20230703-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-Stop TERRORRISM Using Aboriginal Race

Page 1
1
2
3 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus 3-7-2023
4 Email via portal: https://ministers.ag.gov.au/hon-mark-dreyfus-qc-mp/contact
5
6 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
7 Re Stop TERRORRISM using Aboriginal race
8 Sir,
9 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
10 QUOTE
11 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
12
13 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every
14 member of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament
15 will be a sentry.
16 As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a
17 sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
18 END QUOTE
19
20 “A pretend law made in excess of power is not and never has been
21 a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to disregard it”.
22 Chief Justice Latham 1942
23
24 The Commonwealth of Australia commenced its existence on 1 January 1901 and not before
25 that. It was a “political union” and no more as much since then the European Union became the
26 “political union” regarding countries in Europe.
27
28 From onset Aboriginals were deemed in the new “political union” to be equal as other
29 Australians but politicians as they are will, and they do this around the world, seek to drive
30 citizens to oppose each other, never mind the very constitution that provided them with the
31 position of power they are in, by using “raced” as an issue.
32 Many view they are superior and more intelligent than others because after all they had
33 university degrees, etc, and many even accomplished to garnish a lot of wealth and so are
34 deemed the elite.
35 To them the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is no more but a tool to
36 achieve their purposes.
37
38 Scheuer v Thodes, 416 US 232 94S Ct 1683, 1687 (1974) states:
39 “when a state officer (which includes Judges) acts under a state law in a manner violative
40 of the US Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
41 Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is
42 subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct.
3-7-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme
2 authority of the United States”.
3
4 This too was amplified by the Framers of the Constitution:
5
7 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
8 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
9 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
10 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
11 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any
12 arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 Reality is that generally politicians can mass murder citizens (Such as in the COVID SCAM)
16 and simply not just claim to have done a good job protecting citizens but than even being
17 recognised with some award while a person committing even one murder may end up being
18 executed.
19
20 This needs to change!
21
22 Aboriginals as many other races before and since them are just one of many races that enabled
23 Australia to become as it is now.
24
25 As I quoted in 20230625-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner
26 of AFP-Suppl 98-DISINFORMATION, WARMONGERING, etc:
27
28 QUOTE 20230625-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 98-
29 DISINFORMATION, WARMONGERING, etc
30 QUOTE email 25-6-2023
31 Subject:The Uluru Statement Examined
From Gil May
To admin@inspector-rikati.com
Date Today 11:30
32
33 Attachments
34 THE ULURU STATEMENT OK.docx(~970 KB)Options
35 Message Body
36 This 'Uluru Statement' appears more of a community forward goal blaming everyone else
37 for its own lawless failings and not wanting to accept its own responsibility for the
38 situation it is in — and open to use by the ALP for socialist dominance via a back door
39 entry into the constitution.
40 The confused wording of the Uluru statement bringing the PM to tears appears he is lost
41 in a wilderness beyond reality — the was nothing tear-worthy.
42 THIS DOES NOT HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL SUBSTANCE.
43 WHEN IN DOUBT — DON'T.
44
45 ATTACHED.
46 END QUOTE email 25-6-2023
47 And
48 QUOTE email 25-6-2023 attachment

Page 3
1 ULURU STATEMENT EXAMINED

2 HOW CAN YOU VOTE WISELY ON THE $364.6 MILLION CONSTITUTION REFERENDUM —
3 IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS BASED ON —AND WHY?
4
5 THE ULURU STATEMENT
6 “WE, GATHERED AT THE 2017 NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION,
7 COMING FROM ALL POINTS OF THE SOUTHERN SKY, MAKE THIS
8 STATEMENT FROM THE HEART:”
9 “OUR ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER TRIBES WERE THE FIRST
10 SOVEREIGN NATIONS OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONTINENT AND ITS ADJACENT
11 ISLANDS, AND POSSESSED IT UNDER OUR OWN LAWS AND CUSTOMS.”
12
13 NOT SO: Torres Strait Islanders are different unrelated race of structured people living in
14 a different land.
15 The aboriginals were not the first people and were never a sovereign nation. Aboriginals
16 were a warring group of tribes of no cohesive structure, unity or language, frequently
17 wiping out entire neighbouring tribes, women and children inflicting terrible atrocities to
18 take over their food areas, as recorded by pioneers and officials.
19 The Reverend E Gribble referred to them as “A DESPISED RACE” 1932:
20 Captain James Cook and Botanist Joseph Banks 1770, wrote of the Aborigines they
21 encountered as “…a naked and treacherous lot”.
22 Noted Botanist & Explorer, Allan Cunningham 1827 described them as, “….. the very
23 zero of civilization”.
24 Professor Alfred Cort Haddon, Sc.D., FRS, FRGS: Author “The Races Of Man” 1909: stated,
25 the aborigines were clearly “….. pre-Dravidian” people from South India.
26 They were not “the first sovereign nation” — neither first nor sovereign.
27 They were never “the first”: Australia, Papua-New Guinea, Indonesia and Asia were all the
28 one ancient continent of Sunda-Sahul joined by pathways of grassy plains, Australia was
29 once one-third larger where animals and humans migrated frequently. Papua New Guinea
30 has Echidnas, Kangaroos, Possums, Bandicoots, Cassowary, and more — it would have
31 taken a very, very long time for the Echidna and Cassowary to have got there — either
32 way.
33
34 They were never a nation and never “sovereign”:
35 SOVEREIGN: adjective.
36 Meaning: possessing supreme or ultimate power:
37
38 They had no cohesive government, national tribal structure, unity, rules or language.
39
40 “THIS OUR ANCESTORS DID, ACCORDING TO THE RECKONING OF OUR
41 CULTURE, FROM THE CREATION, ACCORDING TO THE COMMON LAW
42 FROM ‘TIME IMMEMORIAL’, AND ACCORDING TO SCIENCE MORE THAN
43 60,000 YEARS AGO.”
44

Page 4
1 “…. the reckoning of our culture, from Creation”, is very wrong, you have only been here
2 for about 141 generation or 4,230 years. The ‘time immemorial’ is unfounded — Science
3 has now totally refuted the 60,000 years by DNA and identification of other prior races.
4 The Torres Strait Islander Meriam people of Murray Island are of Melanesian descent
5 from the Lapita people of about 30,000 years, they had cultivated food production
6 gardens and held land tenure under village law, they were people of a well-established
7 productive community; they were experienced ocean fishermen and ocean travellers
8 between Islands who socially interacted and traded with other islanders. They are an
9 advanced Islander people of achievement, whose laws were compassionate and very
10 protective of their women, children and community.
11 These are two very different unrelated people and cultures that should not be linked
12 together under any circumstances. It is another part of aboriginal distortions instigated by
13 the white aboriginal modernists. National Geographic wrote years ago Australian
14 Aboriginals are ‘The world’s last remaining Stone Age people’ whose highest technology
15 was a stone axe. Whereas the Torres Strait Islanders were a very different race of civilised
16 achievers.
17 They are not related in any way to Aboriginals who by mtDNA are proven to have come
18 from India about 4,230 years ago. Their claim upon prior ancient people’s rock art and
19 artifacts belonging to them or their ancestors are totally false and appear another
20 ongoing fraud, they are unrelated very different races.
21 The reference “according to common law”, appears based on false hearsay and
22 dishonoured by aboriginals wanting a one-way consideration refusing to accept European
23 common law since settlement.
24
25 “THIS SOVEREIGNTY IS A SPIRITUAL NOTION:”
26
27 NOTION: noun.
28 Meaning: a vague or general idea: a theory or belief held by a person or group: an
29 inclination or whim, or a belief or impression about something.
30 SPIRITUAL: a body feeling without any material substance being belief without proof.
31
32 “THE ANCESTRAL TIE BETWEEN THE LAND, OR ‘MOTHER NATURE’, AND
33 THE ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PEOPLES”
34
35 Torres Strait people were a well structure society of achievers with land tenure and
36 farming practices. Remove the Torres Strait people from your claims — they stand
37 strongly on their own merits — stop trying to ride upon their higher achievement and
38 skills of structured respectful civilised society.
39 Stand on your own feet, as descendants of stone-age people who made no physical usage
40 of land, it was never cultivated or farmed, they only walked across the land to gather
41 whatever food was available, there was no land tenure or history as they had no common
42 language, concept of measured time, numeracy or literature ability.
43
44 “WHO WERE BORN THEREFROM, REMAIN ATTACHED THERETO, AND MUST
45 ONE DAY RETURN THITHER TO BE UNITED WITH OUR ANCESTORS.”
46

Page 5
1 A line of pseudo feel-good philosophy — all bodies compost back into the earth.
2
3
4 “THIS LINK IS THE BASIS OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SOIL, OR BETTER, OF
5 SOVEREIGNTY.”
6
7 They never owned land, the old people always people said, ‘WE DO NOT OWN THE LAND
8 WE LOOK AFTER THE LAND FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS AS CUSTODIANS’; It was never
9 ‘sovereign’ and had no ‘sovereignty’, they were warring tribal groups who killed off the
10 previous people before them and took their land by conquest only — their slaughter and
11 mutilation of other tribes were well recorded.
12
13 “IT HAS NEVER BEEN CEDED OR EXTINGUISHED, AND CO-EXISTS WITH THE
14 SOVEREIGNTY OF THE CROWN.”
15
16
17 SOVEREIGNTY: the authority of a state to govern itself or another state.
18 Sovereignty never existed amongst the tribes; the very concept was unknown. Co-
19 existence was subject to kill or be killed practice as recorded by pioneers and officials.
20
21
22 “HOW COULD IT BE OTHERWISE? THAT PEOPLES POSSESSED A LAND FOR
23 SIXTY MILLENNIA AND THIS SACRED LINK DISAPPEARS FROM WORLD
24 HISTORY IN MERELY THE LAST TWO HUNDRED YEARS?”
25
26 FALSE: It is “otherwise”: Scientific DNA examination by the Max Planck Institute of
27 Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany, proved they arrived here from India 141
28 generations ago or about 4,230 years ago.
29 Central University of Haryana Jant-Pali, India, scientific DNA studies of the M42
30 haplogroup proved they shared DNA lineage between Indians and Australian Aborigines
31 — they are the same people.
32
33 The artefacts and rock art of numerous earlier races were totally unrelated people and
34 not their ancestors. Skeletons of different structured previous races prove they were not
35 the original occupiers — Endocast skulls of prior people millions of years old exist.
36 Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology prove numerous prior races occupied Australia.
37
38
39 “WITH SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND STRUCTURAL
40 REFORM, WE BELIEVE THIS ANCIENT SOVEREIGNTY CAN SHINE THROUGH
41 AS A FULLER EXPRESSION OF AUSTRALIA’S NATIONHOOD.”
42
43 There was no “sovereignty”, no unity, no government only primitive stone-age people —

44 as recorded by pioneers and officials. You have never accepted democratic law of

Page 6
1 nationhood, you refuse to ‘close the gap’ from lawless communities to civilised society.
2 You have given little in return for all the many billions we have given you — many do not
3 even respect civilised law.
4 The constitution recognises all Australian people equally, it does not need any change and
5 certainly not to insert a separation of the Australian people by ‘Race’. If race is to be
6 inserted into the constitution, then we must include all the races of people from the 238
7 different countries who now call Australia home, without discrimination. The very
8 concept of the ‘Voice’ referendum is seriously racists and discriminatory such being
9 prohibited by law.
10 The structural reforms needed must be implemented in your own communities first,
11 prove your worthiness by establishing a civilised, respectful, law-abiding society without
12 violence, sexual abuse, rape and gross disrespect to others within your community and to
13 all people — you are judged by what you do — or don’t do — not by fine words or theory.
14 Your first step into the future must be the education of your community and children, to
15 live decently, respectfully with the family structure, safety and wellbeing the basis of your
16 society
17
18 “PROPORTIONALLY, WE ARE THE MOST INCARCERATED PEOPLE ON THE
19 PLANET. WE ARE NOT AN INNATELY CRIMINAL PEOPLE.”
20
21 Crime, violence, theft, rape, murder, substance abuse, bad violent attitude, abusive
22 antisocial acts and behaviour in many of your societies are appalling and are the reason
23 for incarceration showing an ‘innate criminal’ tendency does exists — You are not
24 incarcerated for being good honest decent respectful citizens obeying your communities
25 and government law — You need to understand that fact.
26 Your problem can only be removed by positively identifying the cause — only when the
27 causative factors are removed — will the problem cease. In this case the causative factors
28 are lack of education, poor home life, no self-discipline, no respect and decency to all
29 people. These matters can only be successfully resolved on a community level either by
30 consensus or by the force of law — your choice.
31
32 “OUR CHILDREN ARE ALIENED FROM THEIR FAMILIES AT UNPRECEDENTED
33 RATES.”
34
35 This happens across all culture for the same reasons — from poor community standards
36 and home life when parental teaching, guidance, education, self-discipline and respect
37 have failed both in parents and children — you created the problem — we can help
38 resolve it only if ‘YOU’ are willing to work together with a new direction and new attitude.
39 Nobody owes you anything, understand that fact — you either want to change and walk
40 together into a better future — or stay where you are in life — it’s your choice, your
41 decision — and good luck.
42
Page 7
1 “THIS CANNOT BE BECAUSE WE HAVE NO LOVE FOR THEM.”

2
3 Love is an emotional guide of respect for each other, their fellow man, self-discipline and
4 education — there are no attributes of love in your violent communities.
5
6 “AND OUR YOUTH LANGUISH IN DETENTION IN OBSCENE NUMBERS. THEY
7 SHOULD BE OUR HOPE FOR THE FUTURE.”
8
9 The failure to establish a good respectful home life and environment of strong community
10 values, where self-discipline, respect for law, pride and education are disregarded —
11 ‘YOU’ are destroying the future of ‘YOUR’ children by ‘YOUR’ own acts — ‘YOU’ are why
12 they languish in detention centres in obscene numbers because ‘YOU’ failed to give them
13 a good standard of self-respect, self-discipline, guidance and education. Stop blaming
14 others for your own errors. Own up — Stand up — and — Fix it up.
15 Detention occurs across all communities for exactly the same reasons. You stupidly think
16 that a referendum title will solve your problems, you made the problems and lawlessness
17 yourself — a referendum title will not encourage you to improve, it will only lock
18 lawlessness into acceptance.
19
20 “THESE DIMENSIONS OF OUR CRISIS TELL PLAINLY THE STRUCTURAL
21 NATURE OF OUR PROBLEM. THIS IS THE TORMENT OF OUR
22 POWERLESSNESS.”
23
24 “These dimensions” are disrespect of law, family and education.
25 “The structural nature of our problem”, are well identified, do something about it, get
26 motivated and stop expecting others to solve the problems of ‘YOUR’ own making, stop
27 your parasitic attitude expecting others to carry you. Awareness is useless unless ‘YOU’ do
28 something about it, get motivated, get results — stop the disregard of law.
29 “This is the torment of our powerlessness”, ‘YOU’ are only powerless because ‘YOU’
30 choose to be. No one gives you power or authority, ‘YOU’ stand up and take it — and use
31 it wisely — as your elders once did.
32
33 “WE SEEK CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS TO EMPOWER OUR PEOPLE AND
34 TAKE A RIGHTFUL PLACE IN OUR OWN COUNTRY.”
35
36 Words written in a constitution will do nothing to change your attitudes — you are your
37 own problem.
38 There needs a big attitude change starting by reforms to your own communities,
39 empower your people and children to take a rightful place in your own communities first.
40 Set an exemplary standard of community involvement of high family standards of
41 decency, respect and education. Stop the high levels of criminality, rape, disrespect of
42 women and children, stop the substance abuse, theft, rude filthy language and
43 contemptuous disrespect.
44 When you have achieved a high standard for your own communities and get your own
45 house in order — then step forward with pride and achievement where you will be held

Page 8
1 in high regard across the land having established a future direction for your children’s
2 future.
3 You get respect and success from what you do, not from a word written in a constitution
4 — words will not change your thinking or your heart.
5
6 “WHEN WE HAVE POWER OVER OUR DESTINY OUR CHILDREN WILL
7 FLOURISH. THEY WILL WALK IN TWO WORLDS AND THEIR CULTURE WILL
8 BE A GIFT TO THEIR COUNTRY.”
9
10 You have always had power over your own destiny but many preferred a parasitic
11 existence, substance abuse and laziness, you forgot to lift your thinking from your
12 ancestor’s stone-age attitude into the future offered to you by the modern world. You
13 chose to walk in the past — You forgot your ancestors had traditional pride and respect,
14 that required self-discipline, self-respect and toughness — You chose to leave that behind
15 and disintegrate into the lawless mess of so many of your communities. The same self-
16 discipline, self-respect and toughness of your ancestor are needed across all people to be
17 good parents, teachers and achievers in life. The lawless disintegration of your
18 communities for decades has seen a corresponding loss of you culture your current
19 generation have no interest in.
20
21 “WE CALL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FIRST NATIONS VOICE
22 ENSHRINED IN THE CONSTITUTION.”
23
24 You are not the “First Nations” people, many others lived here long before your time —
25 accept that fact and live in reality.
26 The elders acknowledge the rock art being painted “By the people before our time
27 began”.
28 Your Uluru Statement is not of substance to be included in a nation’s constitution.
29 It is the words of pseudo intellectuals that does not in any way represent Aboriginal
30 Australia.
31 It is nothing more than the basis for a struggling community coming to terms with their
32 internal failures. that need a reality starting point to restructure their own goals and
33 objectives as a written community directive to be achieved in unison. That must
34 eventuate first and foremost before you can move forward.
35
36 “MAKARRATA IS THE CULMINATION OF OUR AGENDA: THE COMING
37 TOGETHER AFTER A STRUGGLE. IT CAPTURES OUR ASPIRATIONS FOR A
38 FAIR AND TRUTHFUL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA AND
39 A BETTER FUTURE FOR OUR CHILDREN BASED ON JUSTICE AND SELF-
40 DETERMINATION.”
41
42 For a “truthful relationship” you need to stop your “First Nations” fantasy, you were
43 never the first to occupy Australia.
44 You expect us to believe by some mysterious means you regularly patrolled the coastline
45 and kept all others out for millions of years?

Page 9
1 Your aspirations must come from within your own communities first, only ‘YOU’ can
2 change your direction in life to a respectful law-abiding community. When that is
3 achieved with respect for each other, minimal incarceration and education for your
4 children, you can become an exemplary community — you have to achieve greatness and
5 respect within your own community first.
6 Violence, substance abuse, rape of women and children has no place and no friends —
7 Only when your community is worthy of respect and friendship — Will it will be given by
8 your own people and the people of Australia.
9
10
11 “ASPIRATIONS FOR A FAIR AND TRUTHFUL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
12 PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA AND A BETTER FUTURE FOR OUR CHILDREN”.
13
14 Will only be achieved by your own truthfulness, when you reject the blatant distortions of
15 your own history from listening to rubbish distortions by the ‘white indigenous invaders’
16 and their concocted ‘New Understanding’ of history — over the wise words of your old
17 people are shameful. Sadly, most traditions were abandoned over a century ago, they
18 are lost and can never be recovered — therefor your community need a complete re-
19 assessment of future direction. Gather the old wise ones, ask their advice, blend it with
20 your own modern knowledge and current laws, listen only to wise achievers and never
21 fools or the greedy.
22 Take a deep breath of fresh air, look to the east at the rising sun, let that be your guide
23 for a new beginning of life, a new direction for your children and community. Open a new
24 page of life and together write a new rule book, a new direction, a road map for your
25 people — with no ‘stop signs’. You set the new direction you want to take — make it the
26 envy of all others, walk forward with self-esteem and you own power from within — that
27 everyone will respect and admire.
28
29 “WE SEEK A MAKARRATA COMMISSION TO SUPERVISE A PROCESS OF
30 AGREEMENT-MAKING BETWEEN GOVERNMENTS AND FIRST NATIONS AND
31 TRUTH-TELLING ABOUT OUR HISTORY.”
32
33 These words epitomise your failure to accept reality, you are not the nation’s first people
34 and do not understand nor accept “truth-telling” of history. You live in delusions of
35 untruth and deceit to yourself, family and your own community.
36 Your community standard of criminality excludes you from general acceptance, these
37 lawless disrespectful communities reflect badly upon all the good aboriginal communities
38 — you shame the decades of hard work and success of many others before you. You
39 need to display achievement in “a process of agreement-making”, in your own
40 communities first.
41 “Truth-telling” is non-existent in most communities, it is only a few of the old remaining
42 people that tell the truth, the rest are distortions of the ‘white indigenous invaders’ with
43 their ‘new’ understanding of dollar dominated distorted history forced upon the old folk
44 and fed to children creating animosities and bad attitudes.
45 The term “truth-telling” is preceded by dishonesty, you are aboriginals from India are not
46 and never were the first people of this nation. Despite the Victorina government’s
47 apparent attempt to have all previous skeletons destroyed and removal of records. There
Page 10
1 are photographs, forensic Anthropology, Archaeology and proven Scientific DNA that
2 establish hard irrefutable evidence of many races having lived here over Millenia long
3 before current Indians claiming aboriginal status. The ancient endocast skulls millions of
4 years old tell an untold story of Hominid evolution. Have a DNA blood test like Ernie
5 Dingo that showed Indian ancestors.
6 The old people tell their stories of “The people before their time began”, of the tiny ‘giro
7 giro’ people who painted the Wandjina rock art, the ‘Little People of the Rainforest’ are
8 held on photographs. In 265 AD and in the 1400’s and 1500’s, Ships Captains recorded
9 little people one-metre-high, as did early explorers.
10 The Tasmania Aboriginals were Papuans with frizzy hair; the Gwion Gwion rock art were
11 painted by African San people, Mungo man was a gracile Asian, the Flat-Head skulls are
12 from an unknown Hominid ancestry, Kow Swamp and Coobool Creek robust people
13 were modern Homo erectus — the evidence is written in artifacts and skeletons all over
14 Australia. You are NOT the nation’s first people.
15
16 The ancient endocast skulls are from at least three different lineages, one was filled with
17 volcanis ash when wet sets like concrete, thus dating the skull — buried in 10 million year
18 old volcanic ash, dated by the NSW Department of Geophysical Survey.
19 You are not and never were the nations first people, your ancestors arrived from India
20 about 4,230 years or 141 generations ago and killed the previous race of people that lived
21 here, taking their land. You wrongly claim their artifacts, rock art and skeletons of prior
22 unrelated people as your acestors to fraudulently claim their history and land. You
23 dishonsty negates you claims.
24
25 “IN 1967 WE WERE COUNTED, IN 2017 WE SEEK TO BE HEARD.”
26
27 “In 1967 we were counted” — Is just more misunderstood nonsense twisted and used as
28 PR to mislead the public. Proving the Uluru statemen is not based on fact but on
29 theoretical sympathy gathering baloney unfit as the basis of referendum inclusion.
Page 11
1 The population number is what decides the size of electorates and number of MPs, plus
2 the need for police, schools, hospitals and services. It had nothing to do with census
3 figures.
4 INDIGENOUS RECOGNITION AND CONSTITUTIONAL MYTHS. by Helen Irving.
5 Quote: The Aboriginal people have always been counted, from the very first
6 Commonwealth census in 1911. In fact, census statistics specifically recorded the
7 populations of Aboriginal Australians. “Half-blood” Aborigines were considered to be
8 white and were included in the general census.
9 The purpose of section 127 was to guide the calculation of the numbers of parliamentary
10 representatives per State and also to determine certain State financial entitlements and
11 obligations, based on State populations. Unquote.
12
13 QUADRANT, Peter O’Brien, 4 May 2023:
14 Quote: Section 51(xxvi) did not exclude Aborigines from the Commonwealth or the
15 Constitution. It merely excluded them from the class of people for whom the
16 Commonwealth could make special laws, because that was the responsibility of the
17 states.
18
19 Aborigines in NSW, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania could vote in colonial elections
20 before 1901 and, by virtue of Section 41 of the Constitution, they could vote in
21 Commonwealth elections. Aboriginals could vote if they registered. In 1962 – before the
22 1967 referendum – the Commonwealth legislated to extend the vote to any Aborigine
23 who did not already have it (already registered), demonstrates clearly that Aborigines
24 were not excluded from the Constitution before 1967. Unquote.
25
26 “In 2017 we seek to be heard” — Really: There are 10 indigneous MP’s in Canberra. In
27 2020 there were 3,273 registered Aboriginal Corporations, delivering health and other
28 services, and making representations to governments. More than 1,000 bureaucrats work
29 in the National Indigenous Australians Agency costing many millions of allocated
30 taxpayers money.
31 The aboriginal organizations receive hundreds of millions of dollars from mining royalties
32 every year. More than 230 million dollars in the NT alone. Taxpayer now provide of $39
33 billion dollars a year on Aboriginals, more than is spent on Medicare.
34 To claim they are not heard is total concocted, distorted baloney — It is Australia’s biggest
35 lie.
36
37 You are over-represented, over-heard and over-funded. National expenditure is about
38 $44,900 per indigenous Australian and around $24,000 for non-indigenous Australian —
39 Where has your money gone, wasted, misappropriated or stolen? ATSIC and others under
40 aboriginal management totally failed due to ineptness and misappropriation, wasting
41 millions.
42
43 You have been heard loudly with land claims to 75.8% of Australia, with governments
44 accepting and promoting your concocted BS ’Welcome to Country’ invented by Ernie
45 Dingo and Richard Whalley, of the ‘Middar Aboriginal Theatre’ in 1976 because two
46 pairs of Maori visitors from NZ and the Cook Islands wanted an equivalent of their own
47 traditional ceremony before they would dance at the Perth International Arts Festival.
48 Worst of all we are insulted and infuriated by this being read on ANZAC DAY and official
49 functions.

Page 12
1 We will not be welcomed to OUR own country and we will not tolerate anyone welcoming
2 the memories and souls of our ANZAC service men and women to their homeland.
3 This is an insulting rude intrusion into the memories of our heroes. We do not tolerate
4 invented rubbish intruding into our sacred day of memories — the gullible stupidity of
5 some in government is appalling.
6 Indigenous former NT Minister for Community Services, Bess Price said, 'All the "Welcome
7 to Country", all the "Smoking Ceremonies" and all the made-up bullshit rituals about "pay
8 our respects to elders past and present" is just one big lie.
9 YOU have been heard loudly and clearly — YOUR distortions of history are heard clearly
10 — They are no basis to corrupt our Constitution as a vehicle for extended parasitic grabs of
11 political control, more land and taxpayers’ money.
12 If you want to be heard — then speak your truth quietly and clearly — listen to the old
13 people and others, for they too have their knowledge.
14 What are the other agendas that require a retrograde insertion of ‘Race’ into the
15 constitution? The reason is hidden in the words the PM refused to reveal or discuss —
16 but revealed in the ABC interview with Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus “There were other
17 elements of aboriginal requirements of truth telling and treaty, but they come next, they
18 come after ‘The Voice’ is put into our constitution”.
19 Got it — After the ‘Yes’ vote — Not before.
20 Pay for it first, then open the box to see what you brought — Come in sucker.
21 Does the government identify a high level of stupidity and ignorance exists in the
22 community sufficient to pass the ‘Yes’ vote — Are you one of them? Is that why the PM
23 will not disclose details, he is relying on your stupidity to trust him — Honest-Anthony is
24 selling you a new car without an engine or gearbox — they come later.
25 The basis of the façade are the groups wanting the words ‘Sovereigns State’ inserted after
26 it is passed, most would not see the legal implications. “…… they come next, they come
27 after ‘The Voice’ is put into our constitution”. Sovereign State’s will have boundaries
28 upheld by law and fully funded by the stupid people who voted ‘YES’ — funds taken from
29 your hospital, ambulances, health and education. Some groups are pushing for all non-
30 aboriginal people to pay a financial tax levy to the ‘Sovereign States, for stealing their
31 land.
32 If there is not enough money, we pay more taxes and higher GST.
33 The ‘YES’ billions will become very expensive monolithic bureaucracy. With no identifiable
34 benefits to anyone — and no way out — without another $364.6 million referendum to
35 nullify the first one. The cost of a new hospital.
36 There will be no legal right of access or journey across sovereign states, you will be locked
37 out — unless you pay a fee: The test areas have been established under native title,
38 where you get fined for trespass.
39 Mt Warning
40 Near Murwillumbah there are guards on duty to arrest and prevent entry onto land the
41 original elders a century ago said had free access to all Australians — The ‘white
42 indigenous invades’ new-understanding’ of invented history is it’s a men’s only sacred
43 site, then how do they explain tribal occupation of women and girls living there? And
44 these unfounded lies are upheld by ignorant governments.
45
46 Githabul elder Harry Boyd, Ngarakwal elder Marlene Boyd, Wijabul elder Fletcher Roberts
47 and Gilbert King stood in my garden looking at Mt Warning proudly saying “The land
48 belonged to everyone to climb, explore and enjoy” — “Aboriginal land does not belong to
Page 13
1 anyone, we do not own the land — it is held in trust by us for our children and their
2 children’s future”. The words were once spoken by old aboriginal elders all across
3 Australia in previous years, long before the birth of those now wrongly claiming land
4 ownership and making land claims— in denial of tribal custodianship law.
5 Clearly ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ is discarded as a tenure of justice.
6 North Stradbroke Island
7 December 2019, Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk visited Stradbroke for a
8 ceremony to formally hand over land deeds for 6,400 hectares — almost 24 per cent of
9 the island — back to traditional owners.
10 Today families who wish to walk across this land to the beach to go for a swim or fishing
11 can be prosecuted for trespass as with all the other land handed over to aboriginals
12 across Australia.
13 Stockton Beach
14 Mr Geoff Walker, advised — Up my way they 'own' Stockton beach, a 20-mile strip of
15 sand between Newcastle and Pt. Stephens. At Easter they (Aboriginals) sit at the 4WD
16 entrance and charge $20 per vehicle. They make countless thousands as city people flock
17 to the place.
18 Has GST been paid on these entry fees and where is the accounting records and bank
19 accounts?
20 Grampian in Victoria, Uluru in NT etc.
21
22 “WE LEAVE BASE CAMP AND START OUR TREK ACROSS THIS VAST
23 COUNTRY. WE INVITE YOU TO WALK WITH US IN A MOVEMENT OF THE
24 AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE FOR A BETTER FUTURE.”
25
26 Nice feel-good PR falsities, this is not unity but a ‘division-by-race’ you are invited to join
27 and vote for.
28 It is a hidden deceit to achieve a goal of taxpayer funded dominance over our Australia via
29 land title transfer, where there are claims to 62.7% of Australia — the Voice referendum
30 extensions admitted by the Attorney-General will see the end of Australian freedoms as
31 we know it today and the democratic independent function of parliament — possibly
32 subservient to high court control of legislation.
33 Learned Judges, Terrence Cole former judge of the NSW Court of Appeals who presided
34 over two Royal commissions and Ian Callinan AC, former Justice of the High Court of
35 Australia and others, strongly advise against a ‘Yes’ vote as few understand the destructive
36 implications at law.
37 This ‘Uluru Statement’ appears more of a community forward goal blaming everyone else
38 for its own lawless failings and not wanting to accept its own responsibility for the
39 situation it is in — and open to use by the ALP for socialist dominance via a back door
40 entry into the constitution.
41 The confused wording of the Uluru statement bringing the PM to tears appears he is lost in
42 a wilderness beyond reality — the was nothing tear-worthy.
43 THIS DOES NOT HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL SUBSTANCE.
44 WHEN IN DOUBT — DON’T.
45 Good luck everybody if you vote for ‘The Voice’, there are endless future years to regret
46 at your leisure as you pay billions more in higher taxes and GST — that should be going to
47 health, ambulances, hospitals and you children’s education.
48 Data extracted from a soon to be released book ‘The ‘UNKNOWN’ History of Australia’.
Page 14
2
3 Schedule_and_Determinations_map.jpg (3308×2339) (nntt.gov.au)
4
5 END QUOTE email 25-6-2023 attachment
6 ENDF QUOTE 20230625-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl
7 98-DISINFORMATION, WARMONGERING, etc
8
10 QUOTE
11 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
12 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
13 END QUOTE
14
16 QUOTE
17 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
18 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
19 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?
20 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
21 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
22 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
23 END QUOTE
24
26 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
27 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
28 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
29 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in the
30 meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
31 END QUOTE
32
34 QUOTE
35 Mr. BARTON.-We are going to suggest that it should read as follows:-
36 the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make any laws not applicable
37 to the general community; but so that this power shall not extend to authorize
38 legislation with respect to the affairs of the aboriginal race in any state.
39 Mr. ISAACS.-My observations were extended much further than that. The term
40 general community" I understand to mean the general community of the whole
41 Commonwealth. If it means the general community of the whole Commonwealth, I do not
42 see the meaning of saying that the Parliament of the Commonwealth shall have the
43 exclusive authority to do that, because any single state would have the right to do it under
44 any circumstances. If it means less than that-if it means the general community of a state-I
Page 15
1 do not see why it should not be left to the state. We should be placed in a very awkward
2 position indeed if any particular state is forbidden to pass any distinctive legislation in
3 certain well-known instances. For instance, if Victoria should choose to enact that Afghans
4 shall only get hawkers' licences under certain conditions which are not [start page 228]
5 applicable to Europeans she may be debarred by this sub-section from doing so. I do not
6 know how it will affect our factory law in regard to the Chinese which does not operate
7 beyond the confines of Victoria at all.
8 Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Why single out the Afghans?
9 Mr. ISAACS.-If any other race possess the same characteristic as the Afghans I will put
10 them in the same class. At all events, the expression general community" means the whole
11 community of the Commonwealth. I do not think that this has any application. If it is to
12 have any application at all, it seems to me to be intended to debar the state from passing
13 legislation-necessary legislation, but purely confined to that state. I do not think that that
14 sub-section ought to be there at all if that is the meaning of it.
15 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-I think the original intention of this sub-section
16 was to deal with the affairs of such persons of other races-what are generally called
17 inferior races, though I do not know with how much warrant sometimes-who may be
18 in the Commonwealth at the time it is brought into existence, or who may under the
19 laws of the Commonwealth regulating aliens come into it. We have made the dealing
20 with aliens, which includes a certain degree of coloured immigration, a power of the
21 Commonwealth, and we have made the dealing with immigration a power of the
22 Commonwealth, so that all those of the races who come into the community after the
23 establishment of the Commonwealth will not only enter subject to laws made in
24 respect to their immigration, but will remain subject to any laws which the
25 Commonwealth may specially devise for them. There is no reason why the
26 Commonwealth should not have power to devise such laws.
27 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-An exclusive power?
28 Mr. BARTON.-It ought to have an exclusive power to devise such laws.
29 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-If it does not exercise it can the state exercise it?
30 Mr. BARTON.-Once the Commonwealth legislates with reference to the question of
31 aliens and immigration, its legislation displaces the state law.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 What this amount to is that had the 1967 Ss51(xxvi) referendum never been held that the
35 States/Territories would have been free to continue to legislate as they were doing prior to this
36 con-job referendum even up till now. But when you got grossly incompetent politicians,
37 constitutional lawyers, judges, etc, dealing with something they haven’t got a clue about how it
38 would apply then well you end up in problems. The Voice cannot undue this all but as I
39 previously suggested (and quoted below) we need to have proper constitutional amendments
40 which will stop racial discrimination, etc.
41
42 QUOTE
43 Chapter IX - Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
44 129. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice
45 In recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of
46 Australia:
47
48 1. There shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.
49
50 2. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to the
51 Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters
52 relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Page 16
1
2 3, The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with
3 respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, including
4 its composition, functions, powers and procedures.
5 END QUOTE
6
8 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
9 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
10 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 Ok “subject to this Constitution” means that the Commonwealth cannot legislate anything in
14 contradiction to S25 , Ss512(xxvi), etc. Neither as to undermine the embedded legal provision
15 that all laws must be “UNIFORM” throughout the Commonwealth of Australia.
16
18 QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR.-
19 But already in clause 52 we have agreed to the insertion of a sub-section which
20 enables the Commonwealth to deal with that matter, and there can be no question
21 about it that in course of time the different laws that exist in the states dealing with
22 such coloured races will be similar, and that such races will be dealt with uniformly,
23 so that whatever privileges [start page 673] or disabilities exist in one state with
24 regard to these people will exist in another state.
25 END QUOTE
26
28 QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR.-
29 So that any citizen of any portion of the Commonwealth would have the guarantee of
30 liberty and safety in regard to the processes of law, and also would have a guarantee of the
31 equal administration of the law as it exists. I think Mr. Isaacs will bear me out, that in the
32 United States it has been decided that the title to equal treatment under the law does not
33 mean that you cannot make a law which differentiates one class of the community from
34 another; but, as has been decided, it means that in the administration of the laws you have
35 made, all the citizens shall be treated equally. And that should be so. Whatever privilege
36 we give to our citizens, the administration of the law should be equal to all, whatever
37 their colour. The case I refer to is one of the Chinese cases-I forget the name of it.
38 Mr. ISAACS.-The case of Yick Wo v. Hopkins.
39 END QUOTE
40
41 And let us not ignore the following either regarding any legislation involving a “race”:
42
44 QUOTE
45 Mr. BARTON.-We are going to suggest that it should read as follows:-
46 the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make any laws not applicable
47 to the general community; but so that this power shall not extend to authorize
48 legislation with respect to the affairs of the aboriginal race in any state.
49 Mr. ISAACS.-My observations were extended much further than that. The term
50 general community" I understand to mean the general community of the whole
51 Commonwealth. If it means the general community of the whole Commonwealth, I do not
52 see the meaning of saying that the Parliament of the Commonwealth shall have the
53 exclusive authority to do that, because any single state would have the right to do it under
54 any circumstances. If it means less than that-if it means the general community of a state-I
Page 17
1 do not see why it should not be left to the state. We should be placed in a very awkward
2 position indeed if any particular state is forbidden to pass any distinctive legislation in
3 certain well-known instances. For instance, if Victoria should choose to enact that Afghans
4 shall only get hawkers' licences under certain conditions which are not [start page 228]
5 applicable to Europeans she may be debarred by this sub-section from doing so. I do not
6 know how it will affect our factory law in regard to the Chinese which does not operate
7 beyond the confines of Victoria at all.
8 Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Why single out the Afghans?
9 Mr. ISAACS.-If any other race possess the same characteristic as the Afghans I will put
10 them in the same class. At all events, the expression general community" means the whole
11 community of the Commonwealth. I do not think that this has any application. If it is to
12 have any application at all, it seems to me to be intended to debar the state from passing
13 legislation-necessary legislation, but purely confined to that state. I do not think that that
14 sub-section ought to be there at all if that is the meaning of it.
15 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-I think the original intention of this sub-section
16 was to deal with the affairs of such persons of other races-what are generally called
17 inferior races, though I do not know with how much warrant sometimes-who may be
18 in the Commonwealth at the time it is brought into existence, or who may under the
19 laws of the Commonwealth regulating aliens come into it. We have made the dealing
20 with aliens, which includes a certain degree of coloured immigration, a power of the
21 Commonwealth, and we have made the dealing with immigration a power of the
22 Commonwealth, so that all those of the races who come into the community after the
23 establishment of the Commonwealth will not only enter subject to laws made in
24 respect to their immigration, but will remain subject to any laws which the
25 Commonwealth may specially devise for them. There is no reason why the
26 Commonwealth should not have power to devise such laws.
27 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-An exclusive power?
28 Mr. BARTON.-It ought to have an exclusive power to devise such laws.
29 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-If it does not exercise it can the state exercise it?
30 Mr. BARTON.-Once the Commonwealth legislates with reference to the question of
31 aliens and immigration, its legislation displaces the state law.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 HANSARD 3-4-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
35 QUOTE
36 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: It is sometimes difficult to say what is a trading corporation.
37 What is important, however, is that there should be a uniform law for the recognition of
38 corporations. Some states might require an elaborate form, the payment of heavy fees,
39 and certain guarantees as to the stability of members, while another state might not
40 think it worth its while to take so much trouble, having regard to its different
41 circumstances. I think the states may be trusted to stipulate how they will incorporate
42 companies, although we ought to have some general law in regard to their
43 recognition.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 Why then has to Commonwealth permitted reportedly over 3,600 Aboriginal companies to have
47 a different standard?
48
49 Where in fact is the constitutional powers to spend a reportedly $39 Billion a year on Aboriginal
50 issues?
51
Page 18
1 How on earth can the Voice legitimately set apart legislation specifically for or applying
2 different to Aboriginals when as I have set out above it cannot be done, this as it would violate
3 legal principles embedded in the constitution!
4
5 Where is the constitutional powers for any State/Territory to legislate as to Aboriginal issues,
6 when clearly it denies any legislation regarding Aboriginals since 1967 and also against the
7 “general community”?
8
9 Consider South Australia alleged Voice legislation which clearly defies the federal constitution!
10 Likewise so with Victoria. And then we have the absurdness regarding Western Australia’s
11 legislation named “Aboriginal Hertiage Act”.
12
13 “Farmers 'absolutely ambushed' by WA's Aboriginal _ Heritage Act”
14
15
16 This allegedly requires a farmer desiring to dig a hole deeper than a short distance to engage an
17 Aboriginal at about $160 an hour.
18
19 Let it be clear that what I \would view as idiots who pursued the 1967 Ss51(xxvi) referendum to
20 include Aboriginals into this section means that all State/Territorial legislation existing were no
21 longer!
22 But also that any Commonwealth legislation since then lacked any legislative validity unless
23 they were legislative provisions that was dealing with all persons of the Aboriginal race, not
24 merely some selection of them, and was for no other purpose than to DISCRIMINATE against
25 Aboriginals.
26
27 The above also makes it very clear that the purported Racial Discrimination Act 1975
28 [KOOWARTA V. BJELKE-PETERSEN (1982) 153 CLR 168 Constitutional Law (Cth)] is
29 unconstitutional because it is a law against the “general community” and defies Ss51(xxvi)!
30
31 I mam obviously not going to call politicians, judges and their collaborators morons because that
32 might not be polite, but in my view this would even be too much of a compliment for those who
33 seem to me to be deranged in their mentality to what the constitution and so its embedded legal
34 principles stand for.
35
36 Let me use another example, such as this unconstitutional State Land Taxation, which I
37 understand the Victorian Government now seems to apply even further in its mania to increase
38 taxation into the stratosphere, because of its out of the world spending.
39 QUOTE
40 I have not explored those in details as to when States specifically commenced to legislate
41 as to State land taxation, however prior to federation councils used to charge (as
42 corporations) for the removal of rubbish, etc. After federation they continued to do so but
43 somehow this then was turned into a State land taxation. I do not know if this was actually
44 so intended by the States or that this was merely a decision by the HCA. However,
45 whatever, as the HCA determined it was a delegated state land taxation then by 11
46 November 1910 when the Commonwealth its Commonwealth land tax the States had to
47 retire from this. Just that no one realised this until I commenced to raise this issue and
48 confronted NSW Kristine Keneally about this.

Page 19
1 It isn't just land taxation but a lot of other issues that the States originally were engaged in
2 and so lawfully but because unlawful due to federation and/or subsequent Commonwealth
3 legislation.
4 There seem to be an awful "constitutional lawyers" (an oxymoron like "Firefighter
5 Firebug") in Australia and they often are giving their alleged expert advice, just that they
6 generally lack yo understand the constitution. After all if they did we wouldn't have this
7 nonsense about Voice, which clashed with numerous legal principles embedded in the
8 constitution.
9
10 In my view it was the High Court of Australia that started all the rot because by in 1904
11 preventing the usage of the Hansard Constitution Convention Debates record it resulted to
12 a gross abuse of judicial powers that went on for decades until the HCA decided to use the
13 Hansard records, but by then the damage was already done and no one besides
14 myself seems to desire to correct it all, and we got "Travelling Pete" Anthony Albanese
15 more interested to push the fraudulent Voice then to concern about keeping his word about
16 lowering heating cost for Australians as he was so much claiming before the election!
17 Well, spending monies, unconstitutionally that is, to support the Ukraine NAZI
18 government to continue its genocide appears to me to be more important then to worry
19 about the suffering of Australian.
20 It may very well be that the States initially didn't change anything but merely that the High
21 Court of Australia drew this conclusion in 1904 due to how the council tries to tax the
22 Commonwealth and much later the States then changed State taxation laws ignoring that
23 after 1910 they no longer had any such powers.
24 Do understand that NSW clearly acknowledged in their writings to me that the State Land
25 Taxation no longer existed , but they claim to have obtained it after the Commonwealth
26 abolished Commonwealth land taxation. My point of issue was therefore that it (so others
27 States/Territories) have to prove how did they obtain the "land taxation" legislative powers
28 to be returned to them when it since 11 November 1910 was an "EXCLUSIVE"
29 Commonwealth and the constitution doesn't provide any mechanism to return those and
30 any other EXCLUSIVE Commonwealth legislative powers to the States.
31 My blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati has extensive set out about it. While I may
32 understand that people do not desire to read perhaps tens of thousands of documentation
33 nevertheless I didn't gain the knowledge I have from just being asleep. I had to put the
34 effort into it to research this all over the decades.
35 Not uncommon people request me to do the preparation of their cases for them knowing I
36 do not charge, but realistically this is far beyond my ability of time and resources. I provide
37 the details and anyone who desires to use it must at the very least understand what the
38 person is writing about.
39 The so called 'constitutional lawyers' are often paid a lot of monies for the sheer and utter
40 nonsense they have foaming from their mouths, and again I do not charge for my
41 presentations as my goal is that Australians are waking up from the utter and sheer
42 nonsense they have been subjected to!
43 Gerrit
44 END QUOTE
45
46 The following is quoted but some typing errors have been removed/corrected. It is just that my
47 computer went on strike fed up with the numerous spelling errors I made while typing and so
48 held readers can eat their heart out having to deal with the typing errors.
49
50 QUOTE 20230623-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 97-
51 Treaties, NATO, TREASON, etc

Page 20
1 Here are some of the constitutional amendments I view would be

2 better to pursue (Not stated in any order of importance):
3
4 1. S116A FREEDOM OF SPEECH (Note: While it is already embedded as a legal
5 principle in the constitution as I wrote extensive about in the past politicians are blatantly
6 ignoring this or just plai9n stupid to understand this and therefore better to include it so
7 never again politicians can use Big Tech, the Media or others to silence Australians
8 (including medical doctors and scientist).
9
10 2. S116B RACIAL DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED (Note: The Framers of the
11 Constitution at their time and circumstances held it appropriate to include ss51(xxvi) as
12 the Colonies already have various legislation regarding races however society has moved
13 on from there and hence the issue of “race” should be prohibited to be involved in
14 legislation or any discrimination albeit for medical purposes this may be a consideration
15 but only to the benefit of the patient. It also means that S25 and Ss51(xxvi) needs to be
16 amended to no longer being applicable)
17
18 3. S116C EQUALITY IN LAW (Note: While Courts may desire to have legal practitioners
19 representing parties the problem is that often this denies a party to be appropriately
20 represented and may end up with a huge legal bill that could be avoided. In the Colosimo
21 case I as a Professional Advocate represented Mr Colosimo FREE OF CHARGE and
22 succeeded in the appeal against Orders for Administration as well in another case
23 regarding CONTEMPT OF COURT. In AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I represented myself
24 successfully in 2 appeals. The court system must provide for a Defendant to be able to
25 submit “written submissions” where the Defendant then may be assisted by others to
26 present a case! Also Courts must be obligated to ensure that any court venue hearing and
27 time is reasonable and not an abuse of p-ower to prevent a Defendant reasonable access
28 to the Court facilities, etc. Such as disabled, etc.
29
30 4. S116D NO UNDUE DELAY IN LITIGATION (Note: Defendants should be entitled to
31 have a reasonable period of time to be heard, in particular if held in detention awaiting
32 trial, and not that the delay in itself becomes a punishment and in the end the Defendant
33 might be found NOT GUILTY or have charged discontinued.
34
35 5. S116E DISCLOSURE OF ALL RELEVANT DETAILS/INFORMATION
36 REGARDING CHARGES (Note: It is not uncommon that a person ended up convicted
37 only to be found afterwards to have been wrongly convicted because the prosecutor or
38 others such as law enforcement agents concealed relevant details that may have been
39 critical in the matter to have been presented before the court. Such details/information
40 must be timely disclose to ensure that the Defendant and/or any legal representatives
41 have sufficient time to possible pursue the validity of details/information)
42
43 6. S116F THE PATIENTS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES RIGHT TO
44 DETERMINE MEDICAL CARE/TREATMENT (Note: During the covid-scam
45 hospitals/care facilities denied patients/residents their constitutional/legal/human and
46 natural rights and isolated them from contact with others at times whern they most
47 needed such contact, etc. Patients were subjected to kind of medical care which were
48 actually to enhance the patient to die rather than to provide appropriate medical care for
49 the benefit of the patient. Often patients/residents are subjected to jabs [Which may or
50 may not be vaccinations] without any proper medical assessment if such jab(s) are

Page 21
1 actually for the benefit of the patient/resident. Persons who had Medical Power of
2 Attorney were nevertheless prevented to exercise their Medical Power of Attorney.)
3
4 7. S116G HOSPITALS & CARE CENTRES AND OTHER BUSINESSES IN
5 CLUDING GOVERNMENT FACILITIES PROHIBITED TO DEMAND SELF
6 HARM TO ANYONE. (Note: Olga my wife (90 years old – suffering from heart failure
7 and other comorbidities) was denied proper medical care by Austin Health, Melbourne
8 because neither she or myself were willing to wear a mask and/or have the bioweapon
9 “gene treatment” poisonous jab. All based upon the covid death cult claims without any
10 scientific evidence to support it. It was like claiming the Toothfairy is real. This also
11 includes that a hospital cannot refuse a transplant because the person didn’t have the
12 bioweapon “gene therapy” poison injection unless a court issue an order for such
13 injection after having heart both sides.)
14
15 8. S116H VACCINATION SHALL NOT BE COMPULSORY AND NEITHER BE
16 SUBJECTED TO COERSION. (Note: If anything the covid scam jabs have caused
17 untold harm and many victims died all based upon lies that the jab would prevent
18 infection/transmission, etc. The States/Territories pursuing so called vaccinations
19 regarding “man-kind” infectious diseases polio, measles, etc, this even so no personal
20 medical assessment was made in each case and it actually is an exclusive Commonwealth
21 matter since 1908! My grandson Dion Schorel ending up with AUTISM and yet no one
22 appears to be held accountable in regard of this. Doctors appear to have the notion that
23 well the pharmaceutical companies it is “safe and effective” regardless it may not at all
24 be so. Hence in each case a personal medical examination is to be required where a
25 medical doctor has assessed the person to be given the jab that it is indeed in the person’s
26 best interest.
27 QUOTE
28 MC23-009372
29 23 June 2023
30 Mr Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka
31 107 Graham Road Viewbank VIC 3084
32 admin@inspector-rikati.com
33 Dear Mr Schorel-Hlavka
34 Thank you for your correspondence of 25 April 2023 to the Attorney-General and
35 Cabinet Secretary, The Hon Mark Dreyfus KC MP, relating to compulsory
36 vaccinations. The Attorney-General has provided your correspondence to the
37 Attorney-General’s Department for consideration.
38 The matters you raise do not fall within the Attorney-General’s portfolio
39 responsibilities so your correspondence has been referred to the Department of
40 Health and Aged Care for their information and response as appropriate.
41 The following link may be used should you wish to follow up this matter directly
42 with the Department of Health and Aged Care – https://www.health.gov.au/about-
43 us/contact-us
44 We apologise for the delay in responding to your correspondence.
45 Yours sincerely
46 Ministerial Correspondence Unit
47 Attorney-General’s Department
48 END QUOTE
49
50 The problem with this is that goi9ng to a link is not going to assist, as I have done so
51 many times, and writing to them has been without success also and after all the Attorney-
52 General as the first law officer should have attended to this as to an issue of law. This
Page 22
1 underlines that a constitutional amendment as proposed by me is providing more

2 security.)
3
4 9. S116I EVERY CITIZEN [SO ITS REPRESENTATIVES] IS ENTITLED ON
5 REQUEST THAT ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND/OR ITS AGENTS
6 PROVIDE FREE OF CHARGE DETAILS/INFORMATION HELD BY SUCH
7 GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND/OR ITS AGENTS. (Note: To give an example my
8 son Mark Schorel contact me as to his son (my grandson) Dion Schorel, having been
9 removed from his legal care without his permission and if I could assist in the matter.
10 Despite for about having requested various government officials for about a year no
11 information has been forthcoming whatsoever. I understand that other citizens similarly
12 have problems to obtain information which may be to hide any unlawful conduct by a
13 public servant, etc. This needs to be addressed.)
14
15 10. S116J NO ONE SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE PROPERTY
16 WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF AN OWNER/OCCUPIER UNLESS BY A
17 COURT ORDER WHERE THE COURT HAS HEARD BOTH SIDES FIRST.
18 (Note: The Framers of the Constitution made clear that they didn’t desire to have soldiers
19 with bayonets against citizens. However it now appears that somehow the Parliament
20 blatantly disregarded this and seem to have authorised for even foreign troops to operate
21 within the Commonwealth of Australia and allegedly cannot be held legally accountable
22 for any violation of law. This is a gross absurdity and needs to be stopped. We already
23 had that a Chief Health Officer, not even a medical qualified doctor, allegedly authorised
24 police to enter properties and enforce mandates, etc. This even so the State/Territory has
25 no such constitutional powers!)
26
27 11. S116K FREEDOM TO TRAVEL, AS SUCH NO TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS
28 UNLESS SO ORDERED BY A COURT AFTER HEARING BOTH SIDES FIRST.
29 (Note: There was this what I consider insane mandate in Victoria that one could not
30 travel more than 5 km beyond once residence. I had a legal obligation to mow grass at
31 my country property some 350 kilometres from my residence and as such prevented to do
32 the mowing despite by law I was required to do so because of fire danger. While I was
33 lucky to have a friend helping out, many may not have this and then have a choice to
34 incur a multi thousand dollar fine and court cost or simply incur a fine to go to do the
35 mowing any how. It is a gross absurdity in law. The same where I was not permitted to
36 have my wife going along to do shopping at the supermarket because of the mandate only
37 one person could go shopping. No scientific basis was for this but just some absurdity of
38 power use and use police to enforce this, again despite mandates falling in the exclusive
39 power of the Commonwealth. I could not even travel top a Justice of the peace or court to
40 file an application against this rot!)
41
42 12. S116L POLITICAL LIBERTY (Note: The Framers of the Constitution provided for
43 POLITICAL LIBERTY but as we witnessed in Victoria citizens protesting against the
44 unconstitutional mandates were facing police in riot gear and firing rubber bullets at
45 protestors at the Shrine of Remembrance while they were holding small children.
46 Somehow the State denied POLITICAL LIBERTY merely to enforce its unconstitutional
47 mandates. Those who protested regarding BLACK LIVES MATTERS (BLM) were
48 freely to do so as somehow covid didn’t get involved, but when going to a park or to the
49 beach with no one else around the danger of the hypothetical covid was lurking around.
50 Well not during curfews as then the State and its workforce used this opportunity to
51 install all kind of CCTV camera’s. As such the curfews [mind you without a court order]
Page 23
1 were then not for any health issues but to enable the government to install spy
2 equipment.)
3
4 13. S116M THE STATES/TERRITORIES SHALL NOT APPLY LAND TAXATION
5 (Note: in 1904 the High Court of Australia in Commonwealth vs Sydney Council held
6 that Council rates were a delegated power of State Land taxation powers. On 11
7 November 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to apply Commonwealth land taxation
8 and by this automatically wiped out the State land taxation powers. The High Court of
9 Australia for example in the income taxation case made clear that once the
10 Commonwealth legislated as to a certain taxation power [in this case income tax] then the
11 States had to retire from this. The constitution doesn’t provide any mechanism that if the
12 Commonwealth abolish any form of taxation the States then can recommence such form
13 of taxation and hence all and any State/Territory land taxation is unconstitutional.)
14
15 14. S116N EVERY NATURAL BORN PERSON WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH
16 OF AUSTRALIA IS A “SUBJECT OF THE KING” AND CANNOT BE DENIED
17 HIS/HER AUSTRALIAN RIGHTS EQUAL AS TO ANY OTHER NATURAL
18 BORN CITIZEN. (Note: Edmund Barton is on record that citizenship is the same as in
19 the USA. Meaning that irrespective if a mother is unlawfully in the country if she gives
20 birth to a child the child is a “natural born” citizen and entitled to all rights as any other
21 “natural born” child in the country. We somehow seems to have so called refugee
22 lawyers who seem to lack to understand this and from time to time children born in
23 Australia have been deported as “stateless”, The High Court of Australia has no judicial
24 powers to override the constitution and as such any judgment to allow for a “stateless”
25 child to be deported is a violation of the constitution.)
26
27 15. S116O A CITIZEN SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO USE AN IDENTITY CARD
28 OR OTHER DOCUMENT BUT ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT
29 WAS ISSUES. The issue of privacy is of concern and while the Federal government
30 claims it is secure with citizen’s details the truth is that hackers even accessed legal
31 offices working with the government. Government insurance office, etc. Now the Federal
32 Government seeks a vaccine ID card this so that foreign enemy entities such as WHO,
33 W.E.F. then can get their hands on every details of Australian and other citizens. This
34 even so the Commonwealth has no constitutional powers for this other than in regard of
35 compensating parts of medical bills. The sheer and utter nonsense also is underlined that
36 when I seek to activate a prepaid sim card then at times it can take about 2½ hours to do
37 so as they not only desire my driver licence details buty also demand my medicare card
38 details and also a contact mobile number and then later demand all the same again and
39 again a contact mobile number. This all because somehow for alleged NATIONAL
40 SECURITY they must have it while the government itself is undermining NATIONAL
41 SECURITY in numerous ways. In particular when handing out the details to foreign
42 entities, etc.)
43
44 16. S116P ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE (Note: Many businesses, and private
45 residents as well as government entities are using CCTV or such kind of video
46 surveillance but then I understand they are not just doing it for security at least not with
47 certain businesses but to build a file on each person. For example to build a profile of a
48 person as to their face, their spending, etc. As such, it is not about security at all. I
49 understand that various companies under Westfarmers such as Coles, Bunnings, etc, are
50 all interchanging details to build a profile of each person and even then may sell it to
51 others. This can endanger certain persons because for example a person who has been
Page 24
1 subjected to domestic abuse and has found a safe place now may be exposed merely by
2 some store releasing to others their profile details of the person. The same with
3 communication companies that may sell the information they obtained from where
4 mobiles were from time to time pinging. In my view only when a Court orders the release
5 of certain information for law enforcement purposes should such information be released
6 but only to the law enforcement agency that applied for the order and not that it can be
7 transmitted to whomever. I had an issue with an Optus store where I took a picture of
8 inside the store and well a person even followed me with a security guard and hassled
9 me. I filed a complaint and with it a copy of the picture making clear there was nothing
10 on towards the picture and was merely taken to prove to Optus management I had
11 attended to the store as was requested for me to do, etc. Now I understand Optus is
12 recording people and even those walking past the store and somehow that is OK but
13 someone doing likewise for genuine and legitimate purposes showing no more but the
14 head shot of the man who served me so with my complaint Optus could identify the staff
15 member who had refused to follow Optus directions that somehow was deemed by this
16 staff member to be unlawful. In the end Optus did pay me a compensation instead. I do
17 view however that appropriate legislative restrictions are needed but for this I view the
18 constitution needs to be amended to enable specific privacy legislation to be provided and
19 not merely pending if some government may or may not do so, eventually if ever at all!
20 The danger is also that companies creating a person’s profile, including a digital face ID
21 and with it what the person purchases as to their cash register details then it targets
22 customers as to their recorded past purchases and as such the CCTV is not for security
23 purposes at all but rather to infringe upon a customer’s private life.)
24
25 17. PROHIBITING OF SCIENTIFIC INGREDIENCES [SUCH AS mRNA) IN FOOD
26 SUPPLIES WITHOUT THE CUSTOMER KNOWLEDGE AND/OR CONSENT.
27 (Note: Australians as other people around the world have been subjected to foreign
28 entities such as W.E.F., U.N., WHO, etc whom desire to change the food supply to their
29 demands rather than to let customer’s decide what they desire to eat. Food supplies fail to
30 show any involvement of say mRNA that may be included and as such customers who
31 may be allergic to this may become serious ill without knowing what caused it. With the
32 covid scam jabs this was very much an issue where some people appear to have become
33 violently ill or even died. A person may purchase alleged “organic” food unaware that in
34 fact the animal may have been fed certain chemicals that end up in the so called
35 “organic” food.)
36
37 18. ABOLISHING s25 OF THE CONSTITUTION (Note: I understand the need for the
38 Framers of the Constitution to have provided for s25 regarding preventing a race to vote
39 however society has moved on and I view this s25 should be abolished.)
40
41 19. ABOLISHING Ss51(xxvi) OF THE CONSTITUTION (Note: Ss51(xxvi) was inserted
42 into the constitution because Colonies had protective legislation against certain races that
43 general were deemed “inferior” “coloured” “alien” races, this so the Commonwealth
44 could provide such UNIFORM DISCRIMINATING legislation for the whole of the
45 Commonwealth. However by deception electors were informed that Aboriginals didn’t
46 have citizenship, etc, and so the exclusion of Ss51(xsxvi) denies them citizenship, etc.
47 There is no way a constitution can have conflicting provisions let alone one section being
48 conflicting to whom it may apply. As S35 of the constitution provided Aboriginals with
49 citizenship and being “subject of the Queen” (as was at that time) then the 1967
50 amendment could only be used to DISCRIMINATE against Aboriginals. Precisely the
51 opposite that was intended! It also means that all so called funding for Aboriginals is
Page 25
1 unconstitutional as it discriminate against the “general community” which the Framers of

2 the Constitution made clear was not permitted!)
3
4
5 Senator Jacinta Nampijnpa Price is an Australian of Aboriginal descent and elected by
6 Aborigines
7 The book is by Thomas Mayo not associated with Senator Jacinta Nampijnpa Price!
8 So now you can allegedly purchase a book (at your own cost) to purportedly discover what they
9 CLAIM about Voice is allegedly applicable, but I doubt they would have a clue what is
10 constitutionally appropriate.
11 END QUOTE 20230623-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl
12 97-Treaties, NATO, TREASON, etc
13
14 I understand that Deputy Director of the Institute of Public Affairs Mr Daniel Wild (Katannning,
15 WA) has concern about this purported “Aboriginal Heritage Act” and well so should have every
16 other person and challenge the purported legislation as to its constitutional validity, considering
17 what I have set out above and I have published over the years at my blog
18 https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati.
19 Hence, I view the calls on WA Government to scrap new Aboriginal Heritage law is a legal
20 requirement where it conflict with the embedded legal principles of the Commonwealth of
21 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
22
Page 26
1 I did also watch a video “Inaugural Speech - NSW Parliament”:

2
3
4
5 Beyond doubt many if not most politicians/lawyers/judges, etc could learn from his speech.
6
7 I understand that “Travelling Pete” (Anthony Albanese) stated:
8 “All of the worst quality of Scott Morrison’s government”
9 Re alleged funds funnelled to Liberal MP Roberts.
10
11 Not having all relevant information at hand it is not for me to pass my personal judgment on
12 former Minister Roberts, but safe to say “Travelling Pete” (Anthony Albanese) would do better
13 to keep his tong in check and stop dribbling the nonsense that he has been engaging in since the
14 purported 2022 federal election. Don’t look for a splinter in the eye of someone else when you
15 cannot even notice the tree in your own!
16
17 So, he is going around travelling at tax payer’s monies to promote this Voice, when he cannot
18 even manage to actually uphold current constitutional principles!
19
20 The message ought to be very clear get rid of all States, Territories and Commonwealth
21 Aboriginal related legislation and then properly consider which, if any, Commonwealth
22 legislation actually fits within the legal principles embedded in the constitution!
23 Also pursue the constitutional amendments I propose so that we can live in a race conflict free
24 society where people are respected for being a human being regardless of race.
25
26
27
28 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal
29 constitution!
30
31 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
32 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
33 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

34 (Our name is our motto!)


20230703-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-Stop TERRORRISM Using Aboriginal Race

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20230703-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-Stop TERRORRISM Using Aboriginal Race

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

3-7-2023 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-7-2023 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 ULURU STATEMENT EXAMINED

3-7-2023 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-7-2023 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

43 There was no “sovereignty”, no unity, no government only primitive stone-age people —

3-7-2023 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 “THIS CANNOT BE BECAUSE WE HAVE NO LOVE FOR THEM.”

3-7-2023 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-7-2023 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-7-2023 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-7-2023 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-7-2023 Page 19 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Here are some of the constitutional amendments I view would be

3-7-2023 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 underlines that a constitutional amendment as proposed by me is providing more

1 unconstitutional as it discriminate against the “general community” which the Framers of

1 I did also watch a video “Inaugural Speech - NSW Parliament”:

33 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

3-7-2023 Page 26 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

You might also like