Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CODE: MGT103
CLASS: MKT1702
EMAIL: phuongLHNSS170357@fpt.edu.vn
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................3
IV. Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................6
V. Reference.............................................................................................................................................6
I. INTRODUCTION
This assignment is written for the purpose of discussing and analyzing my own life experiences.
Those experiences mirror Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y. After analyzing them, I
understand and come to the conclusion of the and application of Theory X and Theory Y in my life,
In the 1960s, McGregor came up with Theory X and Theory Y, theories of motivation. These theories
are built on the premise that management will have to bring together all the factors of production,
including people, to get the job done. “According to McGregor, Theory X and Theory Y reflect two
extreme belief sets that different managers have about their workers. Theory X is a relatively
pessimistic and negative view of workers and is consistent with the views of scientific management.
Theory Y is more positive and represents the assumptions made by human relations advocates.”
(Griffin 2016).
According to Mr. Douglas McGregor, the Theory X management style assumes employees are
"people who do not like work and try to avoid it, so managers have to control, direct, coerce and
threaten employees to get them to work toward organizational goals” (Griffin 2016).
Theory X reflects a lot in life, for me, it is teamwork in the learning process. I usually take on the role
of the group leader, so it is my responsibility to direct the group members to do the exercises to meet
the deadlines set by the teacher. Most members are not actively working but need to be reminded to
do the work. That quite affects the working process. Of course, there are still cases where members
are hard-working and proactive in the process of working, but in my practical experience, not many.
For cases where a team member has such procrastination, I will use theory X. Because those members
always operate under the mindset of only working when being forced to do and they only do enough
of the task. Therefore, they do not have any ambition or motivation to complete the duty. That is why
I always set time limits and remind them constantly, and if they are lazy, they will receive low
evaluation points from the leader. In management, there is a term similar to how I apply Theory X,
which is "carrot and stick", meanings to refer to two motivational concepts: rewards and punishments.
“Carrots designate the financial and non-financial paybacks offered by managers to employees as
inducements to achieve required tasks. On the other hand, sticks refer to the fear of being punished or
blamed which is an effective stimulus in certain situations” (Frangieh & Rusu 2021). The application
of this term can be understood as a reward and punishment policy to put pressure on its employees
According to Mr. Douglas McGregor, the Theory Y management style assumes workers are “people
who do not naturally like to work, work is a natural part of their lives. People will both seek and take
shop. According to my personal observation, all employees work with the spirit of learning, trying,
and taking responsibility for their own behavior. The staff on the same shift as me are always warm-
hearted and happy with customers and colleagues. They themselves learn and practice new drink
recipes. The employees work on the spirit of self-discipline, not being forced by the manager.
Because of the mutual trust between the owner and the staff, the theory Y is effectively applied.
4. Identify and analyze success/failure regarding experience.
In fact, theory X and theory Y are both effective management styles for managers. They need to be
applied to the right people and working environments. However, every theory has certain risks. With
my theory X example, although theory X was applied, not all students worked voluntarily. So, the rest
are the ones who receive reminders from their leader, but they still don't cooperate or work
superficially because they feel controlled and demoralized. In terms of results, however, the
application of theory X is, in this case, still a success. Because without deadlines and reminders from
the team leader, members may not even be able to complete the group's work.
Similarly, Theory Y in the above example is also successfully applied, but there are also some risks
that we need to be aware of. When applying Theory Y, a manager must understand its essence to
avoid situations that lead to conflicts such as an employee has too much power, it can be difficult for
the team to reach mutual agreement. That results in bad relationships between employees and
The Theory X management style is applicable to new hires who need clear direction and close
supervision. In addition, managers should not apply this style to situations where the organization
needs to work freely on their own initiative, without being stereotyped. When applying this style,
managers will closely monitor their employees and give rewards and punishments. After all, this is
the style that should be applied to employees who are lazy and avoid working to motivate them to
In contrast, the Theory Y management style is softer. The organization will be operated in a
decentralized manner, which means that all activities involve the participation of everyone. By that,
employees will develop their own abilities, which motivates them to give opinions, and take
IV. Conclusion
In my opinion, different managers will have different management styles, which can affect employee
performance. In fact, it is advisable to rely on the employee's attitude to give the best management. A
good manager needs to understand the pros and cons of these two styles in order to use them most
effectively.
V. Reference
Frangieh, M., & Rusu, D. (2021). The effect of the carrot and stick transactional leadership style in