Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annex 1A - School Community Data Additional Data 3
Annex 1A - School Community Data Additional Data 3
SCHOOL PROFILE/DATA -
Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill-in only the grade levels that are applicable to yo
community data from different sources. If you find it useful to lift data from other templates and transfer it here, you may
templates to this form.
D.4.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY causing increased in vaccination (insert new rows if neces
Project/intervention
ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template
rade levels that are applicable to your school. This template aims to organize existing school and
plates and transfer it here, you may do so. Otherwise, you can just attach the other data
UNVACCINATED
BOOSTER
Total Male Female Total Male Female
Mainstreamed
Self- Non- Transition Grand Homebound Hospital Total
Contained Graded Program Total Bound
G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12
III. SITUATION OF CHILDREN / LEARNERS - ADDITIONA
Instruction: Please input required data/information in unshaded cells. Fill-in only the grade levels that are applicable to you
1.2 Number of learners no longer participating in the learning sessions by cause (insert new columns if necessary)
Total No. of
Number of Learners No Longer Participating in the Learnin
Level Dropouts
distance from home Other cause: Other cause:
(Current SY) Working
to school _________ _________
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
TOTAL
Percent of Total
1.3 Projects/interventions implemented for learners no longer participating in the learning sessions
1.4.b What are the interventions implemented for learners no longer participating in the learning sessions? Insert new row
if necessary.
ANNEX 1A School-Community Data Template
umns if necessary)
articipating in the Learning Sessions by Cause (Current SY)
Other cause: Other cause: Other cause: Other cause:
_________ _________ _________ _________
If YES, please describe the mechanisms used by the school
Komunikasyon
Total at Pananaliksik
Level Oral Reading and
Enrollment sa Wika at
Communication Writing
Kulturang
Pilipino
Grade 11
SY: 2020-2021
SY: 2021-2022
SY: 2022-2023
Grade 12
SY: 2020-2021
SY: 2021-2022
SY: 2022-2023
1.2 Average GPA per subject for the last three SYs
SY Before Previous SY: 2020-2021
Level
English Filipino Math
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10
Komunikasyon
Level SY Oral Reading and at Pananaliksik
sa Wika at
Communication Writing
Kulturang
Pilipino
SY: 2020-2021
Grade 11 SY: 2021-2022
SY: 2022-2023
SY: 2020-2021
Grade 12 SY: 2021-2022
SY: 2022-2023
1.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve academic performances of the learners (insert new rows if necessary)
Grade 1
Grade 2
2.2 Number of Learners according to reading level during POST TEST
EGRA READING LEVEL
Total No. What Reading Level the learner belongs based on his/ results
Grade Level of
Learners NEEDS
VERY GOOD GOOD NEEDS PRACTICE
IMPROVEMENT
Grade 1
Grade 2
2.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve reading skills of Grades 1 and 2 learners (insert new rows if necessary)
3.2 Number of Kinder Learners according to scaled score during POST TEST
Total No. of Learners Total No. of Actual Takers
Domain
3.3 Projects/interventions implemented to kinder learners in the development of the different domains (insert new rows if
ANNEX 1A
1-3 Suggest Significant delay in overall 4-6 Suggest slight delay in overall
of Actual Takers development in the domain must be development Domain in the domain
monitored after 3 months must be monitored after 6 months
school.
Introduction
to the Physical
Physical Philosophy Education Personal
Science of the and Development
Human Health
Person
SLM/LAS Performance
What Performance did the learner show based on his/her SLM/ GPA Profiling (MTB)
LAS outputs
NEEDS
TOTAL
NEEDS
GOOD PRACTICE
IMPROVEM 74 below 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-100
ENT
SLM/LAS Performance
What Performance did the learner show based on his/her SLM/ GPA Profiling (MTB)
LAS outputs TOTAL
NEEDS NEEDS
GOOD PRACTICE
IMPROVEM 74 below 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-100
ENT