Employee Details Fill here:

Employee Name: Varun Rahul

Date of filling: 18 - 07 - 2023
Designation: AVP - Sales & BD
Department: Sales
_

A Organisational Goals Key Responsibility Area

1 56 Crores Revenue
2 56 Crores Revenue
3 56 Crores Revenue
4 56 Crores Revenue
5 56 Crores Revenue
SubTotal
6 Digitisation
7 Digitisation
8 Digitisation
9 Digitisation
10 Digitisation
SubTotal
11 Process Efficiency
12 Process Efficiency
13 Process Efficiency
14 Process Efficiency
15 Process Efficiency
SubTotal
16 Customer Focus
17 Customer Focus
18 Customer Focus
19 Customer Focus
20 Customer Focus
SubTotal
21 Training and Development
22 Training and Development
23 Training and Development
24 Training and Development
25 Training and Development
SubTotal
Grand Total (Weightage)
Overall Rating of the Employee on a scale of 1
to 5
(to be filled only at the time of year end review
by the manager)
Scale: Meaning
1: Performance significantly above Overall
expectations Rating:
2: Performance somewhat above expectations
3: Performance meets Expectations
4: Partially met expectations
5: Significantly below target
Indicate in Cell E1 ➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡

Weight %
(must grand
Key Performance Indicator (SMART GOAL) total 100)

0
0
0
Status: Meaning
🟢On Target: On schedule to be completed as per
timelines
✅Completed: Completed within time, budget and
specification and objective of project/task has
been met
🟡Below Target: Running late or overbudget or
does not meet objective or all three whether for
internal or external reasons
🔵Exceeding Target: Completes task and improves
upon the goals or initial specs

Mid Year Self Assessment: Goal Status

(use drop down)
Scale: Meaning
1 to 3: Incomplete goal, required very high level of
monitoring by management, no initiative, resisted the
task, did not accept coaching
4 to 5: Incomplete goal, required high level of
monitoring by management, incumbent took late
initiative, accepted coaching
6 to 7: Goal largely met, required very low level
monitoring, incumbent took late initiative, became
efficient with coaching
8 to 9: Goal met, required very low monitoring,
incumbent took timely initiative, very low coaching was
needed
10: Goal exceeded, required no monitoring, early
initiative and leadership, no coaching was needed

Employee's Comments & Evidence

in support of the rating and goal
status
Employee's Self-scoring on a scale of 10 (Cannot be left blank)
 Scale: Meaning
1 to 3: Incomplete goal, required very high level
of monitoring by management, no initiative,
resisted the task, did not accept coaching
4 to 5: Incomplete goal, required high level of
monitoring by management, incumbent took
late initiative, accepted coaching
6 to 7: Goal largely met, required very low level
monitoring, incumbent took late initiative,
became efficient with coaching
8 to 9: Goal met, required very low monitoring,
incumbent took timely initiative, very low
coaching was needed
Column I to K to be 10: Goal exceeded, required no monitoring,
filled by the early initiative and leadership, no coaching was
manager needed

Has the Mid Year

Review discussion Manager's Score of employee's performance on
happened? a scale of 1 to 10
 🟢On Target: On schedule to be completed as per
timelines
✅Completed: Completed within time, budget and
specification and objective met
🟡Below Target: Running late or overbudget or does
not meet objective or all three whether for internal
or external reasons
🔵Exceeding Target: Completed and improves upon
the goals or initial specs

Manager's Comments in support of

the rating provided to the employee Year End Self-Assessment: Goal Status
 Scale: Meaning
1 to 3: Incomplete goal, required very high
level of monitoring by management, no
initiative, resisted the task, did not accept
coaching
4 to 5: Incomplete goal, required high level of
monitoring by management, incumbent took
late initiative, accepted coaching
6 to 7: Goal largely met, required very low level
monitoring, incumbent took late initiative,
became efficient with coaching
8 to 9: Goal met, required very low monitoring,
incumbent took timely initiative, very low
coaching was needed
10: Goal exceeded, required no monitoring,
early initiative and leadership, no coaching
was needed

Employee's Comments & Evidence in

support of the rating and goal status
(Cannot be left blank) Employee's Self-rating on a scale of 10
 Scale: Meaning
1 to 3: Incomplete goal, required very
high level of monitoring by
management, no initiative, resisted the
task, did not accept coaching
4 to 5: Incomplete goal, required high
level of monitoring by management,
incumbent took late initiative,
accepted coaching
6 to 7: Goal largely met, required very
low level monitoring, incumbent took
late initiative, became efficient with
coaching
8 to 9: Goal met, required very low
monitoring, incumbent took timely
initiative, very low coaching was
needed
10: Goal exceeded, required no
monitoring, early initiative and
leadership, no coaching was needed

Has the Year Year

End discussion Manager's Comments in support of Manager's Rating of employee's
happened? the rating provided to the employee performance on a scale of 1 to 10
FOR HR USE
ONLY

Official
Weighted
Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0