You are on page 1of 4

Complications Associated With Surgical Treatment of Congenital

Intrinsic Duodenal Obstruction


By Nitsana Spigland and Salam Yazbeck
Montreal, Quebec

6 Although survival rates for infants undergoing surgical Hydramnios was detected on prenatal ultrasound in I9 of 25 cases
treatment for congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction are (75%) in which this information was available. In nine patients, the
high, long-term follow-up suggests a high complication rate diagnosis of duodenal obstruction was made prenatally, based on a
related to surgical therapy. We reviewed 33 neonates who double-bubble image noted on maternal ultrasound.
underwent surgery for congenital intrinsic duodenal ob- Vomiting and intestinal obstruction were the most frequent
struction during the past 10 years. There were 20 girls and presenting symptoms. Vomiting was bilious in 29 patients (88%) and
13 boys: the mean gestational age was 36 weeks, and mean nonbilious in four patients (12%). Other associated pathological
birthweight was 2,485 g. Bilious vomiting and intestinal conditions are listed in Table 2. All infants had onset of symptoms at
obstruction were the most frequent presenting symptoms. birth, except three patients who became symptomatic on the second
Hydramnios was present in 75% of cases and 21% had day of life. Abdominal x-rays were performed in 31 patients.
associated Down’s syndrome. Findings at laparotomy in- Twenty-seven of 31 (87%) had a double-bubble pattern with no
cluded duodenal atresia (14). annular pancreas (11). and distal air, suggesting the diagnosis of complete duodenal obstruction.
duodenal diaphragm (6). The most frequent surgical proce- Nonspecific gas patterns were found in the remaining four. Upper
dure was side-to-side duodenoduodenostomy (DD), fol- gastrointestinal studies were performed preoperatively in seven
lowed by duodenojejunostomy and resection of web with cases, and suggested the diagnosis of complete or incomplete
Heineke-Mikulicr type duodenoplasty. Bowel transit was duodenal obstruction. All patients underwent surgical intervention
reestablished at a mean of 13.1 days (range, 6 to 45 days). at a mean age of 4.6 days (range, 1 day to 16 months).
Seventy-percent of patients developed postoperative com-
plications, the most frequent being megaduodenum with
RESULTS
blind loop syndrome or bile reflux gastritis (22%). chole-
static jaundice (17%). gastroesophageal reflux (17%). de- Findings at laparotomy included duodenal atresia
layed transit (8%). and bowel obstruction (6%). Six patients (14), annular pancreas (1 l), and duodenal diaphragms
(16%) required secondary surgical procedures for postoper-
(8). In 32 cases the obstruction was at the level of the
ative complications Be, megaduodenum, nonfunctioning
anastomosis, missed intrinsic stenosis). Two patients died second portion of the duodenum, and in one case it was
(6%). Stagnation and functional obstruction in the proximal at the level of the third portion of the duodenum. The
duodenum is the main factor influencing the morbidity rate exact location of the obstruction in relation to the
among these patients. Consideration should be given to the ampulla of Vater was clearly indicated in 28 charts. It
tapering duodenoplasty and diamond-shaped anastomosis
was distal to the ampulla of Vater in 20 cases, at the
in order to help reduce problems associated with megaduo-
denum and help restore earlier bowel transit. level of the ampulla in four cases, and proximal to the
0 1990 by W.B. Saunders Company. ampulla in four cases.
A variety of surgical procedures were performed
INDEX WORDS: Duodenal obstruction; duodenal atresia; (Table 3). The most frequent surgical procedure was
duodenal stenosis: annular pancreas.
side-to-side duodenoduodenostomy, followed by duode-
nojejunostomy, and partial web resection with Heineke-
A LTHOUGH SURVIVAL rates for infants under-
going surgical treatment for congenital intrinsic
duodenal obstruction are high, long-term follow-up
Mickulicz-type duodenoplasty. Tapering duodeno-
plasty with duodenodudonostomy was performed in
two cases, and a diamond-shaped duodenoduodenos-
suggests a high complication rate related to surgical
tomy was performed in one case. Reestablishment of
therapy. In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the
bowel transit occured at a mean of 13.1 days (range, 6
charts of all patients who underwent surgery for
to 45 days); 15 days for duodenojejunostomy, 12.4
congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction during the
days for duodenoduodenostomy, and 7.5 days for
past 10 years, with an emphasis on the early and late
complications.
From S&-Justine Hospital, and the Department of Surgery,
MATERIALS AND METHODS University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec.
Thirty-three neonates were treated for congenital intrinsic duode- Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Canadian Associa-
nal obstruction at Hdpital Sainte-Justine, Montreal, between 1979 tion of Paediatric Surgeons, Edmonton, Alberta, September 20-23,
and 1989. There were 20 girls and 13 boys. The mean gestational age 1989.
was 36 weeks. The mean birthweight was 2,485 g (range, 1,392 to Address reprint requests to Salam Yazbeck. MD, Ste-Justine
4,260 g). Twenty patients had associated congenital anomalies Hospital. 317.5 Ste-Catherine Rd. Montreal, Quebec H3T lC5,
(Table 1). The most frequent associated anomalies included malrota- Canada.
tion (21%). Down’s syndrome (21%). and biliary tract anomalies o 1990 by W.B. Saunders Company.
(12%). 0022-3468/90/2511-0006$03.00/O

Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol 25, No 11 (November), 1990: pp 1127-l 130 1127
1128 SPIGLAND AND YAZBECK

Table 1. Distribution of Associated Congenital Anomalies Table 3. Surgical Procedures (33 Patients)
(33 Patients)
Procedure No. of Patients
Anomalv No. of Patients
Standard side-to-side duodenoduodenostomy 19
Malrotation Retrocolic duodenojejunostomy 6
Down’s syndrome Duodenojejunostomy and choledochojejunostomy 1
Biliary tract anomalies Partial web excision with Heineke-Mickulicz type
Cardiac anomalies duodenoplasty 4
Jejunal atresia Duodenoduodenostomy with tapering 2
H-type tracheoesophageal fistula Diamond-shaped duodenoduodenostomy 1
Skull malformation

atresia, and died of sepsis after anastomotic revision


partial web excision with Heineke-Mickulicz duodeno- for ischemic stricture and necrosis. One patient with
plasty. congenital absence of the gallbladder and common bile
Seventy percent of these patients developed postop- duct dilatation had jaundice that resolved spontane-
erative complications (Table 4). The most frequent ously. The last patient had a liver biopsy suggesting
complications included megaduodenum with blind loop extrahepatic biliary obstruction and periportal fibrosis,
syndrome or biliary reflux (22%), cholestatic jaundice but no follow-up is available.
(17%) gastroesophageal reflux (17%), delayed transit One patient developed a postoperative abdominal
for more than 21 days (18%), and bowel obstruction wall abscess, after having an intraoperative duodenal
(8%). injury as a consequence of a bovie burn that required
Six patients required secondary surgical procedures partial resection of the duodenum. Four patients were
for complications that arose in the postoperative period found to have gastroesophageal reflux diagnosed from
(Table 5). Among these patients, three patients re- 3 months to 1 year after the initial surgical procedure.
quired anastomotic revisions. Two patients were reex- One patient is being treated with medical therapy for a
plored for symptoms related to megaduodenum 17 duodenal ulcer that developed after 17 years of persis-
years and 15 months, respectively, after the initial tent biliary reflux.
surgical procedure. Both patients were found to have The overall mortality rate was 6% (2 deaths). Both
markedly dilated, atonic duodenal pouches, functional of these patients had multiple associated congenital
anastomotic obstruction, as well as missed intrinsic anomalies including biliary anomalies. Follow-up
stenoses. One patient with duodenal, jejunal, and distal ranged from 1 month to 8 years with a mean of 2 years.
common bile duct atresias developed an ischemic
stricture and necrosis at the choledochojejunal and DISCUSSION
duodenojejunal anastomoses. Two patients underwent Although there has been a marked improvement in
repeat surgical exploration for postoperative intestinal survival for infants undergoing surgical therapy for
obstruction, secondary to adhesions and volvulus, re- congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction, much contro-
spectively. One patient, who had massive postoperative versy exists in the literature regarding the best tech-
aspiration, was found to have an H-type tracheoesoph- nique of surgical repair. Modifications in surgical
ageal fistula. Five of the six patients who required techniques over the past two decades were initially
reinterventions had duodenojejunostomy as initial pro- prompted by the high mortality rates associated with
cedures.
Four patients presented with persistent postopera- Table 4. Postoperative Complications (33 Patients)
tive cholestatic jaundice. All four were found to have Comclication No. of Patients 1%)
associated biliary tract anomalies. In one patient with
Megaduodenum (with biliary reflux or blind-
Down’s syndrome and biliary atresia, a Kasai proce- loop syndrome) 5 (22)
dure was not performed and the infant died. A second Cholestatic jaundice 4tlJ)
patient had duodenal, jejunal, and extrahepatic biliary Gastroesophageal reflux 4 (17)
Intestinal obstruction 2 (8)
Table 2. Associated Pathological Conditions (33 Patients) Delayed transit 2 (8)
lschemic anastomotic stricture, bowel necro-
Diagnosis No. of Patients
sis/sepsis 1 (4.6)
Meconium aspiration 2 Abdominal wall abscess 1 (4.61
Respiratory distress syndrome 1 Choking/swallowing difficulty 1 (4.6)
Chylothorax 1 Cardiac failure 1 (4.6)
Renal insufficiency 1 Massive aspiration 1 (4.6)
Macroscopic rectorrhagia 1 Septic arthritis 1 (4.6)
Jaundice 4 TOTAL 23 (JO)
DUODENAL OBSTRUCTION: SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS 1129

Table 6. Secondary Surgical Procedures (6 Patients)

Time Interval
Between First
Postoperative Secondary Surgical and 9scendary
Complication lnltial Procedure Procedure Surgical Procedures

Megaduodenum with biliary reflux Duodenojejunostomy Partial excision missed membrane: take 17yr
down of duodenojejunostomy; duode-
noduodenostomy
Megaduodenum with blind loop syn- Duodenoduodenostomy Partial web excision; revision duodeno- 15mo
drome duodenal anastomosis with tapering
duodenoplasty
lschemic stricture of anastomosis, Duodenojejunostomy and choledo- Take down of choledochojejunal and duo- 1 mo
bowel necrosis chojejunostomy denojejunal anastomoses: jejunal re-
section; redo choledochojejunostomy
and duodanojejunostomy
Intestinal obstruction (adhesive) Duodenojejunostomy Laparotomy; lysis of adhesions 4mo
Intestinal obstruction volvuIus Duodenojejunostomy Laparotomy; reduction of volvulus jejunal 3mo
resection
Massive aspiration Duodenojajunostomv Repair H-type tracheoesophageal fistula 3 wk

anastomotic complications in earlier series. However created, which became obstructed intermittently and
more recently, varied techniques have been proposed to emptied retrograde through the stomach.
diminish the early and late complication rates.‘-’ The high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and
When evaluating the early postoperative results of biliary reflux associated with megaduodenum in this
the various repairs performed in this series, we found series has already been reported.” Additionally, the
that the mean duration for reestablishment of bowel fact that persistent biliary reflux can lead to peptic
transit of 13.1 days, was significantly longer than the ulceration, was demonstrated by one of these patients
3- to 7-day time interval reported in other series in who developed an anterior bulb duodenal ulcer after 17
which the diamond-shaped anastomosis or tapering years of documented persistent biliary reflux. Others
duodenoplasty with duodenoduodenostomy were per- have suggested the possibility of esophageal stricture
formed.sg7Y8 Additionally, partial web excision with formation and malignancy following long-standing
Heineke-Mickulicz-type duodenoplasty, was associ- biliary reflux.”
ated with a more rapid reestablishment of bowel The high morbidity associated with duodenojejunos-
transit when compared with the bypass procedures. tomy parallels findings in other series.4 Five of the six
That’s why we favor this technique for the treatment of patients who required reintervention, including those
intrinsic duodenal webs, when the proximal duodenal undergoing surgery for intestinal obstruction, had
pouch is not too dilated. duodenojejunostomy as the initial procedure.
Although the initial postoperative course following Postoperative cholestatic jaundice that persists should
repair of congenital intrinsic duodenal anomalies may alert the clinician to the possibility of associated biliary
be uncomplicated, certain abnormalies are noted when tract anomalies and not necessarily to a surgical
long-term results are evaluated.‘*” Megaduodenum complication.”
with functional obstruction and stagnation is prevalent Although a variety of tapering techniques have been
among these abnormalities. In this series, megaduode- advocated in the recent pediatric surgical literature,
num was the most frequent postoperative complica- with emphasis on restoring earlier bowel transit and
tion, and it was associated with two basic patterns of minimizing postoperative complications, the impetus
clinical presentation: recurrent abdominal pain with for resection and tapering dates back to a review of
postprandial vomiting, and diarrhea suggestive of a small bowel atresias by Nixon and Tawes12 in 197 1,
blind loop syndrome, or alkaline biliary reflux with They showed that resection of the enlarged proximal
resultant gastritis, duodenitis, and peptic ulceration. bowel in jejunal atresias was associated with a marked
Ein et al9 reported three cases of functional obstruc- improvement in survival when compared with direct
tion following duodenoduodenostomy in patients who anastomosis without resection.
presented 6 to 18 months after the initial surgical Despite the low mortality rate of 6% in this series,
procedure. In this series, two patients underwent anas- the high complication rate of 70% has led us to
tomotic revisions for functional duodenal obstruction, reevaluate the different surgical techniques for repair
at 15 months and 17 years of age. Both of these of these anomalies. This complication rate may in part
patients were found to have missed intrinsic stenoses be a reflection of the fact that duodenojejunostomy was
and in one case, a blind duodenal cul-de-sac was performed among some of the earlier patients re-
1130 SPIGLAND AND YAZBECK

viewed. However, the delayed transit observed with overemphasize the importance of checking the patency
standard lateral duodenoduodenostomy, as well as the of the entire distal bowel, prior to construction of the
development of megaduodenum and its associated anastomosis, to avoid missing additional intrinsic
complications, leads us to consider the more recently stenoses. It became obvious to us, that long-term
reported techniques including duodenoduodenostomy follow-up of these patients is mandatory, because
with tapering and the diamond-shaped anastomosis for many of them will eventually develop abnormalities
duodenal atresia or annular pancreas. We favor partial even if the initial postoperative period is uncompli-
web excision with Heineke-Mickulicz duodenoplasty cated. Although the results of early experiences with
for intrinsic webs when the proximal duodenum is not the newer techniques seem promising, it is only with
too dilated. long-term follow-up that we will be able to compare
Regardless of the surgical procedure, we can not efficacy with respect to earlier techniques.

REFERENCES
1. Fonkalsrud EW, de Lorimier AA, Hays DM: Congenital 7. Weisberger G, Boureau M: Resultats imm6diats et secondaires
atresia and stenosis of the duodenum. Pediatrics 43:79-83, 1969 des duod6no-duodCnostomies avec modelage dans le traitement des
2. Girvan DP, Stephens CA: Congenital intrinsic duodenal ob- obstructions duodCnales congCnitales completes du nouveaun6. Chir
struction: A twenty-year review of its surgical management and Pediatr 23:369-372, 1982
consequences. J Pediatr Surg 9:833-839,1974 8. Adzick NS, Harrison MR. de Lorimier AA: Tapering duodeno-
3. Weitzman JL, Brennan LP: An improved technique for the plasty for megaduodenum associated with duodenal atresia. J
correction of congenital duodenal obstruction in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg 21:311-312, 1986
Pediatr Surg 9:385-388,1974 9. Ein SH, Shandling B: The late non-functioning duodenal
4. Stauffer VG, Irving I: Duodenal atresia: Long term results. atresia repair. J Pediatr Surg 21:798-801, 1986
Prog Pediatr Surg 10:49-60, 1977 10. Kokkonen ML, Kalima T, Jaaskelainen J: Duodenal atresia:
5. Kimura K, Tsugawa C, Ogawa K, et al: Diamond shaped Late follow-up. J Pediatr Surg 23:216-220.1988
anastomosis for congenital duodenal obstruction. Arch Surg 112: 11. Reid IS: Biliary tract abnormalities associated with duodenal
1262-1263,1977 atresia. Arch Dis Child 48:952-957, 1973
6. Weber TR, Lewis JE, Mooney D, et al: Duodenal atresia: A 12. Nixon HH, Tawes R: Etiology and treatment of small
comparison of techniques of repair. J Pediatr Surg 21:1133-l 136, intestinal atresia: Analysis of a series of 127 jejuno-ileal atresias and
1986 comparison with 62 duodenal atresias. Surgery 69:41-51, 1971

You might also like