BPCL Noida Dea 2021 Final

2021
Energy Audit Report for

BPCL NORTHERN REGION OFFICE
BUILDING, NOIDA
Address: A 5 & 6, Sector-1, Noida- 700095, UP
Conducted By
Sonar Bharat Environment &

Ecology (P) Ltd.
Office: 35, C. R. Avenue, 3rd Floor, Kolkata- 700 012
Hallo: +91 8240222545; 033 40031179
Email: sonarbharat2010@gmail.com
ENERGY AUDIT 2021 IN BPCL NORTHERN REGION OFFICE BUILDING, NOIDA, UP
INDEX
Chapter No. DESCRIPTION Page No.

1.0 Acknowledgement 4
2.0 Executive Summary 5
3.0 Summary of Recommendation & Energy Saving Potential 6
4.0 Introduction 7
5.0 Methodology & Approach 7-8
6.0 Instrument used in Energy Audit 8
7.0 Energy Audit Team 8
8.0 Energy Conservation Initiatives & Measures 8-9
9.0 Barriers towards Energy Conservation 9 - 10
10.0 Profile of BPCL Northern Region Office Building 10
Base Line Data & Energy Scenario & Estimation of Energy
11.0 11 - 15
Performance Index (EPI)
12.0 Electricity Bill Analysis 15 - 17
13.0 Electrical Power Distribution System 18 - 25
14.0 Motor Survey & Measurements 26 - 28
15.0 Performance Evaluation of Chiller 29 - 34
16.0 Performance Evaluation of Pump 35 - 38
17.0 Lighting & Illumination System 39 - 52
18.0 Energy Conservation Proposal 53 - 65
19.0 List of Vendors 66
2|Page Sonar Bharat Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd., Date: 8th December 2021
List of Table:
Table No. DESCRIPTION Page No.
T-11.1.1 Annual Energy Consumption, Generation & Estimation of Cost of Energy 11
T-11.2.1 Monthly Diesel Consumption 13
T-11.2.2 Monthly PNG Consumption 13
T-12.1.1 Monthly Electricity Bill Analysis from September 2019 to August 16
T-12.1.2 Monthly Electricity Bill Analysis from November 2020 to October 2021 17
T-13.1.1 Specification of Distribution Transformer of BPCL, Noida Office 18
T-13.1.2 Detailed Specification of Diesel Generating Sets in BPCL, Noida 19
T-13.1.3 Specification of LT Capacitors at LT PCC of Transformers in BPCL, Noida 19
T-13.3.1 Measured Electrical Parameters for Transformer-1 21

T-13.3.2 Evaluation of Efficiency & Losses for 1000 kVA Transformer-1 24
T-14.1.1 Measured Electrical Parameters of Motors for BPCL , Noida 27
T-15.3.1 Measured Electrical Parameters for Chiller-2 30
T-15.4.1 Measured Electrical Parameters for Chiller-3 31
Performance Evaluation of Chillers at Part & Full Load Condition for BPCL,
T-15.5.1 33
Noida
T-16.3.1 Performance Assessment of Pumps in BPCL Building, Noida 36
T-17.3.1 Measurement of Light LUX 41
T-17.4.1 Lighting Details & Energy Consumption Profile of BPCL, Noida 41 - 52
Techno-economic Analysis for Power Factor Correction at LT PCC of
Transformers by Hybrid Harmonic Filter Combination of 3-phase plus 100%
T-18.1.1 55
Neutral Current Compensator, Passive Super Heavy Duty LT Capacitors Series
with 7% Detuned Reactors & Active Filter
T-18.1.2 Sizing of Hybrid Harmonic Filter at LT PCC of 2 x 1 MVA Transformer 55 - 56
Analysis of Energy Saving Potential by Raising Mains Incomers Lighting Feeder
T-18.2.1 58
of BPCL, Noida
Analysis for Energy Saving Potential due to Balancing of Load Currents at
T-18.3.1 59 - 60
Raising Mains Incomers on LT PCC Incomer-1 & Reduction of Neutral Current
T-18.4.1 Proposed Energy metering points for IoT System 61
T-18.4.2 Saving Estimation for IoT based energy monitoring system 62
Techno-Economic Analysis for Replacement of Existing Round Compact
T-18.5.1 63
Fluorescent Lamp (CFL) with LED Round Lamp Fixture
T-18.6.1 Energy Generation Potential from Solar PV Generation & Techno-economics 65
1.0 Acknowledgement:
Sonar Bharat Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd. expresses sincere thanks to the
management of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), Northern
Region Office Building, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, for the awarding Sonar Bharat
Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd. to conduct ‘Energy Audit 2021’ at their Building.
The field study of this audit was carried out on & from 17.11.2021 to 19.11.2021 in
one phase of site study.
The following officials of BPCL Northern Region Building have coordinated and
helped to the audit team during the field study, measurements:
 Mr. S. Manohar (Manager, IFM)

 Mr. A.K Singh (Manager, Admin.)
 Mr. S. Thomas (Technical Executive)
And all other officers, technicians and staffs for the keen interest shown in this study
and the courtesy extended. We also extend our sincere gratitude to Mr. S. Manohar
& Mr. S. Thomas.
We are thankful to the management for giving us the opportunity to be involved in

this very interesting and challenging project.
We would be happy to provide any further clarifications, if required, to facilitate

implementation of the recommendations.
2.0 Executive Summary:

a) This section presents a brief summary of the results of the Energy Audit carried out
during November 2021. The study covered initially the energy saving opportunities
at BPCL Northern Region Office Building, located at Noida, Uttar Pradesh with a
focus mainly on proposals and recommendations on Energy Conservation, which
require short, medium & long term investments.
b) A team of one specialist Certified & Accredited Energy Auditors, BEE were involved
in this energy audit. The energy audit was mainly targeted at identifying practical,
sustainable and economically viable energy saving opportunities in all sections of
the building, resulting from a detailed study and analyses of technical parameters.
The energy audit involved using a wide range of sophisticated, portable, diagnostic
and measuring instruments to generate the data and facilitate in analyses to give a
more reliable basis for evaluation of energy saving potential and economic viability.
c) Electricity, PNG and HSD are the main sources of energy in BPCL Northern Regional
Building. The electrical energy consumption for the last year 2020-21 from grid
works out to 1136256 kVAh (@₹13.04/kVAh), PNG consumption for the last year
2020-21 works out to 2534 kg and also HSD consumption for the last year 2020-21
works out to 6347 Liters. This could increase in future because of the increasing
trend in the cost of all energy sources.
d) The electrical energy saving & energy cost saving potential are identified as 10.82%
& 12.37% respectively over the existing conditions after considering uncertainty
margins for BPCL Northern Region Office Building Complex, and proposals
thereof appear to be quite attractive since most the cases payback period is less
than two year. Sonar Bharat Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd. will try to maximize
the energy savings which is very much possible if uncertainties are found favorable.
Details are given in table below.
e) Electrical Specific Energy Consumption (SECe) or Energy Performance Index (EPI)

for the year 2019–2020 was increased marginally from 84.63 kWh/m2/annum to
87.32 kWh/m2/annum. If all energy saving measures as indicated in this audit
report are taken in near future, EPI will come down certainly further and it will be
healthy for this building in respect to energy efficiency improvement.
f) For energy saving calculation electricity rate is considered as ₹13.04/kVAh as

evaluated from the electricity cost of last year.
3.0 Summary of Recommendation & Energy Saving Potential:

Proposal Annual Energy Annual Energy Investment Payback
No. Proposal Saving Cost Saving Required Period
kVAh ₹ Lakh ₹ Lakh Month
On Power Factor Correction & Harmonic Mitigation:
1) Installation of 380 kVAr rated Hybrid Harmonic Filter (3-phase + Neutral-100%) at LT PCC of
Transformer-1 for Power Factor Correction up to 0.995 & harmonic mitigation with Combination with 80
kVAr Active Harmonic Filter & 8 x 25 kVAr + 2 x 20 kVAr + 4 x 15 kVAr = 300 kVAr, 525 Volt Rated Super
Heavy Duty LT Step Capacitor Banks with 7% Detuned Series Reactor & also Neutral Current Compensator
19.1 at LT PCC of Transformer-1. 60584 10.064 19.840 23.7
(Page-54)
2) Installation of 240 kVAr rated Hybrid Harmonic Filter (3-phase + Neutral-100%) at LT PCC of
Transformer-2 for Power Factor Correction up to 0.995 & harmonic mitigation with Combination with 50
kVAr Active Harmonic Filter & 4 x 25 kVAr + 1 x 20 kVAr + 4 x 15 kVAr + 1 x 10 kVAr = 190 kVAr, 525 Volt
Rated Super Heavy Duty LT Step Capacitor Banks with 7% Detuned Series Reactor & also Neutral Current
Compensator at LT PCC of Transformer-2.
On Optimization of Voltage for Lighting Feeder:
Installation of 50 kVA Rated ‘Energy Saver Lamp Controller’ (ESLC or ES-25) with Raising main Incomer-1
19.2
22638 2.952 2.040 8.3
(Page-57) for lighting & other loads & installation of 30 kVA Rated ‘Energy Saver Lamp Controller’ (ESLC or ES-25)
with Raising main Incomer-2 for lighting & other loads and Save Electrical Energy by optimizing the phase
voltage at 225 volt without sacrificing illumination in different indoor building areas
On Balancing of Load Current:
19.3 Balancing the load current in between phases for all LT Feeders by Shifting Single Phase Load from higher 10094 1.316 0.550 5.0
(Page-59) to lower mutually, checking of tightness for two feeder cable terminals at MCCB, SFU, Starter, LT Motor,
MCB, Bus-bar Chamber etc. and reduction of Substantial Line Losses
19.4 On Internet of Things (IoT) based energy monitoring system:

17044 2.220 5.360 28.9
(Page-61) Installation of Internet of Things (IoT) based energy monitoring system
On Efficacy Improvement of Lighting System:

19.5 Replacement of all Conventional 9 Watt Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) with new energy efficient 3W 7500 1.120 0.638 6.8
(Page-63) down LED round lamp and also replacement of all 50 Watt Halogen as spot light with new 10 Watt LED
Spot Light of Yellow Colour and save electrical energy without sacrificing the colour rendering.
On Solar PV Generation:
19.6 Installation of 5 kWp Solar PV plant on roof-top and harnessing of green energy for building common area 5068 0.660 2.260 41.1
(Page-65) use with grid net metering connection for import & export facility and saving of grid electrical energy &
reduction of GHG emission
Grand Total: 122928 18.332 30.688 20.1
4.0 Introduction:
Energy Audit is an effective means of establishment present efficiency levels and
identifying potential areas of improvement in energy consumption. Energy audit of utility
systems largely helps in reducing the energy consumption with resultant reduction in fuel
and electricity bills. Audit involves data collection, data verification and detailed analysis of
the data. The analysis leads to recommendations, which are short term (with minimum
investment), medium term (with moderate investment) and long term (with capital
expenditure). The cost benefit analysis of various energy conservation proposals enables
managements to take decisions regarding implementation schedules.
Energy conservation is a worldwide objective to save the human being from possible
disaster. Under the mandate of The Energy Conservation Act 2001, the Bureau of Energy
Efficiency and Government of India are implementing various programmers to provide
momentum of the energy conservation movement in the country. Energy Auditing is most
vital part of the conservation of energy. In order to improve the efficiency of the Energy
consuming system, energy auditing is the first necessary action to be taken by the
concerned firm. Through the energy auditing actual parameters can be detected at each
step, which can be compared with the standard achievable parameters. For proper Energy
auditing and energy accounting, parameters need to be monitored on regular basis and for
any deviation immediate action is needed to rectify and retain the efficiency at the
optimum level.
BPCL Northern Region Office Building, located at Noida engages Sonar Bharat
Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd. West Bengal to conduct detailed energy audit in their
Building” for the year of 2021.
5.0 Methodology & Approach:

The audit involved basis design data collection for various electrical utilities, kick of
meeting with concern departmental technicians, engineers & managers, carrying out
various field measurements, performance analysis and loss analysis covering all major
energy consuming sections of BPCL Building to realistically assess losses mainly in energy
consuming utility areas and potential for energy savings. The major areas of study are:
 Electrical Power & Distribution System and Transformer wise measurements

 Assessment of Transformer loading & efficiency
 Harmonic Load Survey and harmonic measurements
 LT motors for Chillers, pumps & fans of Air Handling Units and measurements of
different electrical parameters.
 Performance evaluation of Chillers & their present specific power consumption.
 Assessment of Load centre’s VAr management practices & line loss reduction.
 Study and analysis of Electricity Bills and further scope for monetary saving
 Study, analysis & assessment of performance for Air Handling Units

 Survey of illumination, lighting feeders and lighting system in different areas and
estimation of energy consumption.
 Assessment of other office equipment loads
During study several interactions was made to the office personnel and technicians to
share the actual operational features of equipments, building’s maintenance schedule and
equipment break down, down time of machineries, safety measures etc. At the same time
required data was collected from the building level and review the same with the
operational actual data.
The study focused on improving energy use efficiency and identifying energy saving
opportunities at various equipments. The analyses included simple payback period and life
cycle cost calculations where investments are required to be made to implement
recommendations, to establish their economic viability.
6.0 Instrument used in Energy Audit:

We have a wide array of latest, sophisticated, portable, diagnostic and measuring
instruments to support our energy audit investigations and analyses. The audit study made
use of various portable instruments along with plant online instrumentations, for carrying
out various measurements and analyses. The specialized instruments that were used
during the energy audit include:
 Micro-processor based Power Quality Analyzer, HIOKI with software facility

 Digital power clamp meter & multi-meter KUSAM MECO, India
 Digital thermometer with K-type thermo-couple for temperature measurement.
 Digital thermometer with inbuilt K-type thermo-couple for temperature
measurement.
 Digital Hygrometer
 Non-contact Infrared Thermometers for temperature measurement
 Digital LUX / Foot Candle Meter
 Measuring tape for the measurement of dimension
7.0 Energy Audit Team:

1. Mr. A. Majumdar (Certified & Accredited Energy Auditor- BEE)
2. Mr. S. Porel (Electrical Engineer)
3. Mr. A Dutta (Electrical Engineer)
8.0 Energy Conservation Initiatives & Measures:

BPCL Northern Region Office Building, located at Noida is a very energy intensive building,
where mainly electrical energy, HSD & PNG are used for building air-conditioning (covering
63.01% building area), lighting, pumps, lift, office equipments, diesel generating set,
cooking in officer canteen & staff canteen etc. With the hike of fuel & electricity cost,
management of BPCL took many progressive steps & measures for energy conservation in
electrical distribution system, control in air-conditioning system, lighting system etc. The
adopted energy efficient technologies & energy management strategies are given below.
a) Installation of Micro processer based most energy efficient centralized chiller based
air-conditioning system with water cool condenser & use of variable frequency
drive (VFD) with the motor of screw compressor operation.
b) Installation of variable frequency drive (VFD) with the motor of all secondary
chilled water pumps
c) Installation of variable frequency drive (VFD) with the motor of fan of all Air
Handling Units
d) Use of automatic sensor based glass door opening & closing at main entrance
e) All lift operation is micro-processor controlled.
f) Replacement of all conventional Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) & Fluorescent
Tube Light with most energy efficient and long lasting LED Light fixture.
g) Installation of New LT capacitor banks with APFC panels at LT PCC of two
transformers for power factor correction.
h) Optimizing the cable size in distribution system and use parallel cables with all
major LT feeders for line loss reduction
i) Use of submerged bore well pumps for suction head reduction and power
consumption reduction
j) All CRT monitor in desktop computer is found to be replaced with energy efficient
LCD monitor or Laptop.
k) Maintaining overall good housekeeping & cleanliness.
l) Installation 11 kV/11 kV HT Automatic Voltage Regulation for supplying stable
voltage.
9.0 Barriers towards Energy Conservation:

a) Specific power (kW/TR) consumption of chiller at part load is found to be very high,
where the speed of compressor is controlled by VFD.
b) At present there is big gap in proper energy accounting. At present there are two
digital energy meters; one is connected to LT PCC of Transformer-1, which is in
working condition & another is connected to LT PCC of Transformer-2, which is not
in working condition. And at present no energy accounting is done for individual LT
feeders under Transformer-1 & Transformer-2.
c) Monthly electricity billing Power Factor is not maximized, resulting in increase of
kVAh unit consumption & kVA demand to greater extent.
d) As this building uses large number of non-linear loads like VFD with chiller motor,
secondary chilled water pumps, fans of Air Handling Units, UPS, Server, and Driver
of LED based lighting system, odd & evil harmonics are generated, resulting in
higher line losses, higher kVA demand, de-rating of Capacitors due to parallel
resonance, heating of cable, switches etc. At present no harmonic mitigation

measures are taken by building management.
e) Unbalancing of current is occurring in most of the LT feeders during load condition
and it leads to increase line loss.
f) Most of the time transformer-2 is found to be under loaded, which leads to fall in
transformer efficiency significantly and in nighttime load is fully cut off.
Transformers are not run in parallel mode as these two Transformers are same
capacity (1000 kVA each), same voltage ratio, same vector group, same %impedance
volt.
g) Building uses most inefficient 50 watt spot halogen lamps are using till date instead
of most energy efficient lens fitted LED spot lamps.
h) No LED based task lighting was found in the table of wing office areas. These energy
efficient tasks LED light can operate from Laptop/computer USB port and reduce
the lighting load consumption in wing areas substantially.
i) Lighting supply voltage is found to be high, leading to increase the line loss in
lighting circuits & reduce the life of lamps substantially.
j) Substantial amount of printers are using in different wing office places instead of
centralized printer system.
10.0 Profile of BPCL Northern Region Office Building:

It is one of the most modern 9 storied office building excluding basement, located at A 5&6,
sector-1, Noida, U.P. Total built-up area of this building is 12257 m2, having Office block in
A-wing & B-wing consists of Ground floor plus nine floors, where each floor having two
wings. Beside that there are covered car parking place at basement. Main office building
consists of reception, administrative office, dining hall, kitchen, lecture hall, syndicate
rooms, projection room, faculty rooms, library, etc.
10 | P a g e Sonar Bharat Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd., Date: 8th December 2021
11.0 Base Line Data & Energy Scenario:

11.1 Summary of Energy Consumption Profile:
At present BPCL building uses electricity for building electrical utility operation, HSD for
running of standby DG Sets & PNG for Canteen use. A summary and comparison of the
annual energy consumption, Energy Performance Index (EPI) is given in tables below:
Table: 11.1.1
Annual Energy Consumption, Generation & Estimation of Cost of Energy
Sl.
Particulars Unit 2019 -20 2020-21
No.
Electrical Energy Consumption & Cost Figure:
1a. kWh 1037324 1070294
1b. Electrical Energy Purchased kVAh 1096296 1136256
1c. TOE 89.21 92.05
2. Cost of Electrical Energy purchased ₹ 14006163 14816560
3a. ₹/kWh 13.50 13.84
Total Annual Electrical Energy Consumed
3b. ₹/kVAh 12.78 13.04
HSD Consumption & Cost Figure:
1. HSD Consumed Litre 3260 6347
2. Specific Gravity of HSD 0.832 0.832
3. Heat Value of HSD kCal/kg 10700 10700
4. Thermal Energy Consumed TOE 2.90 5.65
PNG Consumption & Cost Figure:
1a. kg 2363 2534
PNG Consumed
1b. Scm 3109 3334
2. Heat Value of PNG kCal/Scm 9500 9500
3. Thermal Energy Consumed TOE 2.95 3.17
Total Annual Thermal Energy Consumed: TOE 5.86 8.82
Note: ‘TOE’ stands for Metric Ton of Oil Equivalent = 10^7 kCal
A Comparison Annual Energy Consumption (In terms of TOE) for

Different Type of Energy
200.00
180.00
160.00
140.00
92.05
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
89.21
40.00
20.00
8.82
5.65 5.86
0.00 2.90
Electricity HSD PNG
2019-20 2020-21
Sharing of Different Type of Energy in BPCL Building
HSD
5.30%
Other PNG
8.28% 8.28%
Electricity
86.42%
11.2 Fuel Consumption Figures:
Table: 11.2.1
Monthly Diesel Consumption
November 2019 to October 2020 November 2020 to October 2021
HSD Sp. GCV of Net TOE HSD Sp. GCV of Net TOE
Month Month
(Litre) Gravity HSD Consumed (Litre) Gravity HSD Consumed
of HSD (kCal/kg) of HSD (kCal/kg)
Nov-19 200 0.832 10700 0.178 Nov-20 200 0.832 10700 0.178
Dec-19 195 0.832 10700 0.174 Dec-20 170 0.832 10700 0.151
Jan-20 525 0.832 10700 0.467 Jan-21 155 0.832 10700 0.138
Feb-20 335 0.832 10700 0.298 Feb-21 125 0.832 10700 0.111
Mar-20 240 0.832 10700 0.214 Mar-21 577 0.832 10700 0.514
Apr-20 205 0.832 10700 0.182 Apr-21 187 0.832 10700 0.166
May-20 150 0.832 10700 0.134 May-21 352 0.832 10700 0.313
Jun-20 155 0.832 10700 0.138 Jun-21 338 0.832 10700 0.301
Jul-20 345 0.832 10700 0.307 Jul-21 1839 0.832 10700 1.637
Aug-20 365 0.832 10700 0.325 Aug-21 862 0.832 10700 0.767
Sep-20 285 0.832 10700 0.254 Sep-21 1353 0.832 10700 1.204
Oct-20 260 0.832 10700 0.231 Oct-21 189 0.832 10700 0.168
3260 2.902 6347 5.650
525 0.467 1839 1.637
150 0.134 125 0.111
272 0.242 529 0.471
Table: 11.2.2
Monthly PNG Consumption
January 2020 to December 2020 January 2021 to October 2021
PNG PNG GCV of PNG Net TOE PNG PNG GCV of PNG Net TOE
Month Month
(kg) (Scm) (kCal/Scm) Consumed (kg) (Scm) (kCal/Scm) Consumed
by PNG by PNG
Jan-20 448 590 9500 0.560 Jan-21 261 343 9500 0.326
Feb-20 361 475 9500 0.451 Feb-21 212 278 9500 0.265
Mar-20 260 342 9500 0.325 Mar-21 236 311 9500 0.295
Apr-20 38 50 9500 0.048 Apr-21 180 237 9500 0.225
May-20 56 74 9500 0.070 May-21 108 142 9500 0.134
Jun-20 149 196 9500 0.186 Jun-21 186 244 9500 0.232
Jul-20 148 195 9500 0.185 Jul-21 220 290 9500 0.275
Aug-20 131 172 9500 0.163 Aug-21 248 327 9500 0.310
Sep-20 182 240 9500 0.228 Sep-21 227 299 9500 0.284
Oct-20 205 269 9500 0.256 Oct-21 234 308 9500 0.292
Nov-20 184 243 9500 0.231 9500 0
Dec-20 200 264 9500 0.251 9500 0
TOTAL 2363 3109 2.953 2112 2778 2.639
MAX. 448 590 0.560 261 343 0.326
MIN. 38 50 0.048 108 142 0.000
AVG. 197 259 0.246 211 278 0.220
11.3 Estimation of Energy Performance Index (EPI):
11.3.1 Specific Energy Consumed by BPCL Noida Building for FY 2019-20
 Total floor area of BPCL Noida building : 12257 m2

 Annual energy consumed by BPCL Noida building : 1037324 kWh
 Specific Power Consumption : 84.63 kWh/m2/yr.
11.3.2 Specific Energy Consumed by BPCL Noida Building for FY 2020-21
 Total floor area of BPCL Noida building : 12257 m2

 Annual energy consumed by BPCL Noida building : 1070294 kWh
 Specific Power Consumption : 87.32 kWh/m2/yr.
NOTE: 12257 m2 areas include the floor area of Basement, Ground floor to 9th floor &
Boundary lighting areas.
As per ECBC published by BEE, In warm & humid climate “Specific Energy
Consumption” as “Energy Performance Index” (EPI) for 5- star rated building having
more than 50% Air-conditioned area is below 100 kWh/m2/yr. with 5-Star Level-
*****.
11.4 Comparative Charts:
A Comparison of Annual Energy Performance Index (kWh/m2/Yr.)
2020-21 87.32
2019-20 84.63
83.00 83.50 84.00 84.50 85.00 85.50 86.00 86.50 87.00 87.50 88.00
EPI (kWh/m2/Yr.)
11.5 Findings on Energy Consumption:
i. Electrical energy consumption (in kWh or in kVAh) & thermal energy consumption (in TOE) for the
year 2020-21 are found to be increasing in trend as compared to the year 2020-21. And it was mainly
due to COVID 19 Lockdown situation, wherein office activity was closed & it was carried out from
home as work at home through online internet facility for some of the months in the year 2020 &
onwards, resulting in lesser energy consumption.
ii. In the present scenario the Energy Performance Index (EPI) of BPCL Building, Noida is in increasing
in trend for the year 2020-21. Still, it is found to be less compared to the published ECBC of BEE.
Hence, energy efficiency is maintaining by BPCL Building, Noida. Still target should be fixed for
further reduction of loss of electrical energy by Power Factor Correction with Harmonic Mitigation,
accurate energy accounting, timely energy auditing by third party and adoption of new energy saving
technologies.
12.0 Electricity Bill Analysis:

a) Electrical energy consumption (kWh) for the 2020-21 is found to be increased by 3.18% compared to
the year 2019-20.
b) Electrical energy consumption (kVAh) for the 2020-21 is found to be increased by 3.65% compared
to the year 2019-20.
c) Monthly Building Maximum Demand for the 2020-21 is found to be increased by 16.78% compared
to the year 2019-20.
d) Monthly Demand charge for the 2020-21 is found to be decreased by 7.57% compared to the year
2019-20.
e) Monthly average power factor is found to be 0.942, which is maximized i.e. unity, resulting in higher
unit (kVAh) consumption & excess monetary cost involved in electricity consumption.
f) Net electricity bill amount for the 2020-21 is found to be increased by 5.79% compared to the year
2019-20.
g) Derived overall Unit Cost for the year 2020-21 is found to be ₹13.84/kWh or ₹13.04/kVAh.
Table: 12.1.1
Monthly Electricity Bill Analysis from September 2019 to August 2020
Month Tariff Connected kWh kVAh kVA Power Energy Energy Energy Energy Demand Bill Amount
Code Load (kVA) Consumed Consumed Demand Factor Consumed Consumed Consumed @ Consumed @ Charge (₹) (₹)
@ @ ₹8.32/kVAh ₹8.68/kVAh
₹7.9/kVAh ₹8.25/kVAh
Sep-19 HV1 1056 112560 118020 520.8 0.954 2500 115520 - - 316800 1387972
Oct-19 HV1 1056 110652 115524 538.8 0.958 833.33 37674.67 1666.67 75349.33 332640 1317938
Nov-19 HV1 1056 79356 83592 460.8 0.949 - - 2500 81092 340580 1131952
Dec-19 HV1 1056 52368 55932 444.0 0.936 - - 2500 53432 340560 876384
Jan-20 HV1 1056 92952 95568 531.6 0.973 - - 2500 93068 340560 1280204
Feb-20 HV1 1056 122556 124848 535.2 0.982 - - 2500 122348 340560 1518449
Mar-20 HV1 1056 53112 55680 523.2 0.954 - - 2500 53180 340560 870533
May-20 HV1 1056 56184 64692 372 0.868 - - 5000 59692 681120 985199
Jun-20 HV1 1056 34580 39288 441.6 0.880 - - 2500 36788 340560 719376
Aug-20 HV1 1056 113292 120600 492 0.939 - - 2500 118100 340560 1137861
Sep-20 HV1 1056 102624 109044 543.6 0.941 - - 2500 106544 340560 1368826
Oct-20 HV1 1056 107088 113508 459.6 0.943 - - 2500 111008 340560 1411471
Total - - 1037324 1096296 - - 3333 153195 29167 910601 4395620 14006163
Max. - - 122556 124848 544 0.982 2500 115520 5000 122348 681120 1518449
Min. - - 34580 39288 372 0.868 833 37675 1667 36788 316800 719376
Avg. - - 86444 91358 489 0.940 1667 76597 2652 82782 366302 1167180
Findings on Electricity Bill Analysis:
 Monthly average Power Factor of this year is not maximized, resulting in higher kVAh unit consumption & increase of kVA demand
of building. Hence, power factor correction is needed near to unity with proper harmonic mitigation.
Table: 12.1.2
Monthly Electricity Bill Analysis from November 2020 to October 2021
Month Tariff Connected kWh kVAh kVA Power Energy Energy Energy Energy Demand Bill Amount
Code Load (kVA) Consumed Consumed Demand Factor Consumed Consumed Consumed @ Consumed @ Charge (₹) (₹)
@ @ ₹8.32/kVAh ₹8.68/kVAh
₹7.9/kVAh ₹8.25/kVAh
Nov-20 HV1 1056 67716 72204 421.2 0.938 - - 2500 69704 340560 1025672
Dec-20 HV1 1056 37284 40488 351.6 0.921 - - 2500 37988 340560 733343.6
Jan-21 HV1 1056 76836 79608 525.6 0.965 - - 2500 77108 340560 1101094
Feb-21 HV1 1056 109044 111516 524.4 0.978 - - 2500 109016 340560 1395429
Mar-21 HV1 1056 49236 51300 486 0.960 - - 2500 48800 340560 830779.8
Apr-21 HV1 1056 67248 71196 391.2 0.945 - - 2500 68696 340560 1021693
May-21 HV1 1056 80918 86532 451.2 0.935 - - 2500 84032 340560 1163031
Jun-21 HV1 1056 83424 89532 447.6 0.932 - - 2500 87032 340560 1189767
Jul-21 HV1 1056 119436 128268 634.8 0.931 - - 2500 125768 340560 1550390
Aug-21 HV1 1056 131088 138708 582 0.945 - - 2500 136208 316900 1556653
Sep-21 HV1 1056 129072 138648 612 0.931 - - 2500 136148 340560 1676084
Oct-21 HV1 1056 118992 128256 608.4 0.928 - - 2500 125756 340560 1572622
Total - - 1070294 1136256 - - - - 30000 1106256 4063060 14816560
Max - - 131088 138708 635 0.978 - - 2500 136208 340560 1676084
Min - - 37284 40488 352 0.921 - - 2500 37988 316900 733344
Avg. - - 89191 94688 503 0.942 - - 2500 92188 338588 1234713
Findings on Electricity Bill Analysis:

Monthly average Power Factor of this year also is not maximized, resulting in higher kVAh unit consumption & increase of kVA demand of
building. Hence, power factor correction is needed near to unity with proper harmonic mitigation.
13.0 Electrical Power Distribution System:

13.1 Introduction:
The main source of electrical energy in BPCL Building, Noida is the 11 kV grid power of
PVVNL. Beside grid power another source of electrical energy is own generation from 2 x
750 kVA & 1 x 500 kVA Diesel Generating (DG) sets. Normally DG sets are used as standby
source of electricity, when power cut occurs.
Normally, 6 kV power is fed to the main substation of BPCL Building, Noida through
underground network of PVVNL, where two transformers, like Transformer-1 &
Transformer-2 of capacity 1000 kVA, 11 kV/0.433 kV each are energized separately
through one 11 kV/11 kV Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR). All transformers are
equipped with vacuum switchgear & over current & earth fault protection relays. Presently
such transformers run in without parallel mode operation and serve loads of this building.
After step down of transformers to LT voltage, presently power is fed to LT PCC of

transformers separately and LT feeders from such PCC feeds power to the different MCC
panels of this building.
All LT PCC of Transformer-1 & Transformer-2 are equipped with new variable LT
capacitors with APFC, having capacity 250 kVAr & 250 kVAr respectively for power factor
correction. There are no other capacitor banks at load centers. Details of transformer
specification, DG set specification & LT capacitor specification are given in table-13.1.1,
13.1.2 & 13.1.3.
Table: 13.1.1
Specification of Distribution Transformer of BPCL Northern Region Building, Noida
Name of Type Capacity Make Year HT- LT-Side HT Side LT Side % Vector
Transformer (kVA) of Side Voltage F.L. F.L. Imp. Group
Mfg. Voltage (kV) Current Current Volt
(kV) (Amp.) (Amp.)
Transformer-1 ONAN 1000 CG 1994 11.0 0.433 52.5 1333.4 5.19 DYn11
Transformer-2 ONAN 1000 CG 1994 11.0 0.433 52.5 1333.4 5.16 DYn11
NOTE:
a. Tap Setting of Transformer-1 was 3.

b. Tap Setting of Transformer-2 was 3.
Table: 13.1.2
Detailed Specification of Diesel Generating Sets in BPCL Northern Region Building, Noida
Particulars Unit DG - 1 DG - 2 DG - 3
Alternator Details
Make Kirloskar Electric Kirloskar Electric Cummins
Rating Apparent Power kVA 750 750 500
Rating Active Power kW 600 600 400
Design Power Factor p.u. 0.80 0.80 0.80
Speed RPM 1500 1500 1500
Generated Voltage kV 0.415 0.415 0.415
F.L. Current Amp. 1043 1043 696
Rated Frequency Hz 50 50 50
Excitation Voltage Volt 10 10 8
Excitation Current Amp. 1.9 1.9 1.7
Insulation Class H H H
Table: 13.1.3
Specification of LT Capacitors at LT PCC of Transformers in BPCL Northern Region Building, Noida
Particulars Unit Rated Data & Result
Location of Capacitor LT PCC of Transformer-1 LT PCC of Transformer-2

Present Operating Mode APFC APFC
No. of Step Capacitor 10 10
Rated Capacity (Each) kVAr 25 25
Total Rated Capacity kVAr 250 250
Rated Voltage, U Volt 440 440
Rated Current, IN (each unit) Amp. 32.8 32.8
Rated Supply Frequency, fN Hz 50 50

Dielectric MPSH MPSH
Cancel
800A ACB
125A MCCB
AC Plant IC-1
DG-1
kVA
750
DG-1 Primary
Pump
800A ACB
125A MCCB
1250A ACB Spare
Street Light
INCOMER-1
800A ACB
125A MCCB
Spare
Domestic Pumps
& AC Make-up
800A ACB
250A MCCB
250 kVAr
Capacitor
1000 kVA, 11kV/
0.433kV TRF-1
Panel-1 Spare
600A VCB
1600A ACB
13.2 Electrical Single Line Diagram of BPCL Northern Regional Building Office, Noida:
800A ACB
250A MCCB
Raising Mains
2000 kVA, 11kV/11kV AVR
IC-1 (2nd, 4th, 6h Bore-well

& 8th Floors) Pump
63A Starter
400A ACB
Basement
Spare Light / HT
11 kV HT Supply
C/O Isolator
160A MCCB
600A VCB
800A VCB
400A ACB
Security Post
Spare
160A MCCB
Sonar Bharat Environment & Ecology (P) Ltd., Date: 8th December 2021
1600A BC
1000 kVA, 11kV/
0.433kV TRF-2
320A MCCB
600A VCB
1600A ACB Spare

400A MCCB
800A ACB Lift No.1, 2, 3 & 4
160A MCCB
AC Plant IC-2
Spare
800A ACB 160A MCCB
INCOMER-2
Fire Pump Service Lift
Plant IC
160A MCCB
800A ACB UPS Room
DG-3
kVA
500
Raising
250A SFU
Mains IC-2
Spare
800A ACB
20 | P a g e
800A ACB 250A SFU
DG-2
250 kVAr
kVA
750
Capacitor Gr. Fl. Light
Panel-2
125A SFU
1250A ACB 800A ACB DG Room Supply
Raising Mains
IC-2 (1st, 3rd, 63A SFU
5th & 9th Floor) Pre Lube Oil
Pump DG-2
13.3 Summary of Electrical Field Measurements and Findings:
Electrical power measurements & data logging were carried out in 10 second time interval
for one hour at secondary side of 1000 kVA Transformer-1 on 17.11.2021 using
sophisticated HIOKI Power Quality Analyzer. During measurements, all electrical
parameters, like voltage profile, current profile, power factor, all power profile, individual
harmonic level was critically studied & analyzed with maximum, minimum & average
values. During study, measurements for Transformer-2 did not carry out due to some oil
filtration problem and full load was given on Transformer-1 for measurements.
13.3.1 Measured Electrical Parameters for Transformer-1
Table: 13.3.1
Phase Voltage Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
Name Date AVG. MIN. MAX. Units Duration Units
V1 rms 17-11-2021 239.1 237.0 241.5 V 60:00:00 (min:s)
V2 rms 17-11-2021 242.1 240.1 244.6 V 60:00:00 (min:s)
V3 rms 17-11-2021 240.4 238.7 242.6 V 60:00:00 (min:s)
Line Current Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
A1 rms 17-11-2021 396.6 240.0 507.0 A 60:00:00 (min:s)
A2 rms 17-11-2021 363.3 202.0 477.0 A 60:00:00 (min:s)
A3 rms 17-11-2021 345.1 196.0 450.0 A 60:00:00 (min:s)
AN rms 17-11-2021 58.2 48.0 73.0 A 60:00:00 (min:s)
Power Factor Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
PFT 17-11-2021 0.939 0.889 0.966 p.u. 60:00:00 (min:s)
Power Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
PT (W) 17-11-2021 249.3 148.2 324.2 kW 60:00:00 (min:s)
QT (VAr) 17-11-2021 91.7 41.1 118.9 kVAr 60:00:00 (min:s)
ST (VA) 17-11-2021 265.7 153.9 343.4 kVA 60:00:00 (min:s)
Unbalance Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
Iunb 17-11-2021 7.9 5.3 13.1 % 60:00:00 (min:s)
Vunb 17-11-2021 0.5 0.3 0.9 % 60:00:00 (min:s)
Harmonic Distortion Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
A1 THDf 17-11-2021 12.6 11.3 13.9 %f 60:00:00 (min:s)
A2 THDf 17-11-2021 12.9 11.5 14.2 %f 60:00:00 (min:s)
A3 THDf 17-11-2021 13.3 12.1 14.5 %f 60:00:00 (min:s)
V1 THDf 17-11-2021 1.9 1.7 2.3 %f 60:00:00 (min:s)
V2 THDf 17-11-2021 1.9 1.6 2.3 %f 60:00:00 (min:s)
V3 THDf 17-11-2021 1.9 1.7 2.3 %f 60:00:00 (min:s)
Software Generated Electricity Profile with Curve at LT PCC of Transformer-1
Fig.13.3.1 Measured Electrical data at LT PCC of Transformer-1
Fig.13.3.2 Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1
Power Consumption Profile at LT PCC of

Transformer-1
400.0
Power Consumption Profile
350.0
300.0
250.0
200.0 kW
150.0 kVA
100.0 kVAr
50.0
0.0
16:48:10
16:51:00
16:53:50
16:56:40
16:59:30
17:02:20
17:05:10
17:08:00
17:10:50
17:13:40
17:16:30
17:19:20
17:22:10
17:25:00
17:27:50
17:30:40
17:33:30
17:36:20
17:39:10
17:42:00
17:44:50
17:47:40
Active Power vs Power Factor Variation at LT PCC of

Transformer-1
0.98 400.0
0.96 350.0
300.0
0.94
Active Power
Power Factor
250.0
0.92
200.0
0.90 PF
150.0
0.88 kW
100.0
0.86 50.0
0.84 0.0
16:48:10
16:51:20
16:54:30
16:57:40
17:00:50
17:04:00
17:07:10
17:10:20
17:13:30
17:16:40
17:19:50
17:23:00
17:26:10
17:29:20
17:32:30
17:35:40
17:38:50
17:42:00
17:45:10
13.3.2 Evaluation of Transformer Efficiency & Losses:

Table: 13.3.2
Evaluation of Efficiency & Losses for 1000 kVA Transformer-1
Unit Value & Result
Particulars
MAX. MIN. AVG.
Rated Capacity kVA 1000 1000 1000
Load Power Factor p.u. 0.966 0.889 0.939
Measured Apparent Power kVA 335.6 166.7 265.5
Measured Active Power kW 324.2 148.2 249.3
Measured Reactive Power kVAr 86.8 76.3 91.3
Percent Loading of Transformer % 33.6 16.7 26.5
Nominal Voltage at Secondary side Volt 433 433 433
Measured Line Voltage at Secondary side Volt 420.7 413.3 416.5
Rated No Load Loss of Transformer Watt 1800 1800 1800
Actual No Load Loss of Transformer Watt 1699 1640 1666
Rated Full Load Loss of Transformer Watt 13300 13300 13300
Actual Load Loss of Transformer Watt 1498 370 937
Total Voltage Harmonic Distortion (THDV) % 2.3 1.7 1.9
Total Current Harmonic Distortion (THDI) % 14.2 11.6 12.9
Increase of Eddy Current Loss due to Harmonics Watt 149.8 29.6 84.4
Actual Total Losses Watt 3347 2039 2688
Transformer Efficiency % 98.91 98.56 98.86
13.3.3 Findings on Measurements & Performance of Transformer:

a) Measured curves indicate that nature of load is found to be highly fluctuating in nature & cyclic in
nature and it is due to frequent loading & unloading of chiller compressor motor, lighting system,
office computers, UPS, Lift & VFD frequency of AHU fan motors.
b) Power Factor was found to be leading in nature without any chiller load & pumping load.
c) Average loading of Transformer-1 is found to be less as loading of chiller & air handling units is found
less due to winter season. Maximum loading of Transformer-1 was recorded as 33.6% with one
chiller running with other loads. When, another chiller load will be added with the system, any one
Transformer of 1000 kVA can cater entire load of building safely without any fall of running
efficiency and in that case core loss for any one Transformer will be saved. In that case one
Transformer should be switched on/off interchangeably for short duration for avoiding any moisture
ingress in core & winding.
d) Average winding temperature of Transformer-1 was found to be satisfactory (Avg.-52oC).
e) Presently average power factor for Transformer-1 is found to be less (0.939) & not maximized for
reduction of kVAh unit reduction as some of Capacitors in APFC Panel-1 is de-rated due to harmonic
resonance.
f) Average voltage unbalancing at LT PCC of transformers is found to be satisfactory (0.54%), which lies
within acceptable limit of 1%. Unbalancing of load current in between three phases was observed
and some cases excess current (Avg.-58.2A) flow through the neutral, leading to increase of line
losses & transformer eddy current loss. Hence, it has to be minimized or neutralized.
g) Derived efficiency of Transformer-1 is found to be satisfactory even with harmonic loading.
h) Total current harmonic distortion (%THDi) is found to be high due to existence of non-linear loads,
like VFD with chiller compressor, secondary chilled water pumps, condenser-cooling tower pumps,
fan-motor of Air Handling Units, LED lamp, UPS, Computers, Sever etc.
13.4 Guide Line for Efficient Running of DG Set:

a) A poorly maintained injection pump increases fuel consumption by 4Gms/kWh.
b) A faulty nozzle increases fuel consumption by 2Gms/kWh.
c) Blocked filters increase fuel consumption by 2Gms/kWh.
d) Lube oil consumption tells about the health of engine. Appropriate specific lube oil
consumption for DG engine is 0.5litre/hr. If the oil consumption goes higher than
this value, engine needs attention.
14.0 Motor Survey & Measurements:

14.1 Introduction:
Noida Office Building of BPCL uses large number of large, medium & small size LT motors
mainly in Chillers, Chilled Water Pumps, Condenser Water Pumps, Air Handler Fans, Fire
Pumps, Domestic Water Pumps, AC Water Make-up Pumps, and Bore-well Pumps etc.
During study, special emphasis was given on LT motors in details to identify the further
scope of energy saving opportunities in motors. Load survey of such LT motors was taken-
up methodically to identify improvement options.
14.2 Objective of the Study:
a. Measurements of different electrical parameters, like voltage, current, load/unload

power factor & power consumption.
b. Evaluation of motor loading & idea of operating efficiency level
c. Voltage level & voltage unbalancing at motor terminals
d. Scope for power factor improvement at motor end & line loss reduction
14.3 Measurements:
Observation on machine side parameters such as load, flow, pressure, temperature, etc., (as
relevant) was also taken with the electrical measurements. Availability of online
instruments for routine measurements, energy meters for monitoring was also looked into
for each case.
14.4 Analysis:
Analysis of observations on medium size LT motors and connected drives was carried out
towards following outputs:
a. Motor load on kW basis and estimated energy consumption
b. Scope for improving monitoring systems to enable sustenance of a regular in-house
Energy Audit function
c. Scope areas for energy conservation with related cost benefits and source
information
The observations were to indicate:
% Loading on kW, voltage, current, power factor, machine side condition like load / unload
condition, pressure, flow, temperature, damper/throttle operation, whether it was rewound
motor, idle operations, metering provisions etc. Details of motor load survey are given in
table below.
14.5 Measured Electrical Parameters & Loading of LT Motors:
Table: 14.1.1
Measured Electrical Parameters of Motors for BPCL Northern Regional Building, Noida
Measurement: 18.12.2021 to 19.12.2021
Motor Rated Effi. Line Current in Amp. Avg. Current Phase Voltage in Volt Avg. Voltage Avg. Total Percent THDV THDI
Sl. Rating RPM (%) Amp. Unb. Volts Unb. Power Power Loading (%) (%)
Drive's Name
No. in kW R Y B (%) RN YN BN (%) Factor Input in (%)
kW
1. Chiller - 3 128.9 1450 95.5 239.0 250.2 251.7 247.0 1.9 236.2 238.8 237.9 237.6 0.5 0.931 164.0 121.5 4.7 34.3
2. PCW Pump - 1 7.5 1450 88.7 10.3 10.9 10.1 10.4 5.0 236.6 236.6 239.2 237.5 0.7 0.949 7.04 83.3 4.3 6.9
3. PCW Pump - 2 7.5 1450 88.7 9.8 10.8 9.8 10.1 6.2 236.8 236.4 239.4 237.5 0.8 0.948 6.85 81.0 4.2 6.5
4. PCW Pump - 3 7.5 1450 88.7 10.5 11.2 10.5 10.8 4.5 238.8 242.2 240.5 240.5 0.7 0.743 5.77 68.2 2.4 3.7
5. PCW Pump - 4 7.5 1450 88.7 10.8 11.5 10.7 11.0 4.0 239.5 242.9 241.3 241.2 0.7 0.732 5.83 68.9 2.2 3.4
6. CT Fan - 1 5.5 1450 85.0 5.5 6.0 5.7 5.7 4.1 237.3 240.9 239.1 239.1 0.8 0.582 2.4 36.9 2.4 5.9
7. CT Fan - 2 5.5 1450 85.0 6.9 7.0 6.5 6.8 2.6 238.5 241.3 240.1 240.0 0.6 0.721 3.5 54.6 2.3 5.5
8. CT Fan - 3 5.5 1450 85.0 6.9 7.8 6.0 6.9 12.4 238.2 238.2 241.3 239.2 0.9 -0.974 4.8 74.5 4.1 7.5
9. CDW Pump - 2 22 1470 91.6 32.2 34.1 30.5 32.2 5.7 237.2 237.0 240.0 238.1 0.8 -0.895 20.6 85.8 4.1 6.0
10. CDW Pump - 3 22 1470 91.6 33.0 34.3 32.3 33.2 3.3 237.3 240.8 239.2 239.1 0.7 0.826 19.7 81.9 2.3 4.2
11. CDW Pump - 4 22 1470 82.0 32.4 32.8 32.8 32.7 0.4 242.5 244.9 243.9 243.8 0.5 0.152 3.6 13.5 3.5 69.6
12. SCW Pump - 1 11 1460 89.8 17.6 18.4 19.5 18.5 5.4 240.8 243.9 242.2 242.3 0.7 0.898 12.1 98.5 2.0 47.1
13. SCW Pump - 2 11 1460 80.0 0.9 1.4 1.2 1.2 20.7 238.8 242.0 240.5 240.4 0.7 0.581 0.5 3.6 2.4 134.4
14. SCW Pump - 3 11 1460 89.8 16.3 17.8 18.3 17.5 4.8 240.0 239.8 242.5 240.8 0.7 -0.547 6.9 56.4 3.7 41.3
15. AHU - 2 (Wing-A) 7.5 577 80.0 4.3 2.8 2.8 3.3 29.8 243.3 247.2 245.5 245.3 0.8 0.801 1.9 20.7 2.6 77.9
16. AHU - 13 (Wing-B) 2.2 577 82.0 1.6 1.5 3.0 2.0 46.5 241.8 244.9 243.4 243.4 0.6 -0.804 1.2 44.4 2.5 76.4
17. AHU - 3 (Wing-A) 5.5 577 80.0 2.9 2.6 4.3 3.2 32.2 232.7 234.4 242.5 236.5 2.5 -0.871 2.0 29.1 2.9 56.0
18. AHU - 15 (Wing-B) 5 577 80.0 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.3 5.5 233.0 236.5 241.1 236.9 1.8 0.823 1.9 31.0 2.5 64.6
19. AHU - 12 (Wing-A) 7.5 577 78.0 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.4 5.8 242.4 245.5 243.7 243.9 0.7 0.677 1.2 12.2 2.2 107.2
20. AHU - 23 (Wing-B) 5.5 577 85.0 7.3 5.8 5.8 6.3 16.0 240.1 243.2 241.5 241.6 0.7 0.789 3.6 55.8 2.0 78.8
21. AHU - 10 (Wing-A) 5.5 577 83.0 3.3 3.8 5.3 4.2 28.3 242.0 244.4 242.6 243.0 0.6 0.793 2.4 36.2 2.0 80.6
22. AHU - 21 (Wing-B) 5.5 577 85.0 7.4 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.3 241.8 244.5 243.1 243.1 0.6 0.772 4.4 67.2 2.1 80.4
23. AHU - 8 (Wing-B) 5.5 577 80.0 5.4 4.0 4.2 4.6 19.5 240.5 243.8 242.1 242.1 0.7 0.783 2.6 37.7 2.0 81.8
24. AHU - 19 (Wing-B) 5.5 577 78.0 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.2 8.4 240.5 243.7 241.5 241.9 0.7 0.687 1.6 22.7 2.0 106.1
25. AHU - 5 (Wing-A) 5.5 577 85.0 6.9 5.5 5.7 6.0 14.6 240.5 243.6 242.2 242.1 0.6 0.789 3.5 53.3 2.0 78.9
26. AHU - 17 (Wing-B) 5.5 577 85.0 6.0 6.2 7.9 6.7 17.4 242.2 245.2 243.0 243.5 0.7 0.823 4.0 62.1 1.8 68.4
14.6 Findings on Motor Survey & Measurements:

a. Most cases loading of motors for Chiller Plant, like Compressors, Primary Chilled Water
Pumps, Secondary Chilled Water Pumps, Condenser Water Pumps & Cooling Tower Fans is
found to be more than 50%, indicating high operational efficiency near to design value.
b. Some cases loading of Air Handling Units (AHU) is found to be less than 50% as most of
motors run with low frequency or low speed with VFD, indicating low operational efficiency
as against design value.
c. Significant leading power factor was observed at input starter of CT Fan – 3 motor, CDW
Pump – 2 motor, SCW Pump – 3 motor, AHU - 13 (Wing-B) fan motor & AHU - 3 (Wing-A)
fan motor and it due to improper flux distribution in between stator & rotor, resulting in
further increase of line current & chances of increase voltages.
d. Most cases Total Current Harmonic Distortion (%THDi) is found to be significantly high for
VFD connected motors like for Compressor for Screw Chillers, Secondary Chilled Water
Pumps, Condenser-cooling Tower Pumps, Air Handling Units. This harmonic currents of
different order is flowing through the entire networks & infects other motors, which are
connected with DOL starter or Y/Δ starter and increases motor losses.
e. Some cases higher & some cases significant current unbalancing was observed for the motor
of CT Fan – 3, SCW Pump – 2, AHU - 2 (Wing-A), AHU - 13 (Wing-B), AHU - 3 (Wing-A), AHU -
23 (Wing-B), AHU - 10 (Wing-A), AHU - 8 (Wing-B), AHU - 5 (Wing-A) & AHU - 17 (Wing-B),
leading to increase of motor winding losses.
f. All cases voltage unbalancing at starter input is found to be satisfactory & lies within
acceptable limit of 1%.
Fig.14.1 Load vs. Power Factor, Efficiency Fig.14.2 Effect of Voltage Unbalance on motor
15.0 Performance Evaluation of Chiller:

15.1 Introduction:
At present there are 3 nos. of Chillers of BLUE STAR make with Screw Compressors of 755.23 kW or
215 TR capacity each at BPCL Noida Building and they are exclusively catered Air-conditioning loads
of entire building and it contributes around 80% area of air-conditioning from ground floor to 9th
floor and only basement area & some of common area of each floor are not covered with air-
conditioning.
In existing process of air conditioning, chilled water supply is based on Primary – Secondary Chilled
Water Pumping system, where initially chilled water enters into chiller by any one or two or three
primary pumps and after heat exchanging few degrees inside chiller, chilled water then is delivered
to all Air Handling Units (AHU) by Secondary Chilled Water Pumps and then returns back to chiller
from AHUs.
Normally, in summer season, any two or three Chillers are run continuously, which are connected
with “Variable Voltage & Frequency Drive” (VVFD). In winter season, any one chiller is run
continuously due to less cooling demand. During audit Chiller-2 & Chiller-3 were run alternately for
trial & testing.
At present there are 3 nos. of Primary Chilled Water Pumps & 3 nos. of Secondary Chilled Water
Pumps. Normally, at present any one or two Primary Chilled Water Pumps are run continuously and
any one or two Secondary Chilled Water Pumps are directly connected to chillers & AHUs are run
continuously depending on cooling load demand.
On the other hand, Cold Water is supplied to Condenser Unit from Cooling Towers & after exchanging
heat, hot water is return back to Cooling Towers for cooling. At present there are 4 nos. of Condenser
Water Pumps and normally two or three pumps are run continuously depending on running of
number of chillers.
An exhaustive study was carried out to check the operating psychometric performance of most of
individual air-conditioners at site ambient condition & existing cooling load.
a) Evaluation of performance of air-conditioners, which will include the actual loading on air-
conditioners, power measurements, psychometric measurements, air flow measurement and
comparison with design capacity.
b) Evaluation of specific power consumption (kW/TON), Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) &
Coefficient of Performance (COP) of air-conditioners, which are the indicator of efficiency
assessment of air-conditioners.
c) Checking of filter condition.
d) Checking of cooling coil condition of evaporator & condenser coil condition
15.3 Measured Electrical Parameters for Chiller-2:

Table-15.3.1
Phase Voltage Measurements at Input of Chiller-2
V1 rms 17-11-2021 239.0 238.4 239.7 V 15:00:00 (min:s)
V2 rms 17-11-2021 241.8 241.1 242.4 V 15:00:00 (min:s)
V3 rms 17-11-2021 240.7 240.1 241.2 V 15:00:00 (min:s)
Line Current Measurements at Input of Chiller-2
A1 rms 17-11-2021 102.6 101.1 103.9 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
A2 rms 17-11-2021 105.8 103.8 107.9 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
A3 rms 17-11-2021 97.3 95.1 99.6 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
AN rms 17-11-2021 7.4 4.9 9.6 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
Power Factor Measurements at Input of Chiller-2
PFT 17-11-2021 0.766 0.761 0.772 p.u. 15:00:00 (min:s)
Power Measurements at Input of Chiller-2
PT (W) 17-11-2021 56.3 55.3 57.4 kW 15:00:00 (min:s)
QT (var) 17-11-2021 47.3 46.8 47.7 kvar 15:00:00 (min:s)
ST (VA) 17-11-2021 73.5 72.5 74.4 kVA 15:00:00 (min:s)
Unbalance Measurements at Input of Chiller-2
Iunb 17-11-2021 3.8 2.6 5.2 % 15:00:00 (min:s)
Vunb 17-11-2021 0.35 0.20 0.60 % 15:00:00 (min:s)
Harmonic Distortion Measurements at Input of Chiller-2
A1 THDf 17-11-2021 46.4 37.2 55.6 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
A2 THDf 17-11-2021 47.3 40.3 54.2 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
A3 THDf 17-11-2021 48.2 39.6 56.8 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
V1 THDf 17-11-2021 2.6 2.4 2.7 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
V2 THDf 17-11-2021 2.3 2.2 2.5 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
V3 THDf 17-11-2021 2.4 2.3 2.6 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
15.4 Measured Electrical Parameters for Chiller-3:

Table-15.4.1
Phase Voltage Measurements at Input of Chiller-3
V1 rms 17-11-2021 236.4 236.0 236.8 V 15:00:00 (min:s)
V2 rms 17-11-2021 239.3 238.6 240.0 V 15:00:00 (min:s)
V3 rms 17-11-2021 238.2 237.8 238.5 V 15:00:00 (min:s)
Line Current Measurements at Input of Chiller-3
A1 rms 17-11-2021 234.9 227.2 239.1 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
A2 rms 17-11-2021 246.9 238.5 251.9 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
A3 rms 17-11-2021 247.8 241.5 252.1 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
AN rms 17-11-2021 12.6 10.2 15.2 A 15:00:00 (min:s)
Power Factor Measurements at Input of Chiller-3
PFT 17-11-2021 0.931 0.930 0.932 p.u. 15:00:00 (min:s)
Power Measurements at Input of Chiller-3
PT (W) 17-11-2021 161.6 156.6 164.3 kW 15:00:00 (min:s)
QT (var) 17-11-2021 63.4 61.7 64.4 kvar 15:00:00 (min:s)
ST (VA) 17-11-2021 173.6 168.4 176.5 kVA 15:00:00 (min:s)
Unbalance Measurements at Input of Chiller-3
Iunb 17-11-2021 1.9 1.6 2.4 % 15:00:00 (min:s)
Vunb 17-11-2021 0.41 0.10 0.70 % 15:00:00 (min:s)
Harmonic Distortion Measurements at Input of Chiller-3
A1 THDf 17-11-2021 33.8 30.3 37.2 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
A2 THDf 17-11-2021 33.6 31.2 35.9 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
A3 THDf 17-11-2021 32.4 29.8 34.9 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
V1 THDf 17-11-2021 4.7 4.6 5.0 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
V2 THDf 17-11-2021 4.9 4.7 5.2 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
V3 THDf 17-11-2021 4.5 4.3 4.8 %f 15:00:00 (min:s)
15.5 Performance Evaluation of Chiller:

Table: 15.5.1
Performance Evaluation of Chillers at Part & Full Load Condition for BPCL Northern Regional Office, Noida
(Date of Trial: 18.11.2021)
Sl. Unit Design Analysis & Design Analysis &
Name of Chiller
No. Parameter Result Parameter Result
1. Identification Number of Chiller Chiller-2 Chiller-3
2. Make - Blue Star Blue Star
3. Type of Chiller - Screw - Screw -
TR 215.0 - 215.0 -
4. Rated Capacity of Chillers
kW 755.2 - 755.2 -
5. Coolant - Water - Water -
6. Refrigerant used (HFC) - R 134a - R 134a -
7. Temp. Differential across Chiller (∆T) o 6.65 1.6 6.65 5.6
C
8. CMH 129.0 146.2 129.0 137.7
9. Frequency of Chilled Primary Water Pump Hz 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
o
10. Temp. Differential across Condenser (∆T) C 6.6 6.0 6.3 3.8
11. CMH 182.8 190.8 182.8 192.3
12. Specific Heat of Water kCal/kgoC 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
13. Density of Water kg/m3 1000 1000 1000 1000
TR 215.0 77.4 215.0 255.0
14. Net Refrigeration Effect of Chiller
Watt 755940 271988 755940 896477
15. Percent Loading of Chiller (%) % 100 36.0 100 118.6
16. Capacity Wise Chilled Water Flow required CMH/TR 0.600 1.890 0.600 0.540
17. Capacity Wise Condenser Water Flow required CMH/TR 0.850 2.466 0.850 0.754
18. Power Consumed by Compressor Motor kW 128.9 57.4 128.9 164.3
19. Power Consumed by Primary Chilled Water Pumps kW 1 x 7.5 7.0 1 x 7.5 6.9
20. Power Consumed by Secondary Chilled Water Pump kW 1 x 11 6.9 1 x 11 12.1
21. Power Consumed by Condenser Water Pumps kW 1 x 22 19.7 1 x 22 20.6
22. Power Consumed by Cooling Tower Fans kW 1 x 5.5 3.5 1 x 5.5 4.8
23. Total Power Consumed by Central AC Plant kW 351.9 94.6 351.9 208.7
24. Compressor Motor Efficiency % 95.5 95.0 95.5 95.0
25. Transmission Efficiency of compressor & motor % 99.5 99.5 99.5 99.5
26. Compressor Input Power kW 122.5 54.3 122.5 155.3
kW/TR 0.570 0.701 0.570 0.609
27. Actual Specific Power of Compressor
IKW/TR 0.65 0.742 0.65 0.644
28. Compressor Shaft Power Watt 122484 54257 122484 155305
29. Coefficient of Performance (COP) 6.00 5.01 6.00 5.77
15.6 Findings on Chiller Study:

a) Actual operating Specific Power Consumption (kW/TR) as an efficiency indicator for Chiller-
2 at part load is found to be high as against design value & same for more than 100% cooling
load of Chiller-3 is found to be less as compared to design condition, which is satisfactory. As
study was conducted in winter time, performance at hot & humid summer season could not
establish.
b) Power consumed by compressor of Chiller-3 is found to be significantly high compared to
rated input power of compressor motor.
c) Actual chilled water flow/TR for Chiller-2 is found to be significantly high & same for Chiller-
3 is found to be satisfactory as compared to design value.
d) Actual condenser water flow/TR for Chiller-2 is found to be significantly high & same for
condenser water flow/TR for Chiller-3 is found to be satisfactory.
e) Overall Coefficient of Performance (COP) in winter is found to be satisfactory.
f) Suction & delivery valves of all chilled water pumps & condenser water pumps are fully
opened by 100%.
Fig.15.1 Electrical Measurements taken by Energy Auditor for Chillers
16.0 Performance Evaluation of Pump:

16.1 Introduction:
Cooling Water & Chilled Water demand plays vital role in BPCL Building, Noida for supplying Chilled
Water to Chillers & cooling water to Condenser-Cooling Tower & share a significant amount of
electrical energy.
At present there are 4 nos. of Primary Chilled Water Pumps for Chiller Inlet, 4 nos. of Secondary
Chilled Water Pumps for Chiller Outlet & 4 nos. of Condenser Water Pumps for Cooling Tower supply.
Normally, any one Primary Chilled Water Pump, any one Secondary Chilled Water Pump at Chiller
Outlet & any two Condenser Water Pumps run continuously during Winter Season, when any one
Chiller runs. In Summer Season, normally any two Primary Chilled Water Pumps, any two or three
Secondary Chilled Water Pumps at Chiller Outlet & three or four Condenser Water Pumps run
continuously, when any two or three chillers run.
During field audit, diagnostic field trial was carried to measure chilled water flow & condenser water
flow by digital Ultrasonic Flow Meter, pressure at Suction & Discharge points of chillers & condensers
& power at motor input and these captured data were then analyzed to evaluate the actual efficiency
of these above mentioned pumps.
Fig.16.1 Chilled Water Pumps & Condenser Water Pumps

a. Reduction of power consumption of the pump as practicable as possible
b. Identification of oversize pump if any
c. Identification of imbalance in pumping operation
d. Assessment of actual efficiency of existing pump
e. Measurements of power consumption, head develops, temperature of water, flow of water
pump
f. Identification of any inefficiency of pumps by systematic measurements & trial at site
condition
16.3 Performance Evaluation of Pump:

Table: 16.3.1
Performance Assessment of Pumps in BPCL Building, Noida
Sl. Unit PCW PCW PCW PCW SCW SCW CDW CDW
No. Particulars Pump-1 Pump-2 Pump-3 Pump-4 Pump-1 Pump-3 Pump-2 Pump-3
1. Actual Discharge Flow Rate CMH 117.5 116.4 103.1 103.4 154.8 102.8 195.7 192.8
2. Design Flow Rate CMH 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 200.0 200.0
3. Measured Suction Head meter 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 43.0 40.0 40.0
4. Measured Discharge head meter 55.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 60.0 60.0 58.0 58.0
5. Total developed head meter 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 18.0 18.0
6. Design Total Head meter 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 22.0 22.0 25.0 25.0
Percent Discharge Valve opening % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
7.
Supply /VFD Frequency Hz 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 42.0 35.0 35.0
8. Pump Speed RPM 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450
9. Water Temperature oC 13.8 13.8 13.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
10. Fluid Density kg/m3 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
11. Hydraulic Power developed by the pump kW 4.8 4.8 4.2 4.2 7.2 4.8 9.6 9.5
12. Motor Power Drawn kW 7.04 6.85 5.77 5.83 12.1 6.9 20.6 19.7
13. Motor Efficiency % 88.7 88.7 88.7 88.7 89.8 89.8 91.6 91.6
14. Transmission Efficiency % 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0
Derived Shaft Power or Pump Input
15. kW 6.2 6.0 5.1 5.1 10.8 6.1 18.7 17.9
Power
Derived Pump Efficiency at actual
% 77.7 79.1 83.2 82.6 66.7 77.5 51.4 52.9
16. Condition
Design Pump Efficiency % 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 82.0 82.0
17. Overall Pumping System Efficiency % 68.2 69.5 73.0 72.5 59.3 68.9 46.6 48.0
18. Specific Power Consumption kWh/m3 0.060 0.059 0.056 0.056 0.078 0.067 0.105 0.102
16.4 Findings on Pump Performance:

A. Primary Chilled Water Pump (PCWP):
1. Measured average flow with 100% discharge valve opening for primary chilled water pump-
1, 2, 3 & 4 is found to be less (110.1 CMH) as against average design flow of 150 CMH.
2. Operating average total developed head (Delivery head – Suction head) of primary chilled
water pump-1, 2, 3 & 4 is found to be less (15 meters) as against average design head of 18
meters.
3. Average power consumed by primary chilled water pump-1, 2, 3 & 4 is found to be high (6.4
kW) as their motors are not connected with VVFD.
4. Average operating pump efficiency is found to be highly satisfactory (80.6%) as against

design efficiency of 78.0% and it is due to mainly less power consumed by pump motors.
5. No on line water flow meter is connected to the individual pump or in common header and
other parameters like temperature, pressure, ampere of motor etc. are monitored daily
manually in a log book .
B. Secondary Chilled Water Pump (SCWP) at Chiller Outlet:
1. Measured average flow with 100% discharge valve opening for secondary chilled water
pump-1 & 3 is found to be very less (128.8 CMH) as against average design flow of 150 CMH.
2. Operating average total developed head (Delivery head – Suction head) of secondary chilled
water pump-1 & 3 is found to be less (17.0 meters) as against average design head of 22
meters.
3. Average power consumed by secondary chilled water pump-1 & 3 is found to be high (9.5
kW) as their motors are connected with VVFD.
4. Average operating pump efficiency is found to be less (72.1%) as against design efficiency of
78.0% and it is due to less total head developed by pumps & higher power consumed by
pump motors.
C. Condenser Water Pump (CDWP):
1. Measured average flow with 100% discharge valve opening for Condenser water pump-2 &
3 is found to be marginally less (194.4 CMH) as against average design flow of 200 CMH.
2. Operating average total developed head (Delivery head – Suction head) of condenser water
pump-2 & 3 for cooling tower supply is found to be less (18.0 meters) as against average
design head of 25 meters.
3. Average power consumed by condenser water pump-2 & 3 for cooling tower supply is found
to be very high (20.2 kW) as their motors are not connected with VVFD.
4. Average operating pump efficiency for CDWP-2 & CDWP-3 is found to be very poor (52.2%)
as against design efficiency of 82.0% and it is due to only less total head developed & high
power consumed by pump motors without VVFD.
17.0 Lighting & Illumination System:

17.1 Introduction:
Lighting energy contributes to more than 16.23% of power in BPCL Building, Noida and this building
mainly uses of massive population of different wattage of most energy efficient & long lasting LED
based Lighting System & conventional compact fluorescent lamps (CFL & energy inefficient 50W spot
halogen lamps in different floor areas, substation areas, security room area & other outdoor of this
building.
Presently, power is fed to floor-wise dedicated lighting feeders through raising mains to floor-wise
lighting sub-panel from PCC panel room..
The field study was included the LUX measurements & comparison with IS standard, condition of
lamp/ luminaries survey, lighting supply voltage etc.
A detail of LUX measurements for main building was carried out at some of wings of different floors
randomly by digital LUX meter.
Details of different types of lighting population & energy consumption are furnished below.
MAIN BUILDING
Type of Light Lighting Population
5W LED (R) Fix. 1379
10W LED (R) Fix. 68
12W LED TL 157
18W LED TL 2585
9W CFL 85
50W Halogen 34
Type of Light Energy Consumed (kWh)

5W LED (R) Fix. 22034
10W LED (R) Fix. 1780
12W LED TL 4858
18W LED TL 137271
9W CFL 4757
50W Halogen 3323
17.2 Salient Observations:
 At present 97.24% cases BPCL building covers & uses most energy efficient & long lasting
LED based lighting system like low watt high efficacy LED Tube light & Round down low
wattage LED fixtures and only 2.76% conventional & high wattage lighting system i.e. CFL &
spot halogen still exists.
 Inefficient 50W spot halogen lamps contribute to around 0.79% of total lighting population,
which is less & satisfactory. Building may be replaced this inefficient halogen spot light in
phase manner by low wattage LED based yellow colour.
 18W LED TL (Tube Light) contributes to highest population & energy consumption (60% &
78.88% respectively).
 Most cases measured LUX for wing work space areas was found to be marginally less as
compared to recommended value of IS 3646 (Part-1)-1992.
 Lighting system of most of the office toilets in wing areas of different floor is equipped with
occupancy sensor and substantial amount of energy saving is realized due to automatic
switching off the lighting circuits during non-occupancy time.
 There is no scope for harnessing Natural Day light at office areas of the wing areas of
different floor. Hence lighting requirement is found to be high.
 Measured lighting voltage is found to be high (242.3 volt) & it is not optimized in main
lighting feeders. Hence electrical energy is lost & reduced the life of the connected lamps
also.
 There is some unbalancing of current in main lighting feeders on raising mains. If it is

balanced up to 50%, considerable amount electrical line loss will be reduced.
 Presently no task light at working desk is using for reduction of wing lighting consumption.
 No energy meter is connected to the lighting feeder at present. Hence, no energy accounting
is done for lighting feeder.
17.3 Recommended Illumination [Source: IS 3646 (Part 1): 1992]
L – R – H (L – Lower Value of illuminance, H – Higher Value of illuminance, R –

Recommended illuminance).
Panel & unmanned Electrical MCC Panel Room Area L R H
*Electrical PCC Panel Room 100 150 200
Office Premises
*Wing office spaces 200 300 500
*Lobby areas 50 100 150
*Reception Area 150 200 300
*Toilet Area 50 100 150
Table: 17.3.1
IS 3646 (Part
Sl. AVG. % Less/
Location MEASURED LUX 1): 1992
No. LUX Excess
L -R -H
2 9th Floor (Wing -A) 255, 292, 226, 279, 235, 195, 197 239.9 200-300-500 -25.07
3 8th Floor (Wing -B) 220, 174, 171, 162, 268, 283, 173 207.3 200-300-500 -44.73
4 7th Floor (Wing -A) 190, 270, 308, 212, 192, 214 231.0 200-300-500 -29.87
5 6th Floor (Wing -B) 273, 343, 226, 203, 210, 239, 156 235.7 200-300-500 -27.27
6 5th Floor (Wing -A) 100, 256, 266, 238, 246, 235, 276 231.0 200-300-500 -29.87
7 4th Floor (Wing -B) 208, 220, 164, 160, 161, 272 197.5 200-300-500 -51.90
210, 167, 448, 255, 276, 252, 329,
8 3th Floor (Wing -A) 296.6 200-300-500 -1.14
436
9 2nd Floor (Wing -B) 210, 206, 276, 235, 275, 213 235.8 200-300-500 -27.21
10 1st Floor (Wing -A) 367, 445, 359, 448, 290, 241 358.3 200-300-500 16.28
17.4 List of Lighting Population & Energy Consumption

Table: 17.4.1
Lighting Details & Energy Consumption Profile of BPCL Northern Regional Building, Noida
Nos. of Watt/ Ballast Running Power Annual
light Lamp watt Hours Consumed Energy
Floor Wing Location Type of light
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
H/K Store 1 18 1 24 0.019 128
Driver desk 3 18 1 24 0.057 383
Maintenance Room 4 18 1 24 0.076 666
Basement
File store 4 18 1 24 0.076 511

g
18W LED TL
in
W
HVAC Plant 72 18 1 24 1.368 11984

A-
HVAC Plant store 2 18 1 24 0.038 255

Car Parking 53 18 1 24 1.007 6767
In Frout of ramp 2 18 1 24 0.038 255
Fire pump Room 12 18 1 24 0.228 1532
Fire store no.8 2 18 1 24 0.038 255
Basement
Store no.5 2 18 1 24 0.038 255

g
18W LED TL
in
W
maintenance store 3 18 1 24 0.057 383

B-
UPS Room 3 18 1 24 0.057 383

Stationary 2 18 1 24 0.038 255
D.G Room 18W LED TL 37 18 1 12 0.703 3079
VCB Room 18W LED TL 3 18 1 12 0.057 250
Capacitor Bank 18W LED TL 2 18 1 12 0.038 166
Mali Mali Room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 12 0.019 64
D.G Wash Room 18W LED TL 2 18 1 12 0.038 166
Stationary room 18W LED TL 9 18 1 12 0.171 575
Ground Floor
A rea
Main gate security room 18W LED TL 3 18 1 12 0.057 250

18W LED TL 21 18 1 12 0.399 1341
r
Old Reception
Oute
5W LED (R ) Fix. 13 5 1 12 0.078 262

18W LED TL 1 18 1 12 0.019 64
Gents toilet
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 12 0.012 40
18W LED TL 1 18 1 12 0.019 64
ladies toilet
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 12 0.012 40
Main IN Side (A) 18W LED TL 10 18 1 10 0.190 532
Main out Side (B) 18W LED TL 10 18 1 10 0.190 532
A wing Stair case 18W LED TL 23 18 1 12 0.437 1914
M wing Stair case 18W LED TL 25 18 1 12 0.475 2081
B wing Stair case 18W LED TL 21 18 1 12 0.399 1748
Fire control room 18W LED TL 5 18 1 24 0.095 832
Electrical exch.room 18W LED TL 9 18 1 8.5 0.171 407
Driver Room 18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Gallery 5W LED (R ) Fix. 15 5 1 8.5 0.090 214
18W LED TL 24 18 1 8.5 0.456 1085
Hindi deptt.
5W LED (R ) Fix. 19 5 1 8.5 0.114 271
Ground Floor
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

Doctor Room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
Cabin no.8 18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
g
in
W
Cabin no.15 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

A-
Facility manager 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

Sindicate rooms 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Visitor Room 5W LED (R ) Fix. 12 5 1 8.5 0.072 171
ATM Room 5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
securitychanging room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
electrical store 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Reception hall 5W LED (R ) Fix. 54 5 1 8.5 0.324 771
Learning Center lobby 5W LED (R ) Fix. 40 5 1 8.5 0.240 571
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
IRES
12W LED TL 111 12 1 8.5 1.443 3434
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Cabin no.1
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Ground Floor
Cabin no.2 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

l
Cabin no.3 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45

al
-H
Cabin no.4 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

K
A
D
Cabin no.5 18W LED TL 3 18 1 8.5 0.057 136

A.H.U no.1 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8
A.H.U no.2 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 35 18 1 8.5 0.665 1583
Dak Hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 9 5 1 8.5 0.054 129
Learning Center 18W LED TL 30 18 1 8.5 0.570 1357
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Staff wash room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
Ground Floor
18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45

ladies wash room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
g
in
w
H.K Store 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

B-
Electrical panel 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45

A.H.U no.13 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
A.H.U no.14 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
VIP lift lobby 18W LED TL 5 18 1 12 0.095 416
Cabin no.120 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Cabin no.121 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Cabin no.122 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.119 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 7 18 1 8.5 0.133 317
Cabin no.118
5W LED (R ) Fix. 17 5 1 8.5 0.102 243
Cabin no.117 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.116 18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
cabin no.115 18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Cabin no.114
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
18W LED TL 7 18 1 8.5 0.133 317
Cabin no.113
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Cabin no.112
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Cabin no.111
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
First Floor
Cabin no.110 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

g
in
-W
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271

Cabin no.109
A
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29

18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.108
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.107
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.106
5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86
18W LED TL 71 18 1 8.5 1.349 3211
Work station Hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 15 5 1 8.5 0.090 214
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Gallery
5W LED (R ) Fix. 21 5 1 8.5 0.126 300
Staff wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Ladies wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
VIP wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
A.H.U no.3 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
A.H.U no.4 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
Service Lift Lobby 9W CFL 5 9 4 12 0.065 285
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
18W LED TL 32 18 1 8.5 0.608 1447
Library
5W LED (R ) Fix. 31 5 1 8.5 0.186 443
Front Gallery 5W LED (R ) Fix. 9 5 1 8.5 0.054 129
18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
NRTC Gallery
5W LED (R ) Fix. 14 5 1 8.5 0.084 200
18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Aakash tiwari
5W LED (R ) Fix. 11 5 1 8.5 0.066 157
18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Chandirika
5W LED (R ) Fix. 12 5 1 8.5 0.072 171
18W LED TL 20 18 1 8.5 0.380 904
Computer room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 11 5 1 8.5 0.066 157
18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Lubes Gallery
5W LED (R ) Fix. 8 5 1 8.5 0.048 114
Cabin no. 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Manoj Naryal
5W LED (R ) Fix. 23 5 1 8.5 0.138 328
18W LED TL 5 18 1 8.5 0.095 226
Cabin no.105
5W LED (R ) Fix. 10 5 1 8.5 0.060 143
Access Room 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
First Floor
Projector Room 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

g
in
w
Fan store 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

B-
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

BSSPL Room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 10 5 1 8.5 0.060 143
Electrical panel room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 12 0.019 83
Cabin no.103 18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 255
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
ladies wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Indrajeet singh 5W LED (R ) Fix. 7 5 1 8.5 0.042 100
50W Halogen 8 50 0 8.5 0.400 952
A.H.U no.14 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
A.H.U.no.15 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8
A.H.U. no.16 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Pravesh jain
5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
Manoj Naryal store 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Wash Room Lobby 9W CFL 5 9 4 12 0.065 285
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
Lift Lobby 5W LED (R ) Fix. 15 5 1 12 0.090 394
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 81
Visitor Hall area 5W LED (R ) Fix. 11 5 1 8.5 0.066 157
Work station Hall 5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
18W LED TL 5 18 1 8.5 0.095 226
Canteen dining hall 5W LED (R ) Fix. 61 5 1 8.5 0.366 871
12W LED TL 5 12 1 8.5 0.065 155
Second Floor
18W LED TL 10 18 1 8.5 0.190 452

Club hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 17 5 1 8.5 0.102 243
g
in
W
Ladies raist room 5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43

A-
18W LED TL 3 18 1 8.5 0.057 136

Tash Room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86
Canteen kitchan 18W LED TL 42 18 1 8.5 0.798 1899
Staff computer desk 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
H/K STORE 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
A.H.U no.5 18W LED TL 2 18 1 0.5 0.038 5
Sevice Lift lobby 18W LED TL 5 18 1 8.5 0.095 295
Electrical panel room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
18W LED TL 25 18 1 8.5 0.475 1131
Work station hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 10 5 1 8.5 0.060 143
18W LED TL 26 18 1 8.5 0.494 1176
Library
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
V.B Sharma c.n.202
5W LED (R ) Fix. 8 5 1 8.5 0.048 114
18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
S.K Mahesh 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52
Second Floor
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

A.K Dutta 5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86
g
in
w
10W LED (R ) Fix. 5 10 1 8.5 0.055 131

B-
Abhay shankar 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

Rajneesh tiwari 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
V.B Sharma right side 5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
M.M chawala 5W LED (R ) Fix. 16 5 1 8.5 0.096 228
10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52
A.H.U No.17 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8
Cabin no.206 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.207 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.208 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.209 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin no.210
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
5W LED (R ) Fix. 12 5 1 12 0.072 315
Lift Lobby
50W Halogen 1 50 0 12 0.050 219
VIP wash room (G) 12W LED TL 13 12 1 8.5 0.169 402
VIP wash room (L) 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
18W LED TL 16 18 1 8.5 0.304 724
Cabin no 305 5W LED (R ) Fix. 32 5 1 8.5 0.192 457
12W LED TL 16 12 1 8.5 0.208 495
18W LED TL 28 18 1 8.5 0.532 1266
Cabin no 306
5W LED (R ) Fix. 50 5 1 8.5 0.300 714
A.H.U no.6 18W LED TL 2 18 1 0.5 0.038 5
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Pantry
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
5W LED (R ) Fix. 10 5 1 8.5 0.060 143
Room No.303 10W LED (R ) Fix. 8 10 1 8.5 0.088 209
Third Floor
50W Halogen 8 50 0 8.5 0.400 952

g
in
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

W
B. Mishra C.N.304
A-
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57

18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
T.Petavarn 5W LED (R ) Fix. 22 5 1 8.5 0.132 314
10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52
18W LED TL 10 18 1 8.5 0.190 452
outer area 305,306
5W LED (R ) Fix. 35 5 1 8.5 0.210 500
18W LED TL 58 18 1 8.5 1.102 2623
Hall area
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
18W LED TL 50 18 1 8.5 0.950 2261
5W LED (R ) Fix. 20 5 1 8.5 0.120 286
Retail Hall.
10W LED (R ) Fix. 19 10 1 8.5 0.209 497
12W LED TL 2 12 1 8.5 0.026 62
T.Petavarn store 5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
VIP Ladies wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
Visitor area 5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
A.H.U.No18 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
Cabin no 301 5W LED (R ) Fix. 86 5 1 8.5 0.516 1228
Thrird Floor
Rauf khan 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

g
P. Kashiva 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

in
w
B-
Sandeep Kalra 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

Cabin no.307 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Mukul joshi 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Sanjay Kalra 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
santanu Puwhit 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Server Room 18W LED TL 2 18 1 24 0.038 242
Work station Hall 18W LED TL 16 18 1 8.5 0.304 724
VIP Lobby 5W LED (R ) Fix. 17 5 1 12 0.102 447
Wash Room Lobby 9W CFL 5 9 4 8.5 0.065 202
Pantry 12W LED TL 4 12 1 8.5 0.052 124
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
5W LED (R ) Fix. 26 5 1 8.5 0.156 371
Canteen dining hall 18W LED TL 56 18 1 8.5 1.064 2532
10W LED (R ) Fix. 4 10 1 8.5 0.044 105
Fourth Floor
canteen kitchen 18W LED TL 24 18 1 8.5 0.456 1085

18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
g
Visitor area hall

in
W
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57

A-
A.H.U No.7 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8

Canteen Stoer 18W LED TL 5 18 1 8.5 0.095 226
Satpal Singh 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Piush Mishra 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
P.K Bharmvidya 18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
A.H.U No.19 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Gotam Mukarjee 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Ritu Mathur
5W LED (R ) Fix. 7 5 1 8.5 0.042 100
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Sujit kumar
5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Parveen gangwar 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Fourth Floor
10W LED (R ) Fix. 1 10 1 8.5 0.011 26

18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
g
in
w
Pardeep Goyal 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57

B-
10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52

18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Vijay Ranjan
5W LED (R ) Fix. 15 5 1 8.5 0.090 214
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Rajesh Saxsena
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
Aadesh kumar 12W LED TL 5 12 1 8.5 0.065 155
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
M.M Somya 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
10W LED (R ) Fix. 4 10 1 8.5 0.044 105
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
It Exch.Room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Atul Maihra
10W LED (R ) Fix. 4 10 1 8.5 0.044 105
Floor Wing Location Type of light (kW) Consumed
(kWh)
18W LED TL 7 18 1 8.5 0.133 317
Visitor area hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
A.H.U No.8 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
Rajnesh kr.(506) 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Nadeem Khan 508 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Fifth Floor
Beena Mansukh-507 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

g
in
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

W
Mr. L.K Watts 509

A-
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71

18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Mr U.C Upadhyay(502)
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
18W LED TL 110 18 1 8.5 2.090 4974
Work station hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 17 5 1 8.5 0.102 243
Cabin no.503 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Cabin no 502
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
18W LED TL 3 18 1 12 0.057 250
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
Staff Wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
VIP Wosh Room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Ladies wosh room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
A.H.U no.20 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 56 18 1 8.5 1.064 2532
work station hall
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Fifth Floor
K.L Tejwani 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

g
in
w
Micky prem singh 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

B-
Ashwani Kumar 5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43

18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Mukesh nagia
10W LED (R ) Fix. 4 10 1 8.5 0.044 105
18W LED TL 6 18 1 24 0.114 999
Server Room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 24 0.024 161
Photo copy cabin 5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
near VIP lift lobby 5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 12 0.012 53
(kWh)
Visitor area hall 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
VIP Wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
work station Hall 18W LED TL 126 18 1 8.5 2.394 5698
5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
Photo copy cabin
12W LED TL 1 12 1 8.5 0.013 31
A.H.U No.9 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Auditor room
50W Halogen 5 50 0 8.5 0.250 595
Sixth Floor
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

S.N Singh
g
in
5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86

W
A-
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

S.N Aggarwal 5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
10W LED (R ) Fix. 1 10 1 8.5 0.011 26
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Shishir Kumar
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
Sunil Aggarwal 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Nitai Kapoor
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Near cash counter 10W LED (R ) Fix. 1 10 1 8.5 0.011 26
Cach Counter Cabin 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin Lobby 5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 12 0.018 79
VIP Lift lobby 18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
Staff Wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Ladies Wash room 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Gallrey server room 5W LED (R ) Fix. 7 5 1 8.5 0.042 100
A.H.U.No.21 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8
Work station hall 18W LED TL 50 18 1 8.5 0.950 2261
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Tanmay Jayaswal
Sixth Floor
5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86

IT Cabin 18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
g
in
w
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

B-
Sanjay(607) 5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57

50W Halogen 12 50 0 8.5 0.600 1428
18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Rajat Bandopayeday
5W LED (R ) Fix. 14 5 1 8.5 0.084 200
T.T Suryavansi(606) 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
V.K Sehgal(605) 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
IT Store room 5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
18W LED TL 16 18 1 24 0.304 2663
Server Room
5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 24 0.006 53
(kWh)
18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Visitor Hall area
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Staff toilet 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
VIP Toilet 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Ladies Toilet 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Seventh Floor

18W LED TL 149 18 1 8.5 2.831 6738
g
in
Work station hall 5W LED (R ) Fix. 13 5 1 8.5 0.078 186

W
A-
10W LED (R ) Fix. 1 10 1 8.5 0.011 26

A.H.U. No.10 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
Anu Mohla
5W LED (R ) Fix. 12 5 1 8.5 0.072 171
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Cabin No.703
5W LED (R ) Fix. 8 5 1 8.5 0.048 114
Pradeep Kumar Saxena 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
Staff Toilet 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
A.H.U. No.22 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
Seventh Floor
Ajeet Kumar/Server 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

room 10W LED (R ) Fix. 1 10 1 8.5 0.011 26
g
in
w

B-
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271

D.N.Mathur
5W LED (R ) Fix. 11 5 1 8.5 0.066 157
S.K.Bhatt/cabin no.705 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
A.V.Rao/Cabin no.704 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
M.C.Khurana
5W LED (R ) Fix. 2 5 1 8.5 0.012 29
Work station hall 18W LED TL 73 18 1 8.5 1.387 3301
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Hall Visitor Area
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
5W LED (R ) Fix. 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
18W LED TL 82 18 1 8.5 1.558 3708
work Station Area 5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86
10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52
A.H.U. No.11 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8
18W LED TL 8 18 1 8.5 0.152 362
Vishnu Mishra 803
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
G.M.Watts 809 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Naresh Khurana 810 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Eighth Floor
Mahesh Kumar 808 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

P.K.Srivastva 807 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
g
in
W
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181

A-
R.I.A.Khan 5W LED (R ) Fix. 8 5 1 8.5 0.048 114

10W LED (R ) Fix. 2 10 1 8.5 0.022 52
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Ajeet Kumar Dogra
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Atul Agrawal
5W LED (R ) Fix. 6 5 1 8.5 0.036 86
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Uday Basant
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
Ashok Mehta 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Vipin Satsangi
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
K.G.Ghatwai
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
D.Raman
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 8.5 0.024 57
Staff Toilet 18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP Lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
Eighth Floor
A.H.U.No.23 18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8

Work Station Area 18W LED TL 57 18 1 8.5 1.083 2578
g
in
w
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271

B-
Cabin No.801
5W LED (R ) Fix. 15 5 1 8.5 0.090 214
Cabin No.806 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Cabin No.805 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
S.K.Jedka
5W LED (R ) Fix. 8 5 1 8.5 0.048 114
Stationary store 5W LED (R ) Fix. 1 5 1 8.5 0.006 14
(kW) Consumed
(kWh)
18W LED TL 1 18 1 8.5 0.019 45
Visitor Hall area
5W LED (R ) Fix. 8 5 1 8.5 0.048 114
A.H.U.No.12 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 6 18 1 8.5 0.114 271
R.R.Mandal
5W LED (R ) Fix. 10 5 1 8.5 0.060 143
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Ninth Floor
Vijeshwar Pratap
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
g
in
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90

W
Rajat Sen Gupta

A-
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43

Rajesh Kumar Gogna 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Work Station Hall 18W LED TL 12 18 1 8.5 0.228 543
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Megh singh
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Shantanu Ghosal
5W LED (R ) Fix. 5 5 1 8.5 0.030 71
18W LED TL 4 18 1 12 0.076 333
VIP lift lobby
5W LED (R ) Fix. 4 5 1 12 0.024 105
A.H.U.No.24 18W LED TL 4 18 1 0.5 0.076 11
18W LED TL 41 18 1 8.5 0.779 1854
Work Station Hall
Ninth Floor
10W LED (R ) Fix. 1 10 1 8.5 0.011 26

18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
g
Computer DB Cabin
in
w
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43

B-
18W LED TL 10 18 1 8.5 0.190 452

R.K.Ahuja
5W LED (R ) Fix. 14 5 1 8.5 0.084 200
18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
Omveer Singh
5W LED (R ) Fix. 3 5 1 8.5 0.018 43
Anjli Ahuja 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Server Room 18W LED TL 2 18 1 8.5 0.038 90
G.C Ganguli 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Pukit Mathur 18W LED TL 4 18 1 8.5 0.076 181
Lift Machine Room 18W LED TL 19 18 1 0.5 0.361 51
Terrace
Lift Machine Room

18W LED TL 3 18 1 0.5 0.057 8
Service
Outside Of L.M.R. 18W LED TL 2 18 1 12 0.038 166
File Record Room 18W LED TL 12 18 1 8.5 0.228 543
TOTAL 4263 6954 550 62.05 174712.1
18.0 Energy Conservation Proposal:

Proposal-18.1 (On Power Factor Correction & Harmonic Mitigation)
1) Installation of 380 kVAr rated Hybrid Harmonic Filter (3-phase + Neutral-100%)

at LT PCC of Transformer-1 for Power Factor Correction up to 0.995 & harmonic
mitigation with Combination with 80 kVAr Active Harmonic Filter & 8 x 25 kVAr +
2 x 20 kVAr + 4 x 15 kVAr = 300 kVAr, 525 Volt Rated Super Heavy Duty LT Step
Capacitor Banks with 7% Detuned Series Reactor & also Neutral Current
Compensator at LT PCC of Transformer-1.
2) Installation of 240 kVAr rated Hybrid Harmonic Filter (3-phase + Neutral-100%)
at LT PCC of Transformer-2 for Power Factor Correction up to 0.995 & harmonic
mitigation with Combination with 50 kVAr Active Harmonic Filter & 4 x 25 kVAr +
1 x 20 kVAr + 4 x 15 kVAr + 1 x 10 kVAr = 190 kVAr, 525 Volt Rated Super Heavy
Duty LT Step Capacitor Banks with 7% Detuned Series Reactor & also Neutral
Current Compensator at LT PCC of Transformer-2.
18.1.1 Background and Present Status:
Monthly average billing power factor for FY 2020-21 is found to be 0.942, which is not maximized i.e.
near to unity, resulting in increase of higher kVAh unit consumption imposing on monthly electricity
bill & increase of monthly kVA demand, leading to increase demand charges @ ₹673.14/kVA/month
(monthly average) and also to increase of winding eddy current losses & load loss of Transformer to
a greater extent.
At present existing 2 x 250 kVAr 10 steps Capacitor APFC Panels are totally connected to LT PCC
Incomer Panel-1 & LT PCC Incomer Panel-2 and some of step capacitors were de-rated due to mainly
occurrence of dangerous harmonic resonance, where recorded maximum total current harmonic
distortion was found to be 16.8% and mainly 3rd, 5th, 7th,, 9th, 11th, 13th, 15th, 17th order of odd & evil
harmonics were present in the electrical system, which were generated from non-linear “Variable
Frequency Drive”, connected to motor of Chiller Compressors & Secondary Chilled Water Pumps,
UPSs, Driver of LED Lights, Server etc. Moreover, significant high current unbalancing in between
three phases was observed with high neutral current & presence of triple-n (3rd, 6th, 9th, 15th, 21st etc.)
order and 5th & 7th order of odd & evil harmonics, which increased the line losses, Transformer losses
& Motor losses to a greater extent & de-rating the current carrying capacity of existing feeder cables
of different floor of this building & transformers. As a result excess heating effect will be developed &
overall energy consumption was increased to a greater extent. Hence, if Hybrid harmonic filters
(combination of Active & Passive) are installed at LT PCC of these two Transformers, power factor
will be corrected automatically at a maximum level (Above 0.995), leading to reduction of kVAh unit
consumption as well as kVA demand substantially.
18.1.2 Features of Harmonic Filter:
An ever increasing deployment of electronic non-linear load application causes the grid power
quality to deteriorate. The displacement power factor and the current distortion are two key
indicators of the quality of the grid power. An active harmonic filter (AHF) alone is capable of
addressing both, the low power factor issue as well as the high current distortion issues of power
quality. However the higher cost and higher losses associated with the AHF makes the AHF an
expensive proposal for addressing multiple power quality problems. In view of this, audit offers an
economical hybrid solution which combines the features of the AHF with those of automatic power
factor correction (APFC) capacitors. This hybrid solution offered ensures high performance and
quality of power at much lower costs.
FEATURES OF HYBRID HARMONIC FILTER
1. Effective Thermal Design

2. Unique test facility including harmonic generator
3. Controllers with easier of programming
4. Less Maintenance
5. Advanced DSP Controller
6. Suitable for inductive and Capacitive Loads
7. Real time reactive power compensation
8. Load Balancing
9. Most suited for reduction in MD
Figure-18.2.1 Hybrid Harmonic Filter
Figure-18.2.2 Schematic Diagram for Hybrid Harmonic Filter
18.1.3 Summary of Techno-economic Analysis:
SUMMARY OF TECHNO ECONOMICS FOR HYBRID HARMONIC FILTER & PFC:
 Annual Energy Saving Potential : 60584 kVAh

 Annual Cost Saving Potential : ₹10.064 Lakh
 Investment Required : ₹19.840 Lakh
 Payback Period : 23.7 Months
Details of techno commercial analysis are shown in Table-18.1.1 to 18.1.3 below.
Table-18.1.1
Techno-economic Analysis for Power Factor Correction at LT PCC of Transformers by Hybrid
Harmonic Filter Combination of 3-phase plus 100% Neutral Current Compensator, Passive Super
Heavy Duty LT Capacitors Series with 7% Detuned Reactors & Active Filter
Sl. Analysis &
Particulars Unit
No. Result
1. Avg. Monthly Average Billing Demand (from electricity bill analysis 2020-21) kVA 503.0
Present Monthly Average billing Power Factor (from electricity bill analysis
2. p.u. 0.942
2020-21)
3. Desired Billing Power Factor after power factor correction p.u. 0.995
4. Avg. Monthly Demand after power factor correction kVA 476.2
5. Avg. Monthly Demand Reduction after power factor correction kVA 26.8
Present Cost of Monthly Average Demand Charge (from electricity bill analysis
6. ₹/kVA 673
2020-21)
7. Annual Avg. Demand Cost Reduction after power factor correction ₹ 216425
8. Annual kVAh unit Consumption (from electricity bill analysis 2020-21) kVAh 1136256
Annual kWh unit Consumption (from electricity bill analysis 2020-21) at a P.F
9. kWh 1070294
0.942
10. Annual kVAh unit Consumption after power factor correction kVAh 1075672
11. Annual reduction of kVAh unit Consumption after power factor correction kVAh 60584
12. Cost of Electricity ₹/kVAh 13.04
13. Annual Cost Saving from kVAh unit reduction ₹ 790011
Annual energy cost saving due to power factor correction & harmonic
14. ₹ 1006436
mitigation
Net Investment required for power factor correction with 620 kVAr rated
Hybrid Harmonic Filter (3 phase + Neutral-100%) for PFC, harmonic
15. mitigation & Neutral Current Compensator by combination of passive Step ₹ 1984000
Capacitors with 7% Detuned Reactors with APFC & Active Harmonic Filter
including installation charges
16. Payback Period Months 23.7
Table-18.1.2
SIZING OF HYBRID HARMONIC FILTER AT LT PCC OF 2 x 1 MVA TRANSFORMER
Peak Load (kW) 479.8
Peak Current (Amp) 701.7
Fundamental Current (A) 692
Total Harmonic Distortion (%THDi) 16.8
Power Factor 0.94
Calculation for Harmonic Mitigation
Calculation for complete Harmonic Mitigation Calculation for complete Harmonic Mitigation at ~ 5%
3rd order harmonics (%) 3.21 5th order harmonics (%) 0.50
5th order harmonics (%) 9.63 5th order harmonics (%) 1.00
Individual Current harmonics (A) = Harmonic % * Individual Current harmonics (A) = Harmonic % *
Fundamental Current (A) Fundamental Current (A)
3rd order harmonics (%) 22.2 3rd order harmonics (%) 3.5
15th order harmonics (%) 3.7 17th order harmonics (A) 0.7
Total requirement for harmonic mitigation Total requirement for harmonic

(Complete Mitigation) = Sum of all individual 148.1 mitigation (THD ~5%) = Sum of all 20.8
current harmonic component individual current harmonic component
Total requirement for harmonic mitigation <8% = Total requirement for complete harmonic mitigation
127.3
- total requirement for iTHD ~5%
Total requirement for harmonic mitigation <8% (kVAr) 130
Calculation for Reactive Power Compensation
Requirement at PF (Base PF) 0.94 Requirement at PF>0.99 (Desired PF) 0.995
Active Power (kW) 479.8 Active Power (kW) 479.8
Reactive Power (kVAr) 174.1 Reactive Power (kVAr) 48.2
Apparent Power (kVA) 510.4 Apparent Power (kVA) 482.2
Total requirement for reactive compensation (kVAr) 490
Total kVAr requirement for Hybrid
kVAr 620
Harmonic Filter
Final Rating of Proposed Unit kVAr 620
Cost of Proposed Unit ₹ 1984000
Proposal: 18.2 (Optimization of Voltage for Lighting Feeder)
Installation of 50 kVA Rated ‘Energy Saver Lamp Controller’ (ESLC or ES-25) with
Raising main Incomer-1 for lighting & other loads & installation of 30 kVA Rated
‘Energy Saver Lamp Controller’ (ESLC or ES-25) with Raising main Incomer-2 for
lighting & other loads and Save Electrical Energy by optimizing the phase voltage at
225 volt without sacrificing illumination in different indoor building areas
18.2.1 Background:
During lighting load analysis for two Raising Mains feeders, comprising of lighting loads & other
mixed loads, it was observed that phase voltages of these raising mains feeders are significantly high
than required. Most cases these raising main feeders are operated with an average phase voltage of
241.0 volts, which exceeds the lamp rating voltage also. Higher voltage gives higher illumination, but
life of lamps and luminaries deteriorate very fast as well as significant electrical energy is lost due to
higher voltage operation. This higher voltage reduces the life of the lamps.
At present Bharat Bhavan building uses dedicated lighting feeders for stable. Nominal Voltage of
operation of all lamps is invariably 215 Volts. But in this building line voltage obtained is related to
the tapping set at 3, which is more than 415.7 volts (Avg. of all phases). Applying this voltage leads to
higher energy consumption and also reduced lamp life.
ENERGY SAVER LAMP CONTROLLERS (ESLC) helps in reducing energy consumption by reducing the
applied r.m.s voltage, without a proportionate reduction in the illumination level. These are suitable
for fluorescent and other types of lamps including LED, Halogen, CFL, incandescent, Mercury Vapor,
Metal Halide, Quartz etc. The device enables the user to adjust level of savings. The first 10% saving
can be realized without any perceptible drop in illumination level. The ESLC controls entire circuits
of lighting from the lighting distribution board and is a superior alternative to switching off lamps, on
a selective basis to save energy.
ESLC is designed on the basis of technology that even though the manufacturers to start specify the
rated voltage, the resulting ark can be started and stabilized at lower voltage also. This voltage
reduction is achieved by introducing virtually loss-less impedance in the path to reduce power
consumption at optimum level without affecting other parameters.
18.2.2 FEATURES & SPCIFICATION:

Lighting Voltage : 220 volts Single Phase 50 Hz A.C. or 415 volts three phase
Capacity Available : 4.5 KVA – 500 KVA
Auto / Manual Switch : For manual or automatic control (Optional)

SUMMARY OF TECHNO ECONOMICS FOR HYBRID HARMONIC FILTER & PFC:

 Annual Cost Saving Potential : ₹2.952 Lakh
 Investment Required : ₹2.040 Lakh
Details of techno commercial analysis are shown in Table-18.2.1.
Fig.18.2.1 Lighting Energy Saver (ESLC or ES25)
Table-18.2.1
Analysis of Energy Saving Potential by Raising Mains Incomers Lighting Feeder of BPCL
Northern Regional Building, Noida
Sl. Analysis & Result
No. Particulars Unit Raising Raising
Mains IC-1 Mains IC-2
1. Actual Operating Voltage of Lighting Feeder Volt 240.5 241.5
2. Average Lighting Power Load kW 41.50 23.50
3. Average Power Factor of Lighting Feeder p.u. 0.942 0.942
4. Desire output voltage of Energy Saver Volt 225 225
5. Voltage Reduction % 6.9 7.3
6. Power at desired output voltage kW 36.32 20.40
7. Percentage of Power Saving % 12.5 13.2
8. Average annual running hours for Lighting Feeder Hour 2576 2576
kWh 13336 7989
9. Annual Energy Saving Potential
kVAh 14157 8481
₹/kWh 12.78 12.78
10. Electricity Cost
₹/kVAh 13.04 13.04
11. Annual Energy Cost Saving Potential ₹ Lakh 1.846 1.106
Investment Required for ESLC or ES 25 with
12. ₹ Lakh 1.275 0.765
installation
13. Payback Period Month 8.3 8.3
Proposal: 18.3 (Balancing of Load Current)
Balancing the load current in between phases for all LT Feeders by Shifting Single
Phase Load from higher to lower mutually, checking of tightness for two feeder cable
terminals at MCCB, SFU, Starter, LT Motor, MCB, Bus-bar Chamber etc. and reduction
of Substantial Line Losses
18.3.1 Background:
Three-phase unbalance is a familiar issue for power system engineering. This can introduce
additional power losses in distribution network in steady states due to both negative and zero
sequence components. It could also limit the loading capability of distribution transformers, well
below their nominal ratings.
From the measurements at two LT Feeders from CESC supply, it is seen that large amount of current
unbalancing exists in between three phases & considerable amount of unbalance current flows
through neutral, which leads to increase line losses (I2R). It is also noticed that considerable amount
of unbalance current flow through neutral conductor, which also heats up neutral conductor &
increase losses.
Any large single phase load or a number of small loads connected to only one phase cause more
current to flow from that particular phase causing voltage drop on line. Switching of three phase
heavy loads results in current and voltage surges which cause unbalance in the system.
18.3.2 Causes of Unbalance:

Practical imperfections which can result in unbalances are:-
1. A three phase equipment such as induction motor with unbalance in its windings. If the
reactance of three phases is not same, it will result in varying current flowing in three phases
and give out system unbalance.
 With continuous operation, motor’s physical environment cause degradation of rotor

and stator windings. This degradation is usually different in different phases, affecting
both, the magnitude and phase angle of current waveform.
 A current leakage from any phase through bearings or motor body provides floating
earth at times, causing fluctuating current.
2. Any large single phase load like fan load, lighting load, stitching machine load, Iron machine
load, computers, UPS etc. or a number of small loads connected to only one phase cause
more current to flow from that particular phase causing voltage drop on line.
3. Switching of three phase heavy loads results in current and voltage surges which cause
unbalance in the system.
4. Flow of triple-n order of harmonics through neutral conductor.
5. Besides, an unbalance can also be quantified by comparing the intensity of negative

sequence currents in comparison to the positive sequence currents. The permissible limit in
terms of percentage of negative phase sequence current over positive sequence current is
1.3% ideally but acceptable up to 1%.

SUMMARY OF TECHNO ECONOMICS FOR LOAD BALANCING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

 Annual Cost Saving Potential : ₹ 1.316 Lakh
 Investment Required : ₹ 0.550 Lakh
Details of techno-economic analysis are shown in Table-18.3.1.
18.3.1
Analysis for Energy Saving Potential due to Balancing of Load Currents at Raising Mains
Incomers on LT PCC Incomer-1 & Reduction of Neutral Current
Analysis &
Sl. Result
Particulars Unit
No.
LT PCC IC-1
1. Max. Measured "R" phase Load Current, I R Amp. 507.0
2. Max. Measured "Y" phase Load Current, IY Amp. 477.0
3. Max. Measured "B" phase Load Current, I B Amp. 450.0
4. Mean Load Current, IM = (IR + IY + IB)/3 Amp. 478.0
5. Avg. Neutral Current, IN Amp. 73.0
6. Percentage Unbalancing, ((MAX(IR : IB)-IM)*100/IM) % 6.07

8. Copper Losses in "R" phase, IR2 Watt 257049
9. Copper Losses in "Y" phase, IY2 Watt 227529
10. Copper Losses in "B" phase, IB2 Watt 202500
11. Copper Losses in "Neutral", IN2 Watt 5329.0
12a. Overall Cable Resistance of upstream to downstream for phases Ohm 0.3
12b. Overall Cable Resistance of upstream to downstream for Neutral Ohm 0.6
Total Copper Losses due to unbalance currents,
13. Watt 209321
ITUB2 = IR2 + IY2 + IB2 + IN2
14. For balanced load condition, Current per phase (I) Amp. 478.0
15. Total Copper Losses in balance current condition, 3* IM2 + IN2 Watt 205636
Watt 3685.2
16. Net CU loss due to unbalanced load
kW 3.69
17. Allowable targeted current unbalancing (Max.) % 2.0
18. Power Saving Potential due to balancing of load currents kW 3.6
19. Annual Load running time of plant Hour 4200
20. Load Factor, LF p.u. 0.77
21. Loss Load Factor, LLF = 0.2 LF + 0.8 LF^2 p.u. 0.627
kWh 9508
22. Annual energy saving due to balancing of load currents
kVAh 10094
₹/kWh 12.78
23. Cost of Electricity
₹/kVAh 13.04
24. Annual cost of energy saving potential ₹ Lakh 1.316
Investment required for deployment of additional man power for
shifting & balancing of single phase unbalance light, Computers,
25. ₹ Lakh 0.550
Printers, Copiers etc. at 4P MCB DB level of each floor, checking of
tightness for all ACB, MCCB, SFU & MCB cable terminals etc.
26. Payback Period Month 5.0
Proposal: 18.4 (Installation of Internet of Things (IoT) based energy

monitoring system)
18.4.1 Background:
Presently, the plant has only installed digital energy meters at LT PCC OF Transformer-1 &
Transformer-2 at electrical substation & maintenance department is noted only unit consumption
reading manually in a daily log book in 2 hours gap. At present energy meter of LT PCC-2 for
Transformer-2 is not working properly. Also, at present LT feeders from PCC panels are not equipped
with energy meters. A manual energy monitoring process is followed by the plant. The captured date
is then analysed. It is a difficult task due to errors involved and monitoring of limited parameters.
As the investment in energy meters is already made, it is recommended to implement internet of

things (IoT) based (i.e. cloud based) energy monitoring system which will enable to record the
energy consumption of different areas. The energy parameters such as active power (kW), voltage
(V), current (A), demand (kVA) and energy (kWh) will be measured and recorded directly on to the
internet database from where it will accessible through internet connection anytime and anywhere.
These parameters can provide can be further analysed by including output information to arrive at
energy performance indicators such as SEC of this building, Specific Power Consumption of the other
loads, like chillers & pumps. This will provide clarity on the specific actions to be taken for energy
efficiency, through triggered alerts. The proposed energy metering points (indicative) for smart
monitoring is presented in
Table 19.4.1.
Table 18.4.1: Proposed Energy metering points for IoT System
Proposed energy metering points Number of meters

11kV HT VCB Incomer 1
11 kV VCB for Transformer-1 (1 MVA) 1
11 kV VCB for Transformer-2 (1 MVA) 1
415 Volt LT PCC IC-1 of Transformer-1 1
415 Volt LT PCC IC-1 of Transformer-2 1
750 kVA DG set-1 1
750 kVA DG set-2 1
500 kVA DG set-3 1
AC Plant Incomer-1 1
250 kVAr Capacitor Panel-1 1
Raising Mains IC-1 (2nd, 4th, 6th & 8th Floors) 1
Security Post 1
Light of Basement 1
Bore-well Pump 1
Domestic Pumps & AC Make-up Pumps 1
Street Light 1
DG-1 Primary Pump 1
AC Plant IC-2 1
Fire Pump Plant IC 1
Raising Mains IC-2 (1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th & 9th floors) 1
250 kVAr Capacitor Panel-2 1
Lift No.-1, 2, 3 & 4 1
Service Lift 1
UPS Room 1
Ground Floor Light 1
DG Room Supply 1
Pre-lube Oil Pump DG-2 1
Total 27
With advance metering better control can be achieved, system can be operated more efficiently, and
losses can be reduced. These systems are able to generate the saving in range of 1-3% for small units.
For the evaluation of the financials we had considered average value of 1.5%. The estimated annual
energy savings are 17044 kWh, effectively equivalents to an annual monetary savings of ₹ 2.22 Lakh.
The investment requirement is ₹5.36 Lakh. The simple payback period (estimated) of the
recommendation is 28.9 months. The details are presented in 18.4.2 Summary of Techno-
economic Analysis:
Table19.4.2. The annual reduction in GHG emission is estimated to be 15.17 tCO2.

SUMMARY OF TECHNO ECONOMICS FOR IoT BASED ENERGY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM

 Annual Cost Saving Potential : 2.220 Lakh
Table 18.4.2: Saving Estimation for IoT based energy monitoring system
Analysis &
Particulars Unit
Result
Present annual electrical energy consumption kVAh/year 1136256
Annual operating hours of the plant hours/year 3456
Estimated energy savings with energy monitoring system kVAh/year 17044
Monetary saving ₹ Lakh/year 2.22
Energy savings toe/year 1.47
Investment cost (estimated) ₹ Lakh 5.36
Simple payback period (estimated) Years 28.9
GHG reduction potential tCO2/year 15.17
Proposal: 18.5 (Efficacy Improvement of Lighting System )
Replacement of all Conventional 9 Watt Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) with new
energy efficient 3W down LED round lamp and also replacement of all 50 Watt
Halogen as spot light with new 10 Watt LED Spot Light of Yellow Colour and save
electrical energy without sacrificing the colour rendering.
18.5.1 Background:
Presently lighting system of BPCL Building, Noida consists of some amount of conventional compact
fluorescent lamps (CFL) of 9 Watt rating & high wattage inefficient 50 Watt Halogen Lamps as spot
light. It is well proven that CFL is energy efficient & Halogen lamp is most inefficient. Still LED lamp
fixture is much more energy efficient with long lasting than any other lighting system.
It is seen that 40 – 50 % electrical energy saving can be realized from indoor lighting system by the
adoption of latest energy efficient LED lighting system without sacrificing the illumination .
SUMMARY OF TECHNO ECONOMICS FOR EFFICACY IMPROVEMENT OF LIGHTING SYSTEM

 Annual Cost Saving Potential : 1.120 Lakh
Details techno-economic analysis is given in Table-18.5.1.
Table-18.5.1
Techno-Economic Analysis for Replacement of Existing Round Compact Fluorescent
Lamp (CFL) with LED Round Lamp Fixture
Particulars Unit Existing Proposed Existing Proposed
50W 10W LED(Y)
Fixture 9W CFL 3W LED
Halogen Spot
Power consumed per Lamp W 9 3 50 10
Power consumed by Ballast W 4 1 0 1
Total power consumed by
W 13 4 50 11
Lamp
Operating Hours/day Hrs. 14.0 14.0 8.5 8.5
Annual days of operation Day 365 365 280 280
Energy Used per year/fixture kWh 66 20 119 26
₹/kWh 13.84 13.84 13.84 13.84
Energy Rate
₹/kVAh 13.04 13.04 13.04 13.04
Lamp life Hrs. 8000 40000 1000 40000
Project Life of Lighting system Yrs. 8 8 17 17
Average Project Life Yrs. 12
Replacement frequency during
No. 4.00 0 39.00 0
project lifetime
Replacement frequency/year No. 0.51 0 2.32 0
Initial Cost/unit ₹ 140 450 550 700
Annual R & M cost ₹ 6515 0 14566 0
No. of total lamp Unit 85 34
Annual Saving Calculation
kWh 3909 3156
Energy Saving
kVAh 4150 3350
Energy Cost Saving ₹ 50975 41153
Saving in R & M Cost ₹ 6515 14566
Total Annual Saving ₹ 57491 55718
Cost Benefit Calculation
Capital cost of LED ₹ 38250 23800
Labour & Other Cost ₹/Fixture 15 15

Implementation Cost ₹ 1275 510
TOTAL INVESTMENT ₹ 39525 24310
Annual M & V cost ₹ 850 340
Net Annual Monetary Saving ₹ 56641 55378
Simple payback Month 6.8
Proposal: 18.6 (Solar PV Generation)

Installation of 5 kWp Solar PV plant on roof-top and harnessing of green energy for
building common area use with grid net metering connection for import & export
facility and saving of grid electrical energy & reduction of GHG emission
18.6.1 Background and Present Status:

At present, BPCL Building, Noida is fully dependent on grid power with DG set back-up. Rooftops in
BPCL building is made of reinforced concrete. Total roof top area of this building is found to be
approximately 122.57 m2, wherein available effective shadow free & unoccupied areas are found to
be 50 m2 only at roof top or terrace. Hence, there is ample scope for grid connected Solar PV
generation with net metering system (with export & import facility) at vacant roof-top area. In that
case BPCL building can become partly self-sufficient in daytime for its power requirement through
Solar PV system & encourage using of green & clean energy in their premises.
Further, the solar PV panels installed will also act as a shading element on the roof of the building
structure by preventing direct solar radiation to fall on the roof and hence it will protect solar heat
transmission through roof and maintain cool environment inside sheds.
The DNI of Noida is found to be around 3.8 kWh per m2 per day. By using this value and for the
available total effective shadow free & unoccupied roof-top area of BPCL building will be around 50
m2 all together & the total possible solar PV generation by installation of solar PV plant is
approximately 5 kWp @ 10 m2/kWp, which can cater lighting loads of lift lobby & corridor easily for
entire floors (A-Wing & B-Wing both).
Before setting up the roof-top PV plant in BPCL building, site survey analysis has to be carried out
and following details have to be collected.
 Available shadow free area (best to have no shade anywhere on array from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.)
 Annual electrical consumption of Unit
 Minimum Shadow area
 Sanctioned load
 Load bearing capacity of the roof
 Mounting area
It is recommended to harness Solar Energy by installation of 5 kWp rated “Solar Photovoltaic

System” (SPV) of ‘mono-crystalline’ type at roof-top with net metering system facility and saving of
grid electrical energy & reduction of GHG emission.
SUMMARY OF TECHNO ECONOMICS FOR SOLAR PV POWER GENERATION

 Annual Cost Saving Potential : ₹ 0.66 Lakh
Details techno-economic analysis is given in Table-18.6.1.
Table-18.6.1
Energy Generation Potential from Solar PV Generation & Techno-economics
Analysis
Parameters Units
& Result
Total shadow free area required by 1 kWp solar panel m2 10
Total shadow free area available in BPCL Noida Building m2 50
Total Solar kWp panels that can be installed for BPCL Noida Building kWp 5
1 kWp panel can generate kWh/day 3.8
So, total power generation possible per day kWh/day 19
Total sunshine days per year in West Bengal days/year 250
Total electricity generation potential from SPV plant per year (or electricity kWh/year 4774
savings) kVAh/year 5068
₹/kWh 13.84
Cost of electricity
₹/kVAh 13.04
Total monetary savings possible by installation of SPV plant ₹ Lakh/year 0.66
Cost of SPV panel ₹/Watt 45
Net Investment Required for Solar PV Power Generation System ₹ Lakh 2.26
Simple payback period Month 41.1
19.0 List of Service Providers & Vendors

Sl. NAME OF THE PROBABLE SUPPLIERS &
NAME OF THE PROPOSED SYSTEM
No. IMPLEMENTORS
Sinexcel Electric Co. Ltd.
31, Kola Bagan, Bamangachi; Howrah- 711106
Manufacturer & Supplier Hybrid
1 Dial: +91 7602658856/8918843005
Harmonic Filter
Email: indrajit_duya@sinexcel.com
www.sinexcel.com
E hands Energy India Pvt. Ltd.
No.12-1-B Lavanya Apartment, 4th Seaward Road, Valmiki
Manufacturer & supplier of Solar PV
3 Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600041
Generator
Dial: +91 9811456950,
Email: sinha_priyaranjan@yahoo.co.in
Swastika Industries
Manufacturer & Supplier Lighting
4 20B, British Indian Street, Kolkata-700 069;
Energy Saver (ESLC or ES25)
Ph: 033 2248 5333, 3022 4217
Decolux Lighting Solution., Kolkata

Supplier & Manufacturer of LED Light
Chinar Park, Kolkata, West Bengal
5 Fittings (Decolux, Phillips, OSRAM, GE
Mob: 9903144886, Email: mpsharma22@gmail.com/
Make)
mps@decoluxlighting.com

BPCL Noida Dea 2021 Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BPCL Noida Dea 2021 Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021

Energy Audit Report for

Address: A 5 & 6, Sector-1, Noida- 700095, UP

Sonar Bharat Environment &

Chapter No. DESCRIPTION Page No.

T-13.1.1 Specification of Distribution Transformer of BPCL, Noida Office 18

T-13.1.2 Detailed Specification of Diesel Generating Sets in BPCL, Noida 19

T-13.1.3 Specification of LT Capacitors at LT PCC of Transformers in BPCL, Noida 19

T-13.3.1 Measured Electrical Parameters for Transformer-1 21

 Mr. S. Manohar (Manager, IFM)

We are thankful to the management for giving us the opportunity to be involved in

We would be happy to provide any further clarifications, if required, to facilitate

2.0 Executive Summary:

e) Electrical Specific Energy Consumption (SECe) or Energy Performance Index (EPI)

f) For energy saving calculation electricity rate is considered as ₹13.04/kVAh as

3.0 Summary of Recommendation & Energy Saving Potential:

19.4 On Internet of Things (IoT) based energy monitoring system:

On Efficacy Improvement of Lighting System:

Grand Total: 122928 18.332 30.688 20.1

5.0 Methodology & Approach:

 Electrical Power & Distribution System and Transformer wise measurements

 Study, analysis & assessment of performance for Air Handling Units

6.0 Instrument used in Energy Audit:

 Micro-processor based Power Quality Analyzer, HIOKI with software facility

7.0 Energy Audit Team:

8.0 Energy Conservation Initiatives & Measures:

9.0 Barriers towards Energy Conservation:

resonance, heating of cable, switches etc. At present no harmonic mitigation

10.0 Profile of BPCL Northern Region Office Building:

11.0 Base Line Data & Energy Scenario:

A Comparison Annual Energy Consumption (In terms of TOE) for

Sharing of Different Type of Energy in BPCL Building

11.2 Fuel Consumption Figures:

11.3 Estimation of Energy Performance Index (EPI):

11.3.1 Specific Energy Consumed by BPCL Noida Building for FY 2019-20

 Total floor area of BPCL Noida building : 12257 m2

11.3.2 Specific Energy Consumed by BPCL Noida Building for FY 2020-21

 Total floor area of BPCL Noida building : 12257 m2

11.4 Comparative Charts:

A Comparison of Annual Energy Performance Index (kWh/m2/Yr.)

11.5 Findings on Energy Consumption:

12.0 Electricity Bill Analysis:

Findings on Electricity Bill Analysis:

Findings on Electricity Bill Analysis:

13.0 Electrical Power Distribution System:

After step down of transformers to LT voltage, presently power is fed to LT PCC of

a. Tap Setting of Transformer-1 was 3.

Location of Capacitor LT PCC of Transformer-1 LT PCC of Transformer-2

Rated Current, IN (each unit) Amp. 32.8 32.8

Rated Supply Frequency, fN Hz 50 50

IC-1 (2nd, 4th, 6h Bore-well

1600A ACB Spare

13.3 Summary of Electrical Field Measurements and Findings:

13.3.1 Measured Electrical Parameters for Transformer-1

Software Generated Electricity Profile with Curve at LT PCC of Transformer-1

Fig.13.3.1 Measured Electrical data at LT PCC of Transformer-1

Fig.13.3.2 Measurements at LT PCC of Transformer-1

Power Consumption Profile at LT PCC of

Active Power vs Power Factor Variation at LT PCC of

13.3.2 Evaluation of Transformer Efficiency & Losses:

13.3.3 Findings on Measurements & Performance of Transformer:

13.4 Guide Line for Efficient Running of DG Set:

14.0 Motor Survey & Measurements: