ACTIVITY #2

GE 8 SS/ETHICS

I. Imagine a scenario in which an image of someone who is the subject of religious devotion (such
as Jesus Christ or Mary, the mother of Jesus) is placed side by side with a phallic image.

1. Is this ethical an ethical issue? Why or why not?

Yes, it is an ethical issue because from the standpoint of the Christian, displaying phallic
symbols next to a picture of Jesus Christ can be interpreted as disrespecting the Christian
population. Placing phallic symbols on a symbol in the literature that had no sexual
tendencies could be interpreted as mocking that symbol (Jesus Christ). Other Asian religions,
on the other hand, have used phallic imagery, they represent fertility or the power to
procreate, phallic symbols were valued and worshipped. However, we should be fair, admire
and appreciate what other religions that are present in this world.

Well, we can't please everyone, but we should keep in mind that some cultures are
sensitive to things we wouldn't consider detrimental. Moreover, it is not about religions but
by faith to our Creator.

2. Does the religion of rightness or wrongness of this depend on which religion you belong to?
Explain your answer.

No, I don’t believe that the rightness and wrongness depend on religion because the
person itself can discern what is truly right and wrong without recourse to religion. Humans
have freewill and the ability to choose what is right and what is wrong. If we misjudge
events, we may do something wrong without realizing it. However, whether it is right or
bad, it is mostly determined by our motivation, which triggers our conscience, rather than
by the action taken, the words spoken, or even the ideas we entertained or our intent.

However, I admit that religion plays a role in guiding individuals who are humane and
want to follow the path of light to 'goodness'. The path of light requires a person to act
ethically and empathetically toward others, to speak out against injustice and inhumanity,
and to lead by example.

3. Are clothes matter of pure aesthetics taste, or does it make sense for clothes to become a
subject in a discussion of ethics? Why? How about other forms of adornment, such as
tattoos and piercings?

I believe that clothes and the other forms of adornment like tattoos and piercings are a
matter of pure aesthetic taste since these are included in "art" and aesthetic is concerned
 with beauty or the appreciation of beauty. Clothing is not only worn for protection, but also
to display an individual's aesthetic taste.

However, there’s an exemption. it also makes sense for them to become a subject in a
discussion of ethics since it is concerned of what is right and wrong. We know that not all
clothes are acceptable or appropriate in some specific situations/places. Like for example, if
you are priest, you can’t wear street clothes or something revealing and flashy. Priests are
required by the church to wear clerical attire, usually cassocks or a clerical collar, it is
because these clothing worn by priests was intended to symbolize the simplicity of life
modeled by Jesus and also to serve as a role model to the believers.

4. Is looking after the benefit of your own family over all other aspects considered as another
form of egoism? Discuss.

For me, yes, but only if your family is really important to you and you place a high value
on them. Looking out for the greatest advantage of one's family over all other concerns of
anyone else's situation is admirable and requires no explanation or justification from either
of us. People work hard to provide for their families, and they only have as much as they can
afford to survive, thrive, and enjoy life. Egoism is a survival instinct. Our way of life is
egocentric. In the presence of a major threat, it is normal for us to prioritize ourselves and
our families. For me, experiencing sufficiency and abundance is extremely fortunate and
satisfying, it feels like you’ve won a lottery ticket.