4059-Ca-00293881 - 0 Umbilical Installation Analysis

Digitally signed by
zi.qingye@ Digitally signed by

zi.qingye@bwoffshore.com
steve.wig steve.wight@bwoffshore.c
om
Digitally signed by
steve.wight@bwoffshore.com
ht@bwoff DN:
DN:
bwoffshore cn=zi.qingye@bwoffshore.c
om
cn=steve.wight@bwoffsho DN:
re.com cn=steve.wight@bwoffshore.com
.com Date: 2012.03.06 10:47:10
+08'00' shore.com Date: 2012.03.09 17:33:06
+08'00'
Date: 2012.03.09 17:33:20 +08'00'
ISSUED FOR USE 0 06.03.12 ZQY SWI MOMA

ISSUED FOR REVIEW C 30.01.12 ZQY SWI MOMA
RE-ISSUED FOR IDC B 19.01.12 ZQY SWI MOMA
ISSUED FOR IDC A 01.11.11 ZQY
REASON FOR ISSUE REVISION REV. DATE PREP. BY CHECKED APPROVED
Document Family: No. Of pages

ANST 53
PROJECT: Document Title:

FPU for Terang Sirasun Batur Field
Company: BW Offshore Umbilical Installation Analysis
Project: 4059
Vessel: BW JOKO TOLE
IMO No.: 8802911
COMPANY LOGO: Doc. type:
CA
Discipline: System:
U 94
BWO Doc. No.: Rev.
4059-CA-00293881 0
Page 1 of 37
Project: FPU for Terang Sirasun Batur Field Doc. No
Umbilical Installation Analysis 4059-CA-00293881, Rev.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Purpose of Document .................................................................................................. 3
1.3 Scope of Work .............................................................................................................. 3
1.4 Definitions and Abbreviations ...................................................................................... 4
1.5 References ................................................................................................................... 6
2. Summary ..................................................................................................................... 7
2.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Installation Loads ......................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Weather Criteria ........................................................................................................... 7
3. Analysis Basis ............................................................................................................ 8
3.1 Field Data ..................................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Environmental Conditions ............................................................................................ 9
3.3 Permanent Items ........................................................................................................ 11
3.4 Installation Vessel ...................................................................................................... 16
3.5 Main Installation Equipment ....................................................................................... 17
3.6 Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................ 17
3.7 Installation Limitations ................................................................................................ 19
4. Analysis Results....................................................................................................... 20
4.1 Umbilical First End Initiation ....................................................................................... 20
4.2 Umbilical Buoyant Section Installation ....................................................................... 24
4.3 Umbilical Pull-in to FPU ............................................................................................. 30
4.4 Umbilical Normal Lay ................................................................................................. 33
4.5 UTA Laydown ............................................................................................................. 35
APPENDIX I: Spreadsheets for OrcaFlex Modelling ........................................................ 38
APPENDIX II: Drawings of Umbilical.................................................................................. 39
APPENDIX III: Tensioner Squeeze Calculation ................................................................. 40
Page 2 of 37
1. Introduction
1.1 General
BW Offshore has been awarded an FPU Lease and Operation Services Contract for the TSB
Field Development Project.
The Terang, Sirasun, Batur (TSB) Field Development Project consists of the development of
3 gas fields located approximately 250km from Surabaya, East Java and 100km north of Bali
Island.
The Contract scope includes the following:

 Provision of an FPU SYSTEM as per Company requirements and specifications.
 Convert, supply and transport the FPU SYSTEM to the installation site location.
 Install the FPU SYSTEM including mooring system, risers and umbilicals, and
interface with the subsea system as per Company requirements and specifications.
1.2 Purpose of Document

This document presents installation analysis results for umbilical system. Through the
installation analysis, a suitable installation methodology will be determined which allows the
umbilical be installed safely. The static and dynamic installation loads will be established and
the environmental limitations for installation will be determined.
1.3 Scope of Work

The scope of this document is to present installation analysis for the following installation
activities:
 First End Initiation

 Buoyant Section Installation
 First End Pull-in to FPU
 Normal Lay
 Second End (UTA) Laydown
Page 3 of 37
1.4 Definitions and Abbreviations
Definitions
COMPANY Kangean Energy Indonesia
CONTRACTOR PT BW Offshore TSB Invest / BW Offshore Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Terang Sirasun Batur Field located in Kangean Block, North of
TSB Field
Bali, Indonesia
Anchor Anchor for mooring the Vessel
Towing or manoeuvring action, which can be generated by a
Bollard Pull
tug for an indefinite period of time with its propulsion system.
The Offshore Installation Worksite where Permanent items are
Field:
to be installed.
Installation The true deviation from intended to actual position or attitude
Tolerance including installation, instrument and measurement accuracy.
Transfer of a major assembly or a module from land onto a
Load out
barge or vessel by horizontal movement or by lifting.
Planned and controlled vertical or horizontal movement of a
Marine Operation
structure or component thereof over, in or on water
Marine Spread Fleet of vessels assembled to perform a marine operation
Vessel preparation required to install the Installation Spread
Mobilisation
onto the Installation Vessel.
General class of components used in the mooring of floating
Mooring
structures, e.g. chain, steel wire rope, synthetic fibre rope,
Components
clump weight, buoy, winch/windlass or anchor
The complete assembly of chain / rope segments including all
Mooring Line
connection elements between vessel and anchor.
Permanent components which form part of the Mooring,
Flexible Riser, Umbilical, or FPU System, i.e. anchors,
Permanent Items
mooring components, flexible riser and umbilical components,
FPU mooring system, etc.
Point during an operation that represents the final opportunity
Point of No Return
to reverse, delay or abandon the operation
Certified slings, shackles, lifting pins and sheaves, towing gear
Rigging and towing equipment required for safe towing and lifting
operations.
Period of time, sufficient in length to safely carry out a marine
Weather Window operation, for which forecast environmental conditions remain
below prescribed limiting operational environmental criteria.
Page 4 of 37
Abbreviations
A&R Abandonment and Recovery
AHC Active Heave Compensation
API American Petroleum Institute
APL Advanced Production and Loading
BM Buoyancy Module
BR Bending Restrictors
c/w complete with
DAF Dynamic Amplification Factor
DMA Dead Man Anchor
DNV Det Norske Veritas
DP Dynamic Positioning
DSV Diving Support Vessel
FPU Floating Production Unit
HLV Heavy Lift Vessel
IP In Plane
L×B×H Length × Breadth × Height
MBL Minimum Breaking Load
MBR Minimum Bending Radius
MIV Main Installation Vessel
MSL Mean Sea Level
N/A Not Applicable
nm Nautical Miles
OOP Out-of-plane
ROV Remotely Operated Vehicle
RP Return Period
SWL Safe Working Load
t Metric tonne
TBA To be advised
TBC To be confirmed
TDP Touchdown Point
Tp Spectral Peak Period
TSB Terang Sirasun Batur field
UDA Umbilical Distribution Assembly
UTA Umbilical Termination Assembly
w.r.t. With Reference To
Page 5 of 37
1.5 References
Ref No. Reference No. Document Title
Client Documents
KEI
Technical Specifications: FPU Lease and
/A1/
Operation Services of TSB Field Development
Project
P.T. Fugro Indonesia
Final Report: Geophysical Survey for the Proposed
/A2/ S2014-02 20” Gas Export Pipeline Route and the Proposed
16” Flowline Route Terang Block East Java Sea,
Indonesia
P.T Pageo Utama
/A3/ AGSB/59/SI/08/SUB Geotechnical Investigation Report for Terang
Sirasun Batur Field
Fugro GEOS Ltd
/A4/ TS-PL-REP-8171 Terang Sirasun Development Metocean Design
Criteria Report
BWO Documents
/B1/ 4059-KA-00247482 Umbilical Pull-In & Lay Procedure
Other Documents
APL
/C1/ (Umbilical) Dynamic Analysis Design Basis
1724-JDR-E-FE-0001
APL
/C2/ Vessel Hydrodynamic Data Report
1724-APL-W-RA-0001
Weatherford Subsea System Installation & Commissioning
/C3/
8793-01-IC-055_8 Procedure Volume 8 - Jumpers
Page 6 of 37
2. Summary
2.1 General
Installation loads and weather criteria are summarised below. The minimum required
tensioner squeeze calculation is presented in Appendix III. The required squeeze applied on
the umbilical is less than the tensioner capacity and umbilical crushing strength.
2.2 Installation Loads

The installation loads for umbilical laying are summarised below.
Table 2–1 Installation Loads

Activity Static (t) Laying Laying Wave Load
under 1.5m under 2.0m direction wrt carried by
Hs (t) Hs (t) DSV (deg)
First End Initiation 3.7 4.1 4.3 +/- 30 Tensioner
Buoyant Section
3.8 4.3 4.4 +/- 30 Tensioner
Installation
FPU End Pull-in 5.2 6.0 6.2 - FPU winch
Normal Lay at 40m
1.8 2.1 2.3* +/- 30 Tensioner
layback
UTA Laydown 3.6 4.5 4.7 +/- 30 Crane
*Note: For umbilical recovery during Normal Lay, the recovery load is expected to be 3.3t. The
recovery load is calculated as T1=T0*exp(theta*nu), where T1 is recovery load, T0 is the dynamic lay
tension, theta is angle of chute (in radian), and nu is friction coefficient (taken as 0.2).
2.3 Weather Criteria

The following sea states have been assessed in the analysis and the integrity of umbilicals
are not compromised.
Table 2–2 Weather Criteria

Activity Wave Hs (1) Current (2)
First End Initiation 2.0m 0.8 m/s
Buoyant Section Installation
2.0m 0.8 m/s
1st to 10th Buoy Module Installation
Buoyant Section Installation 2.0m 0.6 m/s
11th to 15th Buoy Module Installation 1.5m 0.8 m/s
2.0m 0.8 m/s
Normal Lay
1.5m 1.0 m/s
2.0m 0.6 m/s
UTA Laydown
1.5m 0.8 m/s
Note:
(1) The wave direction is +/- 30 deg wrt DSV.
(2) The most likely current directions have been assessed in the analysis. The current speed is given
for surface current. The current speed at bottom is 44% of surface current.
Page 7 of 37
3. Analysis Basis
3.1 Field Data
3.1.1 Field & Mobilisation Port Location
The TSB Field is located approximately 250km from Surabaya, East Java and 100km north
of Bali Island.
Surabaya
Tanjung Wangi
3.1.2 Water Depth

The water depth at the FPU unit location is approximately 96m (MSL). The seabed has no
abrupt changes in water depth or bathymetric anomalies. Essentially the seabed is flat with
slight undulations of less than 1m over the isolated pockmarks. Ref. /A2/.
Tidal range is approximately +/-1m. Water depth at the specific locations are as follows:
Table 3–1 Water Depth

Location MSL
Anchor #2 95.5m
Anchor #5 94.8m
Anchor #8 94.5m
Anchor #11 95.5m
Riser Base 95.4m
Terang Manifold 95.3m
Page 8 of 37
3.2 Environmental Conditions

Typical environmental conditions in the field are generally expected to be benign for
installation purposes. It should however be noted that there are rare occasions when less
favourable weather may occur due to the north-west monsoon season over the period from
December to March. ref. /A4/.
3.2.1 Wave and Current Data

The wave and current data of the field are as follows. Note that the umbilical installation is
scheduled in NW Monsoon season.
Wave Data
The wave data under normal conditions (non-tropical cyclone) is reproduced below from the
data at the representative Observation Station 3.
Table 3–2 Percentage of Exeedence of Wave

Month Percentage of exceedence (%)
0.5 m Hs 1.0 m Hs 1.3 m Hs 1.5m Hs
NW Monsoon
20 2 0.2 0
(December to March)
SE Monsoon
99 25 5 1
(June to September)
Note:
1. Weather is more benign during the rest of year
2. The relationships between Hs, Hmax, Tz and Tp are as follows, Ref. /A4/
Tp=1.4622 x Hs + 3.6469
Tz= 1.1085 x Hs + 2.5342
Hmax= 2 x Hs
Current Data
Currents are predominantly controlled by the monsoon and form a large monsoon driven
circulation. The current profile (non-directional) is reproduced below from the data at the
representative Observation Station 2.
Table 3–3 Percentage of Exeedence of Current

Depth 1-yr RP current speed (m/s) 95% non-exceedence
current speed (m/s)
Surface 1.37 0.80
Bottom 0.70 0.35
Directional wave, wind and current data as follows, Ref. /A4/.
Page 9 of 37
Figure 3–1 Wave Frequency Rose in NW Monsoon season

(Note: Wave direction is from)
Figure 3–2 Surface Current Frequency Rose in NW Monsoon season

(Note: Current direction is towards)
Page 10 of 37
Table 3–4. 1-Year Return Period Directional Environmental Data

Direction Wave 1-minute Current
from Hs (m) Tp (s) wind (m/s) Surface 1m HAB
N 1.6 5.9 14.0 1.05 0.50
NNE 1.5 5.9 13.8 1.12 0.43
NE 0.9 4.9 12.3 0.36 0.43
ENE 1.0 5.1 12.8 0.34 0.38
E 1.1 5.3 13.4 0.38 0.36
ESE 1.2 5.4 12.3 0.51 0.44
SE 1.0 5.1 11.2 0.55 0.49
SSE 1.4 5.7 13.3 0.60 0.51
S 1.7 6.2 15.2 0.56 0.48
SSW 1.5 5.9 13.7 0.57 0.38
SW 1.2 5.4 12.3 0.57 0.38
WSW 2.2 6.8 16.3 0.72 0.42
W 2.3 7.0 20.2 0.99 0.51
WNW 3.1 8.1 20.2 1.15 0.60
NW 1.7 6.1 14.5 1.37 0.70
NNW 1.6 6.0 14.2 1.29 0.57
3.2.2 Soil Conditions

The soil conditions within the Field are typically described as “loose silty sand” at seabed
level with underlying clay of varying strength down to at least 25m depth. Ref. /A3/
The soil layer data including submerged unit weight, undrained shear strength and friction
angle are presented in Ref. /A3/. The internal friction angle is 33 deg.
The first layer of seabed soil is silty sand except the silty clay at mooring NW cluster. The
umbilical-seabed friction coefficient is taken as 0.7 and a tolerance of +/- 0.2 will be
assessed.
3.3 Permanent Items

3.3.1 FPU Description
The FPU is named BW Joko Tole. Vessel particulars are noted below. The most likely
draught of FPU during riser and umbilical pull-in is the same as that during transit. The
motion of FPU is neglected for umbilical installation analysis.
Table 3–5. FPU Particulars

Particular Transit Ballast Full Load
LOA (m) 246.8
LBP (m) 235.0
Breadth moulded (m) 42.0
Depth moulded (m) 19.5
Draught – midship (m) 7.120 6.628 8.765
Draught – AP (m) 8.399 6.819 10.792
Draught – FP (m) 5.841 6.438 6.738
Page 11 of 37
Mooring and Riser Pull-in Equipment

The FPU will have a dedicated moorings pull-in to complete the initial pull-in and to complete
the final tensioning operations. The moorings will connect to the FPU via suitable fairlead
and chain stopper assemblies. The FPU also has a dedicated 50t winch for the Riser &
Umbilical pull-in.
Riser Balcony Details

Riser and Umbilicals will hang-off from the FPU riser balcony. All connections at the FPU
riser balcony can be accessed above waterline by means of suitable work platforms
suspended from the FPU, i.e. no diving requirements at this end.
Table 3–6. Hang-off Positions on FPU

Parameter Terang Umbilical Sirasun Batur Umbilical
Hang-off angle (deg) 10 10
Hang-off position X (m)
-19.1 -14.6
w.r.t mid ship
Hang-off position Y (m)
23.65 23.65
w.r.t center line
Hang-off position Z (m)
20.15 20.15
w.r.t keel
Reference Drawing 4059-XD-00132111.001
4059-XF-00201132.005
3.3.2 Mooring System

The mooring system will be a 12-point spread mooring. Mooring line arrangement will be a
4x3 line configuration. Each mooring line consists of a continuous length mooring chain
connected to a driven Pile.
The vessel is to be aligned with the bow pointing more or less towards WNW, or more
specifically on a heading of 292.5°. However, the position and heading of FPU will be
adjusted according to as-built riser base. Ref drawing: 1724-APL-W-XG-BM-S0011901.
3.3.3 Umbilical and Accessories

E/H umbilicals, 2-off are to be installed between the FPU riser balcony and the Umbilical
Distribution Assembly. Each umbilical is to be delivered in one continuous length, with the
dynamic and static sections being continuous. Based on the field layout the 2-off umbilicals
have the following lengths (from the bend stiffener of top end to the bend restrictor of subsea
end).
 Terang Umbilical (North side), total length = 4,660m, attached with UTA type-1A
 Sirasun Batur Umbilical (South side), total length = 4,689m, attached with UTA type-
1B
The dynamic section of E/H Umbilical will be installed in lazy wave configuration. A bend
stiffener will be provided that will be secured to umbilical head. All connections at the FPU
riser balcony can be accessed above waterline by means of suitable work platforms
suspended from the vessel, i.e. no diving requirements at this end.
Page 12 of 37
3-off ballast modules
15-off buoyancy modules
Figure 3–3 Configuration of Umbilical Dynamic Section
Table 3–7. Umbilical Cross Sectional Properties

Description Dynamic Section Static Section
Outer Diameter (mm) 136.5 136.5
Length (m) 218.2 4442 / 4471
Weight in Air – Filled and Flooded (kg/m) 29.74 29.74
Weight in Air – Filled and Not Flooded (kg/m) 28.08 28.08
Weight in Water - Filled and Flooded (kg/m) 14.74 14.74
Weight in Water - Filled and Not Flooded (kg/m) 13.1 13.1
MBR – storage (m) 1.365 1.365
MBR – installation (m) 2.05 2.05
Bending stiffness (kN.m2) 6.917 6.917
Axial stiffness (kN) 369600 369600
Torsional stiffness (kN-m/rad) 175.5 (clockwise)
58.5 (counter clockwise)
Maximum allowable Twist (deg/m) 5.0
Maximum allowable tension (kN) -20 to 200
Crushing strength (kN/m/track) 188
on 2-V 140 deg tensioner pad
Cross section drawing 1724-JDR-U-XS-RP-S0012230
Page 13 of 37
Table 3–8. Pull Head Details:

Pull head SWL (kN) 225 225
Length (m) 4.85 4.85
Weight in air (kg) 2350 2350
Weight in water (kg) 1750 1750
Reference drawing 11755-GA-017 11755-GA-017
Table 3–9. Umbilical Dynamic Section Length

Upper Section from hang-off
120.25 120.25
(m)
Buoyant Section (m) 37.5 37.5
Lower Section (m) 60.5 60.5
Layback (m) 150.51 150.51
Reference drawing 11755-GA-001 11755-GA-006
Table 3–10. Ballast modules details:

Distance between centre of
3.0 3.0
modules (m)
Length of module (m) 0.540 0.540
OD of module (m) 0.400 0.400
Quantity in use 3 3
First ballast to hang-off (m) 39 39
Reference Drawing 11755-GA-030 11755-GA-030
Table 3–11. Buoyancy modules details:

Distance between centre of
2.5 2.5
modules (m)
Length of module (m) 0.725 0.725
OD of module (m) 0.750 0.750
Mass (kg) 113 113
Net buoyancy – initial state (kg) 126.5 126.5
Quantity in use 15 15
The buoyant section can be modelled as an equivalent pipe, see the details as follows.
Page 14 of 37
Table 3–12. Equivalent Buoyant Section

OD (m) 0.3710 0.3710
Mass (t/m) 0.0749 0.0749
Submerged weight (t/m) -0.036 -0.036
Table 3–13. Bend stiffener (at FPU end) details:

Length (mm) 4719 4719
Max OD (mm) 437 437
Tip Diameter (mm) 195 195
Bore (mm) 152 152
Note: The calculation of bending stiffness is given in Appendix I.
Table 3–14. Bend Restrictor (at Subsea end) details:

Length (mm) 2100 2100
Max OD (mm) 497 497
Bore (mm) 149 149
Unloaded lock-out radius (m) 2.2 2.2
Bend moment (kN.m) 0 @ 2.2m radius 0 @ 2.2m radius
20 @ 2.1m radius 20 @ 2.1m radius
Note that the bend restrictor does not contribute to bend moment until it is bent to lock-out
radius. For the umbilical section with bend restrictor, the total bend moment vs. curvature of
bend restrictor is illustrated below.
Figure 3–4 Bend moment vs. Curvature
Page 15 of 37
Table 3–15. UTA details:

Type UTA-1A UTA-1B
Dimension - L×B×H (m) 1.88×1.25×1.37 1.88×1.25×1.37
Reference Drawing 8793-13-GA-001 8793-13-GA-001
Note that the UTA will be mounted onto the mudmat of UDA. Refer to Drawing TS-SS-ENG-
SM-DWG-301 and TS-SS-ENG-SM-DWG-302.
3.3.4 Hydrodynamic Coefficients

The hydrodynamic properties are made reference to JDR document /C1/, and re-produced
below.
Table 3–16. Hydrodynamic Coefficients:

Description Normal Axial drag Lift Normal Axial added
drag added mass mass
Cdn Cda Cl Can Caa
Bare umbilical 0.7 0 0 0.8 0
Buoyancy module 1.0 2.0 0 0.8 0.5
The hydrodynamic coefficients of UTA are given in Appendix I.
3.4 Installation Vessel

Contractor plans to use DSV Toisa Paladin for the umbilical installation.
Dimensions of DSV are noted as follows:

Description Value
Overall length (m) 103.7
Length between perpendiculars (m) 96.8
Breadth moulded (m) 19.7
Depth main deck (m) 7.7
Draught (m) 5.6
Page 16 of 37
Figure 3–5 DSV Toisa Paladin
The DSV has the following main features:
- Dynamic Positioning – DP-2 Class

- 140T AHC main crane
The crane can take 65t dynamic load (50t static load x 1.3 DAF) at an outreach between 8m
and 20m. The crane foundation is at 25.9m aft mid-ship and 8.1m offset the centreline. The
crane tip is fixed at 20m above water and its outreach is set to 12m for UTA laydown in the
analysis.
The limitation of side lead angle of crane wire (out of boom plane) is set to 5.5 deg in the
analysis. The off lead angle (in the boom plane) has no specific limit.
3.5 Main Installation Equipment

Major installation equipment includes the following:
 10t tensioner
 10t A&R winch
 Overboarding chute with a radius of 2.5m
 Bell mouth below work platform (on DSV) with an exit angle of 15 deg
 Bell mouth below I-tube (on FPU) with a rounded entry.
In the analysis model, the umbilical laying point (at chute exit) is set to 37m aft midship, 1.5m
outboard at starboard side and 10.5m above keel.
3.6 Analysis Methodology

The installation analysis is performed using OrcaFlex (Version 9.5b). OrcaFlex is a 3D non-
linear time domain finite element program used for mooring and riser analysis. For more
information reference can be made to the OrcaFlex official website (www.orcina.com).
Page 17 of 37
Static analysis models are generated to capture the step-by-step installation sequence based
on industry practice. Dynamic analysis are performed to verify the dynamic loads generated
during the offshore operation under well-defined environmental conditions are compatible
with installation spread, and the integrity of permanent items are not compromised.
The dynamic analysis is performed using regular wave theory. The wave theory selected in
the OrcaFlex model is Dean Stream regular wave (N=5). The wave frequency vessel motions
are derived from vessel RAOs.
The analysis consider a range of wave heights and periods, typically ranging 1.5m to 2.0m
significant wave height, and 5s to 7s wave period, refer to Table 3–2. The maximum wave
height (Hmax) is 2.0 times the significant wave height (Hs).
The wave direction in the dynamic analysis is defined with respect to installation vessel as
shown below. For umbilical installation, vessel will be able to weathervane and choose the
best heading (ie, +/- 30 deg into wave).
180 deg
135 deg 225 deg
270 deg
90 deg
45 deg 315 deg

0 deg
Figure 3–6 Convention of wave directions (w.r.t vessel)
The current direction is defined with respect to lay direction, as shown. Generally the 95%
percentile current speed is used in the analysis.
Page 18 of 37
270 deg
225 deg 315 deg
0 deg
180 deg
FPU
135 deg 45 deg
90 deg
Figure 3–7 Convention of current directions (w.r.t lay direction)
3.7 Installation Limitations

The following installation limitations apply:
 Umbilical properties refer to Table 3–7.
 DSV main crane capacity and lead angle refer to Section 3.4.
 Tensioner capacity, refer to Section 3.5.
 Umbilical departure angle from DSV (bell mouth), refer to Section 3.5.
Page 19 of 37
4. Analysis Results
4.1 Umbilical First End Initiation
4.1.1 Static Analysis
The umbilical will be initiated when FPU is in place, as shown below.
FPU in place
DSV
Figure 4–1 Top View of Vessel for Initiation of Umbilical
Page 20 of 37
Snapshots of umbilical initiation are given as follows.
75m winch
wire
75m winch 3-off ballast
wire modules
Step 2
Step 1
50m winch 50m winch 2.0t ballast

wire wire chain at
100m mark
3-off ballast
modules
Step 3 Step 4
Figure 4–2 Umbilical Initiation (Step 1 to Step 4)
Page 21 of 37
Detailed step-by-step static results are presented as follows. At Step 4, a temporary ballast chain (2.0t in air and 1.7t in water)
is attached to umbilical. The purpose of ballast chain is to pull-down the buoyant section and to reduce the departure angle
when the umbilical is subject to current.
Table 4–1 Static Results for Umbilical Initiation

Step Comment Distance Total Step Top Departure Umbilical Pull FPU Step Tension Winch
No. from DSV payout payout tension angle -IP MBR (m) head winch payout on FPU wire
to FPU (m) (m)(2) (m) (t) (3) (deg) depth payout (m) winch (t) angle
(1)
(m) (m) (4) (deg)
0 1st ballast module 40 39 3.0 1 221 -40 75 0.4 9.9
1 3rd ballast module 40 45 6 3.6 1 172 -46 75 0 0.5 11.3
2 40 70 25 2.5 7 3.6 -60 75 0 2.0 9.4
3 40 100 30 2.0 5 6.6 -37 50 -25 2.9 3.6
4 Attach ballast chain 40 100 0 3.7 3 6.5 -37 50 0 2.9 3.8
*Note:
(1) The distance from DSV to FPU is measured from DSV lay chute to FPU umbilical I-tube.
(2) The umbilical payout is measured at the working platform on DSV.
(3) The lay tension is measured at the exit of overboarding chute.
(4) The FPU winch payout is measured at I-tube level.
4.1.2 Dynamic Analysis

Dynamic analysis is performed for the critical steps, ie, Step 2 (when the umbilical experiences the minimum bending radius),
and Step 4 (when the static lay tension is the highest).
The results for the most critical wave direction and period are presented below. The current is most likely to flow in the
direction between 90 deg and 158 deg wrt North during umbilical installation in NW monsoon season, refer to Section 3.2.1.
The current in the direction of 90deg and 180deg wrt lay direction is assessed in the analysis. A tolerance of +/-10m DSV
position is assessed, with combination of the most critical current flowing direction.
Page 22 of 37
Table 4–2 Dynamic Results for Umbilical Initiation Step 2

No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Distance Max Max Umbilical Tension Max winch
direction (m) period direction speed from chute Top departure MBR (m) on FPU wire angle
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) to I-tube tension angle winch (t) (deg)
(m) (t) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 29 3.0 6 2.8 2.1 6.2
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.8 39 3.0 9 3.1 2.1 10.7
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.8 49 3.1 6 3.4 2.2 15.8
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 29 2.9 6 2.8 2.1 6.0
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 39 2.9 8 3.2 2.1 10.2
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 49 3.0 7 3.5 2.1 15.2
Table 4–3 Dynamic Results for Umbilical Initiation Step 4

(m) (t) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 30 4.3 5 7.0 2.9 2.8
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.8 40 4.3 7 5.8 2.9 5.9
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.8 50 4.2 3 5.1 2.9 8.4
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 30 4.1 5 7.1 2.9 2.6
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 40 4.1 6 6.0 2.9 5.4
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 50 4.1 3 5.2 2.9 8.0
Page 23 of 37
4.2 Umbilical Buoyant Section Installation

The static results for umbilical buoyant section installation are presented as follows.
buoyant
50m winch section
wire
Pull head
5m strop
2.0t ballast
chain
Ballast chain
partly landed
Step 1 Step 4
Step 6
Page 24 of 37
Step 8 Step 9 (DSV ready to disconnect the ballast chain)
Step 10 (Ballast chain disconnected) Step 11

Figure 4–3 Umbilical Buoyant Section Installation
Page 25 of 37
Table 4–4 Static Results for Umbilical Buoyant Section Installation

Step Comment Distance DSV Total Payout Top Departure Umbilical Pull FPU Tension Winch
No. from DSV move - payout - Step tension angle -IP MBR (m) head winch on FPU wire
to FPU Step (m) (m)(2) (m) (t)(3) (deg) depth payout winch (t) angle
(m)(1) (m) (m) (deg)
0 40 100 3.7 3 6.5 -37 50 2.9 3.6
1 1 BM Installed 40 0 121 21 3.8 3 3.1 -37 50 3.2 4.1
2 5 BM Installed 40 0 131 10 3.5 4 3.0 -37 50 3.5 4.0
3 10 BM Installed 40 0 144 13 2.6 4 3.1 -37 50 3.8 2.9
4 15 BM Installed 40 0 156 13 2.0 4 5.8 -37 50 4.0 2.1
5 60 20 176 20 1.6 8 9.1 -37 50 4.2 3.2
Chain partly lands on
6 seabed 80 20 196 20 1.0 8 5.3 -37 50 4.2 3.8
7 100 20 216 20 1.0 8 3.8 -37 50 4.1 2.0
8 120 20 236 20 1.1 9 3.8 -37 50 4.1 2.6
Ready to disconnect
9 ballast chain, Note (4), (5) 120 0 296 60 1.7 4 3.9 -37 50 4.1 1.8
10 Ballast chain disconnected 120 0 296 0 1.6 5 5.0 -37 50 4.1 2.2
11 170 50 296 0 1.6 11 8.8 -37 50 4.0 4.5
Note:
(1) The distance from DSV to FPU is measured from DSV lay chute to FPU umbilical I-tube.
(2) The umbilical payout is measured at the working platform on DSV.
(3) The lay tension is measured at the exit of overboarding chute.
(4) At Step 9, DSV is ready to disconnect the ballast chain and the horizontal distance from DSV to ballast chain is 63m.
(5) It is important to pay out sufficient umbilical and form a “camel hump” as shown in Step 9 prior to cut the ballast chain. Otherwise,
the movement of buoyant section may be undesirable after disconnection of the ballast chain.
Page 26 of 37

Dynamic analysis is performed for the critical steps, ie, Step 1 (when the static top tension reaches the peak and the umbilical
experiences the minimum bending radius), Step 3 (when 10-off BM are installed), Step 4 (when 15-off BM are installed), Step
6 (when the ballast chain partly lands on seabed), and Step 10 (when the ballast chain is disconnected).
The results for the most critical wave direction and period are presented below. The current is most likely to flow in the
direction between 90 deg and 158 deg wrt North during umbilical installation in NW monsoon season, refer to Section 3.2.1.
The current in the direction of 90deg and 180deg wrt lay direction is assessed in the analysis. A tolerance of +/-10m DSV
position is assessed, with combination of the most critical current flowing direction.
Table 4–5 Dynamic Results for Umbilical Buoyant Section Installation Step 1 (1-off BM installed)
(m) (t) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 30 4.4 4 2.6 3.2 3.2
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.8 40 4.4 7 3.0 3.2 6.0
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.8 50 4.3 3 3.6 3.3 8.5
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 30 4.3 4 2.6 3.2 3.0
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 40 4.3 6 3.0 3.2 5.6
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 50 4.2 3 3.6 3.3 8.2
Page 27 of 37
No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Distance Max Max Umbilical Tension Max
direction (m) period direction speed from chute Top departure MBR (m) on FPU winch wire
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) to I-tube tension angle winch (t) angle
(m) (t) (deg) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 30 3.1 4 2.7 3.9 2.5
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.8 40 3.3 10 2.9 3.9 5.2
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.8 50 3.2 4 3.5 3.9 7.2
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 30 3.0 4 2.7 3.9 2.3
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 40 3.1 9 3.0 3.9 4.8
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 50 3.1 3 3.6 3.8 6.8
No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Distance Max Max Umbilical Tension Max
direction (m) period direction speed from chute Top departure MBR (m) on FPU winch
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) to I-tube tension angle winch (t) wire
(m) (t) (deg) angle
(deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 30 2.8 4 6.1 4.0 1.9
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.7 40 2.9 12 5.1 4.0 4.1
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.7 50 2.8 5 4.8 4.0 5.7
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 30 2.6 3 6.2 4.0 1.7
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 40 2.6 13 5.2 4.0 4.2
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 50 2.6 5 4.9 4.0 5.9
Page 28 of 37
Table 4–8 Dynamic Results for Umbilical Buoyant Section Installation Step 6 (Chain partly lands on seabed)
(m) (t) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 70 1.2 5 4.3 4.2 3.2
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.6 80 2.0 15 3.9 4.2 4.5
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.6 90 1.9 9 3.6 4.3 6.8
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 70 0.9 4 4.6 4.2 3.1
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 80 1.8 15 3.9 4.2 4.7
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 90 1.6 6 3.6 4.3 7.4
At Step 10, just after the ballast chain is disconnected from umbilical, the buoyant section rises up by 15m with a peak velocity
of 0.84m/s. The MBR of umbilical is larger than 4.0m.
Terang Umbilical
S/B Umbilical
Figure 4–4 Umbilical Movement just after Ballast Chain is disconnected
Page 29 of 37
4.3 Umbilical Pull-in to FPU

The analysis results for umbilical 1st end pull-in to FPU are presented as follows. Pulling operation can start once the ballast
chain is disconnected.
During the pull-in, the winch wire has an angle less than 10 deg, meaning that it will rub against the inboard side of I-tube
(which is 10 deg tilt). A bell mouth will be fitted below the I-tube to protect the wire and also prevent any snagging when the
pull head enters the I-tube.
Table 4–9 Static Results for Umbilical Pull-in to FPU

Step Comment DSV End Umbilical FPU End
No. Distance DSV Total Payout MBR (m) Pull FPU Payout - Tension Winch
from chute move - payout - Step head winch Step (m) on FPU wire
to I-tube Step (m) (m) angle payout winch angle
(m) (m) (deg) (m) (t) (deg)
0 170 296 8.8 6.9 50 4.0 4.5
1 170 0 296 0 8.7 6.7 25 -25 4.0 4.5
2 Pull head just below I-tube 170 0 296 0 8.8 5.4 1 -24 4.9 3.7
3 Pull head at final position 170 0 296 0 8.9 5.2 -5 -6 5.0 3.7
4 190 20 316 20 10.5 6.2 -5 0 5.1 4.4
5 210 20 336 20 12.5 7.3 -5 0 5.2 5.1
6 Umbilical touches down 230 20 355 19 14.3 8.2 -5 0 5.2 5.8
Note:
(1) All angles reported are wrt vertical.
(2) At Step 6, the lower section touches down on seabed and the layback is 70m. Tension at TDP is 0.5t.
(3) Umbilical laying from DSV (Step 4 – Step 6) can be performed simultaneously when the 1st end is being pulled onto FPU.
Page 30 of 37
Target box for TDP Target box for TDP
Step 1 Step 3
See Figure 4-6
Target box for TDP
Step 5 Step 6
Figure 4–5 Umbilical Pull-in to FPU
Page 31 of 37
It is noted that the nominal TDP will be 0.3m above the seabed, and the actual TDP during installation will be 4m away from
the nominal TDP. This is because the net buoyancy of buoyant section at initial state is 5% higher than the nominal value.
When the net buoyancy drops to its nominal value after a period of time, the umbilical will sink 0.3m to the designed
configuration.
to FPU
Mark for nominal TDP to DSV

TDP during installation
Target box for nominal TDP
Figure 4–6 Zoom in of Umbilical Touch Down Point

As the pull winch capacity (50te) is much higher than the umbilical pull-in load, detailed dynamic analysis is not required for the
umbilical pull-in. The motion of FPU is not significant under 1.5m to 2m Hs. The max dynamic pull-in load can be
conservatively assumed to be 6.2t (static load 5.2t x DAF 1.2) under 2.0m Hs, and 6.0t (static load 5.3t x DAF 1.15) under
1.5m Hs.
Page 32 of 37
4.4 Umbilical Normal Lay

The water depth is almost constant along the lay route. In the analysis, the water depth is
taken as 96m MSL. Analysis results for umbilical normal lay in corresponding to various
laybacks are presented below.
Layback
TDP
Figure 4–7 Umbilical Normal Lay
Table 4–10 Static Analysis Results for Umbilical Normal Lay

Case Layback Catenary Top Tension Departure MBR (m)
No. (m) length tension at TDP angle
(m) (t) (t) (deg)
1 20 107 1.6 0.1 2.5 9
2 30 111 1.7 0.1 4.6 12
3 40 115 1.8 0.2 6.8 16
4 50 120 1.8 0.3 9.2 21
5 60 125 1.9 0.4 11.7 28
6 70 131 2.1 0.5 14.2 35
Page 33 of 37

Sensitivity study on wave period and direction is performed for normal lay with 40m layback.
It is seen that the most severe case is Case 6 (as highlighted below) with the wave coming
from 30 deg wrt vessel and wave period of 6s.
Table 4–11 Sensitivity of Wave Period and Direction for Umbilical Installation
No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Max Max Min Max MBR
direction (m) period direction speed top tension tension departure (m)
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) tension at TDP at TDP angle
(t) (t) (t) (deg)
1 0 2.0 5 0 0 1.9 0.2 0.2 8.3 14.4
2 0 2.0 6 0 0 2.1 0.3 0.1 7.6 10.2
3 0 2.0 7 0 0 2.1 0.4 0.0 7.2 8.4
4 30 2.0 5 0 0 2.1 0.3 0.1 7.3 11.2
5 30 2.0 6 0 0 2.0 0.3 0.1 7.3 11.5
6 30 2.0 7 0 0 2.3 0.5 -0.1 8.4 6.0
Dynamic analysis including wave and current are performed for the most critical wave period
and direction. The current in the direction of 0deg, 90deg and 180deg wrt lay direction is
assessed in the analysis for normal lay and curved lay. A range of layback from 20m to 60m
is assessed. The maximum and minimum loads are highlighted.
Table 4–12 Dynamic Results for Umbilical Normal Lay

No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Mean Max Max Min Max MBR
direction (m) period direction speed layback top tension tension departure (m)
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) (m) tension at TDP at TDP angle(deg)
(t) (t) (t)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.8 21 2.0 0.1 -0.1 9.2 3.7
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.8 41 2.3 0.5 -0.1 10.1 6.4
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.8 59 2.7 1.0 0.0 8.6 9.7
4 30 1.5 7 0 1.0 20 1.8 0.0 -0.1 11.4 3.9
5 30 1.5 7 90 1.0 42 2.1 0.4 0.1 11.5 9.2
6 30 1.5 7 180 1.0 60 2.5 0.9 0.2 7.4 15.8
To absorb overlength, the umbilical may be laid in a curved configuration. The minimum
radius of curve that can stay stable on seabed is calculated as,
Cr=Tb/(nu*Ws)
in which Tb is dynamic tension at TDP, nu is friction coefficient and Ws is submerged weight.
Table 4–13 Minimum Radius for Curved Lay

Dynamic Tension Minimum Radius (m)
Layback (m)
at TDP (t) nu=0.5 nu=0.7 nu=0.9
20 0.1 14 10 8
40 0.5 68 48 38
60 1.0 136 97 75
Page 34 of 37
4.5 UTA Laydown

The static results for step-by-step UTA laydown by using crane are given below and
illustrated as follows.
A&R winch will be used to hold back the UTA during overboarding. However, the A&R winch
is not modelled in the analysis, as the load on A&R winch is minimal.
Crane
wire
Crane
UTA wire
UTA
BR
Zoom in of UTA at Step 0
UTA Laydown Step 0
Page 35 of 37
Crane
wire
UTA
Zoom in of UTA at Step 7

Crane
wire
UTA
UTA Laydown Step 7

Figure 4–8 UTA Laydown
Table 4–14 Static Analysis Results for UTA laydown

Step Horizontal DSV Crane Crane Crane Crane MBR at Umbilical Tension UTA UTA
No. distance move- payout- payout- load wire BR tip MBR at at TDP depth Angle
from crane Step Total Step (t) lead (m) TDP (m) (t) (m) (deg)
tip to TDP (m) (m) (m) angle
(m) (deg)
0 31 3 3.6 2 2.1 11.5 0.1 15 33
1 31 10 13 10 3.4 2 2.1 11.7 0.1 5 31
2 31 10 23 10 2.7 3 2.1 11.8 0.1 -5 31
3 31 20 43 20 2.5 3 2.1 12.3 0.1 -25 27
4 32 20 63 20 2.3 4 2.2 12.9 0.1 -45 23
5 33 20 83 20 2.1 5 2.2 14.2 0.2 -65 18
6 18 10 103 20 1.8 2 2.2 8.7 0.1 -85 15
7 4 0 113 10 1.6 0 3.8 203.2 0.0 -95 9
Note:
(1)The crane tip is set to 20m above water in the analysis.
(2) It is assumed that AHC will be activated prior to UTA landing.
Page 36 of 37

Dynamic analysis is performed for the critical steps, ie, Step 0 (when the crane experiences
the highest load) and Step 2 (when the UTA is subject to surface current).
Note that the UTA will be laid down at the proximity of UDA. The UDA has a heading of 11
deg wrt North, meaning that the lay direction for UTA laydown will be approx 100 deg.
The current in the direction of 90deg and 180deg wrt lay direction is assessed in the analysis
for UTA laydown. A tolerance of +/-10m DSV position is assessed, with combination of the
most critical current flowing direction.
Table 4–15 Dynamic Analysis Results for UTA Laydown Step 0

No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Horizontal Max Max MBR Umbilical Max
direction (m) period direction speed distance crane crane at BR MBR at tension
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) from crane load wire lead tip (m) TDP (m) at TDP
tip to TDP (t) angle (t)
(m) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 16 4.4 4.3 2.1 4.4 0.1
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.6 31 4.2 6.0* 2.1 5.3 0.4
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.6 49 4.7 5.1 2.1 8.3 0.7
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 16 4.2 3.7 2.1 5.2 0.1
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 31 4.3 5.6* 2.1 7.1 0.3
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 50 4.5 4.2 2.1 12.8 0.6
*Note: When irregular wave theory is used, the lead angle of crane wire is less than 5.5 deg for all
cases.
Table 4–16 Dynamic Analysis Results for UTA Laydown Step 2

No. Wave Hs Wave Current Current Horizontal Max Max MBR Umbilical Max
direction (m) period direction speed distance crane crane at BR MBR at tension
(deg) (s) (deg) (m/s) from crane load wire lead tip (m) TDP (m) at TDP
tip to TDP (t) angle (t)
(m) (deg)
1 30 2.0 7 0 0.0 16 3.2 2.3 2.1 4.3 0.2
2 30 2.0 7 90 0.6 31 3.3 5.6* 2.1 5.3 0.4
3 30 2.0 7 180 0.6 50 3.8 3.8 2.1 7.8 0.8
4 30 1.5 7 0 0.0 16 3.2 1.9 2.1 5.0 0.1
5 30 1.5 7 90 0.8 31 3.2 5.9* 2.1 7.1 0.3
6 30 1.5 7 180 0.8 51 3.6 3.0 2.1 12.6 0.7
*Note: When irregular wave theory is used, the lead angle of crane wire is less than 5.5 deg for all
cases.
Page 37 of 37
APPENDIX I: SPREADSHEETS FOR ORCAFLEX MODELLING

No Title
1 Hydrodynamic Coefficients (Cd and Ca) of UTA
2 Bend Stiffener Properties Calculation
Page 38 of 37
Drag and Added Mass of UTA
Project TSB
Prepared by ZQY
Date 31/10/2011
Weight in air (ton) 1.00

Weight in water (ton) 0.87
X-axial Y-normal Z-normal
Outer dimension(m)
1.46 1.35 1.28 Key in
CoG offset from centerline and
0.00 0.00 0.60
mudline(m)
Mass moment of inertia(t.m^2) 0.29 0.31 0.33
Z direction Cd = 0.75
Drag area(m^2) Ad 1.97 Ca = 0.68
Dimension normal to
b 1.46 l/w 1.14
drag(m)
Dimension in the direction
d 1.28 b/d 1.14 x= 1.28
of drag(m) y= 1.35
Half height(m) h 0.68 h/b 0.46 z = 1.46
Greater horizontal
l 1.46 2.00
dimension(m)
Lesser horizontal
w 1.28 0.50
dimension(m) z
Drag coefficient Cd 0.75
x
Dimension(m) a 1.40 1.40 y
Dimension(m) b 1.28 1.28
b/a 0.91 Prism 1.00
Reference Volume(m^3) Vr 2.52
Added mass coefficient Ca 0.68
X direction Cd = 0.75
Dimension normal to
b 1.28 l/w 1.14
drag(m)
d 1.46 b/d 0.88 x= 1.28
of drag(m) y= 1.35
Greater horizontal
l 1.46 2.00
dimension(m)
Lesser horizontal
w 1.28 0.50
dimension(m)
Dimension(m) a 1.31 1.31

b/a 1.11 Prism 2.00
Y direction Cd = 0.75
Dimension normal to
b 1.28 l/w 1.05
drag(m)
d 1.35 b/d 0.95 x= 1.28
of drag(m) y= 1.35
Greater horizontal
l 1.35 2.00
dimension(m)
Lesser horizontal
w 1.28 0.50
dimension(m)
Dimension(m) a 1.37 1.37

b/a 1.07 Prism 2.00
Input data
Calculated results
Note: Cd and Ca are based on DNV-RP-C205, Table 5.5 and Table D-2.
1 of 1 Cd Ca of UTA
Bend Stiffener Properties Calculation
Project: TSB
Subject: Umbilical
Prepared by: ZQY
Date: 30/10/2011
Parameter Value Comment

Length of BS cone (m) 4.500 Measured from WP
Max OD at the flange side of BS cone (m) 0.437 Measured from WP
Min OD at the tip of BS cone (m) 0.195 Measured from WP
Inner diameter of BS (m) 0.152
Density of Polyurithane (kg/m^3) 1200 Typically 1200
Young's Modulus of Polyurithane (MPa) 132 Average value for 0 to 5% strain, refer to
JDR's Design Basis
Total steel mass in bend stiffener (kg) 100
Flexible/umbilical weight in air (kg/m) 28.1
Flexible/umbilical weight in water (kg/m) 14.7
Bending stiffness of flexible/umbilical (kNm^2) 6.9
Length of each BS segment (m) 0.900 Split into 5 equal length segments
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
A
B
C D E F
Cross section Sequence ID (m) OD (m) Bending stiffness (kNm^2)

A 0 0.152 0.195 6
B 1 0.152 0.243 19
C 2 0.152 0.292 44
D 3 0.152 0.340 83
E 4 0.152 0.389 144
F 5 0.152 0.437 233
Segment Volume (m^3) Polyurithane Steel mass Weight in air (kg) Weight in seawater
mass (kg) (kg) (kg)
S1 0.018 21 0 21 3
S2 0.034 41 0 41 6
S3 0.054 65 0 65 10
S4 0.078 93 0 93 14
S5 0.104 110 100 210 103
Sum 0.289 331 100 431 135
Converted to equivalent pipes for OrcaFlex model (incl. flexible/umbilical inside BS)
Segment Length (m) Bending Equivalent Weight in air (t/m) Weight in seawater
stiffness OD (m) (t/m)
(kNm^2)
S1 0.900 19 0.204 0.0518 0.0182
S2 0.900 38 0.256 0.0740 0.0214
S3 0.900 70 0.306 0.1006 0.0253
S4 0.900 121 0.356 0.1317 0.0298
S5 0.900 195 0.405 0.2612 0.1291
Note:
1. Input cells are filled with green colour and output cells are filled with blue colour.
2. The bending stiffness and weight of flexible/umbilical are included in the properties of equivalent pipes
3. The ID, axial stiffness and torsional stiffness can be taken as the value for flexible/umbilical
APPENDIX II: DRAWINGS OF UMBILICAL

Dwg No Title
JR11755 TERANG SIRASUN BATUR FIELD
HU0967
DEVELOPMENT SUBSEA UMBILICALS
4059-XE-00286210.001 UMBILICAL & RISER FIELD LAYOUT
11755-GA-001 TERANG UMBILICAL 1 (4670M) SYSTEM GA
11755-GA-006 SIRASUN/BATUR UMBILICAL 2 (4699M) SYSTEM GA
C235-SKE-4001-01 TOISA PALADIN DECK LAYOUT
349.32 423.00 77.00 500.30 501.61 501.45 500.40
500.40 500.21 504.11 211.17 289.00 84.00
349.25 426.00 73.99 500.32 501.84 501.34 500.29
500.29 502.40 501.95 262.15 238.00 112.00
UP
ROV WORKSHOP (STACKED)

1
APPENDIX III: TENSIONER SQUEEZE CALCULATION

No Title
1 Tensioner Squeeze Calculation
Tensioner Squeeze Calculation
Project: TSB Installation

Subject: Umbilical
Prepared by: ZQY
Date: 5-Mar-12
Parameter Value Comment

Flexible/umbilical weight in air (kg/m) 28.08
Flexible/umbilical weight in water (kg/m) 14.74
Flexible/umbilical crushing strength (kN/m/track) 188
Tensioner squeeze capacity (kN/m/track) 327 10t tensioner
Friction coefficient (lowest of internal and external) 0.15
Number of tensioners 1
Number of tracks 2
Track contact length (m) 1.8 10t tensioner
Safety factor on tensioner setting 1
Safety factor on friction coefficient 1.2
Installation vessel freeboard (m) 5
Water depth (m) 96
Flexible/Umbilical departure angle (degree) 5 See Note 2
Additional weight (t) 2.0 Ballast chain
Static bottom tension (t) 0.14

Horizontal distance, i.e., layback (m) 30.2
Minimum bending radius at touch down point (m) 9.6 Conservative value, see Note 3
Vertical distance (m) 101.0
Catenary arc length (m) 110.2
Catenary arc length over vertical distance 1.09
Static top tension (t) 3.7

Dynamic amplification factor of installation tension 1.15
Dynamic top tension (t) 4.3 Estimated from Catenary Load
Maximum dynamic top tension from Analysis (t) 4.4 From Installation Analysis
Minimum required squeeze (kN/m/track) 96

Nominal applied squeeze (kN/m/track) 110 As per installation procedure
Redundancy of squeeze (%) 15%
Note:
1. Input cells are filled with green colour and output cells are filled with blue colour.
2. Departure angle is typically 2 to 20 degrees for water depth 1000 to 30m
3. The bending radius is larger in reality when taking account for bending stiffness.
4. Tensioner squeeze pressure can be calculated according to tensioner user manual.

4059-Ca-00293881 - 0 Umbilical Installation Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

4059-Ca-00293881 - 0 Umbilical Installation Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Digitally signed by

zi.qingye@ Digitally signed by

ISSUED FOR USE 0 06.03.12 ZQY SWI MOMA

Document Family: No. Of pages

PROJECT: Document Title:

The Contract scope includes the following:

1.2 Purpose of Document

1.3 Scope of Work

 First End Initiation

1.4 Definitions and Abbreviations

Ref No. Reference No. Document Title

/B1/ 4059-KA-00247482 Umbilical Pull-In & Lay Procedure

2.2 Installation Loads

Table 2–1 Installation Loads

2.3 Weather Criteria

Table 2–2 Weather Criteria

3.1.2 Water Depth

Table 3–1 Water Depth

3.2 Environmental Conditions

3.2.1 Wave and Current Data

Table 3–2 Percentage of Exeedence of Wave

Table 3–3 Percentage of Exeedence of Current

Directional wave, wind and current data as follows, Ref. /A4/.

Figure 3–1 Wave Frequency Rose in NW Monsoon season

Figure 3–2 Surface Current Frequency Rose in NW Monsoon season

Table 3–4. 1-Year Return Period Directional Environmental Data

3.2.2 Soil Conditions

3.3 Permanent Items

Table 3–5. FPU Particulars

Mooring and Riser Pull-in Equipment

Riser Balcony Details

Table 3–6. Hang-off Positions on FPU

3.3.2 Mooring System

3.3.3 Umbilical and Accessories

3-off ballast modules

15-off buoyancy modules

Figure 3–3 Configuration of Umbilical Dynamic Section

Table 3–7. Umbilical Cross Sectional Properties

Table 3–8. Pull Head Details:

Table 3–9. Umbilical Dynamic Section Length

Table 3–10. Ballast modules details:

Table 3–11. Buoyancy modules details:

Table 3–12. Equivalent Buoyant Section

Table 3–13. Bend stiffener (at FPU end) details:

Table 3–14. Bend Restrictor (at Subsea end) details:

Figure 3–4 Bend moment vs. Curvature

Table 3–15. UTA details:

3.3.4 Hydrodynamic Coefficients

Table 3–16. Hydrodynamic Coefficients:

The hydrodynamic coefficients of UTA are given in Appendix I.

3.4 Installation Vessel

Dimensions of DSV are noted as follows:

Figure 3–5 DSV Toisa Paladin

The DSV has the following main features:

- Dynamic Positioning – DP-2 Class

3.5 Main Installation Equipment

3.6 Analysis Methodology

135 deg 225 deg

45 deg 315 deg

Figure 3–6 Convention of wave directions (w.r.t vessel)

Figure 3–7 Convention of current directions (w.r.t lay direction)

3.7 Installation Limitations

Figure 4–1 Top View of Vessel for Initiation of Umbilical