Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. Kerta Semaya Saminaya (KSS) is a sustainable Indonesian cocoa bean supplier. They
produce organic fine or flavor cocoa beans that allows their product to become a premium. The
problem however is that they are lacking buyers and wishes to expand their sales by exporting to a
German buyer. This brings forth the question of if it is possible for KSS to enter Germany. To analyze
and research this both qualitative and quantitative research methodology is used in this research to
gain information and identify alternatives for improvement of actions. The primary data gathered is
from interviewing German buyers, Indonesian supplier, survey German market segment and spreading
questionnaires. For analysis technique, descriptive analysis is performed. To penetrate the German
market, the only available option is to go through the niche market. To even sell to the German market
a variety of requirements are needed ranging from basic to the niche requirements. One important
requirement in Germany is sustainability which is also the aim of KSS. KSS has the capability to sell
and compete in the German market however they still require certain certifications and conformity to
be able to enter the market which could be overcome by selling through a wholesaler.
Keywords: Cocoa bean, german market, niche cocoa market, kerta semaya saminaya, sustainable,
fine or flavor cocoa beans
INTRODUCTION
The introduction section should (1) present the scope and objective of the paper and state the problem,
(2) briefly review the pertinent literature, (3) describe the methods, and (5) provide an overview of the
main results of the work.
LITERATURE REVIEW
This part describes the literatures related to the study. It may consists of primary references (grand
theory, concept); journal articles (preferable published in the last 10 years); main idea from text book
or electronic articles. For empirical study which uses hypotheses development, the literatures aim to
strengthen the arguments for variable selection and each proposed hypothesis.
METHODOLOGY
The methodology must be clearly stated and described in sufficient detail or with sufficient references.
1
7
6
5
4
3 Series2
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Table X. Title
No Table
CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions should include (1) the principles and generalisations inferred from the results, (2) any
exceptions to, or problems with these principles and generalisations, (3) theoretical and/or practical
implications of the work, and (5) conclusions drawn and recommendations.
REFERENCES
*arranged alphabetically by the family name or the main name of the first author.
*Invert all authors’ names; give surnames and initials for up to and including seven authors (e.g.
Author, A.A., Author, B.B., & Author, C.C.)
*Capitalize only the first word of the title and of the subtitle, if any, and proper nouns; do not italicize
or place quotation marks around it.
Author, A.A., & Author, A.A. (XXXX). Title of paper. Name of Journal. Volume (Number), XX-XX.
Example:
Rubera, G. & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: a meta-analysis
review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130-147.