Professional Documents
Culture Documents
!"
%
+
,
!
-./0.&1$(&'2)
%#,
+
!
!"#$
%
"
!
&
' &
(
)*!
&
"
"*)+,-!
SANTOSH TIWARI
MANMOHAN NANGIA
Based on M.Arch Thesis, 2009, Integral University, : Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
1
Foreword:
Sitting pensively in my dirty hostel crammed room, choosing a
thesis topic was a great challenge being reminded of how that
gray-haired Professor (whom we, in our hearts of hearts, all
admired and loved) justified the monotonous rigid order of
&KDQGLJDUK¶V City Centre by being an order which could not be
spoiled by even we Indians (sic)! The comment travelled deep
down, more so, when I came face to face with the realities of the
heavenly St 3HWHU¶V Piazza of Rome and the City centre of
Sutton, two places, the memories of which always lingered, still
more with the perception that both of these are preserved by
people who are notorious for their clinical efficiency and guile.
From this an idea was born ± to take up a challenge, like
-RQDWKDQ¶V Livingstone Seagull to fly higher and still higher and
make a statement without any thought of its ever being sold.
Looking around, to me, Connaught Place, as an urban Place,
had an unforgettable nostalgic value - of far greater
significance than /XW\HQ¶V 3UHVLGHQW¶V House or the Central
Vista, because of its intrinsic beauty derived from: the serenity
of a uniform architectural order, the royalty of scale, the
magnificence of the great shopping arcade which I had
occasions to traverse, and variety of activities in which I had
subconsciously participated. Umpteen number of times, I had
visited its restaurants, shared for hours the leisurely gossip and
intellect of many a ³KDYHV´ and the ³KDG EHHQV´ sitting under
the roof of the Coffee House and enjoyed many a two-hour
peaceful naps under the cool shades of trees in its inner central
park.
In doing so, being one of the discerning few who go beyond the
apparent to lament the inhuman vastness of Connaught 3ODFH¶V
central enclosure, the far- too- many interruptions in the
continuum of the shopping arcade, the inaccessibility of the
2
Central Park and the spread of vehicular parking to every inch
of the FUHVFHQW¶V viewing foreground, I perceived it as a
pedestrian heaven in a city bulging at its seams which as the
popular saying goes has ³D glorious past but an aimless
future.´
Add to the aforesaid, the original connecting great visual vista,
between Central Secretariat and Jami Masjid, occupied by an
ugly railway over bridge; the order of the colonnades giving
way to chaotic neon hoardings; pedestrian pavements
encroached by parking bays; the curvilinear sophisticated
horizontal backdrop dotted with multistory buildings and the
tranquility of the place lost in the noise and pollution of ever
increasing vehicular traffic, Connaught Place, as of today, has
lost the grandiose and the romance associated with a Medieval
and Renaissance town &HQWUH¶V core such as St Marks, Venice
or St Peters, Rome.
There is no way the sketchy dream of Gordon Cullen of an
additional storey over the built shopping crescent to humanize
the scale of Connaught Place or Ram 6KDUPD¶V vision of inner
vehicular road, with adjacent parking, at a lower level to free
the area of vehicular traffic can be realized. Both have become
redundant in the present context of the location of the Metro
Station under the Inner Central
Park and the changed dynamics of traffic from outside-in to
inside-out. This thesis does not posit that in a contemporary
city, vehicular accessibility to an Urban Centre, and that too to
a Central Business District, can be denied but takes a position
that in addition, for Connaught Place is to be a forerunner as
an urban place of historic value, there is a need to revive and
add to Connaught Place all the qualities inherent in a
pedestrian precinct: be it freeing it from vehicular traffic; be it
its scale; the size of enclosure, addition of landmarks/markers
3
or addition of pedestrian friendly design elements irrespective
of pressures of various vested stakeholder groups.
Since the designs of large public pedestrian precincts vary to
suit context of people, place, climate, and activity, the thesis
concerns itself only with Development of Connaught Place as a
Pedestrian precinct of great historic value rather than evolution
of universally applicable strategies.
The term ³3ODFH´ comes from a Medieval Town ± an area
located in the heart of the city, in front of a church or a fort,
essentially meant for all major functions of the town: trade,
business, assembly, conversation and relaxation. Its other
counterparts are a Greek agora, a Roman Forum, a Renaissance
piazza, the Indian chowk or a maidan. Having attributes of size,
slope, enclosure, openness and orientation, in time, these
became living organisms responding to various socio-economic
and cultural patterns, including a place for exchange of ideas
and information and debates (Agrawein - Greek) of welfare of
community (Aristotle). In time to come, these places became
one the most evident feature of Urban plans from where all
types of successful urban life sprang and flourished.
With the important parameters of a contemporary town laying
emphasis on socio-economic (functional) and time preferences,
urban places of historic value are more vulnerable to losing their
aesthetic appeal and special character which for long have stood
the test of time. In Connaught Place, we, therefore, need to be
concerned not only with its preservation but also with its
adaptability to contemporary needs and demands if it has to
continue functioning as a living organism.
Towards the aforesaid end I strive.
With God Grace,
Santosh
4
CONTENTS:
Chapter-1: Introduction:
JUSTIFICATION
VALIDITY &
Chapter-2:
Anatomy of Public cores (Pedestrian precincts)
Literature studies:
THEORIES OF
PEDESTRIAN
PRECINCTS
Chapter-3:
Pedestrian environment (city & public places),
LITERATURE STUDIES OF
A Historical overview
ENVIRONMENTS
5
UNDERSTANDING THE
QUALITATIVE & Chapter-4:
QUANTITATIVE A Methodology for Study and Analysis of Pedestrian
ATTRIBUTES Cores
Chapter-5:
Case Studies
Chapter-6:
CONNAUGHT PLACE,
Design Demonstration:
RESEARCH AREA:
NEW DELHII
6
Chapter-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Preamble: Significance and Importance of the topic
Inspiration:
Realization of need of exclusive
pedestrian precincts in towns
and cities despite the advent of
motor car
Familiarity of the author with the
romance of many a Medieval and
Renaissance Pedestrian Precincts
and the concern with the
degradation of many exclusively
pedestrian precincts with the
advent of motor car.
The concern with preserving the
dignity of the pedestrians in
public cores.
The concern for public areas
(exclusively pedestrian precincts)
responding to context of people,
The Piazza del Campo, Siena, place and time.
Source: www.red-travel.com
7
Chandani chowk, Delhi, India;
The major issues: Source: www. http:indian-holiday-pvt-ltd.blogspot.com
Demonstration:
Chandni Chowk, Delhi, India Aminabad, Lucknow, India; Chawri Bazaar, New Delhi;
Source: www.mouthshut.com Source: www.ixigo.com Source: www.
maps.mapmyindia.com
2. District Type
A planned layout of commercial and other public land-uses
arranged in a pre-designated area. The ground floor uses
essentially are planned for commercial use; the upper floors are
for public uses. Such commercial districts are conspicuous by
the absence of residential land-uses, e.g. Nehru Place, New
Delhi; Sector ± 17, Chandigarh; City Centre, Panchkula.
4. Colonial Malls
Many of the British FRORQL]HUV¶ exclusive Malls in many of their
state capitals, through accretion, over a period of time, have
developed in shopping streets. These are characterized by the
nature of their eclectic architecture in uses and patterns and
revered as commercial Malls (commercial streets) even today to
deserve conservation and preservation e.g. The Mall, Shimla;
Hazratganj, Lucknow; MG Road, Bangalore.
Map of Delhi;
Source: www.mapsofindia.com
Degradation of Colonial Malls:
12
Elaboration:
Many a Medieval and Renaissance cores (town centers),
in European countries, brought back by making them
exclusively pedestrian e.g. St 3HWHU¶V Piazza (Rome), St
0DUN¶V Piazza (Venice).
Beyond the core areas, the residential areas are also
examples of this action e.g. Winchester in England and
the planning concepts of Clearance Stein and Henry
:ULJKW¶V - Radburn, in Maryland, USA, and a
completely pedestrian town of Milton Keynes.
13
The examples of SODQQHUV¶ concern in this direction, by
designing exclusively pedestrian cores :
Nehru Place, New Delhi, India;
Bhikajicama Centres, New Delhi, India
Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, India;
Dilli Haat New Delhi, India,
Nehru place, Delhi, India; Dilli Haat, New Delhi; Source: Pragati Maidan, New
Source: www. wikipedia.org ww.architectural-review.com Delhi;
Source: www.archdaily.com
The need of clear-cut design strategies for large pedestrian
precincts as in:
Connaught Place of Delhi, India
Chhoti and Bari Chopar of Jaipur, India
The Hazratganj of Lucknow, India
14
³7KH thesis does not posit for the reversal of the
mechanization trends (since the car is there to
stay) but only pleads for preservation of some
exclusive precincts to preserve the romance,
ambience and tranquility; inherent in pedestrian
precincts.´
1.2 Research Questions:
15
1.4 Scope and Limitations:
The scope of the thesis shall include:
17
Chapter-2
ANATOMY OF PUBLIC CORES
(Pedestrian precincts)
Objective:
18
2.1 The philosophies behind environmental wants:
Most essential Allow man to develop all his capabilities
objective for Design and propensities
of environment:
Goals of Design Primary objectives
Environment met Secondary objectives
through:
Primary Objectives Objectives which satisfy primary needs:
Physical (Food, drink, sleep, security)
Met through advancement of science and
Technology
19
The main catalyst External Stimulation which is provided by
for fulfilling the shape of our environment for this also
psychical needs: forms our creative propensity
So while we talk about design strategies for public area
20
Special Variety
properties which Change
characterize And Availability
stimulants
21
2.2 The theory of designing exclusively Pedestrian Cores:
22
Target groups differ Age, Education, Capacity,
because of: Profession
And personal attitudes
Boundaries of Child as one boundary
behaviour Patterns: Old People at the other end
Behaviour forms Because of their special features
which can be realized Window shopping
in exclusively Buying
pedestrian cores Sightseeing
23
2.3 The theory of Pedestrian Movement:
In Urban spaces- Around walls and Park/ open space- Around trees, shrubs,
corners of buildings; Source-Author grass areas ; Source-Author
THE INDIVIDUAL-
HORIZONTAL MOVEMENT:
24
The adults- likely to be more purposeful The old people - Less purposeful, slower
and direct; Source-Author & stopping to rest; Source-Author
Levels-vertical movement:
Children- Up, down & Adults- Up & down Old people- Gentler
though; Source-Author steps; Source-Author slopes; Source-Author
THE PURPOSE-
25
FLOW OF PEDESTRIAN:
Pedestrians do not naturally walk and change direction in
abrupt angles.
Pedestrian motion , like water, has a Following the line of least resistance,
IOXLGµPRPHQWXPVZHHSLQJZLGHRQ shortening distance by cut offs; Source-
curves; Source-Author Author
27
Through pleasant areas; Towards order Or Towards confusion if
Source-Author tired of order; Source-Author
28
They are directed/ guided by-
29
Inability to proceed; Opportunity for fuller appreciation;
Source-Author Source-Author
30
Serial vision:
A series of constantly changing views helps-
To heighten interest
To involve the viewer in consciously in the urban environment
To evoke emotions such as mystery, suspense and anticipation
To provide a sense of movement through space
Vista- little sense of movement when Medieval street - suspense about what is
walking through; beyond draws one on;
Source-Author Source-Author
31
Progressive towards a goal.......
Progressive realization- the journey Full impact- a strong sense of surprise can
continually arouses one's interest by be created if the goal is suddenly revealed
allowing glimpse of the goal; Source-Author without warning; Source-Author
32
Design for pedestrians:
The function of pedestrian areas should be self
evident, the layout, detailing and 3-dimensional form should
reinforce the activities which are likely to take place.
Social interaction
The design of sitting
areas and positioning
of benches can
encourage or inhibit
conversation.
Seating arrangement for social interaction;
Source: Author
34
Interesting and pleasant views
Views of water and vegetation, either in the distance
or close to hand are often most restful/ relaxing.
Unpleasant views like heavy traffic, flow of dirty
water etc. can be screened.
Details
Special attention
should be paid to the
immediate surroundings
because people will be close
enough, and will have time to
notice the detailing.
Color, form,
textures & fragrances are Opportunity to appreciate the details;
Source: Author
important.
35
Accessories at pedestrian precincts
Lighting
Boundary lines
Floor coverings
Seating facilities
Dis-positioned objects
Vegetation
Water
Object of arts
Playing objects
Information
Sign posting
Flag
Roof coverings
Sale stands
Kiosks
Tables & chairs
Waste bins
Bicycle stands
Clock
Telephones
It affects where people can go, and where they cannot: the
degree of permeability.
It affects the range of uses available to people: the quality of
variety.
It affects how easily people can understand what opportunities it
offers: legibility.
It affects the degree to which people can use a given place for
different purposes: the quality of robustness.
It affects whether the detailed appearance of the place makes
people aware of the choices available: the quality of visual
appropriateness.
It affects SHRSOH¶V choice of sensory experiences: the quality of
richness.
It affects the extent to which people can put their own stamp on
the place: the degree of personalization.
37
Consequently, the key issues The degree of permeability
are: The degree of variety
The degree of Legibility
The degree of robustness
The quality of visual
appropriateness
The degree of richness
The degree of personalization
38
Legibility of People can take advantage of choices/ variety
core areas: only if they can grasp the site layout & type of
activity pattern are existing there.
Legibility in physical form,
Legibility in activity pattern.
Legibility can be achieved by:
Creating focus paths for landmark built forms,
The nodal areas-place for public relevance,
By creating edges through trees, fencing etc.
for limiting the boundary line of particular use.
The The quality of robustness of any public
robustness in precinct is important for creating that site more
core areas lively/ playful because of multiple use, rather
than a specialized space for particular activity.
Robustness in public areas is important,
because it:
Increases the interaction,
People like to enjoy variety of choices at a
same time.
The quality of :KHQWKHSHRSOH¶VLQWHUSUHWDWLRQDERXW
visual particular built form supports the
appropriatene responsiveness of that place, then this quality
ss is called Visual Appropriateness.
Visual appropriateness in public areas is
important to reduce confusion & increase
legibility.
This quality can be achieved by:
Legibility of form,
Legibility of use,
Variety in appearance.
39
Richness in core The quality of any environment-³7KH
areas YDULHW\RIVHQVHH[SHULHQFH´ZKLFKXVHUV
can enjoy is called RICHNESS.
Richness is not a purely visual matter:
other senses also have Design implications
The sense of motion, sense of hearing,
sense of touch, sense of smell etc
Personalization in It is important for user to personalize their
core areas existing environment.
It is helpful for users for creating/ leaving
their own stamps of like, dislikes & values.
Type of personalization-
Users personalization in two way:
To improve practical facilities
To change the image of place
40
Chapter-3
PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT
(City & Public places), A Historical
overview:
Objective:
To trace the historical background of traditional
pedestrian environments giving way to loose
amorphous sprawls of present urban fabric
To familiarize oneself with the changing attitude of
people with the change in the circulation system
3.1 Basis of Traditional pattern of circulation:
Vocabulary RI´ Street & 6TXDUH´
Functions of a traditional Street and square:
Circulation (Access)
Community activities
Place of Assembly
Place of Business & trade
Place of Entertainment
41
3.2 Pedestrian Environments before the advent of
Motor car:
Period Example Design Concept & Design
Characteristics
Greek Greek Agoras Activities:
(Miletus, The Main Shopping
Priene) Centre/community space,
Meant for all activities
Planning Principles:
Located at the most accessible flat
land of town, near harbour,
accessible from all streets,
Plan developed from inside-out.
Design Characteristics:
Viewed by a pedestrian moving at
slow speed,
Organic masses articulating spaces,
Horizontal fenestration to give a
human scale.
42
Period Example Design Concept & Design
Characteristics
Roman Roman Forums Activities:
(Forum of The main parade ground/ market
Augustus, place/ community area
Forum of
Romanum, Forum Planning Principles:
of Trajan) Located at the intersection of two
major streets: Cardo and
Decumenus ± the processional
streets,
Forum of Away from the boundaries of the
Romanum
city for security,
Plan made from outside-in.
Design Characteristics:
Ordered space more important,
Space articulating masses,
Formal,
Inorganic.
Forum Romanum;
Source: www. sites.google.com
43
Period Example Design Concept & Design
Characteristics
Medieval Medieval Place Activities:
(Fatehpur Sikri Market,
Agra; Piazza del Foreground of an important
Campo, Siena) Building (Palace, Church, Fort,
Community Place.
Planning Principles:
Most strategic location in the
heart of the town,
Away from town walls for
security,
Approached through labyrinth of
streets,
Organic.
Design Characteristics:
Organic,
Plan of Fatehpur Sikri, Agra; Human Scale,
Source: www.kamit.jp
Surprise element,
Plethora of buildings around
for variety of landuses,
Vertical character,
Sites of churches,
minarets acting
as landmarks,
Fatehpur Sikri, Agra, India; Landmarks
Source: www.airpano.com
providing sense
of direction and associations.
Planning Principles:
Display of public wealth
(streets and piazzas as exhibition
galleries),
Nodal points of a town to give
impression of orderly
development,
End points of vistas,
Punctuation points in avenues,
Foreground of buildings to
heighten their scale,
magnificence.
Design Characteristics:
6W3HWHU¶V3LD]]D5RPH Formal & Inorganic,
Source: www.shafe.co.uk
Movement to be a part of space,
Movement around sculptures,
fountains, Urban in character,
Distinguishable floor-scape,
Inclusion of specially designed
design elements.
45
3.3 Introduction of automobile & Changing
Structures : 1900-1950
%HWZHHQ¶VDQG¶VPDQ\SURJUHVVLYH
architects and city planners worked on the challenge
of accommodating automobile in the city fabric and
designed for speed and scale of the motorist.
The Challenge:
³(YROXWLRQRIGHVLJQVWRDFFRPPRGDWH
DXWRPRELOHLQWKHFLW\IDEULF´
46
Early Pioneers (1900-1950) :
City of Paris
Source: Autthor
47
Time Name of the Name of the Design
Architect Project Characteristics/
Design Concept
1914 Antonio Proposal for a Immense isolated
Sant'Elia new City structures,
(April 30, (A series of design Linked by tiered
1888- drawings for a channels of
October 10, futurist Città circulation
1916) An Nuova ("New (automobiles).
Italian City") that was
Architect conceived as
(Involved in symbolic of a new
Futurist age)
Movement)
48
Time Name of the Name of Design Characteristics/
Architect the Project Design Concept
Main disadvantages:
In all these concepts, the mainstream investigation was into:
49
3.4 Rise of new awareness (1950 onwards):
Use of urban streets from pedestrian point of view
PIONEERS:
Name Philosophy
Alison and Peter )RFXVRQPDQ¶VH[SHULHQFHRIWKHFLW\
Smithson as a participant,
City is not only a large scale
functional tool,
Review the use of urban street in
terms of levels of differentiation,
Streets to be designed in social,
sociological and anthropological
contexts.
Methodology to Segregation
improve
the quality of
pedestrian
environment:
50
Emerging concepts in design of off-grade segregation:
51
Period Example Design Concept & Design
Characteristics
Baroque Foregrounds of Activities:
Building of relevance Display of power, wealth
Capital Complex, Exhibition galleries
New Delhi Movement
Landscape
Special town events
Planning Principles:
Inorganic
Formal
Huge scale
Design Characteristics:
Vista planning
Avenue creations
Movement dividing space
Grandiose scale
Predominantly landscaped
Planned order
Inorganic
Formal
Huge scale
Design Characteristics:
Vista planning
Avenue creations
Movement dividing space
Grandiose scale
Predominantly landscaped
52
Concepts and designs for on-grade segregation:
53
Time Name of Name of Design Concept
the the
Architect Project
1961 Shadrach Nicollet STEM concept
Woods Mall in To achieve an acceptable social
Minneapol environment, he concluded that
is traffic and people must be
separated by design at points of
intense activity.
Costly and hypothetical
solutions dependent on
multilevel organization in a
built -up city were rejected in
favour of a simple pedestrian
mall called ³6WHP´.
³6WHP´ is a proposed organizing
principle where housing and
commercial activities are
integrally related, but the
pedestrian and automobile is
rigorously segregated.
54
3.5 Changing concepts of Pedestrianisation (1970
onwards):
55
Chapter-4 A METHODOLOGY
FOR STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF
PEDESTRIAN CORES
Objective:
Problem Identification (Quantitative and qualitative) of
Pedestrian Precincts
4.1 Study and analysis of the µVSHFLILF¶ major physical
characteristics of a pedestrian precinct having direct
/indirect bearing on pedestrian movement
Objective Through study of Data
source
Physical characteristics
Understanding the design concept & Matrix of
design constraints Development
Degree of Visual appropriateness Form of
including climate Development
Familiarity with attempts to solution Phases of
finding: incorporation of pedestrian Development
friendly design elements
Identification of major pedestrian Land-uses
]RQHVSHGHVWULDQV¶LQFRPSDWLEOH
land-uses; and variety & robustness
of spaces
Circulation characteristics
57
4.2 Identification of major issues through survey
Objective Through study Data source
of (available variables)
Familiarization with Background of the Name, age, sex, profession,
the respondent Person being place of residence
interviewed
Respondents Planning of the Initiated (Architect, Planner
Stratification into visit & occurrence familiar with area)
initiated, uninitiated of visit
Testing compatibility Purpose of Visit Employment or Business
of existing land-uses Shopping & window-
of a development shopping,
Entertainment (Amusement
± cinema, concert halls,
landmarks, fountains),
Leisure (Assembly, rest,
pass time),
Site Seeing (Tourists)
Test of availability of Duration of visit
leisure time for
passive recreation
(pedestrian movement)
Test of adequacy of Mode of Travel Private Conveyance (Car,
parking lots scooter)
Public Transport (Bus,
Metro, Taxi)
Any Other (Cycle, Walking)
Test of familiarity and Places of In channels leading to
pedestrian linkages: disembarkation pedestrian precincts (Radial
permeability Roads)
Adjacent to pedestrian
precincts (Outer Circle)
Inside pedestrian precincts
(Inner Circle) & Any Other
58
Objective Through study Data source
of: (available variables)
Identification Mode of travel By Car
of routes of within pedestrian or
pedestrian precinct and Walking
movement environs (after
disembarkation)
Establishment Places of Visit Business areas
of activity Shopping areas
centers Amusement Centers
Religious Buildings and activities
(Temples, churches, Mosques)
Resting Points (Steps to sit, shady
areas to lie down, Climate compatible
areas) & Traffic free areas
59
OBJECTIVE THROUGH DATA SOURCE
STUDY OF: (Available Variables)
Test of Visit what all? Map of the site
permeability of
various activities
Test of Legibility Sequence of Circulation system diagram
activities visited
Photographs of activity areas &
Knowledge as map of site
regards location of
activities Photographs of specific constructs
& map of site
Identification of
Constructs
60
Chapter-5 CASE STUDIES
CASE STUDY-1 SECTOR-17, CHANDIGARH
THE CHOICE OF SECTOR-17, CHANDIGARH IS:
61
I N T R O D U C I N G SECTOR ± 17, Chandigarh
(Major Landmarks)
63
LA N D U S E PA T T E R N
(Zone specific development: defined zones of public buildings,
central commercial cross, bank square, district courts, active
recreation area, bus terminus)
INFERENCES:
Variety of land-uses
attracts more people to
the city centre for
various functions
(commercial, transport,
business, recreation
etc.) And increases the
robustness
Concentration Of
Similar Activities In
Defined Zones Reduces
Pedestrian Travel
distances
Easily accessible by
vehicles, location of
high-rise office
EXLOGLQJVFLW\¶VEXV
terminus, bank square
and the district courts in
the peripheral area
restricts unnecessary
pedestrian cross-
movement
Defined commercial
area zone in the centre
reduces pedestrian
travel distances and
provides for intense
commercial activity,
conviviality and
appropriate urban scale
Enables serving of non-
pedestrian zones by
inner vehicular feeder
roads without disturbing
the cross pedestrian
spines
Large number of
incompatible-landuse
zones remain dead Land use pattern-Sector-17 Chandigarh;
during off-hours Source: Author
65
C I R C U LA T I O N PA T T E R N
(Cul-de-sac approaches)
ANALYSIS
Enables provision
of large parking
areas adjacent to
the main pedestrian
commercial spine
increasing
permeability
Vehicular traffic
free cross shaped
pedestrian
commercial spine
Takes care of
service needs of the
built-up areas by
providing them
roads in near
vicinity
Ideally suited for
provision of green
in the otherwise
hard landscape of a
city centre
Humanizes the
scale of the central
spine in which
pedestrian
movement is better
enjoyed
Pedestrian
Approach To
Commercial Areas
Through Cul-de-
sacs (Dull Parking
Areas)
Entry to
commercial spine
from the rear
67
FORM OF DEVELOPMENT
(CROSS PLAN)
ANALYSIS
Easy accessibility from all
directions.
Large shady areas for
pedestrian comfort
Spread over greater area to
accommodate more
commercial functions
Natural plan form for creation
of cul-de-sacs
Easy vehicular accessibility for
most functions
Central cross spine defines
main movement channels
Location of landmarks at
intersection points
Provides shady areas for
pedestrian movement
Provides different experience
in traverse channels ±
(quantum of light, shades and
shadows)
Despite cross plan, puts more
emphasis on one channel (ne-
sw)
Longer pedestrian travel
distances
ANALYSIS
Defines area of intense
commercial activity
Gives sense of place
Fixes location of landmarks
Establishes main direction of
pedestrian movement ± linear
(commercial street) intent
Commiserates with best
orientation
Introvert in concept
Movement, at times, dull and
boring
Large expanses of concrete
floor-scape (climatically very
harsh)
Dilution of the sense of place
69
AVA I LA B I L I T Y O F P E D E S T R I A N
F R I E N D LY D E S I G N E LE M E N T S
Incorporated Design elements to make Sector-17 more
Pedestrian friendly are:
grade separation to segregate vehicular traffic and
maintain pedestrian continuity;
adequate landscape to provide shaded areas for
relaxation;
incorporation of water bodies to provide cooling
effects; and
addition of public use infrastructure to develop in
these a sense of µSODFH¶ through special DFWLYLWLHV¶.
Shady pedestrian spine Water fountain, colourful Hard landscape elements like
facilitating pedestrian banners, light poles etc as raised platforms as garden
movement at day time; design elements; Source: furniture and Beautiful paving as a
6RXUFH$XWKRU¶VSKRWRJUDSK\ $XWKRU¶VSKRWRJUDSK\ visual attraction;
6RXUFH$XWKRU¶VSKRWRJUDSK\
Contrasting building façade to break Hard landscape as street Shady areas to give resting
the monotony of architectural control furniture; Source: places in central spine &
Source: www.chandigarhguide.com $XWKRU¶VSKRWRJUDSK\ soften the hard concrete floor;
Source: $XWKRU¶V photography
71
ANALY S I S T H R O U G H S U R V E Y
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Question Total
1. Purpose of visit
1.a Employment or Business Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
1.b Shopping & Window shopping Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 310
1.c Entertainment (Amusement ± cinema, Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
concert halls, landmarks, fountains
1.d Leisure (Assembly, rest, pass time) Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
1.e Site Seeing (Tourists 0/10
2. Duration of visit
2.a For 0-1 hour Ɣ 1/10
2.b For 1-2 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
2.c For 2-4 hour Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
2.d For 4-6 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
3. Mode of travel
3.a Private Conveyance (Car, scooter) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
3.b Public Transport (Bus, Rickshaw, Taxi, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
Auto)
3.c Walking Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
4. Place of disembarkation
4.a At cul-de-sac leading to pedestrian Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
precincts
4.b Adjacent roads V3 & V4 Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
4.c Inside pedestrian precincts 0/10
4.d Any Other 0/10
5. Mode of travel within the sector
boundaries
5.a Vehicular Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
5.b Pedestrian Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
72
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Question Total
73
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
Y1
Y2
Y3
Y4
Y5
Y6
Y7
Y8
Y9
Y10
Question Total
74
Interviewee Uninitiated person
(Visitors)
Y11
Y12
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Total
Question
1. Purpose of visit
1.a Employment or Business 0/10
1.b Shopping & Window shopping Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
1.c Entertainment (Amusement ± cinema, Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
concert halls, landmarks, fountains
1.d Leisure (Assembly, rest, pass time) Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
1.e Site Seeing (Tourists Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
2. Duration of visit
2.a For 0-1 hour Ɣ 1/10
2.b For 1-2 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 6/10
2.c For 2-4 hour Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
2.d For 4-6 hour Ɣ 1/10
3. Mode of travel
3.a Private Conveyance (Car, scooter) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
3.b Public Transport (Bus, Rickshaw, Taxi, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
Auto)
3.c Walking Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
4. Place of disembarkation
4.a At cul-de-sac leading to pedestrian precincts Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 6/10
4.b Adjacent roads V3 & V4 Ɣ 1/10
4.c Inside pedestrian precincts 0/10
4.d Any Other 0/10
5. Mode of travel within the sector
boundaries
5.a Vehicular
5.b Pedestrian Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 10/10
6. Point of attraction during visit-
6.a Business areas 0/10
6.b Shops or showrooms Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 8/10
6.c Temporary shops (Rehris) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 10/10
75
Interviewee Uninitiated person
(Visitors)
Y11
Y12
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Total
Question
Y11
Y12
Y13
Y14
Y15
Y16
Y17
Y18
Y19
Y20
Total
Question
9. Identification of Constructs
[Showing photographs of various constructs
(Like:hotel James Plaza, Post Office bldg,
toilet block, DM office, Bank of India,
Income Tax Bldg, Godrej showroom,
Underground, PNB Bank, Jagat cinema ) &
asked about their familiarity with
interviewee]
9.a Identified 0-25% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 6/10
9.b Identified 26-50% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
9.c Identified 51-75% Constructs 0/10
9.d Identified 76-100% Constructs 0/10
10. Identification with Space
[Showing photographs of various spaces
(Like:Bank Square, post office bldg,
Football Ground, ISBT, Bata Showroom,
DM office, MC Office, United colors of
Benetton showroom, Income tax building)
& asked to identify these spaces]
10.a Identified 0-25% Spaces Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
10.b Identified26-50% Spaces Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
10.c Identified 51-75% Spaces 0/10
10.d Identified 76-100% Spaces 0/10
11. Identification with an activity
[Showing photographs of various activities
(Like: front piazza of Jagat, Neelam &
Anand cinema, location of Zarista
showroom in one of the two Brick bldgs,
parking lots of bank squares, cul-de-parking
lots, commercial conc. Bldgs at main spine)
& asked to identify & differentiate these
activities]
11.a Identified 0-25% activities Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 6/10
11.b Identified 26-50% activities Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
11.c Identified 51-75% activities 0/10
11.d Identified 76-100% activities 0/10
77
CASE STUDY-2 NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI
ANALYSIS:
Hierarchy in heights of
buildings (4-16 storey) create
variety in spaces
84
ARCHITE CTURAL STYLE
ANALYSIS:
85
LA N D M A R K S & N O D E S
ANALYSIS:
1. Purpose of visit
1.a Employment or Business Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
1.b Shopping & Window shopping Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
1.c Entertainment (Amusement ± cinema, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
concert halls, landmarks, fountains
1.d Leisure (Assembly, rest, pass time) 0/10
1.e Site Seeing (Tourists 0/10
2. Duration of visit
2.a For 0-1 hour Ɣ 1/10
2.b For 1-2 hour Ɣ 1/10
2.c For 2-4 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
2.d For 4-6 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
3. Mode of travel
3.a Private Conveyance (Car, scooter) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
3.b Public Transport (Bus, Rickshaw, Taxi, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
Auto)
3.c Walking Ɣ 1/10
4. Place of disembarkation
4.a At parking lots/cul-de-sac leading to Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
pedestrian spine
4.b Adjacent main roads (Link Roads & ring Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
road)
4.c Adjacent service roads 0/10
4.d Inside pedestrian area 0/10
4.e Bus terminus at site Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
89
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
Question Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5 Z6 Z7 Z8 Z9 Z10 Tota
l
6. Point of attraction during visit-
6.a Business/ office areas 0/10
6.b Shops or showrooms Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
6.c Temporary shops (Rehris) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
6.d Amusement Centers Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
6.e Recreational spaces at Cross spine (Fountain, 0/10
seating places, shady corridors)
6.f Resting Points (Steps to sit, shady areas to sit, Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
Climate compatible areas)
6.g Traffic free areas Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
6.h Landscape areas 10/1
0
6.i Architecturally rich areas Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 610
(Buildings of relevance, fountains, etc.)
6.j Festive Places (Illumination, activities, hustle Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
bustle, colour, landscape)
6.k Pedestrian compatible design elements Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
(Telephone booths, sitting places, sale kiosks,
objects of art etc.)
90
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
Question Z1 Z2 Z3 Z4 Z5 Z6 Z7 Z8 Z9 Z10 Tota
l
9. Identification of Constructs
[Showing photographs of various constructs
(Like: Hotel park Royal, cultural centre,
Paras, Satyam, , Desu, ) & asked about their
familiarity with interviewee]
9.a Identified 0-25% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
9.b Identified 26-50% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
9.c Identified 51-75% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
9.d Identified 76-100% Constructs 0/10
91
Interviewee Uninitiated person
(Visitors)
Question Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Total
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
1. Purpose of visit
1.a Employment or Business Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
1.b Shopping & Window shopping Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
1.c Entertainment (Amusement ± cinema, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
concert halls, landmarks, fountains
1.d Leisure (Assembly, rest, pass time) 0/10
1.e Site Seeing (Tourists 0/10
2. Duration of visit
2.a For 0-1 hour Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
2.b For 1-2 hour 0/10
2.c For 2-4 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
2.d For 4-6 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
3. Mode of travel
3.a Private Conveyance (Car, scooter) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
3.b Public Transport (Bus, Rickshaw, Taxi, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
Auto)
3.c Walking Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
4. Place of disembarkation
4.a At parking lots/cul-de-sac leading to Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
pedestrian spine
4.b Adjacent main roads (Link Roads & ring Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
road)
4.c Adjacent service roads 0/10
4.d Inside pedestrian area 0/10
4.e Bus terminus at site Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
92
Interviewee Uninitiated person
(Visitors)
Question Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Total
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
6.h Landscape areas 10/10
6.i Architecturally rich areas Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 6/10
(Buildings of relevance, fountains, etc.)
6.j Festive Places (Illumination, activities, Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
hustle bustle, colour, landscape)
6.k Pedestrian compatible design elements Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
(Telephone booths, sitting places, sale
kiosks, objects of art etc.)
9. Identification of Constructs
[Showing photographs of various
constructs (Like:Hotel park Royal, cultural
centre, Paras, Satyam, , Desu, ) & asked
about their familiarity with interviewee]
9.a Identified 0-25% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
9.b Identified 26-50% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
9.c Identified 51-75% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
9.d Identified 76-100% Constructs 0/10
93
Interviewee Uninitiated person
(Visitors)
Question Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Total
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
94
INFERENCES FROM CASE STUDIES
PROVISION OF GATHERING/INTERACTIVE
PLACES AT COMMERCIAL AREAS HELP IN
MAKING THAT PLACE MORE VIABLE.
95
Chapter-6
DESIGN DEMONSTRATION
6.1 SLECTION OF THE PROJECT:
Chief reasons for selection of Connaught Place as the
Demonstration area for application of Design Strategies for
Pedestrian Cores (Precincts):
Its being a prominent city core of the Capital of India;
Its being a city core visited by a very large number of
stake-holders: shoppers, businessmen, visitors, and for
leisure activities;
Its being a city core whose intrinsic charm of being a
pedestrian heaven has been lost due to its changing
dynamics over time: advent of motor car; tremendous
increase in vehicular traffic volume; and more recently
the location of the Metro-Station in its central Park .
Consequently, the
application of Design
Strategies for
Pedestrian Cores
(Precincts) in
Connaught Place
requires a vision
much beyond the
short -sighted routine
solutions which have
failed to see the day
of light because of
their inherent
Study model of Connaught Place- New Delhi;
Source: Author
drawbacks
96
6.2 DEVELOPMENT OF CONNAUGHT
PLACE (Brief History)
1. The Original Plan:
In /XW\HQ¶V axial Plan for Delhi, Connaught Place (inspired by
Royal Crescent, Bath) was an important focus. Fitted into the
matrix of Renaissance vistas and axis, and located on a direct
axis from the Central Secretariat to Jama Masjid, it was
conceived as a circus 1100 ft in diameter bounded by seven
colonnaded four-storey structures of unified designs.
/RFDWLRQRI&RQQDXJKWSODFHDW/XW\HQ¶V1HZ'HOKL,QGLD
Source: Author
97
Like most of the Baroque designs,
the enclosure was not full but
partially developed ± acting as an
important focus in which the
circus opens outwards. The
movement was not a part of the
space but divided it. If the width
of the traffic arteries was large, it
was for the sake of scale rather
than the volume of traffic.
100
2. N.D.R.A.C. Recommendations:
Development as per CAT Group recommendations continued to
be chaotic and consequently, at the behest of Prime Minister
Indira Gandhi, NDRAC (New Delhi Redevelopment Advisory
Committee) recommendations came about.
Major recommendations of NDRAC were
³3('(675,$1,6$7,21 OF CONNAUGHT 3/$&(´
through:
1. Creation of specified
disembarkation points for
pedestrians coming into
Connaught Place on the
periphery.
2. Removal of extraneous traffic
from Connaught Place.
3. Creation of a By-pass road
(Desh Bandhu Gupta Road)
to divert the extraneous traffic
using Connaught Place as a
rotary.
Base plan of Connaught place; 4. Treatment of School Lane
Source: Author
Road as a distributor.
Some of these recommendations 5. Provision of multi-level
were only partially effected. parking at the end of each
The proposal of the radial roads radial road to free the inner
terminating into car parks at circle from parking and traffic
grade levels had to be
completely shelved as it would
movement.
have disrupted the continuity of
the shopping colonnade and
corresponding pedestrian
movement.
101
3. Rites Plan for decongestion of Connaught Place:
With time with Connaught Place becoming the central and the
busiest City Centre of Delhi, the estimated users expected to
visit Connaught Place rose to 12 lakhs passengers (2003). It
was also assumed that the figure will rise to 50 lakhs by 2021.
Without a proper control, this means
its conversion into a most
congested place.
Consequently, Rites Plan
(under the auspices of New
Delhi Municipal Council)
for decongestion of C.P.
suggested the following:
Magnificence,
Antiquity
Conviviality
Quality of Place
A Heaven for shoppers
and so on and so forth«««««««««.
103
6.3 STUDY OF CONNAUGHT PLACE-ANATOMY
LIC Building;
6RXUFH$XWKRU¶V3KRWRJUDSK\
104
MATRIX OF DEVELOPMENT
(Centrality in the radial system of New Delhi)
ANALYSIS:
Very good
accessibility(permeability)
from all parts of the city
Strong legibility with all roads
leading to the center
Permits formation of vistas
and avenues
Fixes location and direction of
vistas and avenues
Reduced travel distances from
all major parts of the city
Impossible to manipulate
Ignores orientation
106
FORM OF DEVELOPMENT
(Circular form)
Architectural
character of
Connaught Place;
6RXUFH$XWKRU¶V
Photography
108
ORGANIZATION OF SPACES
(Introvert planning)
ANALYSIS:
Creates Central Node (Main
Activity Area)
Defines main enclosure
Provides central disembarkation/
embarkation points
Increases accessibility of
vehicular traffic close to activity
areas
Ensures visual linkages between
activities
Concentrates pedestrian
movement along the inner circle
and thus more humane
Better permeability & legibility
Offers possibility of being an
exclusive pedestrian precinct
Provides a climax
Rigidity of Size
Difficult to extend
Pedestrian linkages from many
radial roads
Good definition of inner
enclosure
Makes the outer ring less
important
Pedestrian incompatible landuses
get located in the outer ring
Visual linkages broken in the
outer circle because of its convex
plan profile
Organization of spaces at Connaught Place;
Inner ring gets preferential
Source: Author & Base plan from Google
treatment by pedestrians because
Earth
of lesser travel distances
109
CIRCULATION CHANNELS & VEHICULAR -
PEDESTRIAN CONFLICT POINTS
(Formation of traffic arteries on both sides of the
circular form/ development)
ANALYSIS:
Easy accessibility to all areas of
outer and inner circle
Demarcation of the outer road
for µWKURXJK¶ traffic
Reduced traffic volumes on
roads because of splitting of
traffic
More number of shops face
accessible arteries
Provides greater surface area
for advertisements, sign-boards
Circular development exists as
an island between outer and
inner circle
Land-uses in the outer and inner
circle get unnecessarily
differentiated
Resulting in large no. of
vehicular-pedestrian conflicts
points
Formation of major activity
areas in the radials linkages
connecting outside artery and
inside artery
Rigidity of size: no scope for
extension
ANALYSIS:
It creates a large green (lung
space) in the urban-scape
Gives a µVHQVH of SODFH¶ &
boldly marks its own position
Increases the size of the rotary
to accommodate larger
volumes of vehicular traffic
Provides a good embarkation/
disembarkation central point
(being effectively made use of
by metro station)
Increases the size of the
circular development to
accommodate large no. of
shops and commercial area
Restricts/directs
pedestrian/vehicular traffic
along the periphery
Possibilities to reduce &
extend the width of inner road
& park, both as per needs
A place to see & appreciate
the richness of architectural
excellence of façade
Large size of the leisure green
reduces sense of enclosure
Converts inner green into an
µLVODQG¶
Increases pedestrian distances
Landmarks and nodes at Connaught Place;
Source: Author
111
EVOLUTION PATTERN & CHARACTER OF
SPACES
(Colonnaded arcade along one side of movement
channel )
ANALYSIS:
Enlargement of visual envelop
permitting awareness of
totality of form
Greater legibility of shops,
signboards, markers and
landmarks
Enjoyable inside spaces-
outside landscape relationship
Comfortable light and
ventilation of the colonnaded
pedestrian arcade
Heightening of sensual variety
of light and shade effects in
the colonnaded movement
channel
Affords greater flexibility for
integration of pedestrian
design elements in the
development
Involves longer travel
distances
Monotony of the pedestrian
movement channel
Concentration of activities in
zones of comfort (climate-
wise)
Colonnaded side of movement
channel is appealing for illegal
encroachment of hawkers
Fragments the whole site into
pockets
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
X9
X10
Question Total
1. Purpose of visit
1.a Employment or Business Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
1.b Shopping & Window shopping Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
1.c Entertainment (Amusement ± cinema, Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
concert halls, landmarks, fountains
1.d Leisure (Assembly, rest, pass time) 0/10
1.e Site Seeing (Tourists) 0/10
2. Duration of visit
2.a For 0-1 hour 0/10
2.b For 1-2 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
2.c For 2-4 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
2.d For 4-6 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
3. Mode of travel
3.a Private Conveyance (Car, scooter) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
3.b Public Transport (Bus, Taxi) Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
3.c Metro Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
3.d Any Other (Cycle, Walking) Ɣ 1/10
4. Place of disembarkation
4.a In channels leading to pedestrian precincts Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
(Radial Roads)
4.b Adjacent to pedestrian precincts (Outer Ɣ 1/10
circle)
4.c Inside pedestrian precincts (Inner circle) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 5/10
5. Mode of travel inside the circus
5.a Vehicular
5.b Pedestrian Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 10/10
113
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
X9
X10
Question Total
114
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
X9
X10
Question Total
X16
X17
X18
X19
X20
Question Total
1. Purpose of visit
1.a Employment or Business 0/10
1.b Shopping & Window shopping Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
1.c Entertainment (Amusement ± cinema, Ɣ 1/10
concert halls, landmarks, fountains
1.d Leisure (Assembly, rest, pass time) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
1.e Site Seeing (Tourists) Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
2. Duration of visit
2.a For 0-1 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
2.b For 1-2 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
2.c For 2-4 hour Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
2.d For 4-6 hour 0/10
3. Mode of travel
3.a Private Conveyance (Car, scooter) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
3.b Public Transport (Bus, Taxi) Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
3.c Metro Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 4/10
3.d Any Other (Cycle, Walking) 0/10
4. Place of disembarkation
4.a In channels leading to pedestrian precincts Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
(Radial Roads)
115
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
X11
X12
X13
X14
X15
X16
X17
X18
X19
X20
Question Total
116
Interviewee Initiated person
(Architects, Planners, Academician, Journalist,
Shopkeepers, Employees, Buyers)
X11
X12
X13
X14
X15
X16
X17
X18
X19
X20
Question Total
9. Identification of Constructs
[Showing photographs of various constructs
(Like:Staesman House, LIC Building,
Reliance bldg, Fire station, NDMC
Building, RR2, Block-C & E) & asked about
their familiarity with interviewee]
9.a Identified 0-25% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 8/10
9.b Identified 26-50% Constructs Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
9.c Identified 51-75% Constructs 0/10
9.d Identified 76-100% Constructs 0/10
10. Identification with Space
[Showing photographs of various spaces
(Like:Hotel Regal, Odeon Cinema, RR5,
United Coffee House, Palika Car parking,
Gandhi Ashram, Palika Market, Petrol
Pump, Fire Station, Janpath Market) &
asked to identify these spaces]
10.a Identified 0-25% Spaces Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 7/10
10.b Identified 26-50% Spaces Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 3/10
10.c Identified 51-75% Spaces 0/10
10.d Identified 76-100% Spaces 0/10
11. Identification with an activity
[Showing photographs of various activities
(Like:RR4 &6, Restaurant Nirula, Mc
Donalds, CCD, Janpath market, Shanker
market, Hotel Alka, Hotel Marina, Block C
& D, Central Park & park over Palika
bazaar, NDMC bldg & Statesman house) &
asked to identify & differentiate these
activities]
11.a Identified 0-25% activities Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ Ɣ 8/10
11.b Identified 26-50% activities Ɣ Ɣ 2/10
11.c Identified 51-75% activities 0/10
11.d Identified 76-100% activities 0/10
117
6.4 PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Connaught Place;
Source: Author
120
4. Architectural issues:
But in addition to this, once the aforesaid issues are
sorted out, we will still be concerned with:
Magnificence,
Antiquity
Conviviality
Quality of Place
A Heaven for shoppers
DQGVRRQDQGVRIRUWK«««««««««
121
6.5 DESIGN CRITERIA
Design objectives:
1. HUMANIZING SIZE OF ENCLOSURE
2. &5($7,1*$µ6(16(2)3/$&(¶
122
$&7,213/$1«««
Objective-1 HUMANIZING SIZE OF ENCLOSURE
New Construct
124
$&7,213/$1«««
Objective-3
VEHICULAR-PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
SEGREGATION
By diverting of through traffic at another bye-pass roads to
minimize the vehicular traffic at Connaught Place (This aspect
is outside the scope of this thesis)
125
$&7,213/$1«««
Objective-4
CONNECTING SHOPPING ARCADE WITH
INNER PARK
Existing road side parking & vehicular traffic at inner circle
have to be removed for connecting shopping arcade & central
park.
Additional landscape elements & public conveniences like
green areas, street furnitures, water bodies, toilet blocks etc.
need to be provided at inner circle to create an pedestrian
friendly environment.
Few informal shopping areas would help to make the
movement a part of activity.
126
$&7,213/$1«««
Objective-5
BRINGING PEDESTRIAN CONTINUITY IN THE
SHOPPING ARCADE
5HPRYDORIKDZNHUV¶HQFURDFKPHQWVIURPFRUULGRUWRPDNH
the blockage free movement.
127
$&7,213/$1«««
Objective-6
RELEASING SHOPPING ARCADE FROM
ENCROACHMENTS
After releasing shopping arcade from KDZNHUV¶
encroachments for creating free movement, there is a need for
relocation of these at CP itself, to maintain the conviviality of
the place.
For rehabilitation of hawkers and catering future growth,
there is a need of a new construct at Connaught Place.
The new construct at inner circle would also help in
improving the sense of enclosure.
129
$&7,213/$1«««
Objective-8
IMPROVING ARCHITECTURAL
CHARACTER OF CONNAUGHT PLACE AS A
PEDESTRIAN PRECINCT (BY ADDITION OF
PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY
DESIGN ELEMENTS)
131
ANNEXURE-1
EXIXTING PLAN OF CONNAUGHT PLACE
(Ground floor plan)
ANNEXURE-2
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF
&211$8*+73/$&(%LUG¶V(\HYLHZ
132
ANNEXURE-3.1
CONNAUGHT PLACE PARKING PLANS
BASEMENT-1
ANNEXURE-3.2
CONNAUGHT PLACE PARKING PLANS
BASEMENT-2
134
ANNEXURE-5 PROPOSED ARRANGEMENT FOR
SIGNAGES/HOARDINGS
([LVWLQJYLHZRIEORFNµ&¶RI&RQQDXJKW3ODFH,QQHUFLUFOH
6RXUFH$XWKRU¶VSKRWRJUDSK\
3URSRVHGYLHZRIEORFNµ&¶RI&RQQDXJKW3ODFH,QQHUFLUFOH
Source: Author
135
ANNEXURE-6
PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT: TIME SCALE
ANNEXURE-7
PROSTECT OF CONNAUGHT PLACE FROM
LIC BUILDING
136
ANNEXURE-8 DETAIL OF MAIN CENTRAL PARK
138
NOTES:
139