Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Causal- comparative research would allow the researcher to study the effects of
the diet if he or she could find a group of children who have already been
exposed to the diet. The researcher could then compare them with a similar
group of children who had not been exposed to the diet. Much of the research in
medicine and sociology is causal-comparative in nature. Notice that if it were
possible, a correlational study might be preferable, but that it is not appropriate
when one of the variables (in this case, the nature of the groups) is a categorical
variable.
In this research, the investigators can control the treatment (X) and then observe
the dependent variable (Y) as in experimental research, they have reasonable
evidence that X influences Y. Ex-post facto or comparative research, on the
other hand, lacks control of the independent variable and thus has lower internal
validity.
When interpreting the comparative research, one should consider alternative
explanation, such as common cause, reverse causality, and presence of other
independent variables.
a. Common Cause
Consider the possibility that both the independent variable and the dependent
variable of the study are merely two separate results of a third variable.
b. Reverse Causality
Consider the possibility of reverse causality that the reverse of the suggested
hypothesis could also account for the finding. Instead saying that X causes Y,
perhaps it is the case that Y causes X.
It is quite simple, and although the grouping variable is not manipulated, control
procedures can be exercised to improve interpretation of results.
1. Design and procedures, selecting two groups that differ on some variable of
interest and comparing them on some dependent variable.
2. Control procedures
In this part, control procedures have three control techniques: matching,
comparing homogeneous group or subgroups, and analysis of covariance.