Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
DESIGN CALCULATION
Materials of Construction:
Normalized is determined based on the UCS-66 material curve selection and Figure UCS-66.
Impact Tested is based on material selection and material data properties.
Element "To" Elev Element Nominal Finished Reqd Thk Reqd Thk Long Circ
Length Thickness Thickness Internal External Eff Eff
Type cm cm mm mm mm mm
mm mm kgf/cm² kgf/cm²
Note: The Wind and Seismic loads were not load factored in this analysis.
Note:
Wind and Earthquake moments include the effects of user defined
forces and moments if any exist in the job and were specified
to act (compute loads and stresses) during these cases. Also
included are moment effects due to eccentric weights if any are
present in the input.
Weights:
Fabricated - Bare W/O Removable Internals 57251.8 kg
Shop Test - Fabricated + Water ( Full ) 129858.4 kg
Shipping - Fab. + Rem. Intls.+ Shipping App. 57251.8 kg
Erected - Fab. + Rem. Intls.+ Insul. (etc) 79454.7 kg
Empty - Fab. + Intls. + Details + Wghts. 98689.1 kg
Operating - Empty + Operating Liquid (No CA) 141179.1 kg
Field Test - Empty Weight + Water (Full) 170795.6 kg
O2 21 OK 29 OK 14.10 OK Passed
O4 21 OK 29 OK 13.16 OK Passed
O4 21 OK ... OK 13.16 OK Passed
O3 21 OK 29 OK 13.16 OK Passed
O3 21 OK ... OK 13.16 OK Passed
MH3 21 OK 28 ... OK Passed
UC 21 OK ... OK 11.26 OK Passed
LT1A 21 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT2A 21 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT3A 21 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT4A 21 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT5A 21 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LG1 21 ... 28 OK 9.42 OK No Calc[*]
LG3 21 ... 28 OK 9.42 OK No Calc[*]
LG5 21 ... 28 OK 9.42 OK No Calc[*]
I3 26 OK 33 OK 14.33 OK Passed
I4 26 OK 33 OK 14.10 OK Passed
LT1B 26 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT2B 26 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT3B 26 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT4B 26 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LT5B 26 OK ... OK 10.80 OK Passed
LG2 26 ... 33 OK 9.42 OK No Calc[*]
LG4 26 ... 33 OK 9.42 OK No Calc[*]
LG6 26 ... 33 OK 9.42 OK No Calc[*]
PT 26 ... 33 OK 11.02 OK No Calc[*]
PG 26 ... 33 OK 11.02 OK No Calc[*]
TW4 32 ... 41 OK 11.02 OK No Calc[*]
TW3 26 ... 35 OK 11.02 OK No Calc[*]
TW2 26 ... 35 OK 11.02 OK No Calc[*]
I1-A 26 OK 35 OK 12.22 OK Passed
I1-B 26 OK 35 OK 12.22 OK Passed
MH2 25 OK 35 ... OK Passed
TW1 35 ... 47 OK 11.02 OK No Calc[*]
MH1 23 OK 34 ... OK Passed
I2 35 ... 47 OK 10.80 OK No Calc[*]
[*] - This was a small opening and the areas were not computed or
the MAWP of this connection could not be computed because
the longitudinal bending stress was greater than the hoop stress.
Multiple output lines for the same nozzle indicates required Code calculations in both the
longitudinal and circumferential planes of reinforcement where applicable.
ll - Arc length along the inside vessel surface in the long. direction.
lc - Arc length along the inside vessel surface in the circ. direction
Nozzle Schedule:
For hub nozzles, the thickness and diameter shown are those of the smaller
and thinner section.
Note: The Outside projections below do not include the flange thickness.
Bill of Materials:
1 NAMEPLATE ...
Notes:
[ ! ] - This was an impact tested material.
[ 1] - Governing Nozzle Weld.
[ 4] - ASME Flange MDMT Calcs; Thickness ratio per UCS-66(b)(1)(-c).
[ 5] - ASME Flange MDMT Calcs; Thickness ratio per UCS-66(b)(1)(-b).
[ 6] - MDMT Calculations at the Shell/Head Joint.
[ 7] - MDMT Calculations for the Straight Flange.
[ 8] - Cylinder/Cone/Flange Junction MDMT.
[ 9] - Calculations in the Spherical Portion of the Head.
[10] - Calculations in the Knuckle Portion of the Head.
[11] - Calculated (Body Flange) Flange MDMT.
[12] - Calculated Flat Head MDMT per UCS-66.3
[13] - Tubesheet MDMT, shell side, if applicable
[14] - Tubesheet MDMT, tube side, if applicable
[15] - Nozzle Material
[16] - Shell or Head Material
[17] - Impact Testing required
[18] - Impact Testing not required, see UCS-66(b)(3)
[20] - Cylinder/Cone Junction MDMT based on Longitudinal Stress considerations
[21] - Body Flange Bolting Material
[22] - Nozzle Flange Bolting Material
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 17 of 337
MDMT Summary: Step: 61 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Notes:
Impact test temps were not entered in and not considered in the analysis.
UCS-66(i) applies to impact tested materials not by specification and
UCS-66(g) applies to materials impact tested per UG-84.1 General Note (c).
The Basic MDMT includes the (30F) PWHT credit if applicable.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
Configuration Directives:
Nozzle Diameter 80 mm
Nozzle Schedule XXS
Nozzle Class 300
Layout Angle 60.0
Blind Flange (Y/N) N
Weight of Nozzle ( Used if > 0 ) 0 kgf
Grade of Attached Flange GR 1.1
Nozzle Matl SA-350 LF2 [Impact Tested]
Weld is pre-Heated No
Nominal Thickness 24 mm
External Corrosion Allowance 0 mm
Design Internal Pressure 12.61 kgf/cm²
Design Temperature Internal Pressure 237 °C
Design External Pressure 1.055 kgf/cm²
Design Temperature External Pressure 202 °C
Effective Diameter Multiplier 1.2
Material Name SA-516 60 [Impact Tested]
Efficiency, Longitudinal Seam 1.0
Efficiency, Circumferential Seam 1.0
Weld is pre-Heated No
XY Coordinate Calculations:
PV Elite includes an 1/8 inch (3.175mm) raised face and gasket thicknesses for girth
flanges and tubesheet thicknesses where applicable in the Tangent to Tangent length calculation.
The calculated dimensions are based on the given element lengths. Due to variability in
manufacturing (weld gaps etc.), the Tangent to Tangent length may not be exact.
Top Flange
ASME Maximum Circumferential Spacing between Bolts per App. 2 eq. (3) [Bsmax]:
= 2a + 6t/(m + 0.5)
= 2 • 27.0 + 6 • 50.0/(4.25 + 0.5)
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 50 of 337
Flg Calc [Int P]: FLANGE Flng: 5 11:41am Aug 26,2022
= 117.158 mm
ASME Moment Multiplier for Bolt Spacing per App. 2 eq. (7) [Bsc]:
= max( ( Bs/( 2a + t )), 1 )
= max( ( 108.274/( 2 • 27.0 + 50.0 )), 1 )
= 1.0203
Min. Gasket Contact Width (Brownell Young) [Not an ASME Calc] [Nmin]:
= Ab • Sa/( y • π(Go + Gi) )
= 165.541 • 1757.68/(710.1 • π(1270.0 + 1231.9) )
= 5.213 mm
Note: Recommended Min. Width for Sheet and Composite Gaskets per table 2-4 :
= 32.000 mm[Note: Exceeds actual gasket width, 19.050 ]
Blind
ASME Maximum Circumferential Spacing between Bolts per App. 2 eq. (3) [Bsmax]:
= 2a + 6t/(m + 0.5)
= 2 • 27.0 + 6 • 79.0/(4.25 + 0.5)
= 153.789 mm
ASME Moment Multiplier for Bolt Spacing per App. 2 eq. (7) [Bsc]:
= max( ( Bs/( 2a + t )), 1 )
= max( ( 108.274/( 2 • 27.0 + 79.0 )), 1 )
= 1.0000
Min. Gasket Contact Width (Brownell Young) [Not an ASME Calc] [Nmin]:
= Ab • Sa/( y • π(Go + Gi) )
= 165.541 • 1757.68/(710.1 • π(1270.0 + 1232.0) )
= 5.213 mm
= 290966.53 kgf
Minimum 13 17
Bottom Head
Shell-1
Shell-2
Shell-3
Toricone-1 LSF
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 60 of 337
Internal Pressure Calculations: Step: 5 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Toricone-1
Equivalent Crown Radius for the Cone Large End Knuckle [L]:
= Di/(2(cos(α)) + ca per UG-32(h)
= 1959.59/(2(cos(26.0)) + 6.0
= 1095.894 mm
Toricone-1 SSF
Shell-4
Shell-5
Shell-6
Shell-7
Shell-8
Toricone-2 LSF
Toricone-2
= (P•(D+1.2•t•cos(a)))/(2•E•t•cos(a))
= (12.61•(1580.1149+1.2•14.0•0.896))/(2•1.0•14.0•0.896)
= 801.774 kgf/cm²
Equivalent Crown Radius for the Cone Large End Knuckle [L]:
= Di/(2(cos(α)) + ca per UG-32(h)
= 1566.72/(2(cos(26.4)) + 6.0
= 880.280 mm
Toricone-2 SSF
Shell-9
Shell-10
Please note that Nozzle, Shell, Head, Flange, etc MAWPs are all considered
when determining the hydrotest pressure for those test types that are based
on the MAWP of the vessel.
Minimum 1.012
Minimum 1.000
Minimum 1.000
Please note that Nozzle, Shell, Head, Flange, etc MAWPs are all considered
when determining the hydrotest pressure for those test types that are based
on the MAWP of the vessel.
Minimum 1.012
Minimum 1.000
Minimum 1.000
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 73 of 337
Internal Pressure Calculations: Step: 5 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Minimum 3
Bottom Head
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 76 of 337
External Pressure Calculations: Step: 6 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Shell-1
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-2
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-3
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Toricone-1 LSF
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Toricone-1
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Toricone-1 SSF
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-4
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-5
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-5
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-6
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-7
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-7
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-8
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Toricone-2 LSF
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Toricone-2
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Toricone-2 SSF
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 84 of 337
External Pressure Calculations: Step: 6 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Shell-9
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
Shell-10
Elastic Modulus from Chart: CS-2 at 202 °C: 1971711 kgf/cm²
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 85 of 337
External Pressure Calculations: Step: 6 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Weight of Details:
Note: The individual tray liquid weights are listed below, but
these weights are included in the tray weights above.
Platforms 19511.8
Liquid 12736.5
Insulation 2191.1
Lining 19234.3
Stiffeners 1549.8
Nozzles 3494.6
Trays 5465.3
Tray Bolting Weight 4987.5
Liquid on Trays 2291.2
Weights 26997.0
Note that the above value for the miscellaneous weight percent has
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 92 of 337
Element and Detail Weights: Step: 7 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Weight Summary:
Surface
From To Area
cm²
10 20 210154
20 30 96823.3
30 40 174392
40 50 157627
50 60 49235.8
60 70 159563
70 80 141971
80 90 141907
90 100 4872.61
100 110 22309.5
110 120 3930.13
120 130 101448
130 140 101448
140 150 128398
150 160 128398
160 170 88791.5
170 180 3883.01
180 190 17762.5
190 200 2940.53
200 210 65201.4
210 220 65162.2
220 230 11156.6
230 240 20897.1
To Total Ele. Total. Ele. Total. Ele. Total Dtl. Oper. Wgt.
From To Empty Wgt. Oper. Wgt. Hydro. Wgt. Offset Mom. No Liquid
kg kg kg kgf-m. kg
The cumulative operating weights no liquid in the column above are the cumulative operating
weights minus the operating liquid weight minus any weights absent in the empty condition.
Min Rating 12.790 19.987 kgf/cm² [for Core Element s] ... ... ...
Warning:
There are nozzles in this model, but no flange MAWPs were de-rated. Be
sure this is what you intended. There is a check box in the nozzle dialog
that instructs PV Elite to perform the de-rating for each nozzle flange.
See ASME VIII-1, UG-44(b) for more information.
The Natural Frequencies for the vessel have been computed iteratively
by solving a system of matrices. These matrices describe the mass
and the stiffness of the vessel. This is the generalized eigenvalue/
eigenvector problem and is referenced in some mathematical texts.
Wind Load Calculations per India Std. IS 875 (PART 3):2015, Amd. 1&2 (2020):
Input Values:
Calculated Values:
Note:
As per Section 9.1, Dynamic effects of wind should be considered. The
Cross-Wind dynamic effects can be considered using the Vortex Shedding
which can be invoked from Design Constraints tab. While the Along-Wind
effects can be considered using Gust Response Factor method, which can be
invoked from the Wind Load tab.
From Height k1 k2 k3 Vz Cf
m m/sec
Nomenclature
Note:
The Wind Loads calculated and printed in the Wind Load
calculation report have been factored by the input
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 100 of 337
Wind Load Calculation: Step: 10 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Seismic Analysis Results per IS 1893 (Part 4): 2015 + 2018 Amendment 2
Note:
The Earthquake Loads calculated and printed in the Earthquake
Load calculation report have been factored by the input
scalar/load reduction factor of: 1.300.
Note:
The Wind Shears/Moments and the Earthquake Shears/Moments calculated
and printed in the Wind/Earthquake Shear and Bending report have
been factored by the input Scalar/Load reductions factors of;
Wind: 1.100; Earthquake: 1.300.
10 20 89.5526 559.704
20 30 82.9363 518.352
30 40 76.4782 477.989
40 50 68.2041 426.276
50 60 68.1281 425.801
60 70 68.1281 425.801
70 80 68.3783 427.364
80 90 68.3783 427.364
90 100 68.3783 427.364
100 110 62.1223 388.264
110 120 55.8663 349.164
120 130 55.8663 349.164
130 140 55.8663 349.164
140 150 55.616 347.6
150 160 55.616 347.6
160 170 55.616 347.6
170 180 55.3658 346.036
180 190 49.1098 306.936
190 200 42.8538 267.836
200 210 43.104 269.4
210 220 43.104 269.4
220 230 41.6025 260.016
230 240 50.0482 312.801
Hydrotest Hydrotest
From To Tensile Tensile Compressive Compressive
kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm²
Wght. Str. Wght. Str. Wght. Str. Wght. Str. Wght. Str.
From To Empty Operating Hydrotest Emp. Mom. Opr. Mom.
kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm²
Longitudinal Stresses due to Weight Loads and Bending for these Conditions:
Wght. Str. Bend. Str. Bend. Str. Bend. Str. Bend. Str.
From To Hyd. Mom. Oper. Wind Oper. Equ. Hyd. Wind Hyd. Equ.
kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm² kgf/cm²
10 20 ... 13.8348
20 30 ... 12.8981
30 40 ... 18.6614
40 50 ... 14.3362
50 60 ... 16.3763
60 70 ... 15.8591
70 80 ... 11.6886
80 90 ... 10.3367
90 100 ... 6.25688
100 110 ... 6.23769
110 120 ... 7.56166
120 130 ... 7.48442
130 140 ... 6.36591
140 150 ... 6.29025
150 160 ... 4.7813
160 170 ... 3.21837
170 180 ... 2.91919
180 190 ... 2.12839
190 200 ... 3.57215
200 210 ... 2.70043
210 220 ... 1.11643
220 230 ... 0.42367
230 240 ... 0.059659
Bending
From To Stress
kgf/cm²
10 20 ...
20 30 ...
30 40 ...
40 50 ...
50 60 ...
60 70 ...
70 80 ...
80 90 ...
90 100 ...
100 110 ...
110 120 ...
120 130 ...
130 140 ...
140 150 ...
150 160 ...
160 170 ...
170 180 ...
180 190 ...
190 200 ...
200 210 ...
210 220 ...
220 230 ...
230 240 ...
General Notes:
A blank stress and stress ratio indicates that the corresponding stress comprising
those components that did not contribute to that type of stress.
NOTE:
The skirt comprises more than one piece. If this is the case,
the Openings will only be considered in this Section of the
Skirt! Otherwise, make the whole skirt all one piece.
Item: Skirt-1
Interference check:
Access Access Pitch Ligament
mm mm
1 2 4389.6548 3789.6548
1 2 4389.6548 3789.6548
1 77.6519 102.3481
2 257.6519 282.3481
102.348 257.652
-77.652 77.652
Please note:
There is more than one opening in the skirt
EN-13445 and AD-2000 considers only one opening per Figure 16.12-4
this skirt has 2 openings. Please check results
Where ex = 0. : ey = 0.
Item: Skirt-4
Interference check:
Access Access Pitch Ligament
mm mm
1 2 1677.5035 1242.5035
2 3 3355.0071 2955.0071
1 3 5016.5063 4581.5063
1 -12.7070 12.7070
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 127 of 337
Skirt Opening Stress Calcs: Step: 19 11:41am Aug 26,2022
2 79.2495 100.7505
3 259.2495 280.7505
12.707 79.250
100.750 259.250
-79.250 -12.707
Please note:
There is more than one opening in the skirt
EN-13445 and AD-2000 considers only one opening per Figure 16.12-4
this skirt has 3 openings. Please check results
Where ex = -23.122 : ey = 0.
Critical Values:
The compressive bending allowable stress is the minimum of the tensile allowable and
the compressive allowable times the specified compressive allowable increase factor.
Forces and Moments at selected elevations (not all analysis points shown):
Skirt Data :
Skirt Outside Diameter at Base SOD, D6 2999.9253 mm
Skirt Thickness STHK 24.0000 mm
Skirt Internal Corrosion Allowance SCA 1.0000 mm
Skirt External Corrosion Allowance 0.0000 mm
Skirt Material SA-516 70 [Normalized]
Note: This analysis is based on Neutral Axis shift method for Steel on
Concrete (or a material with significantly different Young's modulus).
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 132 of 337
Basering Calculations: Step: 21 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Trial# k knew Cc Ct z j Ft Fc
Nomenclature:
a = ( Dc-Ds )/2 Skirt Distance to Bolt Circle
P = Sa * Abss Maximum Load on one Bolt
l Radial Top Plate Width
lavg Average Gusset Plate Width
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 133 of 337
Basering Calculations: Step: 21 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Req. Skirt Thk. to withstand Local Bending, (Brownell and Young) [t]:
= 1.76( P•a/( m • ( h + tba ) • 1.5 • Sktope) )2/3 • r1/3 + Ca
= 1.76(38946•125.037/(510.51•400.0•2109))2/3•1499.961/3+Ca
= 21.866 + 1.0 = 22.866 mm
Results for Computed Minimum Gusset and Top Plate to Skirt Weld Size
Results for Computed Min Gusset and Top Plate to Skirt Weld Size [GsWeld]
= Wr / [( 0.4 • Yield ) • 2 • 0.707]
= 50.05/[( 0.4 • 2659 ) • 2 • 0.707]
= 3.328 mm
Results for Computed Min Gusset to Top Plate Weld Size [GtpWeld]
= Wr / [( 0.4 • Yield ) • 2 • 0.707]
= 86.94/[( 0.4 • 2659 ) • 2 • 0.707]
= 5.781 mm
Note: The calculated weld sizes need not exceed the component thickness
framing into the weld. At the same time, the weld must meet a minimum size
specification which is 3/16 in. (4.76 mm) or 1/4 in. (6.35 mm), depending
on the component thickness.
Warning:
Please note that nozzle loadings, if included, are assumed to be local in nature
and will not contribute to or create a net section bending moment. Therefore, the
addition of nozzle loads will not affect the support load calculation. If you wish
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 135 of 337
Basering Calculations: Step: 21 11:41am Aug 26,2022
to create a load on the legs/lugs etc. from forces or moments, use the Force/Moment dialog
and add the appropriate forces and moments at the correct locations in the model. Ensure
that all supports are designed to take into account all possible loading conditions.
Input Values:
Toricone-1
Calculated Values:
The moments above are computed from the Wind & Seismic loads as well as any user defined
moments and include effects due to eccentric masses. The vertical forces include the weight
of the elements and details above and below the cone as well as any user defined vertical forces.
Vertical forces also include loads cause from vertical accelerations due to earthquake loading.
= 1.3266
Input Values:
Toricone-2
Calculated Values:
The moments above are computed from the Wind & Seismic loads as well as any user defined
moments and include effects due to eccentric masses. The vertical forces include the weight
of the elements and details above and below the cone as well as any user defined vertical forces.
Vertical forces also include loads cause from vertical accelerations due to earthquake loading.
= 1.3257
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 213.8, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3281.0 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 48.7, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 119.5, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
WRC Bulletin 537 provides equations for the dimensionless curves found in bulletin 107. As noted
in the foreword to bulletin 537, "537 is equivalent to WRC 107". Where 107 is printed in the
results below, "537" can be interchanged with "107".
WRC 107/537 has dimensional limitations that can be found in the bulletin's Foreword
and which can also be inferred by review of the non-dimensional curve limits.
Rad. Memb. P 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9
Rad. Bend. P 123.8 -123.8 123.8 -123.8 123.8 -123.8 123.8 -123.8
Rad. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -62.2 -62.2 62.2 62.2
Rad. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -673.3 673.3 673.3 -673.3
Rad. Memb. ML -80.6 -80.6 80.6 80.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rad. Bend. ML -872.8 872.8 872.8 -872.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tot. Rad. Str. -810.6 687.3 1096.2 -897.1 -592.7 506.3 878.3 -716.0
Tang. Memb. P 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4 28.4
Tang. Bend. P 33.9 -33.9 33.9 -33.9 33.9 -33.9 33.9 -33.9
Tang. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -84.1 -84.1 84.1 84.1
Tang. Bend. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -196.0 196.0 196.0 -196.0
Tang. Memb. ML -109.0 -109.0 109.0 109.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tang. Bend. ML -254.1 254.1 254.1 -254.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tot. Tang. Str. -300.8 139.5 425.4 -150.5 -217.8 106.4 342.4 -117.4
Tot. Shear 42.8 42.8 20.8 20.8 17.1 17.1 46.5 46.5
Str. Int. 814.2 690.7 1096.9 897.7 593.5 507.0 882.3 719.6
Rad. Pm (SUS) 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5
Rad. Pl (SUS) -61.7 -61.7 99.5 99.5 -43.2 -43.2 81.1 81.1
Rad. Q (SUS) -749.0 749.0 996.7 -996.7 -549.5 549.5 797.2 -797.2
Long. Pm (SUS) 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5
Long. Pl (SUS) -80.6 -80.6 137.4 137.4 -55.7 -55.7 112.5 112.5
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 149 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O2 Nozl: 69 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Long. Q (SUS) -220.2 220.2 288.0 -288.0 -162.1 162.1 229.9 -229.9
Shear Pm (SUS) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Pl (SUS) 11.0 11.0 -11.0 -11.0 -14.7 -14.7 14.7 14.7
Shear Q (SUS) 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Pm (SUS) 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5 662.5
Pm+Pl (SUS) 605.9 605.9 803.0 803.0 629.1 629.1 780.9 780.9
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 517.0 1353.2 1759.4 747.7 445.6 1169.5 1544.8 605.8
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 152 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O4 Nozl: 70 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 153 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O4 Nozl: 70 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 257.4, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3237.4 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 49.2, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 150.3, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Warning:
The equations for nozzle local stress analysis pertain to radial nozzles only
and this nozzle is not specified as radial. Please check the specific
analysis code for all assumptions and limitations.
WRC Bulletin 537 provides equations for the dimensionless curves found in bulletin 107. As noted
in the foreword to bulletin 537, "537 is equivalent to WRC 107". Where 107 is printed in the
results below, "537" can be interchanged with "107".
WRC 107/537 has dimensional limitations that can be found in the bulletin's Foreword
and which can also be inferred by review of the non-dimensional curve limits.
Rad. Memb. P 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6
Rad. Bend. P 124.3 -124.3 124.3 -124.3 124.3 -124.3 124.3 -124.3
Rad. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -52.4 -52.4 52.4 52.4
Rad. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -597.8 597.8 597.8 -597.8
Rad. Memb. ML -68.5 -68.5 68.5 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rad. Bend. ML -781.8 781.8 781.8 -781.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tot. Rad. Str. -707.4 607.5 993.3 -818.9 -507.3 439.7 793.2 -651.1
Tang. Memb. P 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6
Tang. Bend. P 35.2 -35.2 35.2 -35.2 35.2 -35.2 35.2 -35.2
Tang. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -68.9 -68.9 68.9 68.9
Tang. Bend. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -186.5 186.5 186.5 -186.5
Tang. Memb. ML -90.0 -90.0 90.0 90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tang. Bend. ML -243.8 243.8 243.8 -243.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tot. Tang. Str. -270.0 147.2 397.7 -160.4 -191.5 111.0 319.2 -124.2
Tot. Shear 41.6 41.6 19.9 19.9 16.3 16.3 45.1 45.1
Str. Int. 711.3 611.3 993.9 819.5 508.2 440.5 797.5 655.0
Rad. Pm (SUS) 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2
Rad. Pl (SUS) -49.9 -49.9 87.2 87.2 -33.8 -33.8 71.0 71.0
Rad. Q (SUS) -657.5 657.5 906.1 -906.1 -473.5 473.5 722.2 -722.2
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 159 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O4 Nozl: 70 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Long. Pm (SUS) 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2
Long. Pl (SUS) -61.4 -61.4 118.7 118.7 -40.2 -40.2 97.5 97.5
Long. Q (SUS) -208.6 208.6 279.1 -279.1 -151.2 151.2 221.7 -221.7
Shear Pm (SUS) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Pl (SUS) 10.8 10.8 -10.8 -10.8 -14.4 -14.4 14.4 14.4
Shear Q (SUS) 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7
Pm (SUS) 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2
Pm+Pl (SUS) 618.8 618.8 784.2 784.2 640.0 640.0 766.0 766.0
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 445.2 1273.5 1656.1 659.7 471.6 1102.7 1459.7 541.8
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 162 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O3 Nozl: 71 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 163 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O3 Nozl: 71 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 257.4, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3237.4 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 49.2, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 150.3, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Warning:
The equations for nozzle local stress analysis pertain to radial nozzles only
and this nozzle is not specified as radial. Please check the specific
analysis code for all assumptions and limitations.
WRC Bulletin 537 provides equations for the dimensionless curves found in bulletin 107. As noted
in the foreword to bulletin 537, "537 is equivalent to WRC 107". Where 107 is printed in the
results below, "537" can be interchanged with "107".
WRC 107/537 has dimensional limitations that can be found in the bulletin's Foreword
and which can also be inferred by review of the non-dimensional curve limits.
Rad. Memb. P 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6
Rad. Bend. P 124.3 -124.3 124.3 -124.3 124.3 -124.3 124.3 -124.3
Rad. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -52.4 -52.4 52.4 52.4
Rad. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -597.8 597.8 597.8 -597.8
Rad. Memb. ML -68.5 -68.5 68.5 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rad. Bend. ML -781.8 781.8 781.8 -781.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tot. Rad. Str. -707.4 607.5 993.3 -818.9 -507.3 439.7 793.2 -651.1
Tang. Memb. P 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6
Tang. Bend. P 35.2 -35.2 35.2 -35.2 35.2 -35.2 35.2 -35.2
Tang. Memb. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -68.9 -68.9 68.9 68.9
Tang. Bend. MC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -186.5 186.5 186.5 -186.5
Tang. Memb. ML -90.0 -90.0 90.0 90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tang. Bend. ML -243.8 243.8 243.8 -243.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tot. Tang. Str. -270.0 147.2 397.7 -160.4 -191.5 111.0 319.2 -124.2
Tot. Shear 41.6 41.6 19.9 19.9 16.3 16.3 45.1 45.1
Str. Int. 711.3 611.3 993.9 819.5 508.2 440.5 797.5 655.0
Rad. Pm (SUS) 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2
Rad. Pl (SUS) -49.9 -49.9 87.2 87.2 -33.8 -33.8 71.0 71.0
Rad. Q (SUS) -657.5 657.5 906.1 -906.1 -473.5 473.5 722.2 -722.2
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 169 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: O3 Nozl: 71 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Long. Pm (SUS) 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2
Long. Pl (SUS) -61.4 -61.4 118.7 118.7 -40.2 -40.2 97.5 97.5
Long. Q (SUS) -208.6 208.6 279.1 -279.1 -151.2 151.2 221.7 -221.7
Shear Pm (SUS) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Pl (SUS) 10.8 10.8 -10.8 -10.8 -14.4 -14.4 14.4 14.4
Shear Q (SUS) 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7 30.7
Pm (SUS) 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2 662.2
Pm+Pl (SUS) 618.8 618.8 784.2 784.2 640.0 640.0 766.0 766.0
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 445.2 1273.5 1656.1 659.7 471.6 1102.7 1459.7 541.8
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 55.6, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3439.2 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 6.2, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 59.0, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [1] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 0.00 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 73.40 mm
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 178 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: UC Nozl: 73 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Note:
External Forces and Moments in WRC 107/537 Convention:
These loads are assumed to be SUStained loads.
Nr/P = 0.149
Mr/P = 0.281
M0/P = 0.090
N0/P = 0.163
MrD/Mc = 0.301
NrDL/Mc = 0.113
M0d/Mc = 0.108
N0DL/Mc = -0.058
MrD/Ml = 0.254
NrDL/Ml = 0.112
M0D/Ml = 0.091
N0DL/Ml = 0.043
Outplane Membrane (P ) 16 16 16 16
Outplane Bending (P ) 56 -56 56 -56
Outplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Membrane (ML) -6 -6 6 6
Outplane Bending (ML) -77 77 77 -77
Normal Pressure Stress 728 741 728 741
Inplane Membrane (P ) 15 15 15 15
Inplane Bending (P ) 175 -175 175 -175
Inplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Membrane (ML) -15 -15 15 15
Inplane Bending (ML) -216 216 216 -216
Inplane Pressure Stress 364 364 364 364
Outplane Membrane (P ) 16 16 16 16
Outplane Bending (P ) 56 -56 56 -56
Outplane Membrane (Mc) 6 6 -6 -6
Outplane Bending (Mc) -73 73 73 -73
Outplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Normal Pressure Stress 364 364 364 364
Inplane Membrane (P ) 15 15 15 15
Inplane Bending (P ) 175 -175 175 -175
Inplane Membrane (Mc) -12 -12 12 12
Inplane Bending (Mc) -204 204 204 -204
Inplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Pressure Stress 728 741 728 741
Hoop Membrane (P ) 16 16 16 16
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 181 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: UC Nozl: 73 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Axial Membrane (P ) 5 5 5 5
Axial Bending (P ) 72 -72 72 -72
Axial Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Membrane (ML) -42 -42 42 42
Axial Bending (ML) -94 94 94 -94
Axial Pressure Stress 7 7 7 7
Hoop Membrane (P ) 16 16 16 16
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) 6 6 -6 -6
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 14 30 14 30
Axial Membrane (P ) 5 5 5 5
Axial Bending (P ) 72 -72 72 -72
Axial Membrane (Mc) -34 -34 34 34
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 182 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: UC Nozl: 73 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Circ. Pm (SUS) 728 741 728 741 728 741 728 741
Circ. Pl (SUS) 10 10 22 22 3 3 27 27
Circ. Q (SUS) -21 21 133 -133 -29 29 379 -379
Long. Pm (SUS) 364 364 364 364 364 364 364 364
Long. Pl (SUS) 0 0 30 30 22 22 10 10
Long. Q (SUS) -41 41 391 -391 -17 17 129 -129
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shear Pl (SUS) 8 8 -8 -8 -10 -10 10 10
Shear Q (SUS) 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Pm (SUS) 728.0 741.0 728.0 741.0 728.0 741.0 728.0 741.0
Pm+Pl (SUS) 738.2 751.2 750.2 763.2 731.3 744.3 755.3 768.3
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 718 773 883 630 702 773 1135 393
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
Circ. Pm (SUS) 14 30 14 30 14 30 14 30
Circ. Pl (SUS) 10 10 22 22 22 22 10 10
Circ. Q (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Long. Pm (SUS) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Long. Pl (SUS) -37 -37 47 47 -29 -29 39 39
Long. Q (SUS) -22 22 166 -166 -21 21 165 -165
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shear Pl (SUS) 6 6 -6 -6 -8 -8 8 8
Shear Q (SUS) 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Pm (SUS) 14.0 30.0 14.0 30.0 14.0 30.0 14.0 30.0
Pm+Pl (SUS) 55.3 71.0 55.8 59.1 60.2 75.7 48.6 51.5
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 85.0 61.2 220.3 164.6 79.6 53.9 213.3 164.5
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 212 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: LG1 Nozl: 79 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 217 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: LG3 Nozl: 80 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 222 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: LG5 Nozl: 81 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 228 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: I3 Nozl: 82 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 233 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: I4 Nozl: 83 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [2] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 87.79 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 242.17 mm
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [3] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 70.23 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 81.21 mm
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
There are no hub area calculations because Figure UG-40 (e-2) was used.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [1] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 0.00 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 81.21 mm
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 358.0, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3136.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 55.6, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 216.9, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note:
External Forces and Moments in WRC 107/537 Convention:
These loads are assumed to be SUStained loads.
Nr/P = 0.086
Mr/P = 0.182
M0/P = 0.053
N0/P = 0.110
MrD/Mc = 0.301
NrDL/Mc = 0.092
M0d/Mc = 0.093
N0DL/Mc = 0.057
MrD/Ml = 0.153
NrDL/Ml = 0.085
M0D/Ml = 0.049
N0DL/Ml = 0.126
Outplane Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Outplane Bending (P ) 93 -93 93 -93
Outplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Membrane (ML) -66 -66 66 66
Outplane Bending (ML) -152 152 152 -152
Normal Pressure Stress 566 579 566 579
Inplane Membrane (P ) 25 25 25 25
Inplane Bending (P ) 319 -319 319 -319
Inplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Membrane (ML) -44 -44 44 44
Inplane Bending (ML) -480 480 480 -480
Inplane Pressure Stress 283 283 283 283
Outplane Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Outplane Bending (P ) 93 -93 93 -93
Outplane Membrane (Mc) -23 -23 23 23
Outplane Bending (Mc) -226 226 226 -226
Outplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Normal Pressure Stress 283 283 283 283
Inplane Membrane (P ) 25 25 25 25
Inplane Bending (P ) 319 -319 319 -319
Inplane Membrane (Mc) -37 -37 37 37
Inplane Bending (Mc) -734 734 734 -734
Inplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Pressure Stress 566 579 566 579
Hoop Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) -66 -66 66 66
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 20 35 20 35
Axial Membrane (P ) 3 3 3 3
Axial Bending (P ) 40 -40 40 -40
Axial Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Membrane (ML) -35 -35 35 35
Axial Bending (ML) -58 58 58 -58
Axial Pressure Stress 10 10 10 10
CIRCUMFERENTIAL PLANE Cu Cl Du Dl
(Stresses in the Left Left Right Right
hoop direction) Outside Inside Outside Inside
Hoop Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) -23 -23 23 23
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 20 35 20 35
Axial Membrane (P ) 3 3 3 3
Axial Bending (P ) 40 -40 40 -40
Axial Membrane (Mc) -27 -27 27 27
Axial Bending (Mc) -104 104 104 -104
Axial Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Axial Pressure Stress 10 10 10 10
Circ. Pm (SUS) 566 579 566 579 566 579 566 579
Circ. Pl (SUS) -34 -34 98 98 -12 -12 62 62
Circ. Q (SUS) -59 59 245 -245 -415 415 1053 -1053
Long. Pm (SUS) 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283
Long. Pl (SUS) -19 -19 69 69 9 9 55 55
Long. Q (SUS) -161 161 799 -799 -133 133 319 -319
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 302 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: I1-A Nozl: 97 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Pm+Pl (SUS) 532.4 545.4 664.3 677.3 554.6 567.6 628.6 641.6
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 476 611 1152 879 167 982 1682 438
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
Circ. Pm (SUS) 20 35 20 35 20 35 20 35
Circ. Pl (SUS) -34 -34 98 98 9 9 55 55
Circ. Q (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Long. Pm (SUS) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Long. Pl (SUS) -32 -32 38 38 -24 -24 30 30
Long. Q (SUS) -18 18 98 -98 -64 64 144 -144
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shear Pl (SUS) 4 4 -4 -4 -5 -5 5 5
Shear Q (SUS) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Pm (SUS) 20.0 35.0 20.0 35.0 20.0 35.0 20.0 35.0
Pm+Pl (SUS) 23.7 24.4 118.2 133.2 44.1 58.9 75.7 90.5
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 46.8 30.4 147.7 183.5 107.7 53.7 186.3 196.6
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 358.0, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3136.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 55.6, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 216.9, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note:
External Forces and Moments in WRC 107/537 Convention:
These loads are assumed to be SUStained loads.
Nr/P = 0.086
Mr/P = 0.182
M0/P = 0.053
N0/P = 0.110
MrD/Mc = 0.301
NrDL/Mc = 0.092
M0d/Mc = 0.093
N0DL/Mc = 0.057
MrD/Ml = 0.153
NrDL/Ml = 0.085
M0D/Ml = 0.049
N0DL/Ml = 0.126
Outplane Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Outplane Bending (P ) 93 -93 93 -93
Outplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Membrane (ML) -66 -66 66 66
Outplane Bending (ML) -152 152 152 -152
Normal Pressure Stress 566 579 566 579
Inplane Membrane (P ) 25 25 25 25
Inplane Bending (P ) 319 -319 319 -319
Inplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Membrane (ML) -44 -44 44 44
Inplane Bending (ML) -480 480 480 -480
Inplane Pressure Stress 283 283 283 283
Outplane Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Outplane Bending (P ) 93 -93 93 -93
Outplane Membrane (Mc) -23 -23 23 23
Outplane Bending (Mc) -226 226 226 -226
Outplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Normal Pressure Stress 283 283 283 283
Inplane Membrane (P ) 25 25 25 25
Inplane Bending (P ) 319 -319 319 -319
Inplane Membrane (Mc) -37 -37 37 37
Inplane Bending (Mc) -734 734 734 -734
Inplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Pressure Stress 566 579 566 579
Hoop Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) -66 -66 66 66
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 20 35 20 35
Axial Membrane (P ) 3 3 3 3
Axial Bending (P ) 40 -40 40 -40
Axial Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Membrane (ML) -35 -35 35 35
Axial Bending (ML) -58 58 58 -58
Axial Pressure Stress 10 10 10 10
CIRCUMFERENTIAL PLANE Cu Cl Du Dl
(Stresses in the Left Left Right Right
hoop direction) Outside Inside Outside Inside
Hoop Membrane (P ) 32 32 32 32
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) -23 -23 23 23
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 20 35 20 35
Axial Membrane (P ) 3 3 3 3
Axial Bending (P ) 40 -40 40 -40
Axial Membrane (Mc) -27 -27 27 27
Axial Bending (Mc) -104 104 104 -104
Axial Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Axial Pressure Stress 10 10 10 10
Circ. Pm (SUS) 566 579 566 579 566 579 566 579
Circ. Pl (SUS) -34 -34 98 98 -12 -12 62 62
Circ. Q (SUS) -59 59 245 -245 -415 415 1053 -1053
Long. Pm (SUS) 283 283 283 283 283 283 283 283
Long. Pl (SUS) -19 -19 69 69 9 9 55 55
Long. Q (SUS) -161 161 799 -799 -133 133 319 -319
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 312 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: I1-B Nozl: 98 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Pm+Pl (SUS) 532.4 545.4 664.3 677.3 554.6 567.6 628.6 641.6
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 476 611 1152 879 167 982 1682 438
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
Circ. Pm (SUS) 20 35 20 35 20 35 20 35
Circ. Pl (SUS) -34 -34 98 98 9 9 55 55
Circ. Q (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Long. Pm (SUS) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Long. Pl (SUS) -32 -32 38 38 -24 -24 30 30
Long. Q (SUS) -18 18 98 -98 -64 64 144 -144
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shear Pl (SUS) 4 4 -4 -4 -5 -5 5 5
Shear Q (SUS) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
Pm (SUS) 20.0 35.0 20.0 35.0 20.0 35.0 20.0 35.0
Pm+Pl (SUS) 23.7 24.4 118.2 133.2 44.1 58.9 75.7 90.5
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 46.8 30.4 147.7 183.5 107.7 53.7 186.3 196.6
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The Nozzle does not fall within the scope of the diameter requirements
of App. 1-7(b). Therefore, the Membrane and Bending stress checks
are not required.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [2] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 534.55 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 574.00 mm
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
The area in the shell has not been calculated by user request.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [2] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 95.19 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 472.00 mm
The Pressure Design option was MAWP + static head (to the nozzle).
Hub Height was < 2.5 times Hub Thickness, use sketch UG-40 (e-1).
Stresses on Nozzle due to External and Pressure Loads per the ASME
B31.3 Piping Code (see 319.4.4 and 302.3.5):
Sustained : 346.0, Allowable : 1389.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Expansion : 0.0, Allowable : 3148.7 kgf/cm² Passed
Occasional : 3.4, Allowable : 1848.3 kgf/cm² Passed
Shear : 380.1, Allowable : 972.8 kgf/cm² Passed
The number of cycles on this nozzle was assumed to be 7000 or less for the determination of
the expansion stress allowable.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This Material was specified as being an Impact Tested (Low Temperature) Material.
Note:
This nozzle configuration requires a full penetration weld between the nozzle and the shell.
Note: The MAWP of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: The M.A.P.(NC) of this junction was limited by the parent Shell/Head.
Note: This nozzle or its diameter limit intersects weld seam # [1] on this element. The
distance between the nozzle and seam is, 0.00 mm , while the distance from the center
of the nozzle to the edge of the diameter limit is: 77.21 mm
Note:
External Forces and Moments in WRC 107/537 Convention:
These loads are assumed to be SUStained loads.
Nr/P = 0.130
Mr/P = 0.237
M0/P = 0.075
N0/P = 0.140
MrD/Mc = 0.298
NrDL/Mc = 0.116
M0d/Mc = 0.105
N0DL/Mc = -0.021
MrD/Ml = 0.222
NrDL/Ml = 0.107
M0D/Ml = 0.080
N0DL/Ml = 0.093
Outplane Membrane (P ) 21 21 21 21
603-C-07(N)
SECOND STAGE HDS STABILIZER COLUMN
BS VI FCC GDS UNIT
PV Elite 24 Licensee: #PHILS HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.
FileName : 603-C-07 (N)_Flange Page 332 of 337
Nozzle Calcs.: I2 Nozl: 102 11:41am Aug 26,2022
Inplane Membrane (P ) 19 19 19 19
Inplane Bending (P ) 219 -219 219 -219
Inplane Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Membrane (ML) -51 -51 51 51
Inplane Bending (ML) -638 638 638 -638
Inplane Pressure Stress 212 212 212 212
Outplane Membrane (P ) 21 21 21 21
Outplane Bending (P ) 69 -69 69 -69
Outplane Membrane (Mc) 7 7 -7 -7
Outplane Bending (Mc) -233 233 233 -233
Outplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Outplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Normal Pressure Stress 212 212 212 212
Inplane Membrane (P ) 19 19 19 19
Inplane Bending (P ) 219 -219 219 -219
Inplane Membrane (Mc) -43 -43 43 43
Inplane Bending (Mc) -664 664 664 -664
Inplane Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Inplane Pressure Stress 424 437 424 437
Hoop Membrane (P ) 21 21 21 21
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) -44 -44 44 44
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 16 32 16 32
Axial Membrane (P ) 6 6 6 6
Axial Bending (P ) 89 -89 89 -89
Axial Membrane (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Axial Membrane (ML) -128 -128 128 128
Axial Bending (ML) -272 272 272 -272
Axial Pressure Stress 8 8 8 8
Hoop Membrane (P ) 21 21 21 21
Hoop Bending (P ) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (Mc) 7 7 -7 -7
Hoop Bending (Mc) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Hoop Pressure Stress 16 32 16 32
Axial Membrane (P ) 6 6 6 6
Axial Bending (P ) 89 -89 89 -89
Axial Membrane (Mc) -99 -99 99 99
Axial Bending (Mc) -300 300 300 -300
Axial Membrane (ML) 0 0 0 0
Axial Bending (ML) 0 0 0 0
Axial Pressure Stress 8 8 8 8
Circ. Pm (SUS) 424 437 424 437 424 437 424 437
Circ. Pl (SUS) -23 -23 65 65 -24 -24 62 62
Circ. Q (SUS) -159 159 297 -297 -445 445 883 -883
Long. Pm (SUS) 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212
Long. Pl (SUS) -32 -32 70 70 28 28 14 14
Long. Q (SUS) -419 419 857 -857 -164 164 302 -302
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shear Pl (SUS) 11 11 -11 -11 -14 -14 14 14
Shear Q (SUS) 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53
Pm (SUS) 424.0 437.0 424.0 437.0 424.0 437.0 424.0 437.0
Pm+Pl (SUS) 401.5 414.5 489.6 502.5 401.2 414.1 486.8 499.7
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 497 651 1143 784 143 861 1374 397
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
Circ. Pm (SUS) 16 32 16 32 16 32 16 32
Circ. Pl (SUS) -23 -23 65 65 28 28 14 14
Circ. Q (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Long. Pm (SUS) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Long. Pl (SUS) -122 -122 134 134 -93 -93 105 105
Long. Q (SUS) -183 183 361 -361 -211 211 389 -389
Shear Pm (SUS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shear Pl (SUS) 8 8 -8 -8 -11 -11 11 11
Shear Q (SUS) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Pm (SUS) 16.0 32.0 16.0 32.0 16.0 32.0 16.0 32.0
Pm+Pl (SUS) 114.6 124.0 143.0 143.4 130.9 146.7 114.4 114.8
Pm+Pl+Q (Total) 305.5 113.2 505.4 322.4 344.9 136.9 507.4 337.8
Because only sustained loads were specified, the Pm+Pl+Q allowable was 3 * Smh.
Listed below are the known problem areas for the current design. If
one or more of the design flags are turned on, please re-run the analysis.
Some of these issues may be resolved when using updated input values.
** Warning: An ANSI Flange is limiting the MAWP which may affect the pressure
used in the Nozzle Reinforcement Calculations.