Assignment 2

Marking Ru
Maximum Unacceptable Poor
Criteria
Marks (0) (1)

No analysis of
Poor analysis of sources is
Analytical and Critical information/data is evident
40 evident and poor attempt to
thinking and no attempt to critically
critically discuss the topic
discuss the topic.

Poor structure; no clear

No noticeable structure is
40 Structure and coherence relationship between
evident
sections of the report

Student fails to communicate

Poor communication skills,
and unable to work in a
poor teamwork, difficulty
group, does not adhere to
following deadlines (set by
deadlines (both set by the
20 Professionalism group and lecturer), difficulty
group and the lecturer),
to conduct research
unable to conduct research
independently, difficulty
independently, unable to
following instructions, etc.
follow instructions, etc.

100
Assignment 2 - Group

Marking Rubrics
Marginal Average Good
(2) (3) (4)

Sources are evaluated

Sources are evaluated
Sources are quite sufficiently
quantitatively or qualitatively
analyzed and limited attempt
and moderate attempt to
to critically discuss the topic
critically discuss the topic
quantitatively or qualitatively,
discussed in-depth and
backed by experts' opinion
and good attempt to critically
discuss the topic

A clear structure is obvious,

which allows a reader to see
Quite clear structure, but not
Well structured report where relationships and transition
all sections follow a natural
sections are well connected between different sections;
or logical order
the report content is
complete

Student can communicate

and work in a group in a Student able to
Some evidence of
basic manner, adhere to communicate and work in a
communication skills and
some deadlines (both set by group, adhere to deadlines
teamwork, barely able to
the group and the lecturer), (both set by the group and
conduct independent
somehow able to conduct the lecturer), able to conduct
research, following
research independently, able research independently, able
instructions, etc.
to follow some instructions, to follow instructions, etc.
etc.
 Excellent
(5)

Various sources are reviewed in

depth, all relevant and necessary
aspects discussed and /or
evaluated, and experts' opinion
analyzed and clear and good
attempt to critically discuss the
topic

The structure of the report is very

clear which expands a reader's
deeper understanding of the
topic; the content is arranged in
unquestionable logical order

Student able to communicate

and work well in a group, adhere
to deadlines strictly (both set by
the group and the lecturer), able
to conduct research
independently with strong sense
of self-direction, able to follow
instructions, etc.