Scoring Rubric for Group Presentations

Criteria
Competence Score
10 8 6 4
Introduction Clearly defined Defined background and General description of Limited background
background and relevance general relevance of policy background and relevance of information. No objectives
of policy issue. States issue. Stated objectives policy. Objectives not stated
objective precisely or are not clear.
Body of presentation Clear valid argument Argument made clearly Argument made though not Confused argument
Appropriate level of Level appropriate for always consistent Level of Inappropriate level of
presentation taking into audience presentation fixed and not presentation
account the audience always appropriate for level
Convincing argument of audience
Conclusion All major points fully Major points fully Some major points Few major points
summarized All summarized Most summarized Some summarized No weaknesses
weaknesses admitted Take weaknesses admitted Take weaknesses admitted Take admitted Take home
home messages are clear home messages are home messages are not clear messages absent
unclear or absent
Speaking style Presenters speak clearly Presenters speak fairly Presenters speak indistinctly Presenters speak poorly
Maintain eye contact Well- clearly Maintain some eye or too fast Minimal eye Maintain no eye contact No
rehearsed Appropriate and contact Some rehearsal contact Some rehearsal rehearsal obvious Absent
effective body language obvious Appropriate body possible Body language body language No dressing
Dressed for the occasion language Some dressing inappropriate Minimal for the occasion
for the occasion dressing for the occasion
Audiovisuals Clear and understandable Understandable Text Barely Understandable Text Not understandable Text
Text readable and clear readable Support the main not fully readable Support crowded and difficult to
Fully support the main points of the presentation some of the main points of read Hardly supports the
points of the presentation Some references the presentation Few main points of the
Well referenced references presentation No references
Overall Assessment Convincing presentation Adequate Presentation Weak presentation Poor Presentation

Total:
Numerical Equivalent: