Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chemical Thermodynamics
Chemical Thermodynamics
Non-ideal solutions
The concept
of activity
7.1
the equation 4; ( ) + RTIn (Section
=
x,
For many real solutions .1) does
the solvent, and the expression
which corresponds to OS
not hold for
6.10), 4, 4S)+ RTinx, also fails to hold for
=
Henry's
the sol.ys
Law (Section
Such circumstances it is convenient to introduce the concept of actinit
We
may wite
A +RTIna.
This equation defines the activity 4 of component i in terms of its chemical
potential in the solution and in the standard state. This activity may be
regarded as the effective concentration of component i relative to its standard
state. (Activity is defined only in so far as the standard state to which it relers
is also specified.) The effective concentration may, in a real solution, difer
greatly from the true concentration as a result of the interactions between the
molecules. The extent to which this is so is measured by the activity coefficient
Effective concentration
Real concentration
uncir vapour pressures are less than those predicted by the law). Writing the
cquations for the chemical potential of one component both in the soluuon
and in the
vapour phase,
HB)= H(g) + RTIn(P,/atm) (Section 4.10),
4,(soln) =
u) + RTln a.
Now
) (g)+ RTIn(P? /atm) (Section 6.1),
as the
pure liquid i must ated
be in equilibrium with its vapour at u*
Vapour pressure/mm Hg
09
2.
106 Non-ideal solutions
330
Two phases
320
0 20 40 60
Percentage phenol
Fig. 7.2. Partial miscibility of phenol-water mixtures as a function of temnerai, .
ature.
strongly from Raoult's Law in a positive manner, and separates into twa
phases as illustrated in Fig. 7.2.
(soln) =
°() + RTIn xid
thus
x
a =
and y =
1. For the solutions which deviate from
Xid/x. ideality y a/x
=
7.3 Activity in
aqueous solutions
Many chemical experiments are carried out in
important to be able aqueous solutions and it is
to define activities in these
Standard state we have used so far
circumstances. However, the
-the
pure liquid at one atmosphere
pressure-is
ons in
singularly inappropriate. We usually wish to
molality (moles per express concentra
a SOdium chloride, the kilogram solvent) and for
of
electrolyte, such
an
pure-liquid state at room
suitable reference state. temperature S not a
tne solute follows Henry's Law (Section 6.10),
dy the case when the solution is very dilute and4, we u? + asRT|ln x,. This
=
P Standard state p
Henry's Law
0 mole fraction x,
Fig. 7.3. Definition of a standard state for a solute, based on Henry's Law
+ RTIn m
H mol kg T
and for a non-ideal solution
i 4 + RTln a
+ R7Tln m
mol kg
Now 4 is the chemical potential of an ion in a (hypothetical) solution of unit
molality which behaves like a solution of infinite dilution (where , = 1,
I mol
m, =
kg"', and 4 =
H).
Including the dimensions of molality makes the resulting equations clumsy
and for this chapter we will adopt a simplifying convention that takes m to
+RTin a
must be modified when we apply the concept of activity to the electrolyteasa
au Cnioride is essentially fully dissociated (NaCl Na" +C
Activity in
aqueous solutions 109
Lation, We can only deal with the
in aqueous so,
overall activity
in
of determining aNa. and aNaci as we
haveno way
would
a independently. As each of the
have nobeexpected to follow Henry's Law independently, the total chemical
ions
can be written
potential
Htotal4Na + &- + RT In ana t+ RT Inac
If we define the overall activity by the equation
otalNa +-+ RT In aNaCI
by compar1ng these equations that
we can see
aNaCIaNa .Gci
and
aNaCI ?Na mNa .Vci- mcI
ma mcI = m the molality of the solution.
We can define a mean 1onic
activity coefticient y+ by
Y(7NaVc-)
Then
aNaCI(7+m)*.
Indilute solutions, where y, 1 , aNacI will be directly proportional to m.
This is illustrated in Fig. 7.4. When the
electrolyte is more complex the
definition of overall activity must be modified accordingly:
for M,A,pM* + qA. aMpAg(aM.(a -)
and
P+ =
(M P(yA-Y.
NaCI
Standard state
1-0
10
m2
Fig.7.4 Detinitie of a standard state for a 1:1 electrolyte based on Henry's Law
n
110 Non-ideal solutions
different from those
Remember, both y, and a, are based
apure-li
standard state. The relerence state has changed and a, and
are
relative to that state. Strictly, in order to define the different activities
pure-liqui
three cquations
defined
should write the we
(x, =
1)+ RTin a, (see Section 7.1)
A =
)+ RTIn a,,
4=°(x,
=
and
1) + RTIn a.
4S (m,
=
4 =
(Section 7.2), where the standard state is one of unit molality which behaves
as if it were at infinite dilution. Let us consider the simplified equilibrium
AB
mA
HA = # + RTin a = + RTln 7A mA
K = 9M BK
VA mA A
where K, is the
not an equilibrium constant expressed in terms of
exact constant
and is equal to molalities. This is
both reactants
and products K, only when y 7a 1, that is when = =
InK.]
OT "
AH
RT?
JHe is the difference in enthalpy between the products and reactants in
their
ctandard states for one mole of reaction. For systems not at equilibrium the
hange in free energy for a mole of reaction, all concentrations being
maintained constant is, as before,
AG, the so-called reaction free energy, is (OG where is the extent of
reaction (Section 4.11).
An important case of equilibrium in ionic solutions is the
sparingly soluble salt, for example, silver chloride solubility of a
Ag.C = K,.
K, =
('As Yc )mAmer
n e salt Is only slightly soluble the activity coefficients will be close to unity,
thus
K, = mAg Mc m
making the zinc electrode the zinc to form ions and mixing too rapidly. The
end to to give
gain electrons andnegative. Conversely,
the
up electrons
reaction is be copper ions in
deposited as metallic solution
copper. The overall
Zn +Cu* - Cu
n the external circuit + Zn**.
from the the flow of
negative zinc. electrons is to the
tSee Atkins positive copper
Physical electroule
chemistry, fourth edition, (Chantu
Electrochemical cells| 113
Zn Cu
inert electrolyte
Zn +* Cu
Zn Zn **
+ 2e C u + 2e » Cu
Fig. 7.5. A simple electrochemical cell.
The maximum electrical work done by such a cell is equal to the product of
charge flowing and the potential difference across which it flows. The
work done on the cell is
nNAe
GTE NA is Avogadro's number, - e is the charge on the electron and n is
m b e r of moles of electrons transferred per mole of reaction. The
Prauct NAe, the magnitude of the total charge of a mole of electrons, 1s
caled the Faraday and written F. Thus
W - nFE.
For thedction
reacti we have considered, two electrons are transferred from the
zinc to the
nfinitely
If the cell copPP for under
sorked reversible
a mole
conditions
of reaction and so (that
n is,2. the current is drawn
=
AG = nFE
tTo do this
* a l C.m.f. must be applied to balance the e.m.f. of the cell
114 Non-ideal solutions
where AG' is the reaction free energy. (If the reaction were
significant extent the concentrations of the electrolytes w
AB
AG =
AG° + RTln(a,/a^).
SO
nFE = -
nFE° + RTIn(ag/a),
or
E =E° -
(RT/nF) In (a,/a,).
For a more general cell reaction
aA + hB/L + mM
we would obtain
E 0 and RT
E°=InK,.
n ink,,
where K, is the
other equilibrium constant of the cell reaction. The
thermodynamic quantities can be obtained
AG =- nFE.
changes in
from the equation
As
as = (AG)]
(Section 4.4),
s -(7
and
AH' =
AG' + TAS' =
nFE +| (OE
0TnFT
Standard electrode potentials 115
|
h ep r i m e s
te that the AH' and AS' reler to a mole of reaction carried
i n d i c a t e
o u t
as
The
absorption chemical cell
rochemical cell provides a very powerful way of determining
stants and the changes in thermodynamic properties accom
quilib in solution.1
reactions
Oanying
Example
AglAgCls)HCl{aq)}Hg,Cl,|Hg
AQ471 V at 288 K and 0.0489 V at 308 K. Use this information to estimate AG, AS,
is 0.0
the cell reaction
and AH for
2Ag + Hg,CI, 2AgCl + 2Hg at 298 K.
The value of the e.m.f. at 298 K is taken as the mean of the values given, that is
0.0455 V. Then
8.78 kJmol
0.0489 0.0421\
AS = n A T = 2 x 96500
20 K'mol
65.6J K'mol
AH AG + TAS = 10.76 kJ mol".
The negative value of AG results from the favourable entropy change that accom
panies the reaction.
Pt M
Salt bridge
M' (a = 1)
H (a =
1)
a hydrogen electrode set up to determine
Electrochemical cell ith
Fia. 7.6.
e l e c t r o d e potential
of element M.
Zn (a = 1) Cu++(a = 1)
Cut, Cu -+0-34
Standard
hydrogen 0-0
electrode e.m.f. of cell
Z n , Zn -0-76
Cut + 2e Cu.
The e.m.f. of a cell with zinc and copper electrodes as in Fig. 7.7 can be
calculated from a knowledge of the standard electrode potentials of these
The standard e.m.f. of the cell is the difference between the standard
iements.
electrode potentials:
E°= Eh.s. - EShs, = 0.34 - ( -0.76) = + 1.10 V.
1 L
1 1
Standard electrode potentials 119
E =E-RFa
reduced states. In the
of the oxidized and
the activities
and ag are
a the electrode
where
as Zn and
Cu one of the states is simply
such
solution containing both Fe2
of metals and
case not be so. If a
This need
material itself. platinum electrode, an
contact with an unreactive
into
Fe3+ ions is brought reaction
e.m.f. is set up
owing to the
Fe +e=Fe3*.
a standard
electrode (relative to
to this
may be applied
The Nernst equation
as before:
electrode)
hydrogen
RT aFe
E = E°
aFe
E° is found to
be +0.77 V.
In this case
In a solution
in which the Calculate
the
Cpectively. spectively.
the solubility + e
is AgCUs)
electrode
Ag
ction at the AgC1, Ag
the reaction
Ciectrochemical cell
in which
+ 2Ag(s) 273 K.
2AgCl{s)
- ZnCl,(aq) 1.015 V at
one
Zn(s)+ and
298 K accompanying
V at
1.055 enthalpy
of
and the
e.m.f.
Occurs has a standard
Gibbs free
energy
a
Estimate the changes in
nole of the cell reaction at 298 K.