You are on page 1of 1

Since the beginning of time man has been looking for an efficient way to flush out the lie.

Various innovative techniques were tried. Some were ridiculous, other cruel, but they were all
based on the assumption that some physiological reaction occurred when a person was
confronted with a specific event under investigation and that this reaction would have a
detectable external manifestation. In 1730, the British novelist Daniel Defoe in his essay "An
Effectual Scheme to the Immediate Preventing and Suppressing of Street Robberies all Other
Disorders of the Night" advance a theory that the pulse of a suspicious person can reveal that
the person is lying. In 1921, John A. Larson, a Canadian psychologist employed by the Police
Service of California, Berkeley, built what many consider to be the original lie detector device
His instrument provided continuous readings of blood pressure, rather than discontinuous
readings of the sort found in Marston's device. He named his instrument the polygraph, a word
coming from Greek and meaning several written because the instrument had the ability to read
multiple psychological responses at the same time and document these responses on a rotating
drum of smoked paper. Using his polygraph, John A. Larson was the first person to measure and
record continuously and simultaneously the heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory
variations of a person during an interrogation. His polygraph was used extensively and very
successfully, in criminal investigations.

The history of research into psychophysiological measurements as an aid to detecting lying,


widely known as the ‘lie detector’ or polygraph, is the focus of this review. The physiological
measurements used are detailed and the debates that exist in regards to its role in the
investigative process are introduced. Attention is given to the main polygraph testing methods,
namely the Comparative Question Test and the Concealed Information Test. Discussion of these
two central methods, their uses and problems forms the basis of the review. Recommendations
for future research are made specifically in regards to improving current polygraph technology
and exploring the role of the polygraph in combination with other deception detection
techniques.

You might also like