Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chris A. Clark
University at Buffalo
2
Abstract
A recent flurry of private company proposals to launch humans into space raises a number of
and organizations. Innovative solutions have been designed to protect astronauts from radiation.
Recruiting volunteers who will waive some protection will enable one venture to establish a
Martian colony without guaranteeing the colonists a return to Earth. As corporations have begun
to explore suborbital and low-earth orbits, there are increasing risks of collisions. Calls are
already coming for the preservation of unique pristine space environments and historic
exploration sites. Though United Nations members are bound by a treaty that prohibits outer
space sovereignty claims, this does not apply to private companies who may extract what they
wish from celestial bodies as they achieve that capability. Harvesting space minerals will affect
world markets and could change or cripple some economies, yet also could bring new riches to
all. Despite these concerns, the promises of new discoveries, new technologies, pride in
overcrowding relief, and the gifts of opportunities to our progeny not only overcome any
objections, but tell us it would be unethical not to pursue off-world human colonies.
3
For over fifty years, world governments have been sending humans into space (NASA).
While they have dealt with some ethical concerns, they have been able to circumvent others in
the interests of national security. In the past decade private companies have begun to send
people into space (Space Adventures; SpaceShipOne) and dozens more have proposed future
plans to launch others (Wall; Booking). They are mandated by regulations and insurance
companies to respond to some ethical problems, but it is unclear if any have answered all the
One could begin by asking whose ethical standards we should accept (Livingston).
Answers to this type of question typically involve the participants themselves, the organizations
they work for, and the hierarchy of umbrella organizations above those, up to and including the
home nation. As this lies outside the scope of this paper, let’s assume the aforementioned and
First and foremost is the concern for human safety. Every space traveler, whether
astronaut, private crew, or space tourist, is essentially a human research subject. Private
companies sending people into space must provide them with a safe environment and the
necessities of life such as air, clean water and healthy food. Of course, they must also assure that
their craft are flightworthy and that their basic operation will not endanger the passengers nor
people on the ground. They must also take steps to protect them from the dangers of space
The viability of any craft falls under the auspices of its nation’s regulatory agencies
(Thirty). In the United States, this domain is primarily that of the Federal Aviation
Administration, specifically its Office of Commercial Space Transportation which was created in
4
1984 (About the Office). Companies are further self-policed by the industry organization known
Radiation is of such a concern that NASA sets a lifetime limit for its astronauts’ exposure
(Managing). Once an astronaut reaches this limit, he or she is banned from all future flights
(Dreifus). Would it be ethical for a private company to launch passengers with a variable
radiation shield that would be removed and replaced throughout the duration of the flight?
Dennis Tito, who flew to the International Space Station as the first self-funded space tourist
(BBC), has proposed sending a couple on a Mars fly-by in a craft shielded with the food and
water store needed for the seventeen-month trip. As the food and water are consumed, they will
Would it be ethical to ask travelers to sign away their health and safety rights? The
Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984 requires participants to sign a waiver releasing the
United States of any liability (Timberlake). Unlike the Golden Spike Company’s plans to launch
expeditions to the Moon (Company), and unable to guarantee them a safe return, Bas Lansdorp’s
Mars One is offering its astronauts a one-way trip to Mars (Mars One). Comparing it to previous
historical emigrations to settle distant lands, the company claims it is completely ethical. It is
honest about its astronauts’ prospects, yet has already received hundreds of applicants to help
There are also environmental concerns, both old and new. We are familiar with earthly
problems like pollution and wasted resources that must be minimized, but moving beyond
Earth’s surface brings new questions. Who owns space? Does Robert Bigelow have the right to
park a hotel in orbit and mar everyone’s view of the night sky (McGarry)? What about space
artists launching orbiting exhibitions? Does Peter Diamandis have the right to profit from
5
mining minerals from the asteroids (Planetary)? Can Buzz Aldrin extract helium-3 from the
Though the United Nations has created an office to assist member states with various
aspects of space law (International), it has historically held little real influence. Ultimately space
belongs to whoever can claim it. If Bigelow can succeed in placing his resort in an unoccupied
orbit, he’ll effectively own that orbit. The United States Space Surveillance Network tracks over
8000 spacecraft, satellites, spent rocket bodies and other orbital debris to help prevent future
collisions, but has no authority over what is up there (Space Surveillance). The International
Dark-Sky Association encourages the reduction of light pollution from ground sources (About
IDA), but has yet to take a position on the visibility of orbiting structures such as the hotel or
A similar concern is the preservation of the pristine, unspoiled expanses of space (Lin).
As with movements on Earth that seek to protect portions of rainforests, wetlands, coral reefs
and any number of other natural habitats, we must identify and safeguard unique environments in
space. Some are now calling for the preservation of historic sites in space such as the Apollo
lunar landers, flags, scientific experiments and the astronauts’ footprints and moon buggy tracks
surrounding them, though the government is wary of demanding it because of the precedent and
ramifications it might have with other countries (Chang). Still they have asked future visitors
politely not to disturb these sites and several state historical agencies have taken what steps they
Ownership of the moon, asteroids, and other celestial bodies is another matter. The 1967
United Nations Outer Space Treaty prohibits ownership of space properties by member nations,
but does not address ownership by corporations or individuals (Who). Diamandis’ company,
6
Planetary Resources, is currently developing the resources and technology to mine asteroids with
both robotic and crewed vehicles (Planetary). The UN treaty does call for authorization and
supervision of such private activities by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty (Franzen), but
ownership of the harvested minerals may ultimately belong to whomever develops the capability
The harvesting of asteroidal minerals and returning them to Earth raises other concerns.
Some countries, particularly poorer ones as those in Africa, depend on the export of their
minerals for their economic survival (Davis). A sudden influx of megatons of iron and nickel on
the world market could cripple third-world economies. A rush of gold, platinum and other
precious metals could devastate commodities trading the world over. Conversely, a flow of
helium-3 mined from the Moon as Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin proposes (Kaplan) could
For some, the greatest ethical concern is not that we are moving toward extraterrestrial
colonization, but that we might not. The sociological and psychological effects of space
exploration are profound. The U.S. space program is perhaps Americans’ greatest source of
national pride (Ross). An off-world colony will generate many new technologies and discoveries
so its major export may turn out to be knowledge (Asimov, 1975, p. 189). Because humanity is
the only intelligence of which we know in the Universe, and because it could be wiped out by a
cometary strike of the sort which killed the dinosaurs or activity of mankind such as nuclear war,
some take comfort in the thought that an independent self-supporting extraterrestrial human
colony will preserve and remember the history, culture, and knowledge of humanity (Asimov,
1989, p. 63). Lin raises the argument that a backup planet may encourage us to take more risks
with our original one, but then he quickly dismisses that, saying risk-takers are less forward-
7
looking and would likely take the risks with or without the backup. More important, he says, is
the possibility for future alleviation of overcrowding and diminishing resources. As Joseph
Angelo concludes, “Without a focused decision to support off-planet expansion, our species
elects to isolate itself on a single world and denies future generations the rich technical and
References
About IDA. (n.d.). IDAHome. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from http://www.darksky.org/about-ida
About the Office. (n.d.). Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/about/
Asimov, I. (1975). Today and Tomorrow and.... New York, New York: Dell Publishing Co.,
Asimov, I. (1989). The Tyrannosaurus Prescription and 100 Other Essays. Buffalo, New York:
Prometheus Books.
BBC ON THIS DAY | 28 | 2001: First space tourist blasts off. (n.d.). BBC News - Home.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/28/newsid_2501000/2501015.stm
Booking | Virgin Galactic. (n.d.). Welcome | Virgin Galactic. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
http://www.virgingalactic.com/booking/
Chang, K. (n.d.). A Push for Historic Preservation on the Moon - NYTimes.com. The New York
Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/science/space/a-push-for-historic-preservation-on-
the-moon.html
Company Vision - The Golden Spike Company | The Golden Spike Company. (n.d.). The
Golden Spike Company | Your Chance to Enable and Take Part in True Space
http://goldenspikecompany.com/about-us/golden-spike-history/
9
http://entreprecurious.com/the-evolving-ethics-of-space-exploration/
Dreifus, C. (n.d.). A Conversation With Paul Root Wolpe - Scientist Tackles Ethical Questions
of Space Travel - Interview - NYTimes.com. The New York Times - Breaking News,
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/science/space/11conv.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Franzen, C. (n.d.). Planetary Resources Space Mining Plans Blaze Uncharted Legal Territory |
TPM Idea Lab. TPM Idea Lab. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/planetary-resources-space-mining-plans-
blaze-uncharted-legal-territory.php
International Space Law. (n.d.). United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. Retrieved April
Is This Ethical?. (n.d.). Mars One. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from mars-one.com/en/faq-en/19-
faq-health/231-is-this-ethical
Kaplan, J. A. (n.d.). Buzz Aldrin Dreams of Mars | Fox News. Fox News - Breaking News
Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Videos. Retrieved April 27, 2013,
from http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/10/19/buzz-aldrin-dreams-mars/
Lin, P. (n.d.). Nanoethics.org - The Ethics and Societal Impact of Nanotechnology. Ethics +
http://ethics.calpoly.edu/nanoethics//paper042406.html
Managing Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration. (n.d.). The National
record_id=12045&page=16
Mars One - Crazy and it might work | Space Industry News. (n.d.). Space News - Space
crazy-and-it-might-work/
McAllister, N. (n.d.). Tito's Mars mission to use HUMAN WASTE as radiation shield The
Register. The Register: Sci/Tech News for the World. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/02/mars_mission_feces_shield/
McGarry, B. (2013, January 28). Las Vegas UFO Aficionado Bets $500 Million on Space Hotel
ufo-aficionado-bets-500-million-on-space-hotel.html
NASA - Mercury. (n.d.). NASA - Home. Retrieved April 25, 2013, from
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mercury/index.html
Planetary Resources “The Asteroid Mining Company” Mission. (n.d.). Planetary Resources“
http://www.planetaryresources.com/mission/
Ross, J. L. (n.d.). Jerry L. Ross: We Must Restore Our Commitment to U.S. Space Exploration.
Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jerry-l-ross/we-must-restore-our-
commi_b_2630668.html
Space Adventures : About Us. (n.d.). Space Adventures : Home. Retrieved April 25, 2013, from
http://www.spaceadventures.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=about_us.welcome
Space Surveillance. (n.d.). This site has been updated. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
11
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/usspc-fs/space.htm
SpaceShipOne - Milestones of Flight. (n.d.). Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.
Thirty Thousand Feet - Aviation Regulatory & Government Agencies. (n.d.). Thirty Thousand
http://www.thirtythousandfeet.com/regulato.htm
Timberlake, B. M. (n.d.). Exploring the Commercial Space Launch Act – University of
Richmond Law Review. University of Richmond Law Review. Retrieved April 27, 2013,
from http://lawreview.richmond.edu/exploring-the-commercial-space-launch-act/
Wall, M. (n.d.). Private Groups Set Sights on Deep Space | Mars, the Moon & Asteroids |
Space.com . Space and NASA News Universe and Deep Space Information | Space.com
space-exploration.html
Whittington, M. (n.d.). Buzz Aldrin Changes His Mind; Now Favors NASA Return to the Moon
- Yahoo! Voices - voices.yahoo.com. Yahoo! Voices. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from
voices.yahoo.com/buzz-aldrin-changes-his-mind-now-favors-nasa-return-6977288.html
Who Owns The Asteroids? : Discovery News : Discovery News. (n.d.). Discovery News.
treaty-ownership-120427.htm
Woods, A. (n.d.). ars astronautica :Orbital Sculptures Space Art, Astronautical Art, Spaceart. ars
astronautica: space artist arthur woods: - Home: Space Art, Astronautical Art,
news_id=14
12