterns of discourse like
those used to state problem, cause, solution, agreement / disagreement,
certainty / uncertainty….
- There have been checklists of these items compiled by linguists
- Certain lexical items are frequently used in specific patterns of discourse like those used
Opening sentence: There is no doubt that one of the major concerns of both viewers and
(main text)
Closing sentence: The chief 'lesson' of all our viewing, reading and discussion is that there
vocabulary
It is with great pleasure that I read about I am very glad to hear that you were
your promotion to the Accounting promoted to the Accounting Manager
Manager position. Congratulations on Congrats!
this well-deserved promotion!
d. Register and signaling vocabulary
- Lexical items that convey the intention, purpose and attitude of the sender of the
utterance.
- Divided into root modality (volition, permission, obligation) and epistemic modality
Root Epistemic
She must swim only when a lifeguard is on Her goggles are not here, so she must be
duty swimming.
(It’s imperative that she swim only when a (Her goggles are not here, so she is certainly
lifeguard is on duty) swimming.)
e. Modality
- Modality is often thought of as the province of the closed class of
modal verbs. (must, can, will, may, etc.) and treated as part of the
grammar of English, but a large number of 'lexical' words (nouns,
adjectives, verbs and adverbs) carry the same or similar meanings to
the modal verbs.
● If you have not signed a contract, you ought not to pay them any money.
● If you have not signed a contract, you are under no obligation to pay them any
money.
● If you have not signed a contract, it is not necessary to pay them any money.
e. Modality