Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essay 3 Draft 2
Essay 3 Draft 2
Vivian Galindo
ENGL 1301-119
9 November 2022
Propotvoa did a satisfactory job in presenting their argument towards the psychologists and
animal communities by considering: the modes of persuasion, statistics, and gathering more
insight from other credible sources to further signify their message, that shelter employee’s metal
health should be the number one priority and should be taken seriously instead of just avoiding
the situation.
Beginning with, their appeal to ethos and logos. First this paper examines tables to prove
the months on the job along with the traumatic reactions influencing these employee’s jobs. This
statement would shock readers because of the responsibilities and obligations it comes behind
the scenes in taking care of these critters daily. The Second table, is the Multivariate regression
model statistics which stresses the compassion these shelters’ workers within their mental health
struggles. This statement proves to readers that shelter workers mental health are at risk.
“Therefore, decisions to accept dogs in the workplace may include many considerations
including health, safety, and stability for these employees, legal and cultural sensitivities and
animal welfare”(Androkonis and Protopopova). The final table reinforces, the summary of
statistics of overall traumatic stress. “The secondary traumatic stress was higher in individuals
who made the selection of critters being euthanized always and occasionally” (Androkonis and
Galindo 2
Protopopova). These overall factors contribute to the readers “awareness” and “understanding”
of the legal obligations of employers under ADA and relevant state laws are critical to ensuring
that both the employee with a disability and co-workers are treated fairly when accommodations
are considers and implemented (Androkonis and Protopopova). Also, the tables serves as
evidence to towards the purpose of the these authors article by providing readers with insight and
has readers making their own conceptions about the problem and make possible solution towards
the situation.
Following, pathos and kiros (argues the message) because it emphasizes both authors
claim towards shelter employee’s mental health risk factors and should be considered by
appealing to the audience of euthanizing these animals their invoking pathos the feelings of
sadness and compassion towards these employees and these critters. “It may be beneficial for
shelters to implement a multi-level approach to euthanasia-related decisions. This may lessen the
and Protopopova). And in essence gives them an overall summation of awareness and
understanding of the legal obligations and relevant state laws are a must in ensuring both
Finally, citing other sources from other institutions from the animal science field due to
coming from a reliable and credible source to emphasize their argument. By giving credibility to
other authors to further their research thus, the reader will feel a sense of importance and be
willing to surrender any preconceptions or emotional baggage that interfere with seeing the
situation.
Galindo 3
persuasion, statistics, and additional insight from other credible sources to make their message
clearer, namely that shelter employees' metal health should be taken seriously instead of simply
Work Cited
Occupational Health of Animal Shelter Employees by Live Release Rate, Shelter Type, and
Euthanasia-Related Decision