Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shindler's Teacher Style Matrix
Shindler's Teacher Style Matrix
Effective/
Or
Intentiona
1-style approach 2-style approach
l Facilitator Conductor
Goal: Self-directed students Goal: on-task behaviour
Motivation: internal, build sense of self- Motivation: External, positive reinforcement
efficacy Clear consequences
Clear Boundaries Builds students’ collective efficacy
Build student’ collective responsibility Answers: “what is expected?”
Answers “why are we doing this?” Short-term goals (the management should be in good
Long-term goals (may be more difficult at shape by the second week.
first, but eventually becomes self-directed. Attitude: My class
Attitude: Our Class
Ineffective
Or
3-style approach 4-style Approach
Accidental Enabler Dominator
Goal: keep students happy Goal: let students know who is boss
Motivation: Student interests Motivation: Avoid punishment
Unclear boundaries Arbitrary punishments
Students increasingly self-centred Students increasingly immune to coercion
Chaotic energy Negative Energy
Goals are vague (management problems Goals is to break students’ will (students respond out
happen early and are still happening at the of fear, but slowly increase hostility and rebellion)
end of the term). Attitude: Those students
Attitude: The students
Student
Teacher
Student Teacher
Effective/Functional
Self-directed learning
Teacher as facilitator Efforts well-orchestrated.
(Liberating-Intentional Climate) Teacher as conductor
(Conditioned-Intentional Climate)
Facilitator 1 2 Conductor
Function
Student
Power
Teacher
Centred
Centred
Function
Enabler 3 4 Dominator
Self-centred effort
Passive Leadership Repressive leadership
(Enabling-Accidental Climate) Student conformity or rebellion
(Reactive-Accidental Climate)
Ineffective/ Dysfunctional
Shindler, 2010, p26