Professional Documents
Culture Documents
renovation
Jelena Srpčič
Abstract
In the paper a presentation of the most desirable task for the conservation expert is described: how to preserve
the old – even severely damaged – wooden structure to be incorporated into the contemporary one. Two major
steps are presented: the thorough inspection of wooden load bearing roof and floor structures with a description
of deteriorated parts, and the proposal for the further construction measures which have to take into account also
the possibility for the replacement or renovation of elements. At the end the architectural solution for
incorporation of old structures into a renewed attic is presented (at the time being the building is still under the
reconstruction).
1. INTRODUCTION
Origins of a building of Minorite monastery in Maribor dated from the 13th century whereas the
majority of building was renovated in the baroque style in the 18th century. The three storey building
was firstly used as a monastery, then as barracks (1784 – 1927) and at the end as an apartment
building. Due to poor maintenance, especially when the building was used as barracks and for
housing, it was in a quite bad shape. Several “ad hoc” renovations have been performed in last 50
years and after a very long period of discussions is has been decided that the building as a historical
monument has to be preserved. Also the purpose of the building was defined: after a complete
renovation it will be a puppet theatre. Although the degradation of major wooden building parts has
been noticed, the wish of the investor and – above all – of the architect, was to maintain at least some
parts and to include them into the modern structure.
Figure 1 - Views to the east wing (tower) and the western façade of the
monastery during a reconstruction.
The walls of the building are made from stone and masonry. The floor structures above the cellar and
ground floor are stone and mason arches, and the floors above upper storeys are made from timber.
The timber roof is, according to the data obtained, over 200 years old. The roof structures in all wings
are symmetric and non-symmetric trapezoid suspended frames lying on the outer walls.
The main structural frames on the distances 4 – 5 m, carry ridge poles, rafters, and purloins. The
building is covered with clay roof tiles.
There are two types of floor structures: above the first floor mainly massive timber floors are installed
with beams adjacent one to another. Above the second floor some of the floors are massive and some
are hollow (beams on the distances ca 0.8 – 1.0 m, closed at the bottom and the top with planks).
Figure 3 - Typical timber roof beams and massive floors in the attics.
But after a first assessment we began with the thorough visual inspection and our impression changed.
When checking structural elements, we concentrated to the points, where deterioration is expected:
supports, roof–valley elements, gutters, etc. We paid attention also on signs of biological attack
(presence of mould or wooden dust, which indicates an attack of wood fungi and insects). All findings
were documented with photos and the problematic spots were marked also on drawings. The text with
a description of findings, drawings with elaborated suggestions for replacement/strengthening of
particular elements and comprehensive photo-documentation were assembled into the final report.
The same procedure was performed also on floor structures.
Figure 4 - Typical floor structures: massive and hollow timber floors.
Figure 5 - Destroyed parts in the bottom of gutter valleys due to fungi attack.
Heavy damage has been noticed on the edge of the roof slope in the SE tower: although lower parts of
the roof have been replaced by new cover, the supporting elements are still deteriorated and closing
elements are missing. The combined attack of fungi and insects was spotted.
In the tower the most problematic element was one main beam (span 12 m) with completely destroyed
lower chord due to the attack of wood destroying fungi. The part was temporary replaced by the new
elements but a frame was unable to carry the load and it deformed substantially. The deformation of
structure has been visible also from the outside on the roof planes. A reason of destruction was
probably a constant leaking of the roof at the ridge (the adjacent longitudinal tie element was
destroyed, too).
Figure 7 - Wood in the lower chord of the main frame and in the
longitudinal tie beam completely destroyed.
Because of these damaged elements the rearrangement of loads occurred. The load from the roof was
taken by the floor structures which have not been designed for that. To the addition, some parts of the
floors were completely destroyed on the supports and needed to be replaced. Heavy damage, the
complicated replacements of the floors and deformed roof structure were the reason that the complete
replacement of all timber structures in the tower was proposed.
In the eastern wing the damage due to insect attack (Hylotrupes bajulus) was spotted, too. It was the
part constructed later (and probably with the less quality wood). Not only elements at roof edges and
in connecting gutter valleys, but also elements in the dry surroundings were heavily damaged mostly
by house capricorn (Hylotrupes bajulus).
In the attics massive floor structures were in some parts completely destroyed (damaged wood on the
supports was seen also in the rooms bellow). On the other hand some parts are assessed to be strong
enough to remain installed. The hollow floors are most problematic in the SE tower: beams are
completely destroyed and temporary supported; as we already mentioned, they have to be replaced.
Figure 10 - Floors in the attics: brown rot on the supports, complete destruction of beams.
Figure 11 - The old roof beams will be installed in the lecture room and the scenery
preparation room.
5. CONCLUSION
After the inspection and assessment performed we can say that the major task was to choose which
parts should be preserved and which replaced. This assessment included not only the selection of
damaged parts but also recognizing the possibilities of partly replacements of elements. The
experienced specialist who is able to recognize wood degrading agents and the level of wood
degradation, but also has the knowledge of construction measures, is very valuable. For the
replacement of the parts of load bearing structures, the possibility of the supporting the remaining
parts should be taken into account.
References
1. Pecenko, G. (1987): Timber Protection in Practice, Wooden library 20, Union of Slovenian Forestry
and Wood Technology Engineers and Technicians, Ljubljana (in Slovene)
2. Srpcic, J. (2000): Deterioration and deficiencies of old timber roof structures, Wood and wooden
structures: Maintenance and re–strengthening of materials and structures. Freiburg: Aedificatio
Publishers, pp. 35–46.
3. Srpcic, J. (2008): Report Nr. 105/08-640-1 on inspection and assessment of the timber roof structure
and timber floors in the building of Minorite monastery in Maribor, 51 p. (in Slovene).
4. Znidarsic. R. and others (2004-2007): Design on the renovation of Minorite Monastery in Maribor
(drawings)