RESEARCH BASES FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW AND THEIR PROS AND CONS

Peer-reviewed journals: Peer-reviewed journals involve a rigorous review process by

subject experts in the field. This can ensure high-quality research and eliminate bias. However,
the process can be time-consuming and may lead to publication bias.

Preprint servers: Preprint servers allow researchers to share their research findings
before peer review. This can accelerate the dissemination of new research findings and can
facilitate collaboration. However, preprints are not subject to peer review and may contain
errors or lack quality control.

Conference proceedings: Conference proceedings can provide a platform for

researchers to present their findings and receive feedback from peers. This can help refine
research ideas and facilitate collaboration. However, conference papers may not undergo the
same level of peer review as journal articles and may have a limited audience.

Databases: Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science can provide access
to a wide range of scientific literature. This can help researchers stay up to date with the latest
research and identify relevant studies. However, databases may have limitations in terms of
coverage and may not include all relevant research.

Research institutions: Research institutions such as universities and government

agencies can conduct original research and provide valuable insights into specific areas of study.
This can lead to innovative research findings and can contribute to the scientific community.
However, research institutions may be subject to funding constraints and may have limited
resources.

Open science platforms: Open science platforms such as Open Access repositories and
Open Science Framework can facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing. This can help
increase transparency and accelerate scientific discovery. However, open science platforms may
not have the same level of quality control as traditional peer-reviewed publications.

These are some of the research bases for scientific review and their pros and cons. It is
important for researchers to carefully consider which research base is appropriate for their
research questions and goals.