Table X presents the number and percentage distribution of the visual learner

respondents in terms of their activity scores level and their academic performance level

and the chi-square and significant p-value. As shown in Table X, it was revealed that in

terms of their activity score levels that there were more than one half (61.54%) of the

respondents demonstrated a high level. Also almost one-fourth (23.08%) of the

respondents demonstrated an above moderate level.,…….

Moreover, in terms of their academic performance, there were almost one-half

(46.15%) of the respondents performed an outstanding level. …. There was none (0%)

of the respondents remained at did not meet expectation level.

The distribution of the number of respondents in the five levels between the

activity scores and academic performance categories in the visual learning is not

significant (X2 = 15.528, p = 0.77 > .05), hence, there is no relationship.

Table X
Activity Performanc p
Description n (%) Description n(%) X2
Score e value
8
High 41- 50 (61.54)
Outstanding 90-100 6 (46.15)
Above 3 Very satisfactory 85-89
Moderate 31 - 40 (23.08) 3 (23.08) 15.52 .77(ns)
Satisfactory 80-84 8
Moderate 21-30 1 (7.69) 2 (15.38)
Below Moderate 11-20 1 (7.69) Fairly satisfactory 75-79 2 (15.38)
Low 0-10 0 (0.00) Did not meet expectation 65-74 0 (0.00)
Total 13 (100) 13 (100)
Number and Percentage Distribution of the Visual Learner Respondents in Terms of Their
Activity Scores and their Academic Performance and the Chi-square and Significant p-value
Note. ns – not significant at .05 level

(put ur insight here,, why there is no relationship… rasonis nimo dri)…. Justify

this findings thru related studies….

Table Y
Activity n Performanc
Description Description n(%) X2 p value
Score (%) e
High 41- 50 Outstanding 90-100
Above
Very satisfactory 85-89
Moderate 31 - 40
Moderate 21-30 Satisfactory 80-84 13.521 .332 (ns)
Below
Fairly satisfactory 75-79
Moderate 11-20
Low 0-10 Did not meet expectation 65-74
Number and Percentage Distribution of the Visual Learner Respondents in Terms of Their
Activity Scores and their Academic Performance and the Chi-square and Significant p-value
Note. ns – not significant at .05 level
Table Z
n Performanc
Description Description n(%) X2 p value
Activity Score (%) e
High 41- 50 Outstanding 90-100
Above Moderate 31 - 40 Very satisfactory 85-89
Moderate 21-30 Satisfactory 80-84 3.250 .517 (ns)
Below Moderate 11-20 Fairly satisfactory 75-79
Did not meet
65-74
Low 0-10 expectation
Number and Percentage Distribution of the Kinesthetic Learner Respondents in Terms of Their
Activity Scores and their Academic Performance and the Chi-square and Significant p-
value
Note. ns – not significant at .05 level