Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Client: - mr.tewodros.G
December 1, 2022 1
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
Contents
1,IntroductionError! Bookmark not defined.
2 site investigation5
2.1 Geo-technical Drilling/Boring5
bore hole5
2.1.1 Numbers of bore hole and spacing based on different5
referenceError! Bookmark not defined.
2.1.2 depth7
2.2Test with their respective justification7
2.2.1 field test7
2.2.2 lab test Test.sample type.sample size.standard(Astm with specific code)8
2.2.2 lab test Test.sample type.sample size.standard(Astm with specific code)8
2.3 Monitoring ground water9
3. Schedule Activity11
December 1, 2022 2
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
Introduction
December 1, 2022 3
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
1.2 investigation objective
The geotechnical investigation of the project was planned and implemented to meet the
following major objectives:
. To study the geomorphological and geological condition of proposed project area
. To identify existing geo hazardous conditions in the proposed construction area
. To determine the material class, lateral and vertical extent and of earth materials composing
proposed construction sites
. To determine engineering characteristics and parameters of soil and rock ground materials of
the engineering sites
. To evaluate the reservoir area with respect to potential land side and water tightness
problems
December 1, 2022 4
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
2 site investigation
The objective of the site investigation is to gather data for the design and construction of a the
multistory building for the apartment purpose. The investigation specifically done
to perform different sampling method and geophysical investigation to determine the extent and
locations of foundations, to retrieve soil samples for Geo-technical laboratory testing,
to investigate and collect local borrow source material that may be utilized in construction of
the building.
2.1 Geo-technical Drilling/Boring bore hole
Boreholes are widely used in Geo-technical site investigation as a cost-effective method of
sampling materials from greater depths than is possible with test pits, with minimal
environmental impact. Boreholes also provide down-hole access for Geo-technical testing
equipment, enabling the measurement and monitoring of groundwater levels, pore pressures,
permeability, ground movements, material strengths, in-situ stresses and so on.
“As a rule of thumb; there are no binding rules on either numbers or depths of boring. It will rely
on the Engineering judgment and site discovery”. In general, and to estimate the concept of
boring layout planning (the depth specifically), Tomlinson suggest the following: “The depth to
which borehole should be sunk in ground is by the depth of soil affected by the foundation
bearing pressure”. under this paper for our project, we discuss some of the engineering judgment
and standard on the bore hole layout, spacing, depth and number.
Here the soil is assumed non uniform to advance our site investigation for the structure to be
safer, sufficient information about the soil to be obtained. Below are some referenced
December 1, 2022 5
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
table 1 no of bore hole and spacing between bore hole
EN 7 (2008) 15-40m for high rise 15m 5 bore hole if the soil is far from 6 bore hole
building uniform
EBCS EN
1997:2015
IS: 1892-1979 for building 10-30m 10m 1 bore hole for area of 200 - 8 bore hole
(1985: apart 400sq.m to be loaded. 1 bore
Reaffirmed hole in each corner and one in
2002) the middle for rectangular
building. I.e 5 bore hole is
recommended
NAVFAC DM- Spacing 15 m in both 15m boring at possible exterior 6 bore hole
7.1 (1982) directions foundation walls, at machinery
and elevators pits.
For Large Structure
with Separate Closely
Footings
December 1, 2022 6
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
2.1.2 Depth
Depth of bore hole is governed by the depth of influence of the foundation soil contact pressure.
Bore holes should go down to at least the depth below the foundation level at which only 5 to
40% q reaches (about 2 to 3 times the foundation width below the foundation level). In our case
we assumed the structure is heavy reinforced concrete structure to be safe with our soil
settlement and ground water conditions. And it is assumed to have raft or mat foundation
EBCS EN 1997:2015 recommend that za>=1.5bB where za-is depth (za ) of investigation and bB-
is width of mat. On the other hand, for heavy reinforced concrete structure
Db=6*s^(0.7)
Where Db: Depth of boring, in meters.
S: Number of stories.
# When deep excavations are anticipated; the depth of boring should be at least 1.5 times the
depth of excavations.
Therefore, from above recommendation our project have bore of depth of about 44m.
2.2Test with their respective justification.
2.2.1 Field Test
December 1, 2022 7
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
Pressure meter test Measures at rest horizontal pressure
2.2.2 lab test sample type. Sample size. Standard (Astm with specific code)
To support soundings and drill descriptions soil samples are tested for many essential
parameters: grain size distribution, plasticity and the content of organic and lime-like substances.
In the case of undisturbed samples, the volume weight and shear strength are also determined.
Combination of these data leads to the unambiguous designation of the soil type.
2.2.2 lab test sample type. Sample size. Standard (Astm with specific code)
Table 3 lab test
Sieve analysis Disturbed 500 grams of Helps to asses particle size ASTEM
sample soil sample is distribution of granular material
taken
Dry density and Slightly 3kg of soil Helps determine the natural content ASTEM
moisture content disturbed sample is of the given soil sample
sample taken
Consolidation test Undisturbed 155.2g of soil To determine the magnitude and rate ASTEM
sample sample is of soil consolidation
taken
Atterberg test Undisturbed 150g of soil Helps to determine the moisture ASTEM
soil sample is content at which grained clay and silt
soil transition between the different
December 1, 2022 8
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
taken phases
Seismic Test
Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia is located in the seismic region of the Country. The zoning
map of the country was prepared earlier. However, the city has a varied ground formation
ranging from rock to soft soil deposit, consequently a seismic microdonation map is essential. In
the absence of strong ground motion records and scarce soil data, microtremor is found to be
adequate. Microtremor measurements were made and analyzed. The Fourier amplitudes and
predominant periods of microtremors are plotted on a GIS based map of the City and a seismic
microdonation map of the city is produced.
Seismic zoning map was prepared for Ethiopia based on past earthquake data and applying
attenuation relations expressing tectonics and seismicity of regions having geological similarity
with Ethiopia, Gouin, [4], Asfaw [5} Seismic microdonation maps provide information on return
period of earthquakes with given magnitude, intensity and acceleration. At its source, earthquake
is influenced by source stress, rapture propagation radiation pattern etc. After emanating from
the source, waves traveling along different travel paths are modified depending on path
parameters such as geometric spreading, absorption, inhomogeneity etc. At sites of interest
further modifications are made by surface conditions, topography and by soil structure
interaction (where structures exist). The general zoning map, MoWUD [6] is produced in a
regional basis for the whole of Ethiopia. Areas in one seismic hazard zone in this map can be
further divided into sub zones to account for the effect of a site on an incoming earthquake this
is what is known as seismic microdonation. Site response is widely recognized as an important
December 1, 2022 9
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
factor that must be accounted for in micronation or specific site effect evaluation studies for
important facilities
December 1, 2022 10
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
Schedule Activity
2 mobilization ✓
3 drilling ✓ ✓
4 ✓
boring
5 ✓
surveying
6 ✓
monitoring
7 ✓
Lab report
December 1, 2022 11
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
TABLE: Joint
Design Reactions
Story Case Type FZ MX MY
kN kN-m kN-m
Base Combination 11953.165 74.8096 25.7613
7
Base Combination 9723.3436 -134.6067 26.3222
Base Combination 8708.8567 -139.6178 -26.1956
Base Combination 8264.7751 -105.2941 -26.1378
Base Combination 8024.2732 309.2911 -45.1949
Base Combination 7576.2661 304.3349 36.6059
Base Combination 7061.2659 135.7582 -48.7718
Base Combination 6978.6526 -149.763 28.9007
Base Combination 6614.1988 65.6022 8.034
Base Combination 5657.3198 368.6309 -67.1625
Base Combination 5611.5296 -216.3752 -196.6848
Base Combination 5709.2591 10.0444 58.9575
Base Combination 5202.7321 -220.1821 -105.9346
Base Combination 4682.5317 400.1365 -82.1893
Base Combination 4639.8893 101.3032 -60.2822
Base Combination 4057.5729 -37.9371 37.4627
Base Combination 4353.5597 -40.1222 -43.0731
Base Combination 4192.8713 0.1023 -42.1712
Base Combination 4023.0093 97.9399 44.7643
Base Combination 3689.6618 11.2423 -3.4905
Base Combination 3657.56 326.2856 58.6871
Base Combination 3612.825 2.5429 22.1083
Base Combination 3542.4998 -74.8038 -24.5467
Base Combination 3525.9555 24.886 58.5401
Base Combination 3417.1146 158.4271 137.5181
Base Combination 3116.2198 -204.9464 95.4289
Base Combination 2984.2704 22.5464 -30.8216
Base Combination 2887.5723 -16.3991 -31.1841
Base Combination 2854.7643 -44.1992 28.5499
Base Combination 2158.88 -44.7229 -84.0196
Base Combination 2096.055 0.5803 31.1375
Base Combination 1971.7452 41.5941 56.9746
Base Combination 1949.7319 -189.9304 91.3399
Base Combination 1807.4188 -1.405 30.5258
Base Combination 1580.6887 -6.6998 -1.5358
Base Combination 1366.3483 -0.2463 -0.7656
Base Combination 1384.4696 -12.2072 36.1203
December 1, 2022 12
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
Base Combination 1371.6511 -18.1131 58.1502
Base Combination 1130.7185 -20.5223 41.7432
Base Combination 942.4905 -21.4306 -43.3509
Base Combination 578.3601 -24.2725 1.0996
Base Combination 397.4262 0.8157 0.4945
Base Combination 389.6054 0.2951 0.2143
Base Combination 387.8857 -0.4431 0.73
Base Combination 381.777 0.2281 0.5766
Base Combination 78.2339 -3.8698 3.223
Base Combination 0 0 0
Base Combination 0 0 0
Base Combination 0 0 0
Base Combination 0 0 0
Base Combination 0 0 0
Base Combination 0 0 0
Base Combination 0 0 0
December 1, 2022 13
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITIY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AMOUNT
A.FIELD WORK
Mobilization and demobilization of investigation crew
1 to and from site LS 1 30,000
2 Drilling in all formations up to 30 meters depth m 110 2000 220000
3 Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) No 40 250 10000
4 Ground water level measurements No 5 100 500
5 Sundry cost No 1 30000 30000
6 Surveyor No 3 7000 21000
SUB TOTAL A 311,500
B. LABORATORY TEST
1 Sieve analysis No 20 200 4000
2 Compaction test (compressive strength) No 20 500 10000
3 Dry density and moisture content No 10 1000 10000
4 Consolidation if soil is cohesive No 2 1500 3000
5 Atterberg Limit No 20 200 4000
6 Specific gravity No 5 100 500
SUB TOTAL B 31500
C.TECHNICAL REPORT
Technical report including, Test pit logs, laboratory
tests and interpretation of results, bearing capacity
determination & foundation recommendation ( 2
1 copies Draft and Final Report) LS 1 20000 20000
SUB TOTAL C 20000
TOTAL A+B+C 363,000
15% VAT 54450
Grand Total 417,450
December 1, 2022 14
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
December 1, 2022 15
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
December 1, 2022 16
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC
December 1, 2022 17
Phylipos and his friend’s building PLC