CBDRR 

CBDRR Program
(Community based 
disaster risk 
reduction) 

Project Summary: 
 3 pilot projects  2 0 1 1
 Each pilot project supported by 
funding around. USD 65.000  
 Total beneficiaries:  
communities in 6 municipalities 
in 3 areas  Resilient Village Development in City of Palu 
 Activity Period: 25 July 2009 –  
25 November  2010) 
  The community-based disaster re-  Potential high institutional
Main Activities:  duction programme is designed to  High population density
 Determining the project loca‐ assist the Central Government and
tion  Local Government to implement the Programs were not only supported
 Determining the implementing  5 priorities for Hyogo Framework by implementing partners and local
partners  for Action as described below: governments, it also supported by
 Formation of technical teams 
 To ensure that disaster risk re- community involvement in regional
 Implementing activities 
duction, including community- locations. In some locations there
 Monitoring and evaluation 
  based disaster risk reduction, is are also establishment of community
Field Activities:  set to be a priority in the develop- -based teams.
 Preparation  ment process in Indonesia based Photo; Water shortage in Layana Indah,
 Program Socialization  on institutional strengthening; Various strategies undertaken in the
Jambata
 Program Orientation  implementation of this program,
 To identify, study and monitor
 Capacity strengthening   there are include:
disaster risks and to improve the tation of Community-Based Disaster
 Risk, Stakeholders and Support‐ early warning system;  Improving rural community
awareness of potential threats Risk Reduction Grant Program
ing Assessment     To use knowledge, innovation and on its territory. namely:
 Formulation of disaster manage‐ education to create culture of
ment plan (DRM) and the proc‐  Reducing the vulnerability of  Community-based disaster risk
ess of integration into RPJMKel  safety and resilience at all levels; reduction undertaken by various
rural communities to reduce
 Formulation of contingency   To reduce underlying risk factors disaster risk parties is integrated in the plan-
plans  (food resilience, sustainable eco-  Increasing the capacity of rural ning and implementation of rural
 Formulation of community  system and environmental, pov- development.
action plan  communities to reduce disaster
erty reduction and et cetera); risk.  The efforts of community-based
 Implementing of community   To prepare and strengthen pre- disaster risk reduction held in line
action plan   Integrating these efforts into
paredness for disaster to build development for the sustainabil- with medium-term development
 Establishment of village DRR 
Forum   effective responses at all levels. ity. plan of the village (RPJMDes/
 Guideline of Resilient Village  Kel), supported by village regula-
Implementation   Implementation of a pilot project Expected output from the imple- tions and the development of
Community Based Disaster Risk mentation of this program are: adequate budget allocations.
Reduction (CBDRR) is the mandate  Capability of the communities of  There are a number of village
Location regulations in the implementation
of Law No. 24 of 2007 which states identifying and understanding
Yayasan Jambata   that Disaster Management is not the potentials of local villages, of community based disaster risk
(Hillside Suburb)   solely a government responsibility, existing disaster threats, vulner- reduction program.
 Layana Indah and Silae Village  but rather a shared responsibility, ability and capacity related to
Total Beneficiaries: 204 people  including communities. certain disaster threats, and of The three selected partners were
 Female : 81 people analyzing disaster risks. Realiza- NGOs: Yayasan Pendidikan Rakyat
 Male : 133 people  The long-term goal of Community- tion of the ability of communi- (YPR), Yayasan Mitra Karya Mem-
Hazard: Landslide and Earthquake  Based Disaster Risk Reduction ties to formulate and implement bangun (YMKM), and Yayasan Jam-
Grant Program is to create safer action plans for disaster risk bata (Jambata).
communities and the culture of reduction community.
YMKM   The program have a specific contribu-
safety at locations in the pilot pro-  Establishment of 1 (one) multi-
(High Density Suburb)   tion to the local government, recently
ject locations. Short-term goal stakeholder Disaster Risk Re-
 West Besusu and Ujuna Village  The Bappeda’s for the City of Palu has
CBDRR Grant Program is to support duction forum whose members
Total Beneficiaries: 106  people  recently conclude its musrenbang and
local government and provincial come from all stakeholders at
 Female : 65 people has allocated government funding
governments also the communities each pilot location
 Male : 47 people  through the City’s annual budget to
at the location of the pilot project in  Availability of Documents of
Hazard: Flooding and Earthquake  replicate the certain approaches and
demonstrating the processes of Disaster Management Plan,
community-based disaster risk re- outputs of the CBDRR pilot projects
Contingency Plan, Disaster Risk
YPR   duction and integrate it into the Reduction Action Plan at village
(Coastal Suburbs)   local development planning and level at each pilot project loca-
 Talise Village  budgeting. tion
 Lere Village   Availability of reliable measures
The criteria for an area that will
Total Beneficiaries: 359  people  for disaster risk reduction to
 Female : 140 people become the implementation of the
reduce structural vulnerability
 Male : 219 people  program was agreed as follows:
related to certain disaster
Hazard: Tsunami and Earthquake  threats
 High poverty levels
Contact Info:  High-level disaster prone In the end of program, there are
CPRU-UNDP Indonesia  High isolation level some expected conditions that can Photo: Flooding simulation in Ujuna
Menara THamrin Building Kav.8  Categories Villages be generated through the implemen- and West Besusu, YMKM
Jakarta—Indonesia
Phone: +6221.3141308
https://undp.or.id

SCDRR
Jl.Tulung Agung No.46,
Jakarta-Indonesia
Phone: +6221.570.3283
http://www.sc-drr.org
 CBDRR 
(Community based 

CBDRR Program
disaster risk 
reduction) 

Project Summary: 
 3 pilot projects 
 Each pilot project supported by  2 0 1 1
funding around. USD 65.000  
 Total beneficiaries:  
communities in 6 municipalities 
in 3 areas 
 Activity Period: 25 July 2009 –  Resilient Village Development in  City of Palu 
25 August 2010  
 
Main Activities:  YMKM : West Besusu and Ujuna   Jambata: Layana Indah and Silae  YPR: Talise  and Lere  
 Determining the project loca‐ Village   Village  Village 
tion     
 Determining the implementing  The community empowerment process The result of Disaster risk assessment Talise and Lere, the geographical con-
partners  starts with facilitating communities in Layana Indah and Silae identified ditions of the areas in the coastal bays
 Formation of technical teams  involving different interest groups in that each village has a high degree of of Palu are very vulnerable with a
 Implementing activities  each village to conduct a series of disas- risk to livelihood elements (human, variety of disasters, especially earth-
 Monitoring and evaluation  ter risk assessment using participatory environmental, economic, infrastruc- quakes and Tsunami that have a high
  disaster risk assessment. ture, social and political). The high risk in all aspects of community life.
Field Activities:  risk of disasters caused by the threat
 Preparation  Currently, Ujuna and West Besusu of floods / landslides, earthquakes At the beginning of the activities, insti-
 Program Socialization  already have their own disaster man- and Tsunami, on the other side, lack tutions face difficulties in building the
 Program Orientation  agement plans and flood contingency of knowledge, awareness, funding, preparedness of individuals, communi-
 Capacity strengthening   plan which was confirmed by decree of sectoral ego, and top-down policy was ties and local governments. And in
 Risk, Stakeholders and Support‐ each of head of village. In addition, identified as their vulnerability. In- both areas is responsive to disaster
ing Assessment    both these villages have also managed cluding lack of preparedness prac- management is still no action on miti-
 Formulation of disaster manage‐ to insert disaster risk reduction sensi- tices carried out both physical and gation and prevention. Through the
ment plan (DRM) and the proc‐ tive activities (which are a community non physical. program, nowadays both place already
ess of integration into RPJM 
initiative) into village level develop- have disaster management plan, con-
 Formulation of contingency  Now, both place already have their
plans  ment planning meeting tingency plan and community action
(musrenbangkel) documents which are own risk map, Disaster Management plan that was integrated to the govern-
 Formulation of community  Plan, Contingency plan, and commu-
action plan  submitted to the district and city level ment program.
for further process. nity action plan. They also facilitate
 Implementing of community  both village to establish DRR forum
action plan    The program also facilitate the estab-
DRR forum in each place already estab- that called KPB and also facilitate the lishment of DRR forum. The responsi-
 Establishment of village DRR  communities to integrate DRR into
Forum   lished, called Enjere Putra Disaster bilities of the forum were determined
their village planning document and
 Guideline of Resilient Village  Care Forum was formed in the village to be: coordinating DRR in their re-
Implementation   of West Besusu and Disaster Prepared- development planning meeting in the spective locations; facilitating commu-
 Reporting, monitoring and  ness Community (TASBE) in Ujuna, village (Musrenbangkel). nity discourse in formulating the CAP
evaluation  which have been confirmed by decree DRR; facilitating a discussion on a
of head of village respectively. transparent mechanism for managing
Location the funding from the SCDRR for the
Yayasan Jambata   Taking the DRR beyond mere prepar- CAP DRR; and, managing the funds as
(Hillside Suburb)   edness, Forum has implemented an well as monitoring the project activi-
 Layana Indah and Silae Village  innovative activity to mitigate flooding ties.
Total Beneficiaries: 204 people  and disease as part of the CBDRR pilot
 Female : 81 people project. As part of the agreed CAP,
 Male : 133 people  some of the funds were allocated to
Hazard: Landslide and Earthquake  purchase a garbage trolley which then Build of Bronjong in Layana
collects rubbish daily to reduce the
hazard. Number of households that
YMKM   participating in the system has grown Action Plan document in Layana
(High Density Suburb)   over the ensuing 3 months from 103 to Indah already adopt into Musren-
 West Besusu and Ujuna Village  around 250 households. bang forum such as; drainage build-
ing , Plat Deker and Gorong-Gorong
Total Beneficiaries: 106  people 
(Sewage). Earthquake Pamphlets used as campaign
 Female : 65 people Currently, both forums are managing
 Male : 47 people  community grants, each amounting to tools
Hazard: Flooding and Earthquake 
Those program was funded by Na-
Rp 117 million, for the implementation
tional Community Development Institutions and forum is also working
of community action plans. In general,
Program (PNPM). In Silae, CAP that to expand the issue to the public, the
the implemented community action
could integrate into RPJMKel are efforts to document the process and
YPR   plans include: (i) the waste control
reforestation of Weura river side disseminate it and the results was
(Coastal Suburbs)   activities as the floods trigger factor,
 funded by government of Palu City distribute to the wider community and
Talise Village  both the mechanism of management,

and Forestry Agency of Palu, training supporting the integration of DRR into
Lere Village  equipment, and processing, (ii) tree
and courses for children that drop- the co-curricular school activities.
Total Beneficiaries: 359  people  planting around the banks of the river,
out from school (informal workshop).
 Female : 140 people (iii) improving the awareness of society
 Male : 219 people  to the threat of flooding through a
Hazard: Tsunami and Earthquake  series of training and equipment sup-
ply, (iv) reduction of economic vulner-
ability, and (v) public awareness and
Contact Info:
CPRU-UNDP Indonesia
coordination with the related agency.
Menara THamrin Building Kav.8
Jakarta—Indonesia
Phone: +6221.3141308
https://undp.or.id

SCDRR
Jl.Tulung Agung No.46,
Jakarta-Indonesia
Phone: +6221.570.3283
http://www.sc-drr.org