Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ID CODE: ◼ OBA-QAC-CDH-DES-HYD_R00
VERSION: ◼R00
NAME
AUTHOR:
DATE 24/06/2021
◼ CONTROL OF VERSIONS
VERSION: CONTROL OF CHANGES:
01
◼ TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4
1 INTRODUCTION
The Project forms part of the Connectivity Agenda of the European Union (“EU”) which promotes
transport connectivity in the Western Balkans as an important factor for the economic development,
regional cooperation and EU integration.
i. Construction Project
Project Name : Works Contract No 48446 “The Rehabilitation of Durres - Tirana Public
Transport Terminal (PTT) railway line and new railway connection to
Tirana International Airport (TIA)”
Client : Albanian Railways (HSH)
Contractor : INC S.p.A.
Commencement Date : 11 March 2021
The works under the present Contract are divided in five sections:
Section 1: DURRES - TIRANA PTT RAILWAY LINE, KP 0-639 - KP 2+000
Section 2: DURRES - TIRANA PTT RAILWAY LINE, KP 2+000 - KP 20+700
Section 3: DURRES - TIRANA PTT RAILWAY LINE, KP 20+700 - KP 33+540
Section 4: TIRANA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RAILWAY LINE AND CONNECTION
BRANCH TO DURRES.
Section 5: SIGNALLING - TELECOMAND AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOR SECTIONS
(1), (2), (3) and (4)
The railway line from Durres Terminal Station to Tirana PTT has an overall length of 34.5km. The
starting point is at KP 0-639, i.e. the head on platform of Durres Terminal Station and the ending
point at KP 33+540 at the end of the Tirana PTT forestation.
The new railway link to Rinas airport has an open line length of approximately 5 km in addition to
the triangular railway intersection.
For the Elaboration of the Design for the Entire Project, Hydraulic Design it is crucial for the future
stability and safety of the Permanent Works.
2 REFERENCES
3 COMMENTS
In the document “0042-attachment Hydraulic Study Explanations and Considerations” (issue date May
2016) are explained briefly the adopted principles for the hydraulic design of the culverts at the certain
study. As it is clearly stated in the document the hydraulic design of the culverts is adapted on the
dimensions and the capacity of the existing drainage channels constructed (as stated in the document)
several decades ago, instead of calculating the design flow employing one of the commonly used
methods (rational method, unit hydrograph, etc.).
Such an approach has disadvantages which are analysed in the following paragraphs.
The design calculations of the existing old drainage system are not available and cannot be evaluated.
If the system were designed now using recent hydrology data and modern methods, it would be, as it
usually happens in such cases, larger with greater capacity. Adapting the capacity of the new culverts
to the capacity of the old existing channels will cause underestimation on design of them.
Additional to the above the new culverts of a refurbished railway are quite expensive and difficult to
modify in the future. The railway operation must be cancelled during the relevant works.
The lifetime of civil works like culverts is expected to be ~50 years (T.S 2.2.4.i). Operational or structural
failure of them after a few years is a waste of the capital investment.
In order to improve the hydraulic design of the culverts and be sure about their efficiency the following
procedure is suggested:
a. Estimate the capacity of the existing drainage channels at their intersection with the railway.
b. Calculate the peak flow employing the most proper method for each case (rational method, unit
hydrograph, etc.) for return period at least T= 50 years (T.S 2.2.4.i).
c. Choose as design flow for the culvert the greater value of the above.
The submitted reports “0042-ref Hydraulic Study Component A - 796 01 13 FD HS RWD 01 0” and
“0042-ref Hydraulic Study Component C - 796 01 13 FD HS RWD 02 0” (issue date June 2021) concern
the hydraulic study and especially hydrology, culvert design and bridge hydraulics. The two reports are
supplementary as the first concerns the Durres-Tirana railway and the second the Tirana-Airport
railway.
Both reports contain a lot of theory and methodology description about hydrology and culvert
hydraulics. The application of the presented theory and methodology on the certain study is missing.
As important omissions can be reported the following:
a. Map in proper scale (commonly used 1:50000 or 1:25000) depicting catchment areas.
b. The used IDF curve (or equation) derived from recent precipitation data.
c. Tables of the design flow calculations for each culvert according to the presented methodology.
There is only one table in the second report (p.30/50).
d. Results of hydraulic calculations for each culvert (flow depth, flow velocity, Froude nr. Etc).
Bridge hydraulic calculation concluded to the estimation of water level below the river deck. There are
not calculations and design of the required pier and abutment protection against erosion (if any).
4 CONCLUSION