Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar 1
Introdiction into Fundamentals of English Stylistics
Part A
1. Style and stylistics.
2. Expressive means of a language and stylistic devices.
3. Lingua-stylistics and literary stylistics.
4. Language, speech, text.
5. Styles and sublanguages.
6. Three types of subsystems (neutral, super-standard and sub-standard).
7. Three classes of linguistic units (non-specific, relatively specific and absolutely specific).
Questions:
1) What does stylistics study?
2) What is the object of stylistics?
3) What is the origin of the word ‘stylistics’?
4) What is stylistics?
5) What are the tasks of stylistics according to Galperin?
6) Give the definition of the terms “expressive means of a language” and “stylistic devices”.
7) What is the difference between them?
8) What are the meeting points and differences between linguastylistics and literary stylistics?
9) Give the definition of the word ‘language’.
10) What are the two main functions of the language?
11) What is the difference between language and speech?
12) What is text as opposed to language and speech?
13) What is text?
14) What is style?
15) What term corresponds with the term ‘sublanguage’ in manuals on stylistics written by I. Galperin and I. Arnold?
16) What is the difference between sublanguages and style?
17) What are the grounds for saying that a national lg is not a homogeneous whole?
18) How many styles do Galperin and Arnold single out?
19) How many sub-languages and styles can be singled out within a national language?
20) Why is the number of styles and sublanguages practically unlimited?
21) Give examples of synonymous sub-systems of a language.
22) What is the ultimate aim of stylistics?
23) What is stylistics in a broad sense?
24) What are the three classes of linguistic units?
25) What constitutes the central part (the common core) of all sublanguages within the national language?
26) What is the peculiarity of non-specific units?
27) What are relatively specific units as opposed to non-specific?
28) What are absolutely specific units?
29) Give examples (from morphology, vocabulary, syntax) of all the three kinds of units (non-specific, relatively specific,
absolutely specific).
4. STYLISTIC COLOURING AND STYLISTIC NEUTRALITY
Every type of speech uses its own lingual sub-systems: not all the forms comprising the national language but only a certain
number of forms.
Every sub-system consists of:
• linguistic units common to all sub-systems;
• specific linguistic units, to be found only in the given sub-system.
Every linguistic unit, along with the meaning, has its stylistic value which may be characterized as connotation (additional
meaning). The connotation of a stylistic unit is just what we think of it as belonging either to the specific sphere of a certain sub-
system or to the non-specific sphere common to all the sub-systems.
Hence, stylistic value is actualized by means of associations, namely:
• linguistic units that are used everywhere cause no definite associations with any particular type of speech. Thus, they
have no definite stylistic value and are called stylistically neutral. It does not mean that they have no connotations. Evidently
such words have so many connotations that it results in their mutual elimination (взаимная ликвидация).
• linguistic units belonging to the specific sphere of a sub-system are mentally associated with that sphere. They are
stylistically coloured. They possess a certain stylistic connotation (additional meaning). We could say that stylistically coloured
units (bookish, solemn, poetic, official and so on) have something like a label on them, a kind of ‘trade-mark” showing the place
of a given unit in the general language scheme.
Thus, we observe an opposition of stylistically coloured specific elements to stylistically neutral non-specific elements.
5. NEUTRALITY AND NORM
Many scholars define ‘style’ as deviations from the lingual norm. In their opinion what is stylistically coloured is a departure
from the norm of the given national language. They all substitute the word ‘norm’ for the word ‘neutrality’
To decide whether such a substitution is appropriate or not, we have to define ‘norm’.
Norm is generally understood as pre-established and conventionally accepted parametres (i.e. characteristics) of what is
evaluated.
The characteristic feature of norm in language is its plurality. What is normal for educated people seems bookish for children.
Pr. Screbnev believes that there are as many norms as there are sublanguages. Each sublanguage has its own norm.
Paradigmatic stylistics :
phonetics – italics, apitalization, repetition of letters, onomatopoeia;
morphology – depersonification;
lexicology – Positive: poetic, official, professional. Neutral. Negative: colloquial, neologosims, jargon, slang, nonce-word,
vulgar words;
syntax – completeness of sentence structure: ellipsis, aposiopesis, one-member nominative sentences, repetition of sentence
parts, syntactic tautology, polysydenton. Word order: inversion of sentence members. Communicative types of sentences: quasi-
affirmative sentences, quasi-interrogative sentences, quasi-negative sentences, quasi-imperative sentences. Type of syntactic
connection: detachment, parenthetic elements, asyndetic subordination and coordination;
semantics – hyperbole, meosis, metonymy, metaphor, allusion, personification, antonomasia, allegory, irony.
Syntagmatic stylistics:
phonetics –alliteration, assonance, paronomasia, rhythm and meter, rhyme;
morphology – it deals with the importance of grammar forms used in a paragraph or text that help in creating a certain stylistic
effect.
lexicology – it studies the “word-and content” juxtaposition that presents a number of stylistic problems – especially those
connected with the co-occurrence of words of various stylistic colourings;
syntax – parallelism, anaphora, epiphora, framing, anadiplosis, chiasmus;
semantics – simile, clarifying synonyms, climax, anti-climax, zeugma, pun, disguised tautology, oxymoron, antithethis.
Seminar 1
Part B
1) Stylistic connotation and stylistic neutrality. Neutrality and norm.
2) Stylistics and other linguistic disciplines.
3) Level structure of stylistics.
4) Semasiology and onomasiology.
5) Paradigmatic and syntagmatic stylistics.
Questions:
1) What does every type of speech use?
2) Name the elements of every lingual sub-system.
3) What is “connotation”?
4) What is the difference in the nature of connotations of stylistically coloured and stylistically neutral linguistic units?
5) What is wrong with defining style as deviation from norm?
6) What is the traditional definition of the word “norm”?
7) What is the characteristic feature of norm in language?
8) What is Prof. Screbnev’s theory of ‘norm’?
9) Which linguistic branches are level disciplines?
10) Why are they called ‘level’ disciplines?
11) What are language levels and their constituent units respectively?
12) What is the general principal by which level units are identified?
13) Is stylistics a level discipline?
14) Into what branches is stylistics subdivided?
15) What phenomena does stylistics investigate and describe at each level?
16) What are the meanings of the words “semantics”, “semasiology”, “onomasiology”?
17) What do stylistic semasiology and onomasiology investigate?
19) What are the meanings of the words “paradigm”, “paradigmatic”?
20) What linguistic units can form a paradigm? Give examples on your own.
21) What are the meanings of the words “syntagma”, “syntagmatic”?
22) What is the interrelation between paradigmatics and syntagmatics?
23) What are the two parts of stylistics according to professor Screbnev’s concept?