You are on page 1of 6

FC: ____________

PFMEA: 77901-T0A-ALL
PCP: ____________
Cover Sheet
HONDA HARNESS ASSEMBLY
Family: CR-V

FAS Part Number Customer Part Number Drawing Revision Level Part Name
77901 T0A ZZ11 CORD TAIL GATE

Changes Log
Revision Date Reason ECN / PCN
0 24-Apr-15 Pre launch

FM-270-01-01 REV:01 Fecha efectiva: 05/31/04


2
POTENTIAL
PROCESS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
CORE TEAM
Q.A. ENGINEER Margarita Salinas
MFGR. ENGINEER Adrian Lievanos
PART NAME: CORD TAIL GATE MTTO. ENGINEER Fernando Betancout
PART NUMBER : REFERENCE TO COVER SHEET Q.C. ENGINEER Jesus Contreras
REVISION LEVEL : REFERENCE TO COVER SHEET PRODUCTION Gabriel Martinez
PRODUCT (s): HARNESSES FAMILY 77901-T0A
MODEL YEAR(S) / VEHICLE(S): 2015 CR-V
PREPARED BY: Adrian Lievanos REVISION DATE: 24-Apr-15
ELABORATION DATE : 24-Apr-15

ACTIONS RESULTS

Ocurrence

Detection
Severity
CURRENT PROCESS RESPONSIBILTY &

OCURRENCE

DETECTION
Class
POTENTIAL FAILURE

RPN

SEVERITY
PROCESS FUNCTION POTENTIAL EFECTS OF FAILURE POTENTIAL CAUSE OF FAILURE CURRENT PROCESS CONTROLS PREVENTION CONTROLS RECOMENDED ACTION TARGET COMPLETION ACTIONS

RPN
MODE
DETECTION DATE TAKEN

10 Raw Material out Receiving inspection


Assembly problems 9 Problems in supplier process 2 Approbal PPAP 7 126
Receiving Inspection specification procedure

Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 #REF!
Short Branch

Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90
Shorth length 9
Disassy circuit
Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90
Broken Circuit
Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 80
Loops * 8
Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 48
Large Length
Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 70
Branch outside dimension 7
Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 42

Work Instruction Warehouse CCIS II System


Missing ID 2 2 36
Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Work Instruction Warehouse CCIS II System


Wrong wire Continuity problems 9 Wrong ID by supplier 3 2 54
Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Not use CCIS II System 4 Training for new operators include map skill Audit by QC 2 72

Work Instruction Warehouse CCIS II System


Continuity problems Missing ID 2 2 36
Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Work Instruction Warehouse CCIS II System


Incorrect Terminal Not Assy in the connector 9 Wrong ID by supplier 3 2 54
Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Not assy in the contraparte Not use CCIS II System 4 Training for new operators include map skill Audit by QC 2 72

Broken strands Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

High insulation 9

Not Assy in the connector Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90
30
Automatic Cutting and crimping

CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

Broken Circuits Wrong Set up 3

Chopper Test First piece inspection 2 54


Low insulation 9

Wire outside the terminal Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

Wire outside the terminal Wrong Set up 3

High Crimping 9 Chopper Test First piece inspection 2 54

Not Assy in the connector Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

CCIS II System First piece inspection 2 36

Wrong Set -Up 2

Broken strands Chopper Test First piece inspection 2 36

Low Crimping 9

Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

Change spare parts at 10 000 shots per applicator


Disassy circuit Desgaste* Spare parts 2
Preventive Maintenance
Cross Section Test 2 36

Wrong Set -Up 2 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 16

Terminal bent up & down Assambly problems in the conector 4

Change spare parts at 10 000 shots per applicator 1st piece by QC


Desgaste* Spare parts 2 2 16
Preventive Maintenance Cross Section Test by QA

Work Instruction Warehouse


Missing ID 2 1st piece inspection by QC 2 36
Inspection by QA

Page 2 of 6
Wrong wire Continuity problems 9
3
POTENTIAL
PROCESS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
CORE TEAM
Q.A. ENGINEER Margarita Salinas
MFGR. ENGINEER Adrian Lievanos
PART NAME: CORD TAIL GATE MTTO. ENGINEER Fernando Betancout
PART NUMBER : REFERENCE TO COVER SHEET Q.C. ENGINEER Jesus Contreras
REVISION LEVEL : REFERENCE TO COVER SHEET PRODUCTION Gabriel Martinez
PRODUCT (s): HARNESSES FAMILY 77901-T0A
MODEL YEAR(S) / VEHICLE(S): 2015 CR-V
PREPARED BY: Adrian Lievanos REVISION DATE: 24-Apr-15
ELABORATION DATE : 24-Apr-15

ACTIONS RESULTS

Ocurrence

Detection
Severity
CURRENT PROCESS RESPONSIBILTY &

OCURRENCE

DETECTION
Class
POTENTIAL FAILURE

RPN

SEVERITY
PROCESS FUNCTION POTENTIAL EFECTS OF FAILURE POTENTIAL CAUSE OF FAILURE CURRENT PROCESS CONTROLS PREVENTION CONTROLS RECOMENDED ACTION TARGET COMPLETION ACTIONS

RPN
MODE
DETECTION DATE TAKEN

Work Instruction Warehouse


Wrong ID by supplier 3 2 54
Wrong wire Continuity problems 9 Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Not use CCIS II System 4 Training for new operators include map skill Audit by QC 2 72

Work Instruction Warehouse CCIS II System


Continuity problems Missing ID 2 2 36
Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Work Instruction Warehouse CCIS II System


Incorrect Terminal Not Assy in the connector 9 Wrong ID by supplier 3 2 54
Inspection by QA 1st piece inspection by QC

Not assy in the contraparte Not use CCIS II System 4 Training for new operators include map skill Audit by QC 2 72

Broken strands Wrong Set up 3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

High insulation 9

Not Assy in the connector Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

3 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54


60
Manual Crimping
Broken Circuits Wrong Set up
Low insulation 9
3 Chopper Test First piece inspection 2 54

Wire outside the terminal Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

CCIS II First piece inspection 2 54

Wire outside the terminal Wrong Set up 3


High Crimping 9 Chopper Test First piece inspection 2 54

Not Assy in the connector Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

CCIS II System First piece inspection 2 36


Wrong Set -Up 2

Broken strands Chopper Test First piece inspection 2 36


Low Crimping 9

Wrong Kan Ban 5 Validation of Tec Docs vs cutting sheet by QA First piece inspection 2 90

Change spare parts at 10 000 shots per applicator


Disassy circuit Desgaste* Spare parts 2
Preventive Maintenance
Cross Section Test 2 36

Wrong Set -Up 2 CCIS II First piece inspection 2 16

Terminal bent up & down Assambly problems in the conector 4


Change spare parts at 10 000 shots per applicator
1st piece by QC
Desgaste* Spare parts 2 Cross Section Test by 2 16
Preventive Maintenance
QA
Electrical test 100 %, visual
Low performance 7 Method not followed properly 3 Work instruction, visual aid, poka yoke fixtures 3 63
aids, Rejections
Inverted Circuits
Electrical test 100 %, visual
Can't be assembled 7 Method not followed properly 2 Fixture of Construction ,work instruction, phisycal visual aid 3 42
140 aids, Rejections
Pre-assembly
Detection alignment fixture in
Can't Be Assembled 7 Method not followed properly 2 Work instruction, visual aid poka yoke fixtures alignment 3 42
electrical board, Rejections
Inverted Circuits
Electrical test 100 %, visual
Low performance 7 Bad handling 3 Work instruction, visual aid and pull method 3 63
aids, Rejections
Dimensional board, visual
Loose Tubing Malfunction 4 Method not followed properly 2 Work instruction, visual aid aid, Rejections CALI-032 & 7 56
033, Visual inspection
160
Taping Station Assembly Fixture and Visual aid & Work instruction & certified 100 % dimensional board,
Short/large Branch Can't Be Assembled 5 Method not followed properly 2 5 50
operator detection fixture,
Assembly Fixture and Visual aid & Work instruction & certified 100 % dimensional board,
Grommet not Taping Out of drawing 2 Method not followed properly 2 8 32
operator detection fixture,

100 % Electrical Board and


Harness Missing test. Pass bad pieces as good 7 Method not followed properly 2 VISUAL INSPECTION 2 28
Visual Board.
180
Dimensional Board
harness missing mark of test. Pass bad pieces as good 7 Method not followed properly 2 VISUAL INSPECTION 100 % VISUAL BOARD. 2 28

Test Failure. Pass bad pieces as good 7 Equipment malfunctioning 2 Quality assurance Electrical Program certification. First quality piece 2 28

Missing Label on switch


Customer Complain. 7 Method not followed properly 2 Visual Inspection. Barcode System. 2 28

190 Pass "OK" electrical test with


Customer Complain. 7 Equipment wrong functioning 2 Q.A. Electrical Program & board certification. First quality piece 2 28
Electrical Test incorrect p/n harness

Wrong Revision on program Barcode System and Visual


Customer Complain. 7 Wrong program loaded 2 Visual inspection 2 28
label. Board.

Harness Missing test in level


Pass bad pieces as good 7 Method not followed properly 2 VISUAL INSPECTION barcode system. Q.A Audit 2 28
change

Page 3 of 6
4
POTENTIAL
PROCESS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
CORE TEAM
Q.A. ENGINEER Margarita Salinas
MFGR. ENGINEER Adrian Lievanos
PART NAME: CORD TAIL GATE MTTO. ENGINEER Fernando Betancout
PART NUMBER : REFERENCE TO COVER SHEET Q.C. ENGINEER Jesus Contreras
REVISION LEVEL : REFERENCE TO COVER SHEET PRODUCTION Gabriel Martinez
PRODUCT (s): HARNESSES FAMILY 77901-T0A
MODEL YEAR(S) / VEHICLE(S): 2015 CR-V
PREPARED BY: Adrian Lievanos REVISION DATE: 24-Apr-15
ELABORATION DATE : 24-Apr-15

ACTIONS RESULTS

Ocurrence

Detection
Severity
CURRENT PROCESS RESPONSIBILTY &

OCURRENCE

DETECTION
Class
POTENTIAL FAILURE

RPN

SEVERITY
PROCESS FUNCTION POTENTIAL EFECTS OF FAILURE POTENTIAL CAUSE OF FAILURE CURRENT PROCESS CONTROLS PREVENTION CONTROLS RECOMENDED ACTION TARGET COMPLETION ACTIONS

RPN
MODE
DETECTION DATE TAKEN

Tape over the label Barcode System and Visual


Customer Complain. 7 Method not followed properly 2 Visual Inspection. 2 28
identification. Board.

200
Harness Missing test. Not Traceability 7 Method not followed properly 2 Visual Inspection. barcode system. Q.A Audit 2 28
Visual Board & Packing

Incorrect standard pack Customer Complain. 7 Method not followed properly 2 Visual Inspection. barcode system. Q.A Audit 2 28

210
Box Missing parts Customer Complain. 7 Method not followed properly 2 Visual Inspection. Dock Audit work Instruction. 2 28
Dock Audit

Page 4 of 6
Diagrama de flujo de Proceso
Process Flow Chart
Honda Harness #DFP/PFC PFC-7901-T0A-ALL
Cliente Descripción del Producto (Diag. de Flujo de Proceso)
Customer Product Description. PFC# (Process Flow Chart)

Nivel (Número de Parte) 77901-T0A-ALL Plataforma CR-V '15M Fecha de Revision 9-Apr-15
Level (Part Number) Plataform Revision Date

1
Simbología
Simbology.
Revision
Revision
Caracteristicas Criticas del producto y proceso
Operación Operación Combinada Inspección Prueba Electrica Almacen Transporte Critical Characteristic of the Product and Process
Operation Combine Operation Inspection Electrical Test Warehouse Transport # Ope Descripcion de la operacion Equipo/Maq. requerido/Comentarios
Ope# Operation Description Equipment Required/Comments.

10 Receiving Inspection.

,170 ,150 ,140 ,30 15 Stock

30 ,140 ,60
30 Automatic cutting and crimping

60 ,140 60 Manual Crimping

75

CALF-101 Hoja 5 de 6 FECHA EFECTIVA:12-13-04


Diagrama de flujo de Proceso
Process Flow Chart
Honda Harness #DFP/PFC PFC-7901-T0A-ALL
Cliente Descripción del Producto (Diag. de Flujo de Proceso)
Customer Product Description. PFC# (Process Flow Chart)

Nivel (Número de Parte) 77901-T0A-ALL Plataforma CR-V '15M Fecha de Revision 9-Apr-15
Level (Part Number) Plataform Revision Date

1
Simbología
Simbology.
Revision
Revision
Caracteristicas Criticas del producto y proceso
Operación Operación Combinada Inspección Prueba Electrica Almacen Transporte Critical Characteristic of the Product and Process
Operation Combine Operation Inspection Electrical Test Warehouse Transport # Ope Descripcion de la operacion Equipo/Maq. requerido/Comentarios
Ope# Operation Description Equipment Required/Comments.

140 140 Pre-Assy

150 150 Assy


90

170 170 Clips station

18 180 Dimensional Inspection


0

19 190 Electrical Testing


0

20 200 Visual board & Packing


0

210 210 Dock Audit

220 220 Stock Finish Good

230 230 Shipping

CALF-101 Hoja 6 de 6 FECHA EFECTIVA:12-13-04

You might also like