study and interpretation by a historian Historians can be subjective sometimes (can
on the data and other source of the past be influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or human activity, people, societies and opinions). civilizations leading to the present day. Different point of views can result to the subjective nature of history. CONCEPT OF HISTORY HISTORIOGRAPHY Based on past events. Interpreted by someone usually by Is the study of how history was written, by historian. whom and why it was recorded as such. Rely on data and documents which It is concerned with how historians have historian call as historical sources. presented history. The study of historical writing – how and HISTORY’S SUBJECT MATTER why historical accounts and perspectives The subject matter of history is the life of have changed over time. people and humanity. Interpretation about the past can be objective The word History greek word “History” – or true as long as they are free of inherent Inquiry contradictions, are not contrary to the laws of denotes asking question or investigation nature and are based on actual remains of the past done by person trained to do from the time period referred to. so or by persons who are interested in There should also a scientific discourse human past. among historians on a particular controversial event. HISTORY AND HISTORIAN One big advantage of historiography is that Historian – an expert or student of the liars of history are usually quite history, especially of that particular transparent. period, geographical period or social Another way for a historian to be objective is phenomenon to follow the historical method. It is the core protocols historians’ use for handling DUTIES OF HISTORIAN sources. An objective historian must verify sources, seek not only historical evidence and to date them, locate the place of origin and facts but also to interpret these facts. identify their intended functions. also gives meaning to these facts and organizes them chronologically. SOURCES OF HISTORY A person who must be able to recognize Primary the evidence, decide how useful it is and Secondary come to conclusion based on what he has Tertiary found out. In reconstructing the past, a historian can be subjective (biased or opinionated) PRIMARY SOURCES Lesson 2 A primary source is a testimony of an individual who was a participant in or a HISTORICAL CRITICISM direct witness to the event that is being Also known as the historical-critical method described. A branch of criticism that investigates the Categories of Primary Sources: origin of text or source in order to Written sources understand the word behind the text. Numerical records Oral statements has also often sought answers to the ever- Relics elusive question of what is called ‘’authorial Diaries and Journals intent’’: What did the author intend for this Eyewitness accounts text to mean in his or her time and place? Speeches GOAL OF HISTORICAL CRITICISM Essays by persons expressing his own view The primary goal of historical criticism is to SECONDARY SOURCES discover the text primitive or original A secondary source interprets and analyzes historical context and its literal sense. primary sources. The secondary goal seeks establish a It is prepared by an individual who was not reconstruction of historical situation of the direct witness to an event, but author and recipients of the text. not who obtained his or her description of the event from someone else. ANSWERS ABOUT THE TEXT SUCH AS: Secondary sources may have pictures, votes who wrote it? or graphics of primary sources in them. when was it written? what else happening at the time of its Types of Secondary Sources: writing? Textbooks how did it come to be in the form we have it Printed materials today? Biographies what did it mean to the people who first read Encyclopedia or heard it? Magazine EXTERNAL CRITICISM TERTIARY SOURCES This type of criticism looks for the obvious It provides third hand information by sign of forgery or misrepresentation. reporting ideas and details from secondary source. This type of criticism tests the authenticity of the sources. An eyewitness is more reliable than testimony at second hand, which is more The historian also analyzes the original reliable than hearsay or tertiary sources. manuscript; its integrity, localization and the date it was written. However, this does not mean that tertiary sources have no value, merely that they TEST OF AUTHENTICITY include potential for an additional layer of bias. determine the date of document to see EXAMPLES OF TERTIARY SOURCES: whether it is anachronistic. Research determine the author’s handwriting, Thesis signature or seal. determining the authenticity of the source is BACKGROUND OF THE by looking for the anachronistic style DOCUMENT/PRIMARY SOURCES Anachronistic reference to events (too early, The type of primary source, how many parts too late) or chapter, how long is the document shall be Provenance or custody. given attention. SEMANTIC Locate where the primary source can be found. The linguistic study of meaning. Determine also the intended audience or the In test semantics, it determines the meaning people the author wants to convey their ideas of the text and words of the source. with. HERMENEUTICS Look for the purpose or motive of the source.
The theory and methodology of CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE IMPORTANT
interpretation. INFORMATION FOUND IN THE DOCUMENT It is than interpretation or method used when Look for corroboration between the research immediate comprehension fails. you gather from the internet and the primary INTERNAL CRITICISM source that your instructor has given to you. In order to analyze the primary source, look Looks for deeper or more intense study of for bias. There are two kinds of bias: either it sources. is strongly positive (strongly in favor of) or Internal criticism has to do with what the strongly negative (strongly against). document says. Analyze the historical perspective or a point Investigate the content or substance of a of view a creator describe the event. document and the author’s point of view. Last task is to analyze the historical context This type of criticism tests the credibility of of the document. To determine historical the source. context, we must look when the source is made. Next is where was it created. Third, TEST CREDIBILITY what event occurred at the time Identification of the author. CONTRIBUTION AND RELEVANCE OF THE Determine the approximate date. DOCUMENT IN UNDERSTANDING THE Test the ability to tell the truth. GRAND NARRATIVE OF PHILIPPINE HISTORY Test the willingness to tell the truth. Look for the cause and consequences of the Lesson 3 primary sources. In this part of the analysis look also for the BACKGROUND OF THE AUTHOR/CREATOR turning point or dramatic moment of change that was cause by the event or primary The researcher must provide brief source. biographical sketch of the author or creator the primary source. RELEVANCE OF THE DOCUMENTS TO THE Example/s: PRESENT TIME Age Look for the historical significance or what Family background modern people consider to be important from Educational attainment the past. Religion How to determine significance of the event? NAME: Novelty – something is new or never been seen before. Applicability – when it is similar to the present. Memory – how it has been remembered over time. Effect – how people have been affected Notes: Baka kulang don sa may course rationale (lesson 3)