Issue No: 001

Effectivity: August 2022

Revision No: 000
Revision ---
Date:

PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA

University Road, Poblacion, Muntinlupa City, Philippines

UNDERGRADUATE COURSE SYLLABUS

MUNTINLUPA CITY VISION

We envision Muntinlupa City as one of the leading investments hubs in the country with educated, healthy and God-loving people living
peacefully and securely in a climate change adaptive and disaster resilient community under the rule of transparent, caring, and accountable
leadership.
MUNTINLUPA CITY MISSION
 To promote a broad-based economic growth and business-friendly environment for sustainable development;
 To protect every person from natural and man-made hazards by ensuring strict enforcement of necessary safety measures;
 To provide quality social services that include education, health care, livelihood and employment, socialized housing, and social
assistance, among others; and
 To institutionalize community participation in local governance, environmental protection, and economic development.
PLMUN VISION
A dynamic and highly competitive higher education institution committed to people empowerment towards building a humane society
PLMUN MISSION
To provide quality, affordable and relevant education responsive to the changing needs of the local and global communities through effective
and efficient integration of instruction, research and extension; to develop productive and God-loving individuals in the society.
INSTITUTE VISION
Vision of the Institute of Public Policy and Governance
INSTITUTE MISSION
Mission of the Institute of Public Policy and Governance

A. COURSE INFORMATION

Course Code: PS151

Course Title: Qualitative Analysis of Political Data
Course Units: 3
Prerequisites: PS110
Department: Political Science Department
College: College of Arts and Sciences
Semester: First Semester
Academic Year: 2022-2023
Instructor/s: John Aquilino Edmund G. de Lima, MA
Venue: Determined
Section: BAPOL2A, BAPOL2B, BAPOL2C
Schedule: MTH 05:30-07:00PM, MTH 07:00-08:30PM, TF 05:30-07:00PM

B. COURSE DESCRIPTION

Doing qualitative research is an important skill that political science scholars should have. Political
phenomena are thoroughly understood especially through qualitative research and analysis. This is an
introduction to the basic concepts, techniques and operations used in qualitative research. It will
specifically introduce students to basic qualitative methods commonly used in political science. The
course is designed to have a balance of lectures, discussions, workshops, and field research. Students are
 expected to design a research proposal, gather data, write and analyze data, and defend their research
work.

WHERE IS THE COURSE SITUATED IN THE FRAMEWORK

OF THE PLMUN CURRICULUM?
GROUNDING: Establishing fundamental knowledge, skills, and values
✓ IMMERSING: Deepening understanding and engaging localities
✓ EXPLORING: Reconnoitering globalities and rethinking the complex world
POSITIONING: Forging identity toward sustainability, justice, and social transformation

C. PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES

PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES

PLO1: Compare, contrast, and classify the major concepts in the discipline
PLO2: Recognize and define the distinctiveness of the discipline, its subfields, theories, and methods
Design and execute research inquiries using appropriate quantitative and qualitative methods
PLO3:
guided by theories or conceptual frameworks
PLO4: Demonstrate written, visual and oral presentation skills to produce or present analytical reports.
Critique, judge, and respond to current issues and problems based on a substantive
PLO5: understanding of the historical and contemporary developments in the national and global
concepts.
Develop a predisposition towards critical political involvement and practice in various forms
PLO6:
and levels.
Note: This section applies to a student who is a major of the program under which the course is administered.

D. COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES

By the end of the course, students should be able to

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES

Understand the concepts, tools, techniques, and processes used in qualitative research,
CLO1: particularly in terms of data generation, management, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of
findings.
CLO2: Evaluate and critique research proposals.
CLO3: Familiarize themselves with the ethical discourse on research
CLO4: Design, complete, and defend a qualitative research project.

ALIGNMENT OF THE COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES

TO THE PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES

PLO1 PLO2 PLO3 PLO4 PLO5 PLO6

CLO1 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
CLO2 ✓ ✓ ✓
CLO3 ✓ ✓ ✓
CLO4 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

E. COURSE OUTLINE

WEEK COURSE TOPICS AND INTENDED LEARNING CLOs

REFERENCES OUTCOMES
1 Course Guidelines and Syllabus  Know the basic details, CLO1
guidelines, and significance
of the course
2 Doing Research in Political Science
 Significance of Research
o Ercan and Marsh 2016
 Fundamental Concepts and Key
Terms
o Furlong and Marsh 2010
o Hay 2002
o Merriam and Tisdell 2016
 Ethics in Research
o Shapiro 2002
3 Parts of a Research Paper
 Discussion of Each
o Merriam and Tisdell 2016
o Trinidad 2018
4 Approaches and Strategies
 Behavioralism
o Sanders 2010
 Rational Choice
o Hindmoor 2010
 Institutionalism
o Lowndes 2010
 Acquire fundamental CLOs 1 and 3
knowledge on research as
conducted in the field of
political science
 Familiarize oneself with
concepts and terminologies
used in political science
research and analysis
 Understand the importance
of ethics in political science
research
 Obtain mastery of the CLOs 1-4
different parts of a
qualitative research in
political science
 Know how to write the
different parts of research:
the Introduction (which
includes the statement of
the problem, objectives,
significance, and scope), the
Review of Related
Literature (theoretical and
analytical framework), the
Methodology (design,
respondent selection,
research instruments, data
collection and analysis),
Discussion, and Conclusion
 Practice the principles
needed in writing a good
research proposal and final
paper, such as coherence,
sensibleness, criticality,
logic, consistency, and
depth
 Explicate the major CLOs 1-2
frameworks and
perspectives used in
political science research
and analysis
 Understand the basic
principles of the different
frameworks and approaches
in political science
 Apply the frameworks to
 intelligently make sense of
political phenomena

5 Approaches and Strategies  Explicate the major CLOs 1-2

 Constructivism frameworks and
o Parsons 2010 perspectives used in
political science research
 Feminism and analysis
o Randall 2010
 Understand the basic
 Marxism principles of the different
o Maguire 2010 frameworks and approaches
in political science

 Apply the frameworks to

intelligently make sense of
political phenomena

6 Qualitative Methods and Analysis
 Interviews
o Bleich and Pekkanen 2013
o Lune and Berg 2017a
 Focus Groups
o Lune and Berge 2017b
 Participant Observation
o Lune and Berg 2017c
o Murchison 2010
7 Qualitative Methods and Analysis
 Discourse Analysis
o Jørgensen and Phillips 2002
o van Dijk 1993
 Unobtrusive Measures, Historical
Research
o Lune and Berg 2017d
o Lune and Berg 2017e
 Visual Methods
o Rose 2001a
o Rose 2001b
o Rose 2001c
 Netnography/Social Media
Research
o Kozinets 2020
 Know the different methods CLOs 1 and 3
used in qualitative research
 Appreciate the various
principles, purposes, and
uses of qualitative research
methods, particularly
interviews, focus groups,
participant observation,
discourse analysis,
unobtrusive measures,
historical research, visual
methods, and other
emerging methods and
approaches
 Know the different methods CLOs 1 and 3
used in qualitative research
 Appreciate the various
principles, purposes, and
uses of qualitative research
methods, particularly
interviews, focus groups,
participant observation,
discourse analysis,
unobtrusive measures,
historical research, visual
methods, and other
emerging methods and
approaches

8 Consultation  Apply the principles and CLOs 1-4

skills in qualitative research
Submission of Qualitative Research to be able to draft an
 Proposal
9 MIDTERM EXAMINATION
10 Data Gathering, Submission of
Progress Report, Consultation
o Atienza 2013
11 Data Gathering, Submission of
Progress Report, Consultation
o Curato 2016
12 Data Gathering, Submission of
Progress Report, Consultation
o Encinas-Franco 2013
13 Research Writing, Submission of
Progress Report, Consultation
o Tolosa 2004
14 Research Writing, Submission of
interesting research
proposal
 Demonstrate mastery of the CLOs 1-3
concepts, perspectives,
approaches, and methods in
qualitative research in
political science
 Conduct data gathering CLOs 1-4
based on the specific details
of and as indicted in the
approved proposal
 Strategize on how to
effectively conduct
qualitative research with the
help of sample qualitative
research publications
 Conduct data gathering CLOs 1-4
based on the specific details
of and as indicted in the
approved proposal
 Strategize on how to
effectively conduct
qualitative research with the
help of sample qualitative
research publications
 Conduct data gathering CLOs 1-4
based on the specific details
of and as indicted in the
approved proposal
 Strategize on how to
effectively conduct
qualitative research with the
help of sample qualitative
research publications
 Analyze processed CLOs 1-4
qualitative data using
appropriate framework
 Write an analytical research
paper that thoroughly
discusses the topic and
addresses the problem
statement
 Provide a well-written
summary and conclusion
that captures the essence,
highlights, and implications
of the qualitative research
paper
 Analyze processed CLOs 1-4
 Progress Report, Consultation qualitative data using
o Veneracion-Rallonza 2014 appropriate framework

 Write an analytical research

paper that thoroughly
discusses the topic and
addresses the problem
statement

 Provide a well-written
summary and conclusion
that captures the essence,
highlights, and implications
of the qualitative research
paper

15 Research Writing, Submission of  Analyze processed CLOs 1-4

Progress Report, Consultation qualitative data using
o Mendonça and Caetano 2021 appropriate framework

 Write an analytical research

paper that thoroughly
discusses the topic and
addresses the problem
statement

 Provide a well-written
summary and conclusion
that captures the essence,
highlights, and implications
of the qualitative research
paper

16 Draft Submission, Consultation  Address an interesting CLOs 1-4

political science topic in the
form of a completed and
organized qualitative
research paper

17 Presentation and Revision  Address an interesting CLOs 1-4

political science topic in the
form of a completed and
organized qualitative
research paper

18 SUBMISSION OF FINAL  Address an interesting CLOs 1-4

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH PAPER political science topic in the
form of a completed and
organized qualitative
research paper

F. ASSESSMENT AND RUBRICS

 Each student will be graded based on the following requirements:

ASSESSMENT TASK WEIGHT CLOs

Class Participation 15% CLOs 1-4

Throughout the semester, students are expected to have an active involvement

in class. Students must be sure to study the required readings assigned for
each week or set of weeks because class participation will be assessed in
terms of how students thoroughly understood, convincingly applied, and
intelligently made sense of the insights, ideas, and concepts discussed by the
different authors.

Midterm Individual Academic Essay 35% CLOs 1-3

The midterm examination is a take-home examination where students will be

required to write an individual academic essay discussing a topic or question
to be determined by the course instructor. The primary objective of this
requirement is to assess the academic writing ability of the students,
particularly in terms of form and content. Form refers to the basic principles
and details which students are expected to observe—grammar, sentence
construction, proper format, correct citation and referencing, and the overall
organization of the paper. The content of the paper refers to the substantial
aspects—the clarity and sensibleness of the points and arguments raised, the
depth of understanding and application of theories and concepts, and the
general quality and brilliance of the essay. Plagiarism is by no means
tolerated.

Final Group Requirement: The Qualitative Research Paper 50% CLOs 1-4

The final requirement is a qualitative research paper, which should contain the
following:

I. INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Statement of the Problem
Objectives of the Study
Operational definition of terms
Significance of the Study
Scope and Limitations

II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
Analytical Framework

III. METHODOLOGY
Respondent Selection
Research Instrument
Strategy in gathering data

IV. PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Argument
Presentation of findings and analysis

V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Recommendations
REFERENCES

APPENDIX
Interview Schedule/Interview Questions/Notes/Transcripts

TOTAL 100%

RUBRICS

Research Paper
Criteria Excellent Good Acceptable Poor
The writer’s central The writing has a The central purpose
The purpose or
purpose or argument clear purpose or or argument is not
Purpose argument is
is readily apparent argument, but may consistently clear
15% generally unclear.
to the reader. sometimes digress throughout the
from it. paper.
Processed topic
given with depth
and real-world
application. Information
Balanced provides reasonable
Central purpose or
presentation of support for a central Information supports
argument is not
relevant and purpose or argument a central purpose or
clearly identified.
legitimate and displays argument at times.
Content Analysis is vague
information that evidence of a basic Analysis is basic or
30% or not evident.
clearly supports a analysis of a general. Reader
Reader is confused
central purpose or significant topic. gains few insights.
or may be
argument and shows Reader gains some
misinformed.
a thoughtful, in- insights.
depth analysis of a
significant topic.
Reader gains
important insights.
The ideas are The ideas are
The writing is not
arranged logically to arranged logically to In general, the
logically organized.
support the purpose support the central writing is arranged
Frequently, ideas
or argument. They purpose or logically, although
fail to make sense
flow smoothly from argument. They are occasionally ideas
Organization together. The
one to another and usually clearly fail to make sense
15% reader cannot
are clearly linked to linked to each other. together. The reader
identify a line of
each other. The For the most part, is fairly clear about
reasoning and loses
reader can follow the reader can what writer intends.
interest.
the line of follow the line of
reasoning. reasoning.
The tone is generally
The tone is The tone is not The tone is
professional. For the
consistently consistently unprofessional. It is
most part, it is
Tone professional and professional or not appropriate for
appropriate for an
10% appropriate for an appropriate for an an academic
academic research
academic research academic research research paper.
paper.
paper. paper.
Length Paper is the number Paper has fewer
10% of words specified words than
 in the assignment or
specified in the
more
assignment.
Although
Compelling
Professionally attributions are
evidence from
legitimate sources occasionally given,
professionally
that support claims many statements References are
Use of legitimate sources is
are generally present seem seldom cited to
Reference given to support
and attribution is, unsubstantiated. The support statements.
10% claims. Attribution
for the most part, reader is confused
is clear and fairly
clear and fairly about the source of
represented.
represented. information and
ideas.
References are
primarily peer Although most of
Most of the
reviewed the references are
references are from There are virtually
professional professionally
sources that are not no sources that are
journals or other legitimate, a few are
peer reviewed and professionally
approved sources questionable (e.g.,
Quality of have uncertain reliable. The reader
(e.g., government trade books, internet
References reliability. The seriously doubts
documents, agency sources, popular
10% reader doubts the the value of the
manuals, etc.). The magazines, etc.).
accuracy of much of material and stops
reader is confident The reader is
the material reading
that the information uncertain of the
presented.
and ideas can be reliability of some of
trusted the sources.

Total: 100%
Adapted from: http://course1.winona.edu/shatfield/air/research%20paper%20rubric.pdf

G. TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITIES

WEEK TEACHING-LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND METHODS CLOs

1  Lecture (powerpoint presentation, copy of syllabus) CLO1
o A short lecture on the specific details of the course syllabus
o An introductory lecture on the nature and purpose of the
course
2  Lecture (powerpoint presentation, assigned reading materials) CLOs 1 and 3
o A comprehensive lecture on the kind of research being done
in political science, the importance of ontology and
epistemology, and research ethics
 Group discussion (oral presentation, powerpoint)
o An interactive discussion facilitated with a series of questions
on the significance of political science research, key concepts
3  Lecture (powerpoint presentation, sample research paper, outline) CLOs 1-4
o Thorough explanation of the parts of a research paper, how
each part should be written, principles and qualities of a well-
written paper, the purpose of each part
 Group discussion (oral presentation)
o Sharing of experiences in research, new insights learned from
the lesson, how research expectations and standards are
different at the college level, and the distinct qualities of a
research paper in political science
4  Lecture (powerpoint) CLOs 1-2
o Introduction to the theoretical approaches, perspectives, and
 frameworks that have characterized the field of political
science, including behavioralism, rational choice, and
institutionalism
 Group discussion (sample issues, articles and reports)
o In-depth discussion and application of frameworks as seen in
different social and political issues
5  Lecture (powerpoint) CLOs 1-2
o Introduction to the theoretical approaches, perspectives, and
frameworks that have characterized the field of political
science, including constructivism, feminism, and marxism
 Group discussion (sample issues, articles and reports)
o In-depth discussion and application of frameworks as seen in
different social and political issues
6  Lecture (powerpoint, applied samples, videos, recordings) CLOs 1 and 3
o Explication of different qualitative research methods, namely
interview, focus groups, and participant observation, and the
key principles and procedures involved in each method
 Group discussion (powerpoint, sample scenarios)
o Exchange of ideas on how to pursue different qualitative
methods in specific situations
7  Lecture (powerpoint, applied samples, videos, recordings) CLOs 1 and 3
o Explication of different qualitative research methods, namely
discourse analysis, unobtrusive measures, historical research,
and visual methods, and the key principles and procedures
involved in each method
 Group discussion (powerpoint, sample scenarios)
o Exchange of ideas on how to pursue different qualitative
methods in specific situations
8  Consultation (oral, powerpoint) CLOs 1-4
o Synthesis and further explanation or clarification of lectures
and discussions on the basics of qualitative research so that
students can submit interesting proposals
9  Written take-home exam CLOs 1-3
10-17  Group consultations and progress reports (draft of the paper, parts CLOs 1-4
written, progress report on each part of the research)
o Hearing of updates on the research being conducted and
written by the students, per group
16-18  Final research presentation, revision, submission (completed paper, CLOs 1-4
presentation)
o Assessment of the finished research projects

H. COURSE READINGS AND REFERENCES

ACCESS TO READINGS: CLICK HERE.

Books/Book Chapters

Bleich, Erik, and Robert Pekkanen. “How to Report Interview Data.” In Interview Research in Political
Science, edited by Layna Mosley, 85-105. New York: Cornell University Press, 2013.

Ercan, Selen, and David Marsh. “Qualitative Methods in Political Science.” In Handbook of Research
Methods and Applications in Political Science, edited by Hans Keman and Jaap Woldendorp, 309-322.
England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2016.
Furlong, Paul, and David Marsh. “A Skin Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science.”
In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd Edition, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 184-
211. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Hay, Colin. “What’s Political About Political Science?” In Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction, 59-
88. England: Palgrave, 2002.

Hindmoor, Andrew. “Rational Choice.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd Edition, edited by
David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 42-59. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE
Publications, 2002.

Kozinets, Robert. Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research. London: SAGE
Publications, 2020. (Available at the PLMUN RLRC)

Lowndes, Vivien. “The Institutional Approach.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd Edition,
edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 60-79. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Lune, Howard, and Bruce Berg. “A Dramaturgical Look at Interviewing.” In Qualitative Research Methods
for the Social Sciences, 9th Edition, 65-93. England: Pearson, 2017a.

Lune, Howard, and Bruce Berg. “Focus Group Interviewing.” In Qualitative Research Methods for the
Social Sciences, 9th Edition, 94-106. England: Pearson, 2017b.

Lune, Howard, and Bruce Berg. “Ethnographic Field Strategies.” In Qualitative Research Methods for the
Social Sciences, 9th Edition, 107-135. England: Pearson, 2017c.

Lune, Howard, and Bruce Berg. “Unobtrusive Measures in Research.” In Qualitative Research Methods for
the Social Sciences, 9th Edition, 146-157. England: Pearson, 2017d.

Lune, Howard, and Bruce Berg. “Social Historical Research and Oral Traditions.” In Qualitative Research
Methods for the Social Sciences, 9th Edition, 158-169. England: Pearson, 2017e.

Maguire, Diarmuid. “Marxism.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd Edition, edited by David
Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 136-155. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Merriam, Sharan, and Elizabeth Tisdell. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016. (Available at the PLMUN RLRC)

Murchison, Julian. Ethnography Essentials: Designing, Conducting, and Presenting Your Research. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.

Parsons, Craig. “Constructivism and Interpretive Thoery.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd
Edition, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 80-98. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Randall, VIcky. “Feminism.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3rd Edition, edited by David
Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 114-135. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Rose, Gillian. “‘The Good Eye’: Looking at Pictures Using Compositional Interpretation.” In Visual
Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, 33-53. London: SAGE
Publications, 2001a.

Rose, Gillian. “Discourse Analysis I: Text, Intertextuality and Context.” In Visual Methodologies: An
Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, 135-163. London: SAGE Publications, 2001b.
Rose, Gillian. “Discourse Analysis II: Institutions and Ways of Seeing.” In Visual Methodologies: An
Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, 164-186. London: SAGE Publications, 2001c.

Sanders, David. “Behavioural Analysis.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, 3 rd Edition, edited by
David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, 23-41. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Trinidad, Jose Eos. Researching Philippine Realities: A Guide to Qualitative, Quantitative, and Humanities
Research. Quezon City: Bluebooks, 2018.

Journals

Curato, Nicole. “Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power.”
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35, no. 3 (2016): 91-109.

Encinas-Franco, Jean. “The Language of Labor Export in Political Discourse: ‘Modern-day Heroism’ and
Constructions of Overseas Filipino Workers.” Philippine Political Science Journal 34, no. 1 (2013): 97-
112.

Mendonça, Ricardo and Renato Duarte Caetano. “Populism as Parody: The Visual Self-Presentation of Jair
Bolsonaro on Instagram.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 26, no. 1 (2021): 210-235.

Shapiro, Ian. “Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political
Science and What to Do About It.” Political Theory 30, no. 4 (2002): 588-611.

Tolosa, Benjamin. “Representations of the Philippine Stock Market and Securities Research, and Global
Financial Regularization.” Philippine Studies 52, no. 1 (2004): 3-42.

Veneracion-Rallonza, Ma. Lourdes. “Women’s Naked Body Protests and the Performance of Resistance:
Femen and Meira Paibi Protests against Rape.” Philippine Political Science Journal 35, no. 2 (2014):
251-268.

I. GRADING SYSTEM

The grading system for the undergraduate students at the end of every semester is as follows:

GRADE RATING LETTER GRADE REMARK

97-100 1.00 A+ Passed
94-96 1.25 A Passed
91-93 1.50 B+ Passed
88-90 1.75 B Passed
85-87 2.00 B- Passed
82-84 2.25 C+ Passed
79-81 2.50 C Passed
76-78 2.75 C- Passed
75 3.00 P Passed
4.00 INC Incomplete
74 and below 5.00 F Failed
6.00 UW Unauthorized Withdrawal
Notes:
1. A student is marked “AW” if he/she followed the Authorized Dropping procedure prescribed by the Office of the Registrar.
2. A grade of 5.00 (Failed) is given for the following reasons:
a. Inability to satisfy the minimum requirements of the subjects
 b. Excessive Absences
c. Cheating during major examinations
3. A base 60 transmutation table must be used in assessing student performance in examinations.

J. CLASS POLICIES

1. Attendance shall be checked regularly. University rules on lateness and absences shall be followed.
2. Proper classroom decorum shall always be observed.
3. All mobile phones shall be put on silent mode.
4. All course requirements shall be submitted on time. Late submissions shall have corresponding
deductions.
5. Students who are caught cheating and plagiarizing in any form shall be punishable by university
rules.
6. Class standings shall be posted before they are released as final marks. Questions regarding grades
shall be raised during this period. Once grades are submitted at the end of the semester, they shall be
considered final. Change of grades shall be possible only if there is an error in computation.
7. Consistent with the provisions of Republic Act 11313 or the Safe Streets and Public Spaces Act of
2019, the Pamantasan as a whole and this class in particular will not in any way tolerate any form of
gender-based sexual harassment. Members of the classroom are expected to respect one another
regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity expression.

K. CONSULTATION HOURS

NAME OF FACULTY EMAIL DAY/S TIME

John Aquilino Edmund G. johndelima@plmun.edu.ph Monday and 09:00AM-10:00AM;
de Lima, MA Wednesday 03:00PM-04:00PM

APPROVAL

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

John Aquilino Edmund G. de Lima, MA Dan Jefferson B. Lopez, PhD

Course Instructor Department Chair
Recommending Approval: Approved by:

Dan Jefferson B. Lopez, PhD Ramonito A. Mesina, MBA

Dean Vice President for Academic Affairs