LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

Academic Task-2
Mittal School of Business

Name of the faculty member: P B Narendra Kiran

Course Code: MGN904 Course Title: Leadership Development

Class: B.Tech Semester: II Section: DOE03 & EOE05

Max. Marks: 30 Task Performance : Group-wise

Date of Allotment: 25.02.2023 Date of Submission of written report: 11.03.2023

Start of Presentation date: 13.03.2023 to 22.03.2023

S. Objectives of Expected
Academic Topic Details Evaluation Parameters
No outcomes
Activity

To build the Students are divided into The student has to analyze
1. ability groups. The assigned group Students will
the leadership traits of the
to review the students will select one judge selected judge. (Marks- 5)also be able to
traits from the “shark tank” and will elaborate upon
of a leader. evaluate his/her leadership Identify what traits make their learning
traits. Also, they will identify them competent to become and
the specific traits which make part of the Shark tank. understanding
them become part of the shark (Marks- 10) of the concepts
tank. The task will follow by covered.
the viva. Presentation: (Marks-15)
(Confidence &
Communication-5,
OR Knowledge &
authenticity-5,
MOOC: LEADERSHIP AND
Cross Questioning-5)
TEAM EFFECTIVENESS

NOTE:
1. The Font style should be Times New Roman.
2. The Font Size for Headings and the Body should be 14 and 12 respectively
3. Assignment must be uploaded on UMS only. No submission shall be accepted through any others
mediums.
4. Do not try to copy any other student’s/group’s work or cut copy paste from the internet and present it
as your original work, if found guilty, zero marks will be awarded.
5. The first page of the document to be attached is present in the annexure. That should be kept as the
first page of your report.
6. Every group has to submit one peer rating format (format attached).
 RUBRICS FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

Minimally
Exceeds the Fully Meets the Doesn’t Meet the
Criteria Meets the Rating
Standards Standards Standards
Standards
A: The student
has to analyze the Has well- Has an averagely
Has excellently Poorly
leadership traits of thought-of described the
described in Described the
the selected judge described in detail leadership
detail leadership leadership traits of
from Shark tank detail leadership traits of the
traits of the the selected leader
India. traits of the selected leader
selected leader (Judge) from the 05
selected leader (Judge) from the
(Judge) from the Shark Tank.
(Judge) from the Shark Tank.
Shark Tank.
Shark Tank.
(Marks- 5)
5 Marks 1 mark
4 Marks 3 Marks

Has excellently Has well- Has average Poorly

Identified and thought-of Identified the Identified the
B: Identify what
analyzed the Identified the leadership traits leadership traits that
traits make them
leadership traits leadership traits that make them make them
competent to
that make them that make them competent to competent to 10
become part of
competent to competent to become part of become part of the
the Shark tank.
become part of become part of the Shark tank. Shark tank.
the Shark tank the Shark tank
(Marks- 10)
.
10 Marks 8 Marks 6 Marks 4marks

Total 15

RUBRICS FOR PRESENTATION

Category 5 marks 4 marks 3 marks 2 marks 1 marks

Moderate Low Degree of No Fluency,

High Fluency, Degree of Fluency, Speech
Good Degree of
Confidence & Speech flowed Fluency, Speech appeared to
Fluency, Speech
Communiunication well. Transitions Speech was appeared to have no
was organized.
were used. somewhat have little organization
organized. organization
 Good Quality, Moderate
Every major Quality,
High Quality,
point was Some points
Every major point
supported with were Low Quality,
was well Poor Quality,
Knowledge & facts, statistics supported Lack of support
supported with Points were
authenticity and or examples, with facts and or examples
several relevant Not supported.
but the relevance statistics of was provided.
facts, statistics and
of some was Questionable
or examples.
questionable. relevance.

Few questions
answered.
Moderate Low sync
Maximum Answer was
All questions number of between
questions not to the
Cross Questioning answered questions Industry and
answered point.
answered Academic
concepts

PRESENTATION SCHEDULE

Serial Registration Roll

Name Presentation Date
No Number Number
1 12000275 Ahmad Shakib Hasib RDOE03A02

2 12017583 Ali Noori RDOE03A03

3 12000513 Kumaran M RDOE03A04 15th March

4 12001149 Gokul Prasath V RDOE03A05

5 11911765 Bugata Sudheer RDOE03A06

6 11913018 Ebrahim Adeb Ali Ghaleb RDOE03A07 15th March

7 11913511 Barre Vivekananda Reddy RDOE03A08

8 12012283 Utsav Rai RDOE03A09

1 11902817 Aazim Imtiaz Butt REOE05A02

2 11901762 Twinkle REOE05A03

3 11901768 Tummala Yagna Gopal Chowdary REOE05A05

15th March
4 11902153 Vivekananda Reddy Annapa Reddy REOE05A06

5 11902231 Adireddy Vasu REOE05A07

6 11908266 N Mouli Sharma REOE05A08

7 11904206 Ayush Raja REOE05A09

8 11904463 Mohit Rawat REOE05A10

15th March
9 11904845 Ram Krishna Pattanayak REOE05A11

10 11912592 Pothula Srikanth REOE05A12

11 12010703 Vivek Kumar Jallan REOE05A13

12 12011684 Said Shoki Said Mohamed REOE05A14

13 12013045 Peter Inyani James Mindrakole REOE05A15

16th March
14 12018201 Dennis Elihuruma Masuki REOE05A16

15 11918542 Tarak Hossain REOE05A17

16 11905789 Sanchari Mandal REOE05A18

17 12000803 Harshit Kumar REOE05A19

18 12001005 Sourav Kumar Singh REOE05A20

16th March
19 12001851 Jayesh Kumar REOE05A21

20 12010522 Seikh Atif  Aslam REOE05A22

21 12014369 Sharad Panwar REOE05A23

22 12000122 Mwabila Kasongo Josue REOE05A24

23 11900546 Arnab Bachhar REOE05A25

16th March
24 12000067 Mwamba Muloy Junior REOE05A26

25 12020177 Shubham Godara REOE05A27

26 11715808 Boiena Tarakaram Threlok REOE05A28

27 11918835 Anjani Kumar Yadav REOE05A30

28 11914827 Sangam Tirumala Raghu Vardhan REOE05A31

17th March
29 11905883 Uppala ManojKumar REOE05A32

30 11916403 Vanimireddy Uday Kumar REOE05A33

31 11913375 Ritesh Kumar REOE05A34

32 11913715 Manish Kumar Yadav REOE05A35

33 11913983 Anirudh Nawani REOE05A36

34 11914876 Veluri Rajesh Naidu REOE05A37 17th March

35 11915884 Moturu Manish Kumar REOE05A38

36 11915928 Mallela Venkata Pavan Kumar Reddy REOE05A39

37 11911565 Abhinav Pundir REOE05A40

38 11901356 Bhawna Chatterjee REOE05A41

39 11901532 Chirag Rathod REOE05A42

40 11710871 Pothana Pavan Kalyan REOE05A43

17th March
41 11904408 Komma Siva Vyshnavi Reddy REOE05A44

42 11903567 Manas Daga REOE05A45

43 11905889 Kavali  Anjaneyulu REOE05A46 17th March

44 11912414 Rajapantula Sai Likith REOE05A47

45 11712933 Yallalacheruvu Manikanta REOE05A48

46 11716601 Rohit Raj Singh REOE05A51

47 11918389 Aakansha REOE05A52

48 12000160 Md Jaber Sikder REOE05A53

49 11901933 Siddhant Rai REOE05A54 17th March

50 11911514 Nallapaneni Mahendra REOE05A55
 PEER RATING FORMAT

S.NO REGISTRATION NO. NAME PEER RATING

**RULE FOR PEER RATING

1. All the team members are required to weigh the amount and quality of work done by their peers (group
members) on a rating scale (called weight) of 1 to 10.
2. There must be a gap of at least three marks between minimum and maximum weight (W).
3. Weights must be written on the front page of the final report.
4. Reports must bear the signature of all the group members.
5. Each member’s marks will be calculated as per the formula= Weights(-)Marks/10

Annexure:1 For Students

LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

School of Faculty of

Name of the faculty member :

 Course Code: Course Title:
Academic Task No: Academic Task Title:
Date of Allotment: Date of Submission:
Student Roll No: Student Reg. No:
Term: Section:
Max. Marks Marks. Obtained:
Evaluation Parameters

Learning Outcomes: (Student to write briefly about learnings obtained from the academic tasks)

Declaration:

I declare that this Assignment is my individual work. I have not copied it from any other
students’ work or from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made
explicitly in the text, nor has any part been written for me by any other person.

Evaluation Criterion: Rubrics on different parameters

Student’ Signature:

Evaluator’s Comments (For Instructor’s use only)

General Observations Suggestions for Best part of assignment

Improvement