Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figures of merit
Basic Structure
Input and output matching
Noise (NF)
Gain (over the band)
Linearity (IIP3, SFDR)
Stability
•Frequency
•Noise Figure
•Linearity (CP-1dB, IIP3)
•Bandwidth and Q
•Gain S21
•Power Consumption
•Supply Voltage
•Stability
NF ~ 2dB
IIP3 ~ 0 dBm
CP-1dB ~ -10 dBm
Gain 15~ 20 dB
S11, S22 < -10 dB
S12 < - 30 dB
Supply Voltage ~ 1.2-1.8 V
Current ~ 5 mA
Vout
RS Cu Cdb+CL
Vin
Vin
0 1 Rs (Cin AV Cu )
0 1 RsCin (1 AV u ) RsCin AV u
RS u
If Av=10 and RL/Rs=2,u=0.2
T
0
10
RT
Zin
Zin = RT = 50
Zin
Zin = 1/gm = 50
v 2
F 1 eq
4kTR s
1
BJT : Fmin 1 1.51.8dB
2 g m Rs
2
MOS : Fmin 1 1.7 2.2dB
3g m Rs
•Added noise RF
•Broadband Amplification due to
Feedback => More Power to Reduce
Noise
Zin
Zin = RF /(1+Av)= 50
LG
•Ideal Inductors are Noiseless => No
Extra Noise Contribution
•More Flexibility in Design and
Optimization
Zin LS
Zin = 50
1 gm LS
s(LG LS )
sCgs Cgs
1
T LS @ f
2 (LG LS )Cgs
•Low-Q Inductors:
•Relatively Broad Band
•Small Design Headroom for Matching
•Small Noise => Large Gm => Small LS => Large
LG => LG parasitic resistance contributes more
noise
•Inductors, in particular LG, have been implemented
using bondwire or off-chip
i g2 in2,d
i 4KTgg
2
g c
ig id*
2C gs2 ig2id2
gg
5g d 0
Introduction to CMOS RF Integrated Circuits Design
Fall 2012, Prof. JianJun Zhou III-18
LNA - Noise Figure
en2 Rn 4 KTf
i S2 G S 4 KTf
iu2 Gu 4 KTf
ic2 YC en2
YS GS jBS
i YC Y e
2 2 2
NF 1 u S n
YC GC jBC
iS2
2
NF 1 2 Rn (Gopt GC ) ( Rn / Gs ) YS Yopt
2
vRg
in2,d
i 2o ,T Gm ( v 2 g v 2 s ) i 2 d
2
•Assume Rs>>Rg
Rg 2
F 1 ( ) ( ) g m Rs
Rs T
It’s important to note that this expression contains both the channel noise and
the gate induced noise. If we assume that Rg = Rpoly + 1/5gm, and the noise is
independent from the drain thermal noise, we get a very good approximation
to the actual noise without using correlated noise sources.
Let’s find Rs,opt for a typical amplifier. Say fT = 75GHz, f = 5 GHz, and
(γ/α)= 2. Also suppose that by proper layout Rpoly is very small. The
intrinsic gate resistance is given by:
1 1
Rg R poly
5gm 5gm
Rg 1 10 1
0 .1 0. 1 gm S 40ms
Rs 5 g m Rs 5 50 25
Note that for Vgs-VT = 200mV, the required current is:
1 1
I ds g m (Vgs VT ) 40ms 200mV 4mA
2 2
fT Rg 5 25
Rs ,opt 15 119
f 2
( ) gm
2 52
Fmin 1 2( ) g m Rg ( ) 1 1.08 0.35dB
T 15 25
RLG LG RG
RS Zin LS
RLS
2
vRg
in2,d
It’s fairly easy to calculate the noise for the case with inductive degeneration.
Simply observe that the input generators noises see a gain of Gm2 to the
output.
The drain noise, though, requires a careful analysis. Since it flows partly into
the source of the device, it activates the gm of the transistor which produces
a correlated noise in shunt with drain noise.
in2,d
At resonance:
jLs 1
v ( g m v id )
Rs jC gs
Ls
v ( g m v id )
RsC gs
g m Ls Ls
v (1 ) id
RsC gs RsC gs
When matched, Rs T Ls
Ls id g m Ls i
2v id g m v ) d
RsC gs 2 RsC gs 2
So we see that only 1/4 of the drain noise flows into the output! The total
output noise is therefore
i 2d
Gm ( v v s)
2 2 2 2
i o ,T g
4
v2g i 2d 2 g m ( 2 Rs ) 2
Rg
F 1 2
2 F 1 ( ) ( )
v s 4v 2 sGm Rs T 4 Rs
Rg 2
F 1 ( ) ( ) g m Rs
Rs T
The inductive degeneration did not raise the noise ! So the minimum noise
figure Fmin is the same.
The advantage is that the input impedance is now real and programmable
(ωTLs). By proper sizing, it’s possible to obtain a noise and power match.
ZC
Gm gm gs
g m Q in
R s Z in
gmZC T
Gm o gs
2Rs 2 o R s
W W , L L , V V , L LG / GS GS G
I I DD
T T
T T
G m Gm
2 o R s 2 o R s
Same Gm as Cgs and Power are Reduced!
Z in R s Zo RL
S , S
Z in R s Zo RL
11 22
Po Pin
S AP
21
, S 12
Pin Po
S S S S 1
11 22 21 12
1 S S
2 2 2
K 1 11 22
2S S 21 12
Zin LS
Common 1/gm 1 g m RL
5
Gate
Feedback RF RL 6
1
R
s (1
1 2
) g m RL
Stage 1 g m RL g m Rs RF g m Rs
Inductor g m Ls 1 2 2
1 ( ) g mQin RL
Source C gs g m Rs Qin
Degeneration
Ca vo
Without Lint, M1 is loaded by
VB M2 Z=1/(gm2+jωCgs2)
vdd
No stacked transistors.
VB is used to control the gain.
LG VB Which will not affect input matching.
Zin
LS L0 C0