Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 5:
Dynamic Behaviour of More Complicated Systems
u(s) y(s)
g(s)
(5.9)
Solution:
I. The step input of magnitude M,
II. The Laplace transform is obtained as,
III. Combining the input u(s) with g(s), we obtain
(5.10)
(5.11)
It is left as an exercise for the students how the inversion
leads to:
(5.12)
Case i:
(
Case ii:
(
Case iii:
(
Fig. 5.8: Step response of an overdamped second order system for different
values of ( , )
(5.16a)
(5.16b)
Hint (for term 3): ,
[t-shifting theorem]
Obafemi Awolowo University 8
Chemical Engineering
Transient Response of Systems with Time Delay
(5.16c)
(5.16a)
(5.16b)
(5.16d)
Fig. 5.9: Step response of a second order system to a unit step change
-2
(d) Sketch this transient response. Fig. 5.10: The doublet pulse
u(t)
1
Positive negative
step step
0
10 30
Positive t
step
-2
(5.17a)
(5.17b)
(b) (5.18a)
[t-shifting theorem]
(5.18b)
(5.18c)
(c) (5.18d)
(5.18e)
5.18f)
The common fraction to all the terms can be split into partial
fractions thus:
(5.18g)
In finding the inverse Laplace transform of (5.18f), omit the delay:
(5.18f)
(5.18g)
Using the [t-shifting theorem]
(5.18h)
(5.18i)
Time-delay systems
Whenever there is movement of material/energy from one point
to another in a processing plant, there is a transport lag
associated with the flow.
The occurrence of time delay presents some challenges in the
design of control system.
Mathematically, it is represented as:
(5.19)
(5.22)
[3] 2/2 Pade approximant
(5.23)
(5.24a)
(5.24b)
(5.24c)
(5.25b)
(5.25c)
(5.25d)
(5.25d)
Fig. 5.12: Comparison of the actual and approximate model of example 5.4
[1] A first order plus time delay (FOPTD) model in the form:
[2] A second order plus time delay (SOPTD) model in the form:
[3] Compare the normalized output responses for g(s) and the
approximate models for a unit step input.
Fig. 5.13: Comparison of the actual and approximate model of example 5.5