You are on page 1of 4

Readings In Philippine Lesson 1

History
HISTORY SUBJECTIVE NATURE OF HISTORY

 study and interpretation by a historian  Historians can be subjective sometimes (can


on the data and other source of the past be influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or
human activity, people, societies and opinions).
civilizations leading to the present day.  Different point of views can result to the
subjective nature of history.
CONCEPT OF HISTORY
HISTORIOGRAPHY
 Based on past events.
 Interpreted by someone usually by  Is the study of how history was written, by
historian. whom and why it was recorded as such.
 Rely on data and documents which  It is concerned with how historians have
historian call as historical sources. presented history.
 The study of historical writing – how and
HISTORY’S SUBJECT MATTER
why historical accounts and perspectives
 The subject matter of history is the life of have changed over time.
people and humanity.  Interpretation about the past can be objective
 The word History greek word “History” – or true as long as they are free of inherent
Inquiry contradictions, are not contrary to the laws of
 denotes asking question or investigation nature and are based on actual remains
of the past done by person trained to do from the time period referred to.
so or by persons who are interested in  There should also a scientific discourse
human past. among historians on a particular
controversial event.
HISTORY AND HISTORIAN  One big advantage of historiography is that
 Historian – an expert or student of the liars of history are usually quite
history, especially of that particular transparent.
period, geographical period or social  Another way for a historian to be objective is
phenomenon to follow the historical method. It is the
core protocols historians’ use for handling
DUTIES OF HISTORIAN sources.
 An objective historian must verify sources,
 seek not only historical evidence and
to date them, locate the place of origin and
facts but also to interpret these facts.
identify their intended functions.
 also gives meaning to these facts and
organizes them chronologically.
SOURCES OF HISTORY
 A person who must be able to recognize
 Primary
the evidence, decide how useful it is and
 Secondary
come to conclusion based on what he has
 Tertiary
found out.
 In reconstructing the past, a historian can
be subjective (biased or opinionated)
PRIMARY SOURCES
Lesson 2
 A primary source is a testimony of an
individual who was a participant in or a HISTORICAL CRITICISM
direct witness to the event that is being
 Also known as the historical-critical method
described.
 A branch of criticism that investigates the
 Categories of Primary Sources:
origin of text or source in order to
 Written sources
understand the word behind the text.
 Numerical records
 Oral statements  has also often sought answers to the ever-
 Relics elusive question of what is called ‘’authorial
 Diaries and Journals intent’’: What did the author intend for this
 Eyewitness accounts text to mean in his or her time and place?
 Speeches GOAL OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM
 Essays by persons expressing his own view
 The primary goal of historical criticism is to
SECONDARY SOURCES discover the text primitive or original
 A secondary source interprets and analyzes historical context and its literal sense.
primary sources.  The secondary goal seeks establish a
 It is prepared by an individual who was not reconstruction of historical situation of the
direct witness to an event, but author and recipients of the text.
not who obtained his or her description of
the event from someone else.  ANSWERS ABOUT THE TEXT SUCH AS:
 Secondary sources may have pictures, votes  who wrote it?
or graphics of primary sources in them.  when was it written?
 what else happening at the time of its
 Types of Secondary Sources:
writing?
 Textbooks
 how did it come to be in the form we have it
 Printed materials
today?
 Biographies
 what did it mean to the people who first read
 Encyclopedia
or heard it?
 Magazine
EXTERNAL CRITICISM
TERTIARY SOURCES
 This type of criticism looks for the obvious
 It provides third hand information by
sign of forgery or misrepresentation.
reporting ideas and details from secondary
source.  This type of criticism tests the authenticity of
the sources.
 An eyewitness is more reliable than
testimony at second hand, which is more  The historian also analyzes the original
reliable than hearsay or tertiary sources. manuscript; its integrity, localization and the
date it was written.
 However, this does not mean that tertiary
sources have no value, merely that they TEST OF AUTHENTICITY
include potential for an additional layer of
bias.  determine the date of document to see
 EXAMPLES OF TERTIARY SOURCES: whether it is anachronistic.
 Research  determine the author’s handwriting,
 Thesis signature or seal.
 determining the authenticity of the source is BACKGROUND OF THE
by looking for the anachronistic style DOCUMENT/PRIMARY SOURCES
 Anachronistic reference to events (too early,
 The type of primary source, how many parts
too late)
or chapter, how long is the document shall be
 Provenance or custody.
given attention.
SEMANTIC  Locate where the primary source can be
found.
 The linguistic study of meaning.  Determine also the intended audience or the
 In test semantics, it determines the meaning people the author wants to convey their ideas
of the text and words of the source. with.
HERMENEUTICS  Look for the purpose or motive of the source.

 The theory and methodology of CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE IMPORTANT


interpretation. INFORMATION FOUND IN THE DOCUMENT
 It is than interpretation or method used when  Look for corroboration between the research
immediate comprehension fails. you gather from the internet and the primary
INTERNAL CRITICISM source that your instructor has given to you.
 In order to analyze the primary source, look
 Looks for deeper or more intense study of for bias. There are two kinds of bias: either it
sources. is strongly positive (strongly in favor of) or
 Internal criticism has to do with what the strongly negative (strongly against).
document says.  Analyze the historical perspective or a point
 Investigate the content or substance of a of view a creator describe the event.
document and the author’s point of view.  Last task is to analyze the historical context
 This type of criticism tests the credibility of of the document. To determine historical
the source. context, we must look when the source is
made. Next is where was it created. Third,
TEST CREDIBILITY
what event occurred at the time
 Identification of the author.
CONTRIBUTION AND RELEVANCE OF THE
 Determine the approximate date. DOCUMENT IN UNDERSTANDING THE
 Test the ability to tell the truth. GRAND NARRATIVE OF PHILIPPINE HISTORY
 Test the willingness to tell the truth.
 Look for the cause and consequences of the
Lesson 3 
primary sources.
In this part of the analysis look also for the
BACKGROUND OF THE AUTHOR/CREATOR turning point or dramatic moment of change
that was cause by the event or primary
 The researcher must provide brief source.
biographical sketch of the author or
creator the primary source. RELEVANCE OF THE DOCUMENTS TO THE
 Example/s: PRESENT TIME
 Age  Look for the historical significance or what
 Family background modern people consider to be important from
 Educational attainment the past.
 Religion  How to determine significance of the event?
NAME:
 Novelty – something is new or never been
seen before.
 Applicability – when it is similar to the
present.
 Memory – how it has been remembered over
time.
 Effect – how people have been affected
Notes:
Baka kulang don sa may course rationale (lesson 3)

You might also like