ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY

Art Appreciation
1st Semester, AY 2021-2022
Performance-based Summative Test
Part A- Soulmaking; B- Art Talk (embedded)
Professor :Jose Marie E. Ocdenaria, LPT, PhD
Outcome :The students shall be able to create and showcase a soulmaking (art expression)
presentation through a video.
PART A & B. General Description of Soulmaking (Art Expression) Presentation (Individual)
The students will create a video presentation showing their soul (expression) in a form of an art.
Guidelines:
(NOTE: Review first what Art Expression/Soulmaking is all about)
(1) Each student will choose their art form (self-expression in a form of an art).
(2) Each student can choose one, two or more art forms combined. One art form is also appreciated.
(3) The soulmaking presentation shall be recorded in a video format (.avi/.mp4).
(4) The video presentation must be in a minimum of 6 minutes and 30 seconds; and a maximum of 7
minutes.
(5) Video size: 500mb or less
(6) The video must have the following parts:
- Introduction (about yourself and the art) – FACE must be visible
- Body of your art expression (perform your ART)
- End (brief discussion of your ART and relate it to any topics of ARTAPP)
- Post-ending part (TWO MINUTE-ART TALK-your synthesis/reflection about Art Appreciation)
- INCLUDE: A Summative Test Submitted to: Dr. Jose Marie E. Ocdenaria (ArtApp Professor)
(7) Submit your video presentation via ART APP Official Google drive (Shared Drive) on or before October
25, 2020 (Monday)-11:59pm. (In the ArtApp Summative Test folder, create your own subfolder- with
your SURNAME and FIRST NAME written in it)
(8) Do not forget to include your rubric in the folder.
(9) NOTE: STUDENT’S/PRESENTER’S FACE must be visible in the video presentation
(soulmaking and art talk).
Rubric for the Presentation (Maximum score: 100; Lowest Possible score: 40/100)
Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
CRITERIA
(10pts) (8pts) (6pts) (4pts)
An advanced use of and combination Good use of and combination of Acceptable use of art Lacks evidence of
Elements & of art elements and principles that art elements and principles that elements and principles thoughtful use of
Principles of seamlessly work together for the work well together for the overall but lacking harmonization elements and principles
Design/ overall design/presentation. Work design. Meeting expectations. or demonstration of with a design that looks
Presentation demonstrates a deep understanding Work demonstrates an expected planning or unplanned, rushed,
(2) and ability to manipulate these use of concepts. understanding. and/or incomplete.
concepts.
The presentation is pristine and well- Overall, the presentation is clean Minor defects may be Work includes obvious
recorded without any defects. It has a and without major defects in present but the work is deficits. Little effort
Craftsmanship
professional finish and level of detail video/audio. All areas have been acceptable. Some portions went into creating the
Neatness
that shows a pride in work. Areas considered and finished to meet of the work could have work and using
(2)
other may ignore and skip have been expectations. benefited by more information
considered. attention to detail. demonstrated.
Student was actively engaged and self- Student was mostly independently Student was somewhat Often reminded to stay
motivated. Student may have even motivated with a few social distracted from their work on task. Lack of focus
Time &
taken work home to do more than distractions. Work was mostly and had to be reminded to had a strong impact on
Management
expected or required. Student was self-driven. stay on-task. More focus project work.
focused and never distracted. would have been helpful.
Work had a novel and original Work was unique & original with Though work did include What work was done
approach to the subject. Media choices some evidence from some sample or derivative was highly derivative of
Execution,
and use coordinated seamlessly to samples/examples. Work included imagery, it did include the samples or other
Originality, &
create a compelling work of art. no direct copying from other many unique elements. student’s work. Little
Uniqueness
sources. was truly original or
(2)
unique.
Content Substantial, specific, and meaningful Specific and ample content of the Meaningful yet limited Provides no content in
(Synthesis) content of the synthesis (art talk) synthesis depthness of content the synthesis
(2)
Intense exploration of subject & Subject and media were well Subject or technique was Little depth of subject
Requirements & techniques; student exceeded most/all explored and met project not fully explored. A and technique.
Depth expectations. expectations. requirement was missing. Requirements were not
fully met.
-- End --