Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab 4 Report - 20001169 - Muhammad Faiz Bin Bakrin
Lab 4 Report - 20001169 - Muhammad Faiz Bin Bakrin
Lab 4 Report - 20001169 - Muhammad Faiz Bin Bakrin
Name ID Number
Muhammad Faiz bin Bakrin 20001169
EXPERIMENT 4 OBJECTIVES:
5. The dial was returned to its original no-stress position. Then, the resistance and op-
amp voltage output measurements in Step 3 was repeated for 6 quarter-turns in the
counterclockwise (CCW) direction, turning the dial one quarter at a time.
6. All the measurements were recorded in Table 1 and 2 (stress in quarter-turns,
voltage and resistance). The relationship of (i) stress vs. resistance and (ii) stress vs.
voltage was plotted.
RESULTS & ANALYSIS
1st turn 2.70 2.57 2.54 2.57 9.36 9.55 9.85 9.60
2nd turn 2.41 2.30 2.40 2.37 8.32 8.22 8.35 8.30
3rd turn 2.20 2.17 2.22 2.19 7.25 7.34 7.16 7.25
4th turn 2.05 1.83 1.85 1.91 6.03 5.77 5.70 5.83
5th turn 1.53 1.46 1.37 1.45 1.84 1.41 1.71 1.65
6th turn 1.23 1.10 1.27 1.20 1.41 1.39 1.21 1.34
Table 1
Table 1 shows 6 voltage and resistance readings when the dial on the strain gauge is turned
at the clockwise (CW) direction. The voltage and resistance measurements get lower as the
dial is turned by increasing quarter-turns. This is because the conductor (or metal beam) on
the strain gauge is under compression. When the conductor is getting compressed, its
length decreases and its cross-sectional area increases, making the conductor resistance
decreases.
Counter Clockwise Direction (CCW)
1st turn 3.04 3.09 3.12 3.08 12.96 14.74 13.86 13.85
2nd turn 3.26 3.40 3.29 3.32 14.47 16.33 18.69 16.50
3rd turn 3.65 3.57 3.74 3.65 22.25 18.33 21.54 21.35
4th turn 4.01 3.89 3.93 3.94 23.03 28.17 30.25 27.15
5th turn 4.10 4.31 4.17 4.19 31.16 35.44 37.30 34.30
6th turn 4.52 4.54 4.60 4.55 50.54 50.54 50.54 50.54
Table 2
The table above shows the voltage and resistance readings when the dial on the strain
gauge is turned at the counterclockwise (CCW) direction. As the quarter-turn increases, the
voltage and resistance measurements increase. The conductor on the strain gauge is under
compression and as a result, its length increases and cross-sectional area decreases, hence
increasing the conductor electrical resistance.
CONCLUSION
This experiment was