Peer Evaluation of Assignment 3

Use this form to evaluate the contributions of each team member (including yourself) to
the group effort. These evaluations are completely confidential and will never be shown
to your team members. Please respond honestly and answer ALL questions. Submit the
completed form on canvas as part of assignment 3.

1. Allocate a total of 100 percentage points among your team members, including
yourself, with higher percentages going to those members who contributed most.
Consider attendance and participation in team meetings, individual contributions to
idea generation and decisions, communication within the group, etc. In the case of
equal contribution, points should be divided equally among team members.

Name % Points

Yourself Chathumi Lelwala 25%

Member 1 Trish Fleming – 30%

Member 2 Tiare Matara – 25%

Member 3 Neil Denny – 20%

Total 100 %

2. Evaluate the work for each member of your group. Bold the choice you feel is the
most appropriate response to each question:

Group member’s name (1): Trish Fleming

a. How would you rate this group member’s overall participation in group meetings:

Above average Average Below average

b. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work?

Above average Average Below average

c. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work?

Above average Average Below average

Provide explanatory notes (optional)

Trish was absolutely amazing to work with and so intelligent. She was a more the
dominant group member or, our “leader” of the group who was the first to organize our

1
huis. Reason for timeliness being average is purely due to slide content being finalized
on the last day but this was very minor and didn’t impact our progression.

Group member’s name (2) Tiare Matara

a. How would you rate this group member’s overall participation in group meetings:

Above average Average Below average

b. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work?

Above average Average Below average

c. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work?

Above average Average Below average

Provide explanatory notes (optional)

I think both Tiare and I could have completed the slides a bit timelier but we both had a
lot of mahi commitments.

Group member’s name (3) Neil Denny

a. How would you rate this group member’s overall participation in group meetings:

Above average Average Below average

b. How would you rate the quality of this person’s work?

Above average Average Below average

c. How would you rate the timeliness of the completion of the work?

Above average Average Below average

Provide explanatory notes (optional):

Due work commitment was absent for the interview. We made sure to send him our
notes however and he primarily connected with Wiremu’s emailed answers due to the
governance/centrality nature of his content (so it didn’t impact quality of his content). I
really appreciated all of Neil’s wonderful insight through his valuable experiences.