Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11
Radio Wave Propagation
1 1 . 1 . NTRODUCTION
civingtransiniter
The po
oweTaValahle at most of the 1s
antennas is orcdinarily
radiated
a n s m i s s i o no s s ( r a t i n
ivedsignalwillt
The transmitling and may be as radiated power. ard hence
sible mode of porlion ol the great
recciving antennas 10'" o 10 (150some cases
as In
veTanyof
und wave o surface propagations. The received which
energy at a distant o0 db)
(a) Gro.
that
ns of these modes of propagation
be noted
It may
racently
communica
propagation
developed me;
critical
frequency, skip refraction or duct will be omited.
discussed.
propagation,
distance fading and and some terms
11.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC OR RADIOWAVES measurements will also be
romagnetic waves are nothing but
Electro
approximately,c = 3 x oscillations which
10 m/s) in free
forces. space. propagate with the velocity of
andmagnetic forces."The lines of force in the
rection of pronagot electric
ctric and aagneaves waves Electromagnetic
of mos
consistof
moving
light
a right angle to the direction nagnetic fields of electric
the 'magnetic field' and
propagation. As fields are
illustrated in Fig. 11.1, the right angle and they both are
at
Doted lines
Electric lines (Vertical)
Full line
magnetic lines (Horizonal)
EARTH T
DIRECTION OF-
PROPAGATION
Fig. 11.1. Simple electromagnetic waves. Fig. 11.2. E. M. Waves in free space.
hsantaneous direction of fields for a wave
travelling towards reader.
ne magnetic fields surround the wire and perpendicular to it, it means electric field is parallel to the
axis of wire.
This cor
Art. 6.25). The configuration is true even after the radiation from antenna and hence the polarization (refer
ntation of Electricfield w.r.t carth gives the polarization. In Figs. 11.l and 11.2 wave is
vertica
The initial polarization is determined by the oricntation of antenna. Ifantenna is vertical
or hoPOlarized.
horizontal,
then it will produce respectively vertically polarized orhorizontally polarized waves. The wave
USual
nin free enit
ly maintains itspolarization¢during the ravel as was initially generated. Since no obstacle or interference
free spacei
4ssumed to be present so e.m. waves spread uniformly in all drecuons trom a point source.
1104 ANTENNA WAVE PROPAGA
nON
01RECTION OF
PROPAGATION
SOURCE
WAVE
FRONT
A, B, C,D = Wave fronts
Fig. 11.3. Wave fronts and rays rom a
point source in free space. Fig. 11.4. Spherical wavefront representation.
The wave front is, thus, spherical as illustratcd in Fig. 11.3 and actual wave front is also shown in Fig. 11.4
Sometimes for convenience even the "rays" are also imagined which radiates from point source in all direction
and they are every where perpendicular to the plane of wave front
optical phenomena of reflection, refracion. diffraction and polarizations are also observed and
followed by e.m. waves.
11.3. THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION FOR FREE-SPACE PROPAGATION
The ratio of radiated power to received power is called the radio transmission loss. The basic concept
in estimating radio transmission loss is the loss expected in free space i.e. in a region of all objects that might
absorb or reflect radio cnergy. This concept is essentially the inverse square law in optics applieú to radio
Lransmission.
For the fundamental equation for free space transmission or propagation, first consider an average
power Wr assumed to be radiated equally in all directions (isotropically). It is further assumed that this isotropic
radiator is placed in free space, a homogeneous and non-absorbing mediun of dielectric constant unity. This
radiations will be spread out spherically as it travels away from the source so thatdistance r, the power density
in the wave, which is the power per unit area of wavefront, will be
P, W/m . (11.1)
4Ta
where 4 t d is the surface area of une sphere of radius d, centered on the source.
Since all the practical antennas have directiorial characteristics i.e. radiate more power in sonie
direction and less power in some other direction, therefore, the directivity gain is defined as the ratio of actuaB
power density along the main axis ofradiation ofthe antenna to that which would be produced by an isotropic
antenna at the same distancefed with the same input power. Let
Gr = Maxmum directivity gain of the uransmitting antenna.
Pp= Gr Wr .. (11.2)
4md
Now a receiving antenna may be positioned so that it collects maximum power from the wave. Let
,WRbe the power delivered by the antenna to the load (receiver) under matchcd condition. When so posilioned
the antenna can be considered to have an effective Aperture Are:a ( A«) so that
.. (11.3)
WR PD A
W A V EP R O P A G A ?
RADMOW
We TWTA,
4T 1105
But foranyantenna,
the maximum dir
directivity gain and
GA o efctive arcea are . (114)
related as
uhere Ai
Wavelength being radiated. 4T
Maximum directivity gain of the . (11.5)
receiving
=
antenna. Then
A = GR from eqn. 11.5
we have
eqn.
11.4 we get
this in
Putting
WR G7W
4T
WR Gr Gr
WT 4T Watts
1 1 6is the . (11.6)
fundamental equation
pACE equation in SI. units forjor free space tYansmission or
F R I SF R E E
antennas in a propagati >n. This is also called
alternative
form, we get loss-free medium. Writing eqn. 11.5 in an
R = Gr GR
WT . . 11.7 (a)
WR WT Gr Gr
4Td .11.7 b)
whcreWr Radiated power in Watts; WR = Received power in Wats:Gr = Maximum directüviy
gain oftransmitting antenna; GR = Maximum directivity gain of receiving antenna; = wavelength in
distance in meters.
meters=f/cand d =
It is apparent from the eqn. 11.7 (b) that larger the denominator, smaller the value of received power
Wand hence we may describe
( losSes.
.. (11.8)
Iron
from eqn. 11.7
(a) (
Gr + 10 logio G
+
101og10 4Td
10 logio = 10 logio
106 NNA 8 WAVE
PROP
or WR( dbW) = Wr(dbW) + Gr(db) + Gr(db) - L(s)
PAGATION
with L)= 10logie = 201ogie
L(s)db = 32.45+ 20log1os+ 20 logid
This is obtained
further known that
as follows. Normally, frequency is expressed in MHz, and distance
nce d in .km.(11.10
Lis
= 3x10 (m/s) . 3x 10
S(Hz) fx 10° (MHz)
300
AFMH)
Hence expressing eqn. 11. 6 (a) intoabove units, we hav .01.12)
Gru
Gr GR
16 T
300x 300
(10
x
'xf(MHz)
= Gr GR 9x 10
16 x 9.8596 x 10(df?| 9x10
CrGr | 157.7536(df? 1
10 logio WR =10 logio Gr+ 10 logio GR+ 10log1o 0.57 + 10 log1o 10- 10log1o d - 10log1o
Wr
Gr ( db)+ Gr ( db) + 10 x 1.7559 10x3 logio 10- 10 x 2 logio d-2x 10log1of
= -
.(11.9)
d in km and f in MHz.
This is the loss in decibels, resulting from the spreading of the wave as it proçagates outward from
thesource. L (6 ) is known as spatial atenuation or transmission path loss. At microwave frequencies, the loss
greater because of atmospheric absorption. It may be noed that decibels are defined in terms of power
ratios as such, it is not comrect to express logarithmic ratio of frequency and distance as decibels and the
expressions should always be written as 20 log10f or 20logio d etc.
it is required to know the electric ficld strength of the wave at the receiving antenna. This is
Often,
obtained as follows. By Poynting Theorem,
Pp E x H and= n = 120rt
RADO WAVE PROPA.
107
H e n e
E -E
E =PD =
V G7 WI, 120
V4T 120 «
.
b y eqn. 11.2
E 3 0G W
d V/m .. (11.11)
e
h i ic the fundamental equation whichgives the field strength at the receiving for free
propagation con
conditions. A receiving antenna, therefore, has an effective
antenna
atoefective arca and hence open circuit emf of the receiving antenna is given bylength or heig
Voe E l, (11.12)
Ean, 11.11 is also writen sometmes in terms of the field strength Eg at unit distance ie. 1 km. Thus
we havee
1 km
atd
E =Ee = N 30 Wr.GT V/m . (11.13)
Putting eqn. 11.13 into eqn. 11.11, we havve
E
or
Ee x
V/m .11.14 (b)
Further, Eqn. 11.11 is also written in an alternative form when choice ofreference having distance
ernressed in 1 km and transmitted power is 1 kW. Then
Ee =
30 Wr GT 30 x I000 x 1 x Wr 100 x 13 x Wr v/m
d O00 1000
or
Ee= 173 mv/m
Hence, it can be writen, in general, as
173 VWr(kW) .(1115)
E (m V/m) =
d( km)
(AMIETE, Dec. 1992)
11.4. MODES OF PRoPAGATION
antenna following any of
the transmitting antenna may reach to the receiving
The radio waves from distance
depending upon several factors like frequency of operation,
he following modes of propagations
between transmitting and receiving antennas étc.
Wave Propagation (Upto MHz)
2
1.4.1. Ground Wave or Surface 1977, 78, 1985, 1992)
(AMIETE, May 1976,77,78, 79,93, Nov.
as Norton's
surface wave) is of practicai
(sometimes also called waves. The
ne ground wave or surface wave
waves, long waves and very long
ampo a broadcast and lower frequencies i.e. for mediuméarth just as an electromagnetic wave is guided
iS a wave that is guided along
the surface of the around the
curvature of the earth.
SKYWAVE
BETWEokn
S 3 T O
4 0 o k m
PROPAGATION
OIRECTION
DIRECT WAVE
INDIRECT ie.
TILT ANGLES-
GROUND
REFLECTED TRANS MITING
UPTO R WAVE ANTENNA
16m
EARTH
GROUND WAVE OR
EARTH
SURFACE WAVE
Tx = Transmitting antenna.
Rx = Receiving antenna.
Path A =
Ground wave propagation.
Paah B Sky or ionospheric propagation. W Successive
Pah C = Space wave propagatioon. wave fronts
A, A, A", A",A' = Tilt angles in increasing order
Fig. 11.5. Posible propagation pauhsfrom Fig. 11.6. Tilting wave wave fronis in
transmitting antenna to receiving antenna
ground wave progagalion.
Besides ground atenuaion, there is sill another way in which surface wave is atenuated ie. due to
diffraction and tilt in the wave front as illustrated in Fig. 11.6. As the wave progress over the curvature of the
carth, the wave fronts startgradually tiling more and more. This increase in thetiltof wave causes more short
circuit of the electric field component and hence the field strength goes on reducing. Ultimately, at some
appreciable distance from the transmitting antenna in wavelength, the surface wave dies because of the losses
mentioned above.
t may be noted that maximum range of surface wave
propagation depends not only on the frequen
but power as well. Hence range of ransmission can he increased by increasing the power of the ransmiterin
the VLF band but this method can not be effective at the MF band (higher side) where the tilung due
diffraction is more effective.
Thefield strength at a distance from the transmitting antcnna due to ground wave has been calculatcd
from the Maxwell eqns. as
RADYO VAVE PROPAGATION
1109
120 rh
,l yolt/meter
. (11.16)
where
120m 377 Q =
Intrinsic
Effective heights ofimpedance
hr, hr = of free space.
I, Antenna currents.
= transmitüing and receiving antennes.
A = wavelength.
ddistance between
=
tt.however, the distance d is fairly large, the uransmiting and receiving points.
reduction
ancnheric absorption increases and thus the actual in the field strength due to ground
and.atmosph
sults in
less ficldstrength than attenuaton
that shown by eqn. 11.16.voltage received at receivirng point decreases. 1nd
According to Sommerfeld, the field strength for
ground wave propagation
for a flat is earth given by
d ..(11.17)
where
Eo Ground wave field strength at the
transmitting antenna. Earth losses surface of earth, at unit distance from the
not accounted.
E =
Ground wave field strength.
A Factor accounting for earth losses
d Distance from transmitting antenna
called attenuation factor.
expressed in the same unit as Eo.
Unit distance field strength Eo depends upon
()Power radiation of transmitting antenna.
(i) Directivity in vertical and horizontal planes.
If the antenna is non-directional in the horizontal plane,
producing a radiated field which is propor
tional to the cosine of the angle of elevation (as in case of short vertical
antenna), then the ield at unit distance
(ie. 1 km) for a radiated power of 1 kW is given by the general formula
Eo V / m 300 T V/m
= 1000 300 mV/m . 11.17 (a)
d
where P radiatea power in kiloWatts and d = distance in kilometers.
This is because, for a short vertical unipole antenna (grounded antenna), the field strength Eo at a
distance of d on a hypothetical flat perfectly conducting earth is
90P volts/metres
E = .. 11.18 (a)
Eo V/m
1.609
ANTCNNA WAVE PROPAGATIO
300 mV/m at a distance of l km and Ea
sau 18645 mV/m
radiated power of 1 kW, Eo =
0s b .. 11.19 (a)
.. 11.19(b)
and b tan = 2b b
.. (11.23)
tan&
a = tan
b Power factor angle of the impedance offered by the earth to the flow of current
=
A E 2+03p_ . (11.24)
2+p + 0.6
R A D I O W A V E P R O P A G A 7 T O N
1111
p
0.582 dem tM) (11.25)
o(mS7mn)
S
value ofA
and
givenb y
2 +0.3p sinbV r ... (11.26)
A 2+p+ 0.6p
b 0 for vertical
frequency currents when
=
a resistive
impedance to the flow of radio when b = 0 tor
orth offers polarization and offers a capacitive impedance
Earth
and b =
180 for horizontal shows that
polarizatic
polarization.
Thestudy
study c of Fig.11.8
either
b 0
b=30
0.
Aldb -60
b90
b 180
-10 0
-12
000
0.001 00
0-01
-lo
P (NUMERICAL DISTANCE)-
P
factorA with
approximae values of ground
Fig. 11.8. Variation ofground atenuation
values ofb.
Shows graph ofihe distance p based mumerical distance pfor diferent
Fig. 11.7.
nwnerical
factoronagainst A
from unity and reduces slowly
wavealtenuation egn. 11.24.
differs only slightly the field
attenuation factor A 11.17 it can be
seen that
1. The ground not significant.
From eqn.
) Forp ground losses are then
p. The
with the
increase of with the distance.
varies inversely
attenuation factor A
wave than unity, the
strength of the ground
becomes greater
numerical distance p
>L As the
() Forp proportional to
actual physical
decreases rapidly. factorA is almost
exacly inversely the square of
attenuation proportional to
> 10. The wave is inversely
(i) Forp field strength of the ground
the
distance. Hence forp> 10, wave
attenuation factor
11.25) ground A is
the distance. of the plane earth (eqn attenuation factor
numerical distance variation of p p and ground
The value ofdiffraction and ground pemittivity. The less than dmx where
of distance
Orestneeffect
11.7. This gives
realistic answers
for the
1OWn in Fig. . (11.27)
dmax 100 km
dmax F 90 km
distance is 125 km to
maximum
value of the
where is in MHz. Typical
1S in' km and f 1.5 MHz. the
nx 0.5 MHz to distance by incorporating
frequency range off
=
is only of units.
and
is sub-divided into surface
wave space wave n
Sometimes, ground wave propagation
wave predominates at a larger distance above the
tion following sommerfeld. According him, space
to
surface of the earth.
where as, the surface wave is the larger near the
114.3. Sky wave or lonospheric Wave Propagation. (Between 2 to 30 MH). The sky waves aves aare
at medium waves and short waves) for verv lne
of practical importance at medium and high frequencies (i.e.
waves reach the receiving oi
distance radio communications. In this mode of propagation electromagnetic
after reflection from the ionized region in the upper atmosphere called ionosphere-Situated between 50kmn
400 km above earth surface-under favourable conditions. This is illustrated by the path (B) in Fig. 11.5. The
ionosphere acts like a reflecting surface and is able to reflect back the electromagnetc waves of frequencies
between 2 to 30 MHz. Electromagnetic waves of frequency more than 30 MHz are not reflected back from
the ionosphere rather they penetrate it. Mostly sky wave propagation is suitable for frequencies between 20
30 MHz, so this mode of propagation is also called as 'Short wave propagaton'.
Further, since sky wave propagation takes place after reflection
from the ionosphere, so it is also called as ionospheric propagation.
Since long distance point to point communication is possible with sky
wave propagation, so it is also called as point to point propagation or
communication by engineers and scientists. Extremely long distance EARTH
ie. round the globe communication is also possible with the multiple
reflections ofsky waves as shown in Fig 11.9. In a single reflection from
the ionosphere the radio waves cover a distance not more than 4000 km.
The signals received due o sky wave propagation are, however,
subjected to fading in which signal strength varies with time. It is because Fig. 11.9. Shows mulipie reflectionsof
at the receiving point a large number of waves followa different number radio waves from ionosphere.
of paths. Hence provision has to be made to overcome the fading
1144 Space wave propagation (above 30 MH. The space wave propagation of pracical
importance at VHF bands (betwecen to 30 MHz to 300 MHz), U.H.F. and microwaves and communications
like televisions, radar, frequency modulations etc.. utilize this mode of
propagation. In this mode
propagation, electromagnetic waves from the transmitting antenna reach the receiving antenna either direcuyo
or after reflections from ground in the earth's
troposphere region. Troposphere is that portion of ue
atmosphere which extends upto 16 km from the earth surface (Fig. 11.5, path C). Space wave consists, ofa
least two components e.g. direct component and indirect ie.
ground reflected It means In
former, wave reaches directly from the transmitting antenna to receiving antenna components.
and in latter, the wave reacn
the receiving antenna after reflection from the
to reflection at the ground, in the
ground, where the phase change of 180' is also introduced du
ground reflected wave. Although both the waves (direct and indirect)
the transmitting antenna at the same time with the
same phase but may reach the
phase or out of phase, because the two waves travel different receiving antenna e
waves, thus, at the receiving point may be path lengths. The strength of the resu
the two waves are adding or
stronger or weaker than the direct
path alone depending upon w
opposing in phase. Atreceiving point the signal strength is the vector addiuo
RADIO WAVE PROPAGATTON
direct
direct and indire waves. Space wave
wave propagales through troposphere. propagation is also called as 1113]
Space wave Tropospheric propagation because space
ground wavepropagation
is
and mainly in VHF, and
propagations
to be reflected from the both fail. higher frequencies because at
Beyond 30 MHz sky such frequencies sky
ionosphere
attenuation is very high. Therefore and ground waves are
wave fails as the
wavelength becomes too
tilt, Space wave propagation just after few hundred propagating
feet ground waves close to the antenna
only, as
wave
is
rOwave frequencies, this mode of also called as line of sight propagationtoobecause
die due to attenuation
and
uVature of the earth. propagation is limited to the line of at VHF, UHF and
Although in actual practice sight distance and is also limited by
eoht distance due tO reiraction in the space waves propagate even
slightly beyond the line of
and receiving antenna can usually "see"atmosphere
each other.
of the earth. In line
of sight distance
transmitting antenna
In fact, the line of sight distance i.e. range of com-
munication can also be increased by increasing the
heights of transmitting and receiving antennas as S
llustrated in Fig. 11.10. The curvature of the earth
t
and the height of the transmitting and receiving
antennas determines maximum range of com- EARTH
TTTT
Troposphere remains approximately the same as at EARTH
the surface of the earuh. The enure belt is called as
earth surface.
troposphere or region of change. Although in the Fig. 11.12. Mediun above
(a) Troposphere upto 15 km.
troposphere, the percentage ot the gas components (b)lonosphere-50-400 km. km.
remains almost constant with increase of height, yet above 400
(c) outer atmosphere