TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

CLIENT DETAILS
Company / Organisation: Fuzzy Operations
Client contact: Daniel McMillan Mobile #: 0402 091 345 Email Address: danielm@fuzzy.com.au
Job / Purchase Order #:
Risk Assessment Location: Desktop On Site Date of Assessment: 08/11/2022
Person Conducting Assessment: Signature: Assessors Qualification:
Benjamin Luxford TMD Open# 468

PROJECT DETAILS / SCOPE OF WORKS

Location: Gregory Terrace, Spring Hill
Site Extent #1: Costin St Site Extent #2: Exhibition St
Project Commencement: November 25, 2022
Project Conclusion: November 27, 2022
Quantity of Shifts: 2 Shift Duration:
Time of Shift: Dayshift Nightshift Both (Long-term Project Work)
Project Staging: works to be conducted along Gregory Terrace
Staging Elements: road closure will be implemented in Gregory Tce for the National 4x4 Outdoor Show
Plant & Equipment Required: Trucks, UTE
Method for Delivery of Materials & Equipment to Site: Driven to site as required
Required Access & Egress for Plant & Equipment: Access / Ingress via closed road under Traffic Control direction when safe to proceed

SITE CONDITIONS & CHARACTERISTICS

Road #1: Gregory Terrace
Road Configuration: Two way Posted Speed: 60kph Traffic Volume: Unknown
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Present on both sides of Details: signalised crossings at Details: @ Brunswick St, Brookes
carriageway Brunswick St, King St & Brookes St St & King St
intersections
Road #2: Brunswick St / Bowen Bridge Rd
Road Configuration: Multilane Posted Speed: 60km/h Traffic Volume: Unknown
divided
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Present on both sides of Details: @ Gregory Tce intersection Details: @ Gregory Tce
carriageway on all 4 points intersection
Road #3: Anderson St
Road Configuration: Single Posted Speed: 50km/h Traffic Volume: Unknown
Lane/Single direction
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Present on both sides of Details: pram ramps at Gregory Tce Details:
carriageway intersection
Road #4: Costin St
Road Configuration: Single Posted Speed: 50km/h Traffic Volume: Unknown
Lane/Single direction
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Present on both sides of Details: pram ramps at Gregory Tce Details:
carriageway intersection
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

Site Risk Rating & Risk Assessment Matrix

 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party

Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
Environmental features (weather/smoke)
 Retro-reflective devices to be used
obscuring positioning of signs and devices –  PCBU
 Revise positioning within allowed limits.
traffic unable to react appropriately to changed MEDIUM LOW  TMD
 Where limits are outside tolerances,
conditions.  TMI
TMI shall contact TMD for guidance.

Shadow, fog, or glare impacting on visibility of  Retro-reflective devices to be used

 PCBU
traffic control devices – traffic unable to react  Revise positioning within allowed limits.
MEDIUM LOW  TMD
appropriately to changed conditions.  Where limits are outside tolerances,
 TMI
TMI shall contact TMD for guidance.
Existing road surface unsafe for worksite –
Workers and traffic exposed to additional
N/A  Road surface in good trafficable condition
geographical risks.

Changes in condition of road surface due to road

work – additional hazards created N/A  Road surface in good trafficable condition
for traffic.

 Trafficable lane to be clearly identified & delineated

  PCBU
Site access/egress conflicting with traffic flow –  Access/egress area to be identified during pre-start
MEDIUM LOW  TMI
risk of vehicle collisions  Work Crews to contact TC prior to exit/entry
 TC
 Access protocol to be identified during pre-start
Safe access to worksite compromised – site   PCBU
 Work Crews to contact TC prior to exit/entry
traffic unable to exit traffic stream safely without MEDIUM LOW  TMI
 Tapers and Signage for motorist direction & Warning
compromising workers on site.  TC
 PCBU & TMI to conduct site drive through prior to pre-start
to evaluate site conditions
 PCBU & TMI to communicate with any adjacent worksite
Excessive queue lengths or delays due to
prior to any TC Implementation to coordinate work activities  PCBU
adjacent works – negative impact on road N/A if required  TMD
network performance or end queue collisions  TMD to be contacted & advised of situation to provide  TMI
guidance and support
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 PCBU to supply accurate worksite information prior to
Excessive worksite length or amount of work
design  TMD
areas – negative impact on network performance MEDIUM LOW
 TMD assessment of worksite & suitable design  TMI
/ excessive delays.  Worksite kept to minimum lengths required
  Prior notification to residents of upcoming works
Compromised access to adjoining properties –
 TMD to prescribe access egress controls on TGS or site   TMD
restricted access causing loss of business or LOW LOW
operation  TMI
personal access.  Adequate staff to be allocated to manage residential access
 Existing infrastructure for vulnerable road users to be  PCBU
Vulnerable road users unable to pass site safely
maintained at all times.  TMD
on existing pathways – Vulnerable users at risk of LOW LOW
 Traffic Controllers to assist with safe thoroughfare as  TMI
conflict with vehicular traffic. required.  All TC’s
 Prior notification to residents of work  PCBU
Detours for vulnerable road users too long
 TMD to prescribe access egress controls on TGS or site  TMD
creating unnecessary impact – risk of physical or MEDIUM LOW
operation documents  TMI
emotional distress to user.  Adequate staff to be allocated to manage safe thoroughfare  TC
Unfamiliar or illegible paths used for vulnerable  PCBU
 Alternate routes to be adequately delineated and signed to
road user detours – Users at risk of misdirection MEDIUM LOW  TMD
ensure ease of use
from guidance.  TMI
Surfaces not adequate for prams, wheelchairs,  PCBU
 Provisions provided to be to the same standard as existing
elderly, and school children – Users at risk of N/A  TMD
facilities to ensure safe access for all users
slips, trips & falls.  TMI
  Work scheduled to minimise impact
 Suitable alternative to be designed into worksite setup by  PCBU
Safe school crossing practices compromised by
TMD  TMD
works – Users at risk of exposure to vehicular N/A
 Appropriate warning signage to be erected on approach’s  TMI
traffic.  Additional staff where required to assist with safe  All TC’s
thoroughfare
 Work scheduled to minimise impact to network  PCBU
 Temporary stops/routes to be implemented as approved by
Bus stops or routes within work area – public  TMD
N/A network administrator
transport services interrupted  Advance notice to patrons of disruptions
 TMI
 Additional staff as required to manage diversions  TC
Inadequate Lane widths or turning availability for MEDIUM  Lane widths to be maintained where practicable or LOW  PCBU
oversize/over dimension vehicles – worksite alternative routes utilised  TMD
intrusion / TTM device destruction & network  Swept path to be conducted where required to determine  TMI
blockages. suitability of proposed design  TC
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
 Approval and advance notification of detours
 Conflict points identified on TMP/TGS and discussed at pre-
start
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 PCBU
 Emergency services to be notified of works prior to works
Delays to emergency services travelling through  TMD
MEDIUM  Emergency Service vehicles will ALWAYS have priority LOW
the site – negative impact on response times  TMI
through worksite
 TC
 Traffic impact assessment to be conducted prior to selecting
Volume of detoured traffic having an
option  PCBU
unacceptable impact on surrounding areas - risk MEDIUM LOW
 Detours to be designed to prevent vehicle crossovers  TMD
of network blockages. causing delays (i.e., left turn only routes)
 Designer to ensure suitable advance warning & delineation
Removal of options for road users (Lane /Road guidance prior to works  PCBU
Closures) – Risk of driver frustration & non- MEDIUM  Clear signage for road users to see lane closure LOW  TMD
compliance and/or misdirection.  Regular signage checks  TMI

 Designs to include advance warning

 PCBU
Compromised legibility of traffic control devices  Routes to be clearly signed
 TMD
for road users – Risk of trafficable path deviations MEDIUM  Equipment checks to be conducted prior to deployment LOW
 Assets Team
& site intrusion.  Regular sign/device checks
 TMI

Site distance or visibility compromised on  TMD to be consulted if signs need to be adjusted outside of
 PCBU
approach for road users due to signage tolerances due to visibility
MEDIUM LOW  TMD
placement – inappropriate driver reactions or  Regular sign/device checks
 TMI
non-compliance.
 Ensure signage does not conflict with permanent posted
Conflict in signage compromising legibility of  PCBU
signage
worksite - inappropriate driver reactions or non- MEDIUM  Conflicting signs to be covered or removed
LOW  TMD
compliance.  TMI
 Regular sign/device checks
 Designer to assess appropriate speed options (implement
reduction if required)
  Ensure traffic control sign & devices are clearly visible to all  PCBU
Road users traveling at inappropriate speeds for road users  TMI
works undertaken – risk of accident-causing MEDIUM  Vehicles, Workers & TC’s located clear of travel path LOW  TMD
injury, property damage or death.  TC
 All TC’s
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
Works incorrectly scheduled (traffic volumes not  PCBU & TMD to assess work method options
 PCBU
considered) – negative impact to network MEDIUM  Confirm suitable times with asset owner LOW
 TMD
operations / network blockages.  Work scheduled to reduce impact on network
Incorrectly trained/non-accredited staff – work  Evidence of competency to be verified  PCBU
site non-compliance resulting in injury, property MEDIUM  Work inductions to be completed LOW  Op’s Team
damage or death.  Work pre-start meeting to be conducted  TMI
 Fit for Duty check conducted at pre-start  PCBU
Staff fatigue - work site non-compliance resulting
MEDIUM  Welfare checks during shift LOW  Op’s Team
in injury, property damage or death
 Adequate staff allocated for daily tasks  TMI
Incorrect P.P.E. for shift (inc. adequate food &  PCBU
water) – dehydration/starvation/sun protection LOW  PPE checks prior to & throughout shift LOW  Op’s Team
leading to fatigue.  TMI
 PCBU
 Designer to generate manifest for Op’s & Assets Teams
Incorrect signage & devices – non-compliant  TMD
MEDIUM  Vehicle stock confirmed & loaded LOW
worksite establishment and management.  Op’s Team
 TMI to check available resources prior to implementation
 TMI
Application of incorrect or expired
 Correct specifications to be confirmed prior to design  PCBU
specifications, standards, rules and LOW LOW
 Suitability reviews prior to submission  TMD
policies
Older works contractually governed by
 Specifications to be confirmed with PCBU by TMD prior to  PCBU
older standards, roles, LOW LOW
design  TMD
specifications and/or policies
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
OTHER. (Residual Risks to be assessed on site by PCBU representative & TMI at pre-start)
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
OPTION
Side-track (Around)
Contraflow (Around)
Detour (Around)
Traffic through the Worksite
Traffic past the Worksite
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS
TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
Two way side-track to be constructed past the
granted for the construction of a side
work area to allow traffic to flow in both
track NOT FEASIBLE
directions. Additional access points required
 Would add additional costs to the
for side roads
project
Traffic swapped to lanes in the opposite
direction of travel with adequate  Insufficient available roadway width to
NOT POSSIBLE
delineation/separation to permit the use of a utilize option.
single side of the carriageway
 Detour required on this Concert
Affected road area to be closed with access ground event.
permitted via the use of alternative local  Detour route will be provided, and ADOPTED
roads VMS will be placed to warn motorist
about the event.
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing  Full road closure will be applied to
carriageway where work will take place with closed Gregory terrace only
NOT APPLICABLE
advance warning and speed restrictions production truck will be allowed to
imposed enter the site.
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate  Full road closure will be apply to
work areas whilst permitting flow in both closed Gregory terrace only
NOT APPLICABLE
directions under traffic control using a single production truck will be allowed to
trafficable lane enter the site.
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
OPTION
Side-track (Around)
Contraflow (Around)
Detour (Around)
Traffic through the Worksite
Traffic past the Worksite
HEAVY VEHICLE TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS
TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES
Two way side-track to be constructed past
the work area to allow traffic to flow in both
directions. Additional access points required
for side roads
Traffic swapped to lanes in the opposite
direction of travel with adequate
delineation/separation to permit the use of
a single side of the carriageway
Affected road area to be closed with access
permitted via the use of alternative local
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing
carriageway where work will take place with
advance warning and speed restrictions
imposed
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate
work areas whilst permitting flow in both
directions under traffic control using a single
trafficable lane
FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
granted for the construction of a side
track NOT FEASIBLE
 Would add additional costs to the
project
 Insufficient available roadway width to
NOT POSSIBLE
utilize option.
 Detour required on this Concert
ground event.
 Detour route will be provided, and ADOPTED
VMS will be placed to warn motorist
about the event.
 Full road closure will be applied to
closed Gregory terrace only
NOT APPLICABLE
production truck will be allowed to
enter the site.
 Full road closure will be apply to
closed Gregory terrace only
NOT APPLICABLE
production truck will be allowed to
enter the site.
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
OPTION
Side-track (Around)
Contraflow (Around)
Detour (Around)
Traffic through the Worksite
Traffic past the Worksite
PUBLIC TRANSPORT TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS
TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES
Two way side-track to be constructed past
the work area to allow traffic to flow in both
directions. Additional access points required
for side roads
Traffic swapped to lanes in the opposite
direction of travel with adequate
delineation/separation to permit the use of
a single side of the carriageway
Affected road area to be closed with access
permitted via the use of alternative local
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing
carriageway where work will take place with
advance warning and speed restrictions
imposed
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate
work areas whilst permitting flow in both
directions under traffic control using a single
trafficable lane
FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
granted for the construction of a side
track NOT FEASIBLE
 Would add additional costs to the
project
 Insufficient available roadway width to
NOT POSSIBLE
utilize option.
 Detour required on this Concert
ground event.
 Detour route will be provided, and ADOPTED
VMS will be placed to warn motorist
about the event.
 Full road closure will be applied to
closed Gregory terrace only
NOT APPLICABLE
production truck will be allowed to
enter the site.
 Full road closure will be apply to
closed Gregory terrace only
NOT APPLICABLE
production truck will be allowed to
enter the site.
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
OPTION
Side-track (Around)
Detour (Around)
Traffic through the Worksite
Traffic past the Worksite
VULNERABLE ROAD USERS TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS
TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES
Two way side-track to be constructed past
the work area to allow traffic to flow in both
directions. Additional access points required
for side roads
Affected road area to be closed with access
permitted via the use of alternative local
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing
carriageway where work will take place with
advance warning and speed restrictions
imposed
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate
work areas whilst permitting flow in both
directions under traffic control using a single
trafficable lane
FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
granted for the construction of a side
track NOT FEASIBLE
 Would add additional costs to the
project
 The existing formed footways will
NOT REQUIRED
remain accessible at all times
 Pedestrians will be required to use the
formed footway to access the closed
ADOPTED in conjunction with PAST
section of Gregory Tce which form part
of the event area.
 The existing formed footways will
ADOPTED in conjunction with THROUGH
remain accessible at all times