Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by:
MIKA S. DIMAPILIS
Student, MA in English
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPICS PAGE#
I. POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
1.1. SYNTAX
1.1.1. Natural Language Ambiguity …
p. 3
1.1.2. Internal Structure of Syntactic Constituents …
p. 4
1.1.3. Specifiers, Adjuncts and Complement …
p. 7
…
p. 17
2.4. TRP #4: Finite Verbs as Markers of Time
III. ACTIVITIES
3.1. Dissecting Words (Morphology) p. 18
3.2. The X-Bar p.20
2| Page
I. WRITTEN REPORT
1.1. SYNTAX
- the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language.
1.1.1. NATURAL LANGUAGE AMBIGUITY
COMPOSITIONALITY
- Words are not the only ones to convey their meanings, but also, how they are formed
into a sentence.
AMBIGUOUS
- The word ambiguous is another of those words that has a specific meaning in
linguistics: it doesn’t just mean that a sentence’s meaning is vague or unclear.
Ambiguous means that there are two or more distinct meanings available.
EXAMPLE:
1. Hilary saw the pirate with the telescope.
A. Hilary saw the pirate using a telescope.
B. Hilary saw the pirate who has a telescope.
2. Well, I’ve certainly never tasted chicken cooked that way before!
A. The cooked chicken is not good.
B. The cooked chicken did not taste like anything because it is good.
STRUCTURAL AMBIGUITY
- structural ambiguity can sometimes lead to some funny interpretations. This often
happens in news headlines, where function words get omitted. For example, in
December 2017, several news outlets reported, “Lindsay Lohan bitten by snake
on holiday in Thailand”, which led a few commentators to express surprise that
snakes take holidays.
LEXICAL AMBIGUITY
- If a word has more than one distinct meaning, then using that word in a sentence will
make it ambiguous.
1. Heike recognized it by its unusual bark.
A. Bark - sound of a dog
B. Bark - part of a tree
2. I saw bats
SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY
- The context plays an important role in giving meaning in sentences. Depending on how
a speaker/writer uses the words in certain context, the meaning changes.
DISCOURSE AMBIGUITY
1. Call me a taxi, please.
3| Page
a. Call a taxi for me.
b. Call me, “taxi”
SCOPE AMBIGUITY
- Ambiguity in quantifiers.
A. Every kid climbed a tree.
B. Every kid climbed that tree.
PRAGMATIC AMBIGUITY
- the words which have multiple interpretations. Pragmatic Ambiguity arises when
the meaning of words of a sentence is not specific; it concludes different meanings.
1. Will you crack open the door? I am getting hot
A. to break
B. open the door just a little
1.1.2. INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF SYNTACTIC CONSTITUENTS
CONSTITUENTS
- group of words that act together to form a unit.
- A constituent can be a morpheme, word, phrase, or clause.
EXAMPLE:
1. Harriet mistakenly went home with her cousin’s jacket.
[Harriet] -1
[mistakenly went home] -2
[with her cousin’s jacket] -3
1 + 2 + 3 ≠ 3 + 2 +1
The arrangement of the constituents declares the meaning of the sentence because these
are arranged in HIERARCHICAL ORDER.
2. Harriet, who purchased a guitar, mistakenly went home with her cousin’s jacket.
Constituents can contain constituents.
[Harriet, who purchased a guitar] -1
[mistakenly went home] -2
[with her cousin’s jacket] -3
Harriet mistakenly went home, who purchased a guitar, with her cousin’s jacket.
CONSTITUENCY TESTS
1. Replacement Test
2. Movement Test
4| Page
3. Cleft Test
4. Sentence Fragment Test
REPLACEMENT TESTS
● Noun Phrases can be replaced with Pronouns (it, them, they).
● Verb Phrases can be replaced with do or do so (or did, does, doing).
● Some Preposition Phrases (but not all) can be replaced with then or there.
● Adjective Phrases can be replaced with something that you know to be an adjective,
such as happy.
1. Harriet, who purchased a guitar, mistakenly went home with her cousin’s jacket.
[Harriet, who purchased a guitar] Noun phrase (She)
[mistakenly went home] Verb phrase (did)
[with her cousin’s jacket] Preposition phrase (it)
MOVEMENT TEST
- We change the position of the constituents inside the sentence.
5| Page
[Marites, who is the Barangay’s muse,] [had fun] [last night.]
WRONG:
[The] [students saw] [their friends after class.]
CLEFT TEST
To use the cleft test, we take the string of words that we’re investigating and put it after
the words It was, then leave the remaining parts of the sentence to follow the word that.
It is to give emphasis on the word.
Example:
Those were their friends whom the students saw after class.
6| Page
SENTENCE FRAGMENT TEST
a. rested
c. rested in a
b. About her
Head: wife
2. The specifier points to the head. For nouns, specifiers include determiners
(“the”) and possessives (“her”). For verbs, adverbs occasionally fill this role
(“quickly”).
3. The complement tends to feel intimately related to the head of a phrase (e.g., “of
poems” in “a book of poems”).
4. Adjuncts, on the other hand, tend to feel more optional (e.g., “big” in “big
book”).
ADVERB HEAD
Preposition:
I sleep at night.
I sleep at night.
I sleep at night.
Determiner:
SPECIFIER
The specifier points to the head. For nouns, specifiers include determiners
(“the”) and possessives (“her”). For verbs, adverbs occasionally fill this role
(“quickly”).
8| Page
MODIFIER: NOUN PHRASE
The - specifier
Grandmother – head
Nervously - specifier
went – head
Her - specifier
song – head
9| Page
[Her song] [gently kissed my monsters] [away.]
Gently - specifier
Kissed – head
COMPLEMENT
The complement tends to feel intimately related to the head of a phrase (e.g., “of
poems” in “the book of poems”).
The specifier
of poems complement
Bought head
ADJUNCT
X-bar theory makes the claim that every single phrase in every single sentence in the
mental grammar of every single human language, has the same core organization.
According to x-bar theory, every phrase has a head. The head is the terminal node of the phrase.
It’s the node that has no daughters. Whatever category the head is determines the category of the
phrase. So if the head is a Noun, then our phrase is a Noun Phrase, abbreviated NP. If the head is
a verb (V) then the phrase is a verb phrase (VP). And likewise, if the head is a preposition (P),
then the phrase is a preposition phrase (PP), and Adjective Phrases (AP) have Adjectives as their
heads.
11 | P a g e
Keep in mind: Heads:
A parse tree or parsing tree or derivation tree or concrete syntax tree is an ordered,
rooted tree that represents the syntactic structure of a string according to some context-
free grammar.
A parse tree is made up of nodes and branches In the picture the parse tree is the entire
structure, starting from S and ending in each of the leaf nodes (John, ball, the, hit). In a
parse tree, each node is either a root node, a branch node, or a leaf node. In the above
example, S is a root node, NP and VP are branch nodes, while John, ball, the, and hit are
all leaf nodes.
Nodes can also be referred to as parent nodes and child nodes. A parent node is one which
12 | P a g e
has at least one other node linked by a branch under it. In the example, S is a parent of
both NP and VP. A child node is one which has at least one node directly above it to
which it is linked by a branch of the tree. Again from our example, hit is a child node of
V.
X-bar theory makes the claim that every single phrase in every single
sentence in the mental grammar of every single human language, has
the same core organization.
According to x-bar theory, every phrase has a head. The head is the terminal node of the
phrase. It’s the node that has no daughters. Whatever category the head is determines the
category of the phrase. So if the head is a Noun, then our phrase is a Noun Phrase,
abbreviated NP. If the head is a verb (V) then the phrase is a verb phrase (VP). And
likewise, if the head is a preposition (P), then the phrase is a preposition phrase (PP), and
Adjective Phrases (AP) have Adjectives as their heads.
13 | P a g e
II. Thought Reflection Essays
The idea of the English language system is just the same as the concept of Science. Human
beings cannot live without language which is congruent with their intellectual (IQ), physical
(spoken words), and social abilities (communication). But even though language is natural and
14 | P a g e
inborn, its origins need a lot of time and expertise to understand. Kracht (nd) has stated that
language is a mean to communicate and it has four different levels such as Semantics,
Morphology, Syntax, and Phonology. Language, as it is formed into a sentence, is as
complicated as how a word is formed and how it is formed to fit its function.
Morphology is ambiguous in meaning because just as what is stated earlier, Science and
Language overlap. In Science, morphology is the study of the physical and internal structure of
organisms (Toepfer, 2021), while in Language, it is the analysis of word formation. Both body of
knowledge dissect the abstract idea of words and the earthly organisms. Linguistically speaking,
words are studied as how these were formed to fit its purpose. For example, there are free
morphemes which are independent words and create own meaning, and there are bound
morphemes which are morpheme that create their meanings only when attached on free
morphemes. In addition to this, bound morphemes are also categorized as inflectional and
derivational. Inflectional morphemes are attached on words to either make it plural, change its
tense, or create comparison. In a sense, the word “child” means there is only one young human,
but if a speaker is talking about many others, it is combined with the suffix -ren (which is not
ordinary since it is an irregular noun) to pluralize it. On the other hand, derivational morphemes
are morphemes that shift the meaning and the word class of a certain word. Taking a look at the
word “agree”, it used as a verb alone, but to change it into a noun, a speaker shall add the suffix
“-ment”.
Other than morphology, words can also be studied by how it means when being used by
humans. This is the idea of Semantics which is the study of words and its meaning. Semantics lie
heavily on individuality since humans are the ones who use words to communicate and create
messages by means of discourse. Words are also boundaries that separate the social order of a
person from one another, for example, slangs can be often used by people with lower social
order in the society, while jargons are used by those who have professional endeavors. In a
nutshell, meanings can be made based on humans’ intersectionality- or what is called as the
different aspects that create an individual such as gender, race, age, social order and etc (Ferree,
2018).
These concepts of the English language are the preliminaries of Linguistics, yet, not
everyone can actually understand how to form words to serve its meaning that can fit in the
purpose of a sentence. Sometimes, people tend to just look for the meaning of words in the
dictionary, never really minding how to use it in a sentence. But just like what is stated in
Semantics, word meanings are innate in human’s diversity and so, making the language
dynamic.
Thought Reflection Paper 2: Discourse, Ideology and Context
In a discourse between two people, and even in a larger scale of group, the context of the
message does not only depend on any time or place. It is rather strongly adhered to the
15 | P a g e
individual’s diversity in ideology. Ideology, however, is a set of beliefs and opinions that
common and is enveloped in a certain individual or group (Martin, 2015). And for every set of
ideology, context gives off different intended effects to people who are participating in the
discourse.
One example, the formality of the language and accent. The Standard English language,
according to Bickerton, is composed of the different lects that forms the hierarchy of the
language usage. These are acrolect (highest level spoken by prestige people), mesolect (the
average), and the basilect (the lowest level). In the Philippine context, according to Llamzon,
there is so called “Standard Filipino English” in which he defined as the accepted scholarly
usage of English (1997). In my opinion, since the English language is not the native language
spoken by the Pilipinos, the context of the lects of Standard English cannot be applied. And this
is how ideology takes place also.
Freedom of opinion and usage of the English language can be depending also on the
limits of ideology. If a society is finesse and strict, then freedom is also limited. Otherwise, if the
ideology of the society is not restricted, then use of language is loose.
Thought Reflection Paper 3: Canonical Sentences: The Standard Pattern
Creating sentences may require skills, it will mostly depend on the complexity of
meaning and the purpose it will serve. Sentences can be simple, complex, or compound, or can
be a combination of all. What unexpecting is, we are not aware that there is a certain pattern that
we are all using unconsciously.
The term “canon” or “canonization” is defined by Halbertal (1997) as incorporated with
“sacredness, authority, value, prestige, and so on”. In this context, it is also believed that there
are so called “canonical texts” which deals with expectations of standards of a text. However,
canonical sentences are the ones with pattern that follows “S-TV-O” or “S-TV-DO-OC” or such.
In the English language, to form a confirming sentence, the subject must come first before the
verb/predicate.
On the other hand, canonical phrases, in a sentence is the leading phrase that dictate the
tense or the whole idea of the whole sentence. It is the main clause, in short, leading
Students who find it difficult to construct sentences shall be aware of the canonical
structure of sentences to ease out their difficulties in simple sentence construction. It may not be
applied to another language, but it is an exclusive trick for the English language.
16 | P a g e
Thought Reflection Paper 4: FINITE VERBS AS MARKERS OF TIME
As a kid, a learner would wonder as to how to construct sentences with proper tense of a
verb. As a general rule, the verb should agree with the subject, considering also the time the
action was done. Finite verbs are said to be time markers of the sentence. It is located near the
main subject of the main clause.
Lately, when I was asked to be the grammarian of BatState-U Malvar campus, I realized
that it was really difficult to construct a research paper wherein it has to comply their standard
with the grammatical rules. Almost everything in the research paper should be in past tense, but
then, it should be disregarded when stating facts, no matter how old the statement was. Also, it
was really confusing to decide which tense should be applied because sometimes, in a sentence,
the finite verb was not the same as the tense of the non-finite verb. For example in a research:
Elizalde (2021) stated that we do not know what the future holds, but we hold the future.
The finite verb was “stated” because it was near to the subject, but then, notice that the
following verbs were not in the past tense such as know, holds, and hold. These verbs were
called as non-finite verbs and were not a part of the main clause, but rather, in the subordinating
clause. It was a part of the clause that stated a fact, that was why past tense was not appropriate.
Sentence construction could be difficult, because sentences should be analyzed parts by parts.
III. ACITIVITIES
DISSECTING WORDS: MORPHOLOGY
The idea of the English language system is just the same as the concept of Science. Human
beings cannot live without language which is congruent with their intellectual (IQ), physical
(spoken words), and social abilities (communication). But even though language is natural and
inborn, its origins need a lot of time and expertise to understand. Kracht (nd) has stated that
language is a mean to communicate and it has four different levels such as Semantics,
Morphology, Syntax, and Phonology. Language, as it is formed into a sentence, is as
complicated as how a word is formed and how it is formed to fit its function.
Morphology is ambiguous in meaning because just as what is stated earlier, Science and
Language overlap. In Science, morphology is the study of the physical and internal structure of
organisms (Toepfer, 2021), while in Language, it is the analysis of word formation. Both body of
knowledge dissect the abstract idea of words and the earthly organisms. Linguistically speaking,
words are studied as how these were formed to fit its purpose. For example, there are free
morphemes which are independent words and create own meaning, and there are bound
morphemes which are morpheme that create their meanings only when attached on free
morphemes. In addition to this, bound morphemes are also categorized as inflectional and
derivational. Inflectional morphemes are attached on words to either make it plural, change its
tense, or create comparison. In a sense, the word “child” means there is only one young human,
but if a speaker is talking about many others, it is combined with the suffix -ren (which is not
ordinary since it is an irregular noun) to pluralize it. On the other hand, derivational morphemes
are morphemes that shift the meaning and the word class of a certain word. Taking a look at the
word “agree”, it used as a verb alone, but to change it into a noun, a speaker shall add the suffix
“-ment”.
Other than morphology, words can also be studied by how it means when being used by
humans. This is the idea of Semantics which is the study of words and its meaning. Semantics lie
heavily on individuality since humans are the ones who use words to communicate and create
messages by means of discourse. Words are also boundaries that separate the social order of a
person from one another, for example, slangs can be often used by people with lower social
order in the society, while jargons are used by those who have professional endeavors. In a
nutshell, meanings can be made based on humans’ intersectionality- or what is called as the
different aspects that create an individual such as gender, race, age, social order and etc (Ferree,
2018).
These concepts of the English language are the preliminaries of Linguistics, yet, not
everyone can actually understand how to form words to serve its meaning that can fit in the
purpose of a sentence. Sometimes, people tend to just look for the meaning of words in the
dictionary, never really minding how to use it in a sentence. But just like what is stated in
Semantics, word meanings are innate in human’s diversity and so, making the language
dynamic.
1. Write five different sentences. These sentences must be originally created and not
interrelated; hence, each must deal with a concept/idea that varies from the others.
2. The document must begin with an introduction which is the first part of the paper.
I. Introduction- This must be one to three paragraphs long, must briefly explain
the theories or concepts that are applied in the analysis of each of the five
sentences.
3. As the second part of the analysis, the following format shall be employed:
II. Structure Analysis – This must provide details and discussion of each of the
five sentences using the following matrices:
Sentence 1: Every man deserves a chance because we are all humans.
Sentence type: declarative
A. Morphological Dimension
A.1. Morphemic and Morphological Typification
a Grammatical Function
we Lexical Content
The first sentence is a declarative one. In this sentence, there are six lexical
morphemes and four grammatical. The lexical morphemes are composed of three nouns (man,
chance and humans); one verb (deserves); one linking verb (are); and one pronoun (we). The
remaining grammatical morphemes consisted of three determiners (every, a, and all); and one
conjunction (and).
Bound and free morphemes connect with each other to either form new words or
just transform it in various ways. In the sentence, there are three morphemes (every, deserve, and
humans). The determiner every, is a combination of the free morph every and bound morph -y
wherein, the word ever becomes every. On the other hand, the verb deserves and noun humans
are combined with suffix -s to show the tense of the verb which is present tense and for
pluralization respectively.
B. Verb Dimension
deserves √ √ √
are √ √
Note: Check the appropriate column/s and the indicate the object where it is applicable.
C. Syntactic Dimension
C.1. Word Layer
A Determiner base
We Pronoun base
NP VP
Every man deserves a chance because we are
all humans.
C.4. Parse Tree
A. Morphological Dimension
A.1. Morphemic and Morphological Typification
is Lexical Content
it lexical content
Is lexical Content
difficult Lexical Content
The second sentence is also declarative. In this sentence, there are seven lexical
morphemes and two grammatical. The lexical morphemes are composed of one nouns (writing);
two linking verbs (both is); three adjectives (fun, difficult, and frustrating); one pronoun (it); and
one conjunction (yet). The remaining grammatical morphemes consisted of two conjunctions
(yet and and).
In the sentence, there are two morphemes (writing and frustrating) that have
bound morphemes. The noun writing, is a combination of the free morph write and bound morph
-ing wherein, the word ever becomes writing, making the verb write transform into a noun. On
the other hand, the adjective frustrating is combined with suffix -ing to make the verb frustrate
an adjective.
B. Verb Dimension
Is √ √ √
is √ √ √
Note: Check the appropriate column/s and the indicate the object where it is applicable.
C. Syntactic Dimension
C.1. Word Layer
Word Part of Word Form
Speech (as
used in the
sentence)
It pronoun Base
A. Morphological Dimension
A.1. Morphemic and Morphological Typification
Is Lexical Content
eating Lexical Content Eat Ing Inflection –
progressive
tense
is lexical Content
The third sentence is also declarative. In this sentence, there are nine lexical
morphemes and one grammatical. The lexical morphemes are composed of four nouns (Eli,
sushi, Zeus, and juice); one adjective (orange); two linking verbs (both is); two verbs (eating and
drinking). The only grammatical morpheme is a conjunction (while).
In the sentence, there are three morphemes (eating, drinking, and softdrinks) that
have bound morphemes. The verbs eating and drinking, are combinations of the free morph eat
and drink and bound morph -ing wherein, the word eat becomes eating and drink becomes
drinking).
B. Verb Dimension
Is √ √ √
Eating √ √ √
Is √ √
drinking √ √ √
Note: Check the appropriate column/s and the indicate the object where it is applicable.
C. Syntactic Dimension
C.1. Word Layer
NP VP
Eli is eating sushi while Zeus is
drinking orange juice.
Sentence 4: Several students liked the adventure while some wanted the solitude.
Sentence type: declarative
A. Morphological Dimension
A.1. Morphemic and Morphological Typification
Word Morpheme Type Morph Affixation
Type
The fourth sentence is also declarative. In this sentence, there are five lexical
morphemes and five grammatical. The lexical morphemes are composed of three nouns
(students, adventure, and solitude); two verbs (liked and wanted). The five grammatical
morphemes consisted of three determiners (several, the, and some); and one conjunction (while)
A.3. Morphemic Analysis
In the sentence, there are three morphemes (students, liked and wanted) that have
bound morphemes. The noun student is combined with the suffix -s for pluralization. The verbs
like and want are combined with the suffix -ed to transform into past tense.
B. Verb Dimension
Verb Type s Object
Liked √ √ √
wanted √ √ √
Note: Check the appropriate column/s and the indicate the object where it is applicable.
C. Syntactic Dimension
C.1. Word Layer
NP VP
Several students Liked the adventure while some
wanted the solitude.
A. Morphological Dimension
A.1. Morphemic and Morphological Typification
Of Grammati Function
cal
we lexical Content
The fifth sentence is also declarative. In this sentence, there are seven lexical morphemes
and three grammatical. The lexical morphemes are composed of three nouns (research,
presentation, and data); one adjective (correct); one pronoun (we); and two verbs (stated, and
used). The four grammatical morphemes are two determiners (two the) and two prepositions (of,
and which).
In the sentence, there are three morphemes (research, stated, presentation, and
used) that have bound morphemes. The verbs search is applied with the prefix re- to transform
into a noun. Meanwhile, the verb state is combined with -ed to change into past tense. The verb
present is joined by the suffix -ation to transform into a noun. And lastly, the verb use is
combined with suffix -ed to change into past tense.
B. Verb Dimension
stated √ √ √
used √ √
Note: Check the appropriate column/s and the indicate the object where it is applicable.
C. Syntactic Dimension
C.1. Word Layer
presentation noun
Of Preposition Base
we Pronoun Base
NP VP
The research stated the correct presentation of
data which we used.
4. The paper must end with a conclusion which emphasizes the significance of understanding
and analyzing the structure of words and sentences of a language.
III. Conclusion
The structural analysis of sentences is far more complex than creating sentences.
People use language in communication and grammar, in this particular activity, is being
mildly disregarded because the intention is to send message. But then, the usage of
language is not enough the value of language can only be appreciated when it is
understood in its smallest unit of meaning – morph.
Language is said to be dynamic and even in the English language, new words exist and add up to
the vocabulary since their functions depend upon the usage and the intention of the user. Verbs
can be nouns, such as present to presentation, and also, nouns can be adjective (orange – orange
juice) or verb (telephone – telephoned ). In fact, the flexibility of words also depends on the
context of the time these are being used. Nowadays, there are a lot words that are still being
updated by the younger generation which can be studied by future researchers. And because
language is dynamic, analyzing the language structure today may be already obsolete someday.