UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE & POLICY STUDIES

AM110
PAD390: DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

TOPIC:

NAME
MATRIC NO.

ASSESSMENTS
MARKS

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

PRESENTATION

PROJECT
 1. RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT (20 MARKS)

Scale/
1 (Very Weak) 2 (Weak) 3 (Fair) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) Marks
Criteria

1) Format Not able to follow Follows the specified Able to follow the Follows the specified Excellent ability to follow
the specified format format but requires specified format and needs format with precision the specified format
significant improvements minor adjustments without any flaws

2) Content Missing or Weakly defines or lacks Broadly defines with some Provides a clear picture Provides a
(Quality, Accuracy, incomplete necessary details missing necessary details of how the initiative comprehensive and clear
and Relevance) works, including context picture of how the
and relevant literature initiative works,
or research support including context and
well-supported by
literature or existing
research
3) Reflection Missing or Limited information Fair information provides a Offers clear and useful Offers clear and useful
incomplete provides minimal better understanding of feedback on areas for feedback on areas for
understanding of the how the growth growth, along with
initiative/project/program initiative/project/program potential strategies to
is done address challenges
4) Originality Contains elements Limited elements of Partially references sources Properly references and Excellent use of proper
of plagiarism plagiarism cites sources referencing and citations

TOTAL (20 MARKS)

 2. RUBRIC FOR PRESENTATION (25 MARKS)

Scale/
1 (Very Weak) 2 (Weak) 3 (Fair) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) Marks
Criteria

1) Personal No preparation at Demonstrates a weak Demonstrates a fair Demonstrates a good Demonstrates excellent
Appearance all personal appearance personal appearance personal appearance personal appearance

2) Visual Aid Unable to prepare Delivers a weak visual Delivers a fair visual Delivers a good visual Delivers a creative and
a good visual compelling visual

3) Verbal Unable to deliver Delivers ideas with Delivers ideas fairly Delivers ideas Delivers ideas with
Communication ideas effectively, limited effectiveness, effectively, minor effectively and great effectiveness,
understand, or needs improvement, and improvements needed, articulately, responds articulately, and fully
respond to understanding and and understands and well to questions understands and
questions question responses are satisfactorily answers responds to questions
inaccurate questions very well
4) Teamwork No clear evidence Fosters relationships and Fosters good Fosters good Highly fosters good
of the ability to works with group relationships and works relationships and relationships and works
foster good members towards goal with group members effectively collaborates effectively with other
relationships and achievement but with towards goal with group members group members
work effectively limited effectiveness achievement with some towards goal towards goal
with other group room for improvement achievement achievement
members towards
goal achievement
5) Time Management Very weak fluency Weak fluency of the Fair fluency of the Fluency of the Highly fluency of the
of the presentation, presentation, use of a presentation, use of a presentation, use of a presentation, use of a
use of a given time given time given time given time given time
TOTAL (25 MARKS)
 3. RUBRIC FOR PROJECT (25 MARKS)

Scale/
1 (Very Weak) 2 (Weak) 3 (Fair) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) Marks
Criteria

1) Organization No preparation at Demonstrates a weak Demonstrates a fair Demonstrates a good Demonstrates excellent
all organization organization organization organization

2) Division of labour Serious problems Problems due to Progress is satisfactory, Progress is good and all All members make
(equality/ quantity) due to unequal unequal workload but unequal workload is members are significant contributions
workload observed accountable to and are accountable to
complete assigned complete assigned tasks
tasks
3) Contributions Internal conflicts Weak contribution of Most (but not all) All members contribute All members contribute
(quality/ result in team idea result in team members contribute quality and useful idea quality and useful idea
management of failing to achieve failing to achieve project useful idea and use only the best
quality) project goals goals

4) Teamwork No clear evidence Fosters relationships and Fosters good Fosters good Highly fosters good
of the ability to works with group relationships and works relationships and relationships and works
foster good members towards goal with group members effectively collaborates effectively with other
relationships and achievement but with towards goal with group members group members towards
work effectively limited effectiveness achievement with some towards goal goal achievement
with other group room for improvement achievement
members towards
goal achievement
5) Punctuality Very weak in Weak in conducting Fair in conducting Good in conducting Excellent in conducting
conducting program program program program
program
TOTAL (25 MARKS)