The document outlines criteria and scoring for a presentation on a primary source. It evaluates the organization and presentation of the presenters, the background provided on the primary source and its context, and a thorough analysis of the content and how it contributes to understanding issues during the period. Strong organization and preparation of presenters is worth 18 points, a clear introduction of the source and its relation to topics is 22 points, accurate and detailed contextual analysis is 30 points, and thorough discussion of the source's contributions is 30 points, for a total of 100 points.
The document outlines criteria and scoring for a presentation on a primary source. It evaluates the organization and presentation of the presenters, the background provided on the primary source and its context, and a thorough analysis of the content and how it contributes to understanding issues during the period. Strong organization and preparation of presenters is worth 18 points, a clear introduction of the source and its relation to topics is 22 points, accurate and detailed contextual analysis is 30 points, and thorough discussion of the source's contributions is 30 points, for a total of 100 points.
The document outlines criteria and scoring for a presentation on a primary source. It evaluates the organization and presentation of the presenters, the background provided on the primary source and its context, and a thorough analysis of the content and how it contributes to understanding issues during the period. Strong organization and preparation of presenters is worth 18 points, a clear introduction of the source and its relation to topics is 22 points, accurate and detailed contextual analysis is 30 points, and thorough discussion of the source's contributions is 30 points, for a total of 100 points.
Organization and The presentation is smooth, with 18
Presentation confident and prepared presenters leading the discussion. Background of the The presentation includes a clear, 22 Primary Source interesting, and effective introduction that identifies how the material is related to the topic under discussion, as well as to previously-discussed topics. Contextual Analysis The presentation of the author’s 30 background and context (bias) is clear, accurate, and detailed. Content Analysis The presentation thoroughly discusses 30 the values and contributions of the source’s contents in understanding the issues known during the period. Total Points 100