4

SECTION D : PROJECT PROGRESS

3

Evaluate each item using following scale

Excellent 5
Good 4 2
Moderate 3 1
Weak 2
Very Weak 1
Fail 0 0

Fill in this
column only

MARKS
CO ITEM 5 4 3 2 1 0 WEIGHT
GIVEN

THESIS/REPORT

Clear description about Satisfactory Unclear description

Introduction/ domain/case study of the <inbetween> description about about domain/case No introduction
CO1 Overview domain/case study of <imbetween> 0.4
project the project study

Clear description and Satisfactory Unclear description No problem

description and Statement / problem
CO1 Problem Statement problem statement is <inbetween> problem statement is <inbetween> about problem statement is 0.6
acceptable statement
acceptable unacceptable

Consistent with the

Clear and measurable. problem statement. Inconsistent with
Consistent with the 1-2 objective is problem statement. No objectives stated /
CO1 Objectives problem statement. <inbetween> unmeasurable. <inbetween> Unmeasurable. Not fulfill PSM level 0.8
Fulfill PSM level. Fullfill PSM level. Too small.

Precisely describe the Scope are not clearly Scope not related
CO1 Scope scope of the project <inbetween> defined <inbetween> to the project No scope stated 0.4
accodingly
 Incomplete Incomplete
Description and Clearly describe and description and Clearly describe and description and Attempt to describe
CO1 comparison of compare at least THREE comparison of at compare TWO existing comparison of at and compare but No description 0.8
systems existing systems least THREE existing systems least TWO existing not accepted
systems systems

Comparison of existing Comparison of

Relevance of existing systems are
CO1 comparison on systems are fully <inbetween> <inbetween> <inbetween> not relevant/ No discussion on 1
existing systems relevant/ related/ in related/ in different exsiting systems
similar domain. domain.