MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee:AILEEN C. ABELLA Name of Rater: MA. SHEILA B. MULTO

Position: Teacher 2 Position: Teacher -In- Charge
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CAMARINES SUR Date of Review: February 13, 2023
Rating Period: S/Y 2022-2023

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and content within and or Inter-observer
Services Pedagogy across curriculum agreement forms done
teaching areas. through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
observation

Timeliness
2. Used a range of 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
teaching strategies Tool (COT) rating sheets
that enhance or Inter-observer
learner agreement forms done
through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
achievement in
literacy and face/ in-person classroom
numeracy skills. observation

Timeliness
3. Applied a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheets
strategies to or Inter-observer
develop critical agreement forms done
and creative through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
thinking, as well as
other higher-order observation
 thinking skills.

Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Environment classroom structure Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and Diversity to engage learners, or Inter-observer
Services of Learners individually or in agreement forms done
groups, in through on-site/ face-to-
meaningful face/ in-person classroom
exploration, observation Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Timeliness

5. Managed learner 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality

behavior Tool (COT) rating sheets
constructively by or Inter-observer
applying positive agreement forms done
and non-violent through on-site/ face-to-
discipline to ensure face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
learning-focused observation
environments.

Timeliness
6. Used 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheets
developmentally or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
learning through on-site/ face-to-
experiences to face/ in-person classroom
Efficiency
 address learners’ observation
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.

Timeliness
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheets
n implemented or Inter-observer
Services developmentally agreement forms done
sequenced through on-site/ face-to-
teaching and face/ in-person classroom
learning processes observation Efficiency
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC
enrich teaching sessions/ FGDs/
practice. meetings/ other collegial
discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
Efficiency
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs/
 meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proofs of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
9. Selected, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets
organized and used or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
teaching and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
learning resources, face/ in-person classroom
including ICT, to observation
address learning
goals. Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Assessment selected, organized Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and and used or Inter-observer
Services Reporting diagnostic, agreement forms done
formative and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
summative face/ in-person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with Timeliness
curriculum
requirements.
11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner following:
progress and ▪ Individual
achievement using Learning
 learner attainment Monitoring Plan
data. (ILMP)
▪ Peer assessment
data
▪ Sample of
learners’ outputs
with reflection/
self-assessment
▪ Progress charts/
anecdotal records
▪ Class/ e-class
Efficiency
record/ grading
sheets

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
▪ Lesson plans Timeliness
showing index of
mastery
▪ Frequency of
errors
▪ Any equivalent
ALS form/
document that
highlights the
objective (e.g.
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment
Form 2)
▪ Others (please
specify and provide
annotation)
Basic 5. Personal 12. Communicated 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
Education Growth and promptly and following:
Services Professional clearly the learners’
Development needs, progress ▪ A sample of
and achievement corrected test
paper of a learner
 to key in a learning area
stakeholders, with parent’s or
including guardian’s
parents/guardians. signature and date
of receipt
▪ Minutes of
meetings with key
stakeholders (e.g.
PTA, SGC, SPT,
CPC) with proof of
attendance
▪ Report card with
parent’s or
guardian’s
signature in all
quarters supported

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
by minutes of Efficiency
meeting
▪ Communication Timeliness
with key
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians,
co- teachers, LGU)
using various
modalities
▪ Anecdotal records
showing entries per
quarter
▪ Any equivalent ALS
form/ document that
highlights the
objective (e.g.
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment
 Form 2)
▪ Other documents
showing learners’
needs, progress
and achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders

13. Applied a 7% A reflection/ journal entry Quality

personal that highlights the
philosophy of application of a learner-
teaching that centered teaching
is learner- philosophy in the lesson
centered. plan or community work. Efficiency

Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the Quality
professional ICT Coordinator/ School
development Head/ Focal Person in
goals based charge of
Efficiency
on the e-SAT
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related
● Committee
Services works/
involvement
 activities that ● Involvement as
contribute to module/ learning
the teaching- material writer/
learning validator
process. ● Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
facilitator in the
RO/ SDO/ school-
initiated TV/Radio-
Efficiency
based instruction
● Book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/
contributorship
● Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
● Participation in
demonstration
teaching

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● Participation as
research presenter Timeliness
in a forum/
conference
● Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted
research within the
rating period

with annotation on how it

contributed to the
 teaching-learning process.

MA. SHEILA B. MULTO AILEEN C. ABELLA MARIA-MAGNOLIA F. BRIOSO, CESO VI

Rater Ratee Approving Authority